Sad Creator

3K posts

Sad Creator banner
Sad Creator

Sad Creator

@SadCreatorTalks

Enigmatic persona of a depressed mad scientist, setting out to reverse humanity's failures. Check out what is brewing inside of the SAD Lab! 👨‍🔬🧪

Katılım Mart 2023
163 Takip Edilen22.3K Takipçiler
Sad Creator retweetledi
Highstreet
Highstreet@highstreetworld·
Psst… 👀 Have you heard? ⚔️ Highstreet: Calamity just dropped into Early Access on Meta Quest #VR Dive into the chaos with your friends, swing your way through the arena, and see if you’ve got what it takes. 🎮 Jump in now → Download here: meta.com/experiences/hi…
English
9
27
109
9.2K
Sad Creator
Sad Creator@SadCreatorTalks·
Every single xAI co-founder is now gone. Not one left. The remaining two co-founders, Manuel Kroiss and Ross Nordeen, have left as well, meaning all 11 original builders who started xAI with Elon Musk have exited in under 3 years. This comes amid layoffs, restructuring and Musk openly admitting the company "wasn’t built right" and needs rebuilding. The company was recently acquired by Musk’s SpaceX, bringing SpaceX, xAI, and X (formerly Twitter) together under one corporate umbrella, all as SpaceX is reportedly planning to go public. Curious to know what made them quit... Is xAI evolving or falling apart behind the scenes? Let me know your thoughts below👇
Sad Creator tweet media
English
4
31
105
2.8K
Sad Creator
Sad Creator@SadCreatorTalks·
🚨 Bhutan is dumping Bitcoin… again. Another 519 BTC ($37M) just moved, which is a part of a larger trend that has already seen $100M+ sold this year and reserves drop from 13,000 BTC to nearly 4,400. A country that once bet its future on Bitcoin is now steadily trimming exposure. So what’s really going on here... Is smart money taking profits and a sovereign state de-risking after massive gains? Or is it a quiet exit signal? If even governments are selling… what do they see coming? Drop your thoughts in the comments!
Sad Creator tweet media
English
3
28
105
3.9K
Sad Creator
Sad Creator@SadCreatorTalks·
🚨 Will Ethereum crash to $1.2K next? Analysts are warning ETH could drop another 40% if key levels break with weak demand, whale distribution, and macro fear all stacking against it. The same pattern already triggered 45-48% crashes twice before… and now it's forming again. So what is really going on here? Is this just another bear trap (ETH always looks dead before a major rally) or is Ethereum losing strength indeed?
Sad Creator tweet media
English
3
33
100
3.4K
Sad Creator
Sad Creator@SadCreatorTalks·
6 straight months of losses for Bitcoin… worst period since 2018. >> BTC is on the edge of a historic breakdown. The BTC price action touches $65K to start the week as traders expect a copycat bear flag breakdown. >> Iran headlines dominate the macro mood amid rumors of a US ground invasion. March could go either way for Bitcoin as it sits on the edge of its first six-month losing streak since 2018. >> Whales have begun to reduce their BTC exposure, adding to mid-term price headwinds. >> Modest demand in the current trading range lacks "magnitude" to support a trend reversal. So is this the bottom? Every cycle looks like this before the next massive rally. Or is this time different, considering weak demand, selling pressure and structural breakdown? Share your thoughts below.👇
Sad Creator tweet media
English
3
34
99
3.7K
Sad Creator
Sad Creator@SadCreatorTalks·
🇺🇸David Sacks just left the White House. The CLARITY Act is still stalled. The stablecoin bill is unfinished. The strategic Bitcoin reserve hasn’t been funded. The crypto council never happened. And the 100-day promise on market structure legislation is forgotten. This is the person the entire crypto industry celebrated as their man inside the most powerful office on earth. The industry donated, lobbied, and cheered for a Trump administration specifically because of promises like these. Sacks did shift the tone. The Biden-era enforcement-first approach is gone, and that matters. But tone isn’t legislation. And after 130 days, the most important legal questions in crypto remain exactly where they were: unanswered. Did crypto get played? The industry handed political capital to an administration that used its goodwill, delivered symbolic wins like the Bitcoin reserve narrative, and left before the hard work of actual law-making was done. Comment your opinion below!
Sad Creator tweet media
English
3
33
94
3.8K
Sad Creator
Sad Creator@SadCreatorTalks·
Crypto donations exceeded $1B in 2024. And in Africa, the infrastructure built with that money is quietly failing. Nobody wants to talk about that. 👇Here is the pattern: Charity token launch or NFT drop generates buzz and goes viral -> capital flows and optimism peaks -> then the launch window closes, and nothing is left behind except a transaction hash and broken infrastructure that nobody was funded to maintain. Blockchain transparency, the industry's favourite selling point, turns out to be a transparency illusion. An on-chain record can show you where money moved. It cannot show you whether the water pump still works three years later, whether the school has teachers. Most crypto philanthropy is built around visibility, not durability. And every failed project makes the next legitimate one harder to fund. Africa absorbs the damage of the industry's learning curve. So the question remains whether crypto philanthropy is fixing global problems or using human suffering as a narrative for fundraising?
Sad Creator tweet media
English
3
32
96
3.8K
Sad Creator
Sad Creator@SadCreatorTalks·
A federal judge just blocked the Trump administration’s attempt to blacklist Anthropic, calling the move likely retaliatory and legally shaky. The Pentagon labeled an American AI company a “national security risk” because Anthropic refused to let its AI be used for autonomous weapons and mass surveillance. The court basically said: you can’t punish a company for disagreeing with government policy. Some people said this was a textbook case of government overreach and First Amendment violation. And it was political from day one. Was this ruling inevitable and correct? Or a dangerous precedent that limits government control over critical tech? Drop your opinion in the comments!
Sad Creator tweet media
English
3
29
105
3.8K
Sad Creator
Sad Creator@SadCreatorTalks·
🔥 OPENAI JUST KILLED “EROTIC MODE,” AND PEOPLE ARE MAD (OR ARE THEY?) OpenAI hyped an "adult mode" for ChatGPT… Then suddenly pulled the plug "indefinitely." Why? - employees felt uncomfortable - investors pushed back - concerns about mental health, safety, and minors Sounds responsible… right? Or is it something else? It looks like AI companies want to decide what humans are allowed to explore. OpenAI keeps launching bold ideas… then backtracking under pressure. Is this leadership or chaos? 🤨 Should AI allow fully uncensored adult interaction for consenting users? Drop your take below! 👇
Sad Creator tweet media
English
3
27
109
4K
Sad Creator
Sad Creator@SadCreatorTalks·
BREAKING HISTORY OR BREAKING NORMS? 🇺🇸💵 President Donald Trump is now the first sitting U.S. president in 165 years to put his signature on American paper currency, breaking a tradition where only the Treasury Secretary & Treasurer’s autographs appeared on banknotes. 👉 According to the Treasury, this is to celebrate the USA’s 250th anniversary and symbolize strength & economic pride. But let’s be honest, this smells a lot less like heritage and a lot more like ego branding. 
Is this historic and visionary or a Trump ego trip that undermines American traditions?
 🔥 Share your opinion below! 👇
Sad Creator tweet media
English
3
32
101
3.9K
Sad Creator
Sad Creator@SadCreatorTalks·
If you still think AI is impartial… think again. Wikipedia has been systematically “poisoned” by pro‑Iran edits, and that because LLMs pull heavily from Wikipedia, those models are now spitting out propaganda shaped by geopolitical agendas, not truth. 👀📉 Meanwhile, AI agents are being used to waste scammers’ time for hours on end but the real story is underneath: what does it mean for trust in AI when the data backbone is slanted? 
⚠️ If regime‑backed actors can skew public data sources, AI outputs are compromised at the root. So let me ask you: 
Are LLMs poisoned by foreign influence or is this just internet panic?
Sad Creator tweet media
English
3
33
102
3.8K
Sad Creator
Sad Creator@SadCreatorTalks·
Is Bitcoin's biggest weakness… about to become Ethereum's biggest bull case? A growing narrative says Bitcoin is falling behind on quantum resistance, while Ethereum is actively building a post-quantum roadmap. Some are even warning that Bitcoin's core cryptography could become obsolete, and devs are too slow or unwilling to adapt. The Bitcoin community is split on how to deal with it, with some advocating for upgrading cryptography while others say intervention would violate Bitcoin’s core principles. Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin said in late February that validator signatures, data storage, accounts and proofs must change to prepare for quantum threats, while proposing a quantum resistance roadmap. What's your take: will Ethereum be ready for the quantum threat?
Sad Creator tweet media
English
3
31
85
3.8K
Sad Creator
Sad Creator@SadCreatorTalks·
Bitcoin is beating gold during the Iran war… but is it actually a safe haven? During the Iran conflict, BTC outperformed gold and even rallied at times, yet every escalation still triggered selloffs and risk-off behavior. Before the Iran war, Bitcoin spent months trading sideways while gold rallied to record levels. At the time, gold was seen as the go-to safe haven. Inflation concerns remained persistent and geopolitical tensions continued to build, while Bitcoin failed to live up to that role. In fact, it continues to trade like a high-beta liquidity asset, which means tighter financial conditions, such as higher real yields, a strong dollar and weaker inflows. But what do you think, is it a new digital safe haven or not?
Sad Creator tweet media
English
3
21
83
3.8K
Sad Creator
Sad Creator@SadCreatorTalks·
🚨 Are Grok’s deepfakes actually being regulated… or just going viral Baltimore is now suing xAI over Grok generating non-consensual deepfake images, including thousands involving minors. Baltimore's consumer protection suit will test whether local law can hold AI companies liable where federal regulation has failed. Features are being restricted, but the content is still spreading. 3 million deepfakes have already been created before anyone acted. Is it too little, too late? And will Baltimore win this lawsuit? Drop your comments below!
Sad Creator tweet media
English
13
28
86
3.9K
Sad Creator
Sad Creator@SadCreatorTalks·
Most Crypto "banks" are just stablecoin wallets with a debit card, what we need is the ability to pay rent, utility bills, ACH pulls, direct deposits, credit card payments, proof of funds, leases, mortgages. @brookwellapp is definitely something upcoming
Ravi Riley@ravi_riley

