Monday's #SCOTUS grants? The issue of uninjured class-action members returns yet again; basing harmless determinations on in capital murder trials on evidence the jury *didn't* hear; QI and the mistaken use of deadly force; and Trump advisor Steve Bannon
scotusblog.com/2026/03/uninju…
Reminder: The court has indicated that it may release opinions tomorrow (Friday) morning. We will be live blogging tomorrow beginning at 9:30 a.m. EDT.
scotusblog.com/2026/03/announ…
On Monday, the court will hear argument on whether federal law requires not only that voters cast their ballots by Election Day, but also that election officials receive the ballots by then.
scotusblog.com/2026/03/court-…
A group of Haitian nationals urged the Supreme Court on Monday to leave in place a ruling by a federal judge in Washington, D.C., that allows them to stay in the U.S. for now because of unsafe conditions in their home country.
scotusblog.com/2026/03/haitia…
Reminder: The court has indicated that it may announced opinions on Friday at 10 a.m. EDT. We will be live blogging that morning beginning at 9:30.
scotusblog.com/2026/03/announ…
New on the interim docket: Trump administration urges Supreme Court to allow it to revoke protected status for Haitian nationals
scotusblog.com/2026/03/trump-…
SCOTUSblog is expanding its podcast lineup.
We’re proud to welcome @amaricas_const and @DividedArgument as new editorial partners, joining Advisory Opinions in a growing Supreme Court and constitutional law media ecosystem.
Listen to a special Advisory Opinions episode featuring hosts from all three podcasts here: thedispatch.com/podcast/adviso…
The second and final opinion is in Galette v. New Jersey Transit Corporation. In a unanimous opinion from Justice Sotomayor, the court holds that NJ Transit is not an arm of New Jersey and cannot share in New Jersey's interstate sovereign immunity.
supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf…
The first opinion is in Urias-Orellana v. Bondi, on federal courts' role in asylum cases. In a unanimous ruling from Justice Jackson, the court holds that a persecution determination should be reviewed under the substantial-evidence standard.
supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf…