Seema Sharma

1.4K posts

Seema Sharma

Seema Sharma

@SAWINS1992

New Delhi, India Katılım Nisan 2022
101 Takip Edilen28 Takipçiler
Seema Sharma retweetledi
𐌁𐌉Ᏽ 𐌕𐌉𐌌𐌉
The older I get, the more convinced I am that anxiety and depression are just natural responses to a deeply unjust society.
English
207
2.5K
15.5K
119.4K
🇵🇸HalalFlation.
🇵🇸HalalFlation.@Halalflation·
@Ryandally08 To say ‘In the name of god’ would only be hated in a satanic place. Look at all the satans on x crying right now. They have identified themselves clearly for us.
GIF
English
7
0
261
4.4K
Ryan Dally
Ryan Dally@Ryandally08·
A hijab-wearing teacher leads young children in reciting Islamic phrases like “Bismillah" before activities and “Alhamdulillah" afterward. Should this be taught in English speaking Public Primary schools? Is it a form of early indoctrination?
English
1.6K
1.1K
2.3K
395.7K
Seema Sharma retweetledi
Chota Don
Chota Don@choga_don·
What a brilliant expose of Dhruv Rathee's claims that Bhagwan Ram ate meat with authentic proofs from the Ramayan by this young boy! He looks like a factory-reset version of Dhruv Rathee, making him taste his own medicines🔥 More power to him, he should create more content like this! 🙌
English
442
9.6K
31.2K
427K
Seema Sharma retweetledi
∆nkit 🎭
∆nkit 🎭@Backhand_Slice_·
It's beyond my understanding how men even like this. I mean without intimacy / romance/ love / connection or all of them, how do these people even experience pleasure in the act? If this is what makes u feel good, buy a sex doll or just put your d*ck in a hole in the wall. No 1/2
Netra Sharma@Netra_sharma0

The men defending this scene in #Chiraiya are clueless about a woman body. Forced sex without arousal, consent & lubrication can lead to vaginal tearing, severe inflammation, excruciating pain & tissue damage in her private parts. Marriage isn't a license to mutilate. NO MEANS NO

English
20
72
756
35.3K
Seema Sharma
Seema Sharma@SAWINS1992·
@Quantum_143 You’ll be surprised to know but- most men ARE primarily driven by lust.
English
0
0
0
17
Wizard 🐉
Wizard 🐉@Quantum_143·
Chiraiya on Hotstar is completely biased propaganda against men.. >To understand the story, focus on three characters: Pooja, who is the victim in a love marriage; Arun, who is Pooja’s husband; and Kamlesh, who is the wife of Arun’s brother... >In this, Arun is shown as someone who is asking his wife Pooja for sex even during her periods. Because of this, Pooja even ends up hurting herself with a blade in pvt part. Arun is portrayed as being obsessed with sex all the time. I mean, if you are showing the story of a psycho, then why are you presenting it in a way that makes it seem like society as a whole is like this? >In this series, the story of a sex-obsessed psycho is shown, but it ends up pointing fingers at society as a whole. It portrays arranged marriage as completely wrong and gives the impression that men, in general, are driven only by lust..but Then during Navratri, when condom sales increase so much, it’s hard to understand whose lust and desire is actually driving that.. >The ironic thing is that Arun’s brother’s wife, Kamlesh, is shown in such a way that Arun’s brother massages her feet and listens to everything she says. It feels like the series is defining a ‘good man’ as someone who just serves his wife and obeys her..just like a puppet >In my opinion, if this series is viewed as a psycho-thriller, then it’s fine..but these things don’t really fit or reflect society as a whole..
Wizard 🐉 tweet mediaWizard 🐉 tweet media
English
93
149
781
458.4K
Seema Sharma
Seema Sharma@SAWINS1992·
@Ishanwk23 I feel like we need to introduce the western model of dating in India. When guys start having access to sex from an early age they’ll stop putting it on a pedestal once they get married.
English
0
0
0
60
Ishan's SRH🧡
Ishan's SRH🧡@Ishanwk23·
I haven’t watched Chiraiya, and tbh, I’m not going to because it scares me. But after seeing everything on my timeline, one thing is clear, MOST Men are not ready for marriage with respect and understanding and that’s the truth. It’s honestly scary how many of them there are.
English
15
57
585
7.1K
Seema Sharma
Seema Sharma@SAWINS1992·
@SarianaOliveira @AndRanting1 @deebayleaf Reason shown in the series include her being unwell and also not knowing the partner yet as it was an arranged marriage. She didn’t say no, she only wanted to delay it. But the guy proceeded to force her.
English
1
0
19
812
Dewy.dee
Dewy.dee@deebayleaf·
This is rape. Marital rape. TV series like Chiraiya aren’t just fiction; they are a grim reality of our society.
Dewy.dee tweet media
English
683
2K
25.8K
2.4M
Afzal Ali
Afzal Ali@AfzalAli1730703·
@bharatiyamedusa Sahi h baat, ya to apna kamao warna dusre ke hisab se chalna hoga or law bhi sabke liye same ho agar koi wife mana kare to use ek paisa na do or chodh do
हिन्दी
2
0
1
383
Seema Sharma retweetledi
Rohan Saraf (Unknown/Man)
Rohan Saraf (Unknown/Man)@RohanSaraf20·
@Tushar_KN @Ayudhika1310 Bahut hua samman. In sab ko court main khichte hain. Even though this is a work of fiction as per declaration, the malice intent is clearly evident to malign Indian army. Shall we start a petition?
Rohan Saraf (Unknown/Man) tweet media
English
1
4
16
3.6K
Seema Sharma
Seema Sharma@SAWINS1992·
@kushal_mehra What’s wrong with enjoying terrorists’ heads being blown up 😭
English
1
0
2
263
कुशल मेहरा
And the problem is?
vir sanghvi@virsanghvi

Here’s @TheEconomist on Dhurandhar 2. “Some of the biggest cheers for “The Revenge” at the showing Banyan attended erupted not when patriotic dialogue is delivered, nor when Pakistanis are finished off in increasingly imaginative ways, nor even when the sneering terrorist has his brains blown out. The loudest cheers came when the screen lit up with news footage of Mr Modi, the bravest Hindu of all. But to dismiss “Dhurandhar” as propaganda is to miss something important. It did not become a monster hit by trying to convince viewers of an alternate reality. Its genius is to reflect the world many Indians, browbeaten by years of shrill pro-Modi messaging on TV news and social media, already believe to be real.”

English
7
17
257
10K
Seema Sharma
Seema Sharma@SAWINS1992·
@kk600g @MeruOnX India has issues with poverty and crime similar to Pakistan. You talk as if you are a white man sitting in a western country. If anything women have even lesser rights in Islamic countries, requiring to cover their faces to protect themselves from men.
English
0
0
1
26
kk
kk@kk600g·
@MeruOnX The facts speak louder than any random video
kk tweet media
English
5
0
0
996
Seema Sharma
Seema Sharma@SAWINS1992·
@5UM8O And Hindu lives are literally at the bottom in the priority list regardless of who the butcher is
English
0
0
2
39
Sumati
Sumati@5UM8O·
Muslims lives wont matter when killer is Pakistan/Iran. Black lives wont matter when Muslims are killing Nigerian Christians LGBTQ lives wont matter when I5LAM throws them off roof. Jew lives anyway never mattered to the world. Only life Terrorists life matters? Fuck off.
English
11
94
279
2.4K
Seema Sharma retweetledi
Satyamevajanate
Satyamevajanate@Satyamevajanate·
@TheEconomist How dare brownies make movies based on their sensibilities instead of accepting western imperial inspired and self-appointed moral guardian movies like Rambo, Jamesbond, MI, Top Gun etc...😂
English
2
33
696
9.9K
Seema Sharma retweetledi
Mahesh Jethmalani
Mahesh Jethmalani@JethmalaniM·
That is the fraud. American power on screen is “craft.” British power on screen is “heritage.” Indian power on screen is suddenly evidence of political conditioning. Same cinema. Same nationalism. Different skin colour. The Economist has a wonderfully colonial rulebook for cinema. When America straps a camera to Pentagon hardware and sells state power with a soundtrack, it is “spectacle.” When a film is made with CIA-adjacent mythology around national revenge, it is “serious storytelling.” But when India puts its own enemies and terrorist attack scars on screen, suddenly the magazine reaches for the psychiatrist’s couch. That is the real joke here. Fighter jets, spies, commandos and national vengeance are perfectly acceptable as long as the flag fluttering in the background is American or British. Then it is culture. It is craft. It is cinema doing what cinema does. The Economist has invented a very elegant little rule for cinema: Top Gun: Maverick can fly on Pentagon muscle, RAMBO & Zero Dark Thirty can ride CIA mythology, James Bond can sell six decades of British spy glamour, Dunkirk can turn wartime memory into national legend, and all of that is called storytelling. But the moment India puts terror, retaliation and national memory on screen with Dhurandhar, the magazine starts diagnosing the audience instead of reviewing the film. What @TheEconomist cannot digest is not one film. It is the fact that Indians are no longer outsourcing their memory to London’s approval. A country that has lived through decades of Pakistan-sponsored terror is apparently expected to process all that pain in whispers, with tasteful disclaimers, and preferably under the supervision of foreign editors who still think they are qualified to explain India to Indians. And that is why the review reeks. Not of sophistication, but of the old imperial tic: Western nationalism on screen is a nation telling its story; Indian nationalism on screen is a pathology requiring diagnosis. The costume has changed. The sneer has not. The funniest part is that The Economist probably thinks this is fearless criticism. It is not. It is just another imported lecture from people who never mind propaganda when it wears aviators, a tuxedo, or a CIA badge, but develop exquisite moral sensitivity the moment India stops being apologetic on its own screen. Just FYI: Decades of Pakistan-sponsored terror are apparently meant to be processed quietly, apologetically, and preferably without ever producing a mass-market cultural response. That is the old script. India is no longer following it.
The Economist@TheEconomist

The genius of “Dhurandhar” is to reflect the world many Indians, browbeaten by years of shrill pro-Modi messaging on TV news and social media, already believe to be real economist.com/asia/2026/03/2…

English
196
3.2K
10K
201K
Nithish Venkatesh
Nithish Venkatesh@nithishgowdadxb·
@rishibagree Patriotism isn’t just making propaganda to hail the ruling government! We are more patriotic than you can ever be, coz we propagate harmony and peace ✌️ fyi, I have never like Karan’s movies!
English
3
0
24
2.2K
Rishi Bagree
Rishi Bagree@rishibagree·
Reason why Karan Johar can't make patriotic movies like Dhurandhar
Rishi Bagree tweet media
English
201
1.8K
11.3K
211.7K
Jasveer Singh
Jasveer Singh@jasveer10·
In India, if a woman is 28+ and not married, life at home turns into constant pressure every single day, mostly from mothers. Most Indian marriages don’t start with love or clarity, they start with pressure. And this is not because parents are evil. They are not. They love their daughters. But they are scared - Scared of society, scared of relatives, scared of those constant questions that never stop. ‘Koi ladka mila nahi ab tak?’ ‘Kya koi pasand nahi aata?’ ‘Zyada padha diya, isliye attitude aa gaya?’ These lines don’t just stay outside. They enter the house. They sit on the dining table. They become part of daily life. So the pressure shifts. From society to parents. From parents to the daughter. Now it becomes emotional blackmail without anyone saying it directly. I’ve seen women who were commuting daily from Delhi to Gurgaon for work suddenly decide to move, not because they couldn’t travel but just to avoid this daily marriage conversation stress. Now calls become shorter, conversations become guarded. And then comes the arranged marriage process, which is even worse. One meeting. One conversation. Parents expect a yes immediately to start the process. If you say no, get ready for a week of interrogation. ‘What didn’t you like?’ ‘Tumhe koi pasand hi nahi aata.’ ‘Kitne ladkon ko mana karogi?’ I know a real case. Girl meets a guy from the US through family. One meeting. She doesn’t like him. They come back home. Parents ask for a decision - She says YES! Not because she liked him. But because she was tired. Tired of explaining, tired of defending, tired of the endless questioning. Parents also know she’s not happy. Still they move forward. Engagement gets planned. Now she is getting married to someone she doesn’t even like. This is not an exception. This is happening everywhere. And the worst part? Everyone involved thinks they are doing the right thing. Parents think they are securing her future. Society thinks they are asking normal questions. Relatives think they are just “concerned” But the girl is the one who pays the price for everyone else’s peace of mind.
English
146
169
866
74K
Seema Sharma retweetledi
Ambrösia
Ambrösia@psychotic_me·
Ok frankly speaking I didn't like #Chiraiya much. I get that marital rape is real and serious but saying it happens in most marriages feels over the top.. And the narrative that only women are victims doesn't really fit in today's time.. #mytake
English
69
99
716
19K
Narendra Modi
Narendra Modi@narendramodi·
Looking forward to being among the people of Keralam later today. Will address a rally in Palakkad and later will take part in a roadshow in Thrissur. The mood of Keralam is in favour of the NDA. The people have had enough of the poor governance of LDF and UDF.
English
557
2K
18K
10.3M