shutup
1.7K posts
@dontbsalti I left 2 micros to carry over for Asia, homie surprised dicked me. Love it my butthole is available for any dildos going my way
English
That is the biggest scam candle i've ever seen in $NQ in all my 87 years of being alive
English
Is @TakeProfitLLC in trouble?
First they cut the affiliates. Quietly. Codes disabled, no further commissions
Then the trader account restrictions started. Frozen accounts. Bot investigation emails going out at scale.
I'm not saying I know what's happening inside that organization. I don't. Nobody on the outside does.
But I've been in this industry long enough to know that healthy firms don't move in that order.
Watch this one carefully.
English
@dontbsalti @tradingview Just sell me your bath water. I’ll pay for that shit. Drop the link plx
English
So apparently “bloop hehehe” has 4k users on @tradingview
So cartoon girl is probably hoping to convert 15-25% of that to paid subscribers. Which would net $30,000-$50,000 per mo. in rev
That’s why she hired a marketing team 😉
Shizzy@shizzyc95
@dontbsalti 4000 users and 319 boosts on TradingView
English
Spreads on market r such scam and the only reason we’re OK with it is because there exists no better of a market where fair pricing exists. Imagine going to grocery store and a banana has a bid and ask between .25 and .50 and you can only buy it in nickel increments. What a joke
English
shutup retweetledi
you can only play one video game for the rest of your life, what game are you choosing and why?
English
@dontbsalti I’m all for 50k. It’s gonna be fucking fast though. I doubt my orders will fill lol
English
Smells like accumulation.
Upside targets for $BTC 85k and 93k -- if it fails and breaks below this balance I got 51k below.
English
@smartertrader You said SPX will be at 7000 a week ago
English
This is how 1987 happens. 2001 and 2008
Clowns all telling you to buy xx and yy.
Only1sam. Join us. Be ready.
English
Fun fact, when you get alot of chargebacks they will freeze your account. Esp if it’s stripe.
You also have to pay fees on those.
Prob going to lose all those chargebacks. So cooked.
Market Mommy@dontbsalti
What kind of idiot do you have to be to make a video admitting guilt and committing fraud?most likely with no intention of refunding the people you scammed. Let this be a lesson, you can tell how well somebody knows the market based off of their articulation, not a copy traded PNL.
English
@babyelitetrader @FlowbyBobby He can’t answer it because all this really is just open interest and gex lol…
English
Today’s $SPX / $SPY / $QQQ Heatmap Recap
1) Why SPX Dropped Through the Air Pocket?
Today’s move lower was structurally clean once you analyzed the maps in conjunction.
On the SPX heatmap, price entered a low-(air pocket) an area between meaningful node clusters where there is minimal magnet presence. When price trades into an air pocket, there is no nearby gravity to slow it down, which often results in accelerated directional movement. Instead of reacting immediately, price fell efficiently through that vacuum because there were no dominant supportive nodes directly underneath to create deflection.
Additional we could clearly see downside nodes gaining strength across the three. SPY flashing in particular.
2) Why an Immediate Bounce Was Not in Play?
The critical factor was Trinity confirmation, when SPX approached lower levels:
SPY did not show a significant purple support node beneath price.
QQQ also lacked a dominant lower magnet or stacked support zone.
Without supportive nodes on SPY and QQQ, there was no reversal confluence across the index complex. In prior sessions, we’ve seen that strong purple floors on SPY or QQQ can prevent a full rug on SPX. Today, that structural protection was absent and as a result there was no Trinity-based absorption signal at least during the time I was available to look at the maps.
Key Takeaways
Air pockets = acceleration zones. Price moves quickly when no magnets are nearby.
Trinity confirmation is mandatory for reversal bias. If SPY and QQQ lack support nodes, SPX bounce probability decreases significantly. Don’t anticipate a floor unless the maps actually show one.
Like this if you want me to keep doing recaps for you!
Bobby@FlowbyBobby
$SPX heatmaps, not much except the air pocket down to the lower purple nodes on SPX.
English
English
As much as I agree with the ‘math of the market’ part of churning and being highly profitable, as the same business models are used in everything arbitrage on sports lines, crypto swap arbitrage, even poly market arbitrage where bots process millions of .01 spreads.
Most true seasoned traders know that if you’re seeing claims of 90%+ win rates well they should be billionaires and have better win rates than Warren buffet himself…. So that part is bullshit.
The part where for me personally I am a little put off by both apex as well as your claim of being victimized is this….
For 99% of traders, they would have been banned, limited, funds taken, moved to live and heavily monitored before even 50k balance. You were making them a lot of affiliate money so the business decision was to turn a blind eye. Once you tipped the scale to them no longer being net positive with you, and silver volatility in general wrecking props, they cut you loose.
When you make that much, wouldn’t you rather trade your money with no prop rules? You clearly can remain net positive.
Anyway, I think you both used each other and apex threw you away when it no longer was profitable for them to allow the abuse of rules.
That would never happen with most, they are handcuffed immediately. So I def have apathy over empathy for you and apex
English
I’ve always been transparent about my expenses and payouts. And it still surprises people.
At the end of the day, what matters in this business is how much you’re profiting relative to what you spent.
ROI is everything.
Profit divided by expenses.
It’s one of the clearest indicators of real success, especially when 90% of prop traders are net negative.
Across all the prop firms I trade, my ROI typically ranges anywhere from 3x to 10x.
And I’m happy for anyone who is net positive, because that means you’re profitable, you made money, and that’s all that matters.
There’s more I’d like to talk about, but I’ll speak when it’s appropriate.
BrianStonk@thebrianstonk
People are surprised I spent ~$150k on prop firm expenses this year. But how much is appropriate to spend when you’re pulling in +$700k in payouts?
English
@thebrianstonk @r_jack51373 Lmao only recently you started trading metals. Jesus Christ
English
@r_jack51373 4 years consistently on props.
Short metal A, long metal B.
Different assets: gold, silver, copper, titanium.
Only happened once, as far as I know.
English
Most visits across the top futures prop firms 👀
🥇 TPT is currently on top.
📈 Lucid is the fastest-growing firm by far.
Does this data surprise you?
English
