Stanford Law & Policy Review

Check out our new online piece from @marknilsstrand and Tim Lang from @conginst on how reintroducing reformed earmarks would allow Congress to reassert its constitutional role over both the country’s finances and policy. law.stanford.edu/publications/c…

Almost one year ago today, during Justice Gorsuch's nomination hearing, the U.S. Senate debated the issue of whether Roe v. Wade should be considered a "super precedent." Check out @senorrinhatch's analysis of this issue in SLPR online. law.stanford.edu/publications/t….

Be sure to check out @mjs_DC, Karen Oehme, and Nat Stern's article on the judicial and generational dispute over transgender rights. 1,124 student newspapers and over 8,000 references to LGBTQ terms over a three-year period were analyzed for this piece! law.stanford.edu/publications/j…

SLPR Volume 29, Issue 1 is now available online! Featuring articles on the settlement problem in public interest law, gender sidelining, targeting white supremacy in the workplace, and the judicial and generational dispute over transgender rights. #slsnav-volume-29-issue-1" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">law.stanford.edu/stanford-law-p…