x.com/i/article/2036…

English
3
39
99
3.9K
Sad Creator
Sad Creator@SadCreatorTalks·
🚨 Why did OpenAI kill Sora… just 6 months after launch? This was one of the most viral AI products ever. It had millions of users and massive hype. And now, it's gone. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman reportedly said all its text-to-video models would be shuttered, and a $1B investment from Disney has also been cancelled. What do you think this is: a strategic genius move (cut distractions, focus on core AI ans profit) or a massive failure (couldn't handle costs, legal risks or real demand)? Drop your take below!
Sad Creator tweet media
English
3
24
83
2.8K
Sad Creator
Sad Creator@SadCreatorTalks·
🚨 Balancer Labs is shutting down… just 4 months after a $100M+ exploit. And yet, they say the protocol lives on via DAO. Balancer was one of the leading DeFi protocols during the 2020-2021 bull market, reaching a peak total value locked (TVL) of $3.3B in November 2021. However, that figure fell to $800M by October 2025, with the hack leading to another $500M drop in TVL over the next 2 weeks. Balancer’s TVL has since fallen to $158M, showing how challenging it is for DeFi protocols to recover from large-scale hacks. After the hack, TVL collapsed, legal risks piled up, and now the company itself is calling it quits while claiming the protocol will “continue” under a DAO. So what is this REALLY? Decentralization working as intended or a failed project hiding behind “DAO transition”? Drop your take in the comments below.
Sad Creator tweet media
English
3
35
98
3.8K
Sad Creator
Sad Creator@SadCreatorTalks·
Trump announced a temporary Iran de-escalation. Oil dumped 14%, S&P jumped 3%, BTC bounced 4%, and derivatives traders still didn't buy it. Despite all this, Bitcoin futures are still trading at a 2% annualized premium when neutral conditions demand 4-8%. Nobody trusts the bounce. And gold just had its biggest weekly fall in 43 years. 🐻 Bears will tell you the data is clear: futures weak, oil still above $85, Fed still hawkish, and $19B in liquidations from October's flash crash still haunting market makers. 🐂 Bulls will tell you this is how generational bottoms are built. When nobody believes, smart money accumulates in silence. Institutional ETF inflows haven't stopped. $70K is the battleground: hold it and the narrative flips, lose it and $65,800 comes into play fast. What side do you choose: 🐂bulls or 🐻bears?
Sad Creator tweet media
English
3
37
92
3.7K