Indian Muslim Archives

Yes, the Indians (Muslim leadership) played a crucial role in aiding the American freedom struggle. There is a reason why George Washington fired a salute for Nawab Hyder Ali and American revolutionaries named a ship after him, idealised him, & sung his praises. Apart from this economic factor, Nawab Hyder diverted crucial manpower, which was to be utilised by the British monarchy against the infant American state. Apart from the East India Company Europeans, a force from His Majesty's Troops (the King's Army), comprising 8,575 rank and file, 429 officers, and 64 surgeons, was dispatched to India. These forces would go on to meet a disastrous fate and suffer failure in India. At Bednore, Nawab Fateh Ali (Hyder Bahadur's son) captured some 1,022 Europeans. This thinning and stretching of resources and crucial manpower was felt on American soil.

Brahman reservation has been continuing in this way for thousands of years, generation after generation.🔥🔥🔥 Brahmanical people are continuously spreading hypocrisy and superstition in India, ruining the country and prospering themselves.

A Mosaue in Kerala, India.

An Indian Muslim heritage before going to sleep. The drone footage fails to capture the sheer, crushing scale, the absolute mass, height, and brutal magestic presence of: Ruins of Golconda Fort (800 acres)

Taj Mahal is great, but the Indian Muslim heritage is too vast and diverse to be reduced to the Mughals, who were but one of the many contributors. Ruins of the Bidar Fort of Deccan, India.

Ex Muslims are planted and funded by Nagpur

Fed up of the Rajput dominance under Medini Rai at his court, administration and personal affairs, Sultan Mahmud of Malwa escaped to the Muzaffarid sultanate. He asked Sultan Muzaffar to rescue him, who accepted and marched against the Rajput coalition led by Medini Rai, Rana Sanga, Rai Raiyan, Silahdi Tomar. Sultan Muzaffar personally besieged the Rajputs assembled within the grand fort of Shadiabad, while dispatching Azam Humayun, Imad-ul-Mulk, Fath Khan, and Qiwam-ul-Mulk to intercept Rana Sanga, who was marching to relieve the siege. Shadiabad fell, and the Rajput garrison and civilians were both slaughtered without quarter. Realising the march was futile, Rana Sanga retreated to Chittor.

Our ancestors didn't eat Beef while composing Vedas. That's why they prohibited cow slaughter in the Vedas itself.

Employment of certain terms by the fringe men of literarure is not an evidence that they constituted a community's primary identity. A primary identity emerges only when there is overwhelming consensus within that community. In the "Hindu" case, that consensus did not develop until the 18th century. You are mistaken. Similarly, Turkish nationalists scour historical sources for traces of the term "Turk" (say, Göktürk) to argue that a distinct Turkish identity existed since ancient times.

In 15th century, Chaitanya Mahaprabhu specifically used "Hindu" is a religious sense, arguing that Hindus follow Vedas and don't kill cows Vidyapati in the same period also uses Hindu & Turk (Muslim) in a religious sense. Raso literature also does this Hence, you're wrong!