Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Sabir Semerkant
12.6K posts

Sabir Semerkant
@SabirS
🔗 Growing https://t.co/QJzDwtHGDM, https://t.co/qJvAuqkmJy
New York Katılım Şubat 2009
965 Takip Edilen7K Takipçiler

Every dollar you spend on ads passes through your website.
If your site loads in 5 seconds, you are losing 90% more visitors than you should be.
That is not a marketing problem. That is a physics problem. And no amount of better copy, better targeting, or better creative will fix it.
Wallien fixed their physics -- 4.9s to 1.8s -- and revenue jumped 328% with the same ad spend.
The full framework is in my free manifesto -- growthbysabir.com/xbook
What would your revenue look like if you stopped losing visitors to slow load times?
English

A 328% revenue increase with zero ad spend increase.
That is not a fantasy. That is what happens when you fix the physics.
Most ecommerce founders think they have a traffic problem. Or a creative problem. Or a targeting problem.
They actually have a loading problem.
Your site is the bottleneck. Your customers on mobile data are bouncing before your page even renders.
Fix the physics first. Everything you do after that works harder.
When was the last time you loaded your own site on a phone using cellular data?
English

Before you spend another dollar on ads, check your real site speed.
Not on your laptop. On a phone. Over cellular.
I cover exactly how to diagnose and fix The Physics Problem in my free manifesto -- growthbysabir.com/xbook
What is your current PageSpeed score on mobile -- do you even know?
English

Wallien was a perfect example.
Site speed: 4.9 seconds. PageSpeed score: 28.
We brought it to 1.8 seconds and a score of 87.
No new ads. No new creative. No offer changes.
Revenue jumped 328% in week 2.
This is why Sprint 1 of the Rapid 2X Protocol is always about fixing the physics. Everything else multiplies from this foundation.
English

Wallien came to me spending good money on ads with terrible conversion rates.
I checked their site speed: 4.9 seconds to load. PageSpeed score of 28 out of 100.
We did not touch their ads. We did not change their offer. We did not redesign anything.
We fixed the physics.
-> Load time: 4.9s down to 1.8s
-> PageSpeed: 28 up to 87
Week 2 result: +328% revenue.
Same ads. Same budget. Same products. Just a site that actually loads.
How many sales are you losing right now to a site your customers cannot even load?
English

You are spending thousands on ads to send people to a slow website.
Google data says it clearly:
-> 3-second load time = +32% bounce rate
-> 5-second load time = +90% bounce rate
You are literally paying for people to leave.
The worst part -- most founders test their site on a laptop connected to WiFi. Their customers are on a phone on mobile data.
Your site is slower than you think. Have you actually tested it on a phone over cellular?
English

The gap between a 3x ROAS and a 17x ROAS is not a better ad.
It is everything that happens BEFORE and AFTER the click.
Most founders obsess over the ad. The creative. The targeting. The copy.
But Aurum Brothers went from 3x to 17x ROAS without changing a single ad. We changed the sequence underneath.
I put the entire framework into a free manifesto -- growthbysabir.com/xbook
If your ROAS is stuck, what is the one thing you keep tweaking hoping it will finally work?
English

"I have tried everything."
I hear this from founders every single week.
But when I audit their business, here is what I actually find:
-> They have tried 47 tactics in random order
-> They have never followed a complete system
-> They are optimizing pieces while the whole machine is broken
You have not tried everything. You have tried everything randomly.
Aurum Brothers was the same way. Stuck for months. Then we applied the 8-sprint sequence and they 2X'd in 6 weeks with a 130% jump in orders.
What if the problem is not what you are doing but the order you are doing it in?
English

I put the entire 8-sprint sequence into a free manifesto called The Rapid 2X Protocol.
No fluff. No upsell. Just the framework that has doubled 200+ brands.
Grab it here -- growthbysabir.com/xbook
What would change in your business if you stopped chasing tactics and started following a sequence?
English

The 8-sprint sequence matters more than any individual tactic because each sprint multiplies the next.
-> Sprint 1 fixes your foundation
-> Sprint 2 gives you real data
-> Sprint 3 builds retention loops
-> Sprint 4 scales what works
-> Sprints 5-8 compound everything
Skip one and the rest underperform.
English

Globe-Trotter grew +333% in 6 weeks.
Not from a viral campaign. Not from a new ad platform. Not from hiring a bigger team.
They followed a specific sequence of 8 sprints -- each one building on the last.
Most founders skip straight to Sprint 4 (scaling ads) without doing Sprints 1-3 first. Then they wonder why nothing works.
Old belief: "I just need to find the right tactic."
New belief: "I need to follow the right sequence."
What sprint are you stuck on right now?
English

I used to believe more tactics = more growth.
More ads. More channels. More hacks.
I call it the Growth Delusion.
Here is what actually happened when I stopped chasing tactics and started following a sequence:
-> Aurum Brothers: 2X revenue in 6 weeks
-> Orders up 130%
-> ROAS jumped from 3x to 17x
The difference was not a new tactic. It was an 8-sprint sequence that put the right moves in the right order.
Are you still adding tactics hoping something sticks?
English

I spent 25 years in ecommerce. Built the ecommerce division at VaynerMedia with Gary Vaynerchuk. Worked with 200+ brands.
The #1 pattern I see in brands that plateau:
They're not failing from lack of effort. They're failing from effort applied in the wrong sequence.
I wrote everything I've learned into one book. 184 pages. 13 chapters. Free.
growthbysabir.com/xbook
What would change in your business if you knew the exact sequence to follow?
English

Two identical DTC brands. Same product. Same market.
Brand A: Spent $65k on agencies, ads, influencers, CRO.
Revenue up 15%. Profit down 8%.
Brand B: Spent $12k fixing speed, analytics, and lifecycle FIRST. Then scaled.
Revenue up 112%. Profit up 34%.
Same tactics. Different sequence. Completely different outcome.
Are you Brand A or Brand B right now?
English
