@VildaRosenblad @TheJayDelta Lmao cope and seethe. The world finally sees Israel for the monstrosity that it is. No going back.
English
Saint James
5.6K posts
@TheJayDelta Are you insane? The pro Palestinian side doesn’t hold up to scrutiny. From them having initiated violence at every turn and turned down peace every occasion to what they did to Gaza after Israel left…
English
Ironically, the more Israeli history you read, the more pro Palestinian you become too
Sarah@Sarahjdublin
The more Palestinian history you read the more pro Palestinian you become
English
People want you to believe Elway was winning SBs after carrying bad teams there. He didn't.
People want you to believe Brady was winning SBs during his statistical peak (2007-12). He didn't.
Guys who won while they were the best QB?
89 Montana
94 Young
06 Peyton
22 Mahomes
Chris@chiefs_outsider
I find it odd that John Elway has 0 first team All-Pro selections. People will gaslight you and tell you he was some top 5 QB OAT when he was arguably not even top 5 in his era most of his career. His legacy was a inflated when he won back to back Super Bowls off Terrell Davis’ legs (7 straight post season games over 100 yds) a Rod Smith 80 yd house call that was under-thrown, and 4 turnovers from his defense gifting him his SB MVP.
English
Canada's NUMBER ONE author??? smdh shameful performance by our neighbors to the north
National Post@nationalpost
FIRST READING: He's Canada's number one author, and he's leaving Canada for safety reasons nationalpost.com/opinion/gad-sa…
English
@ScottKacsmar I didn't hate the end but it didn't live up to how good this show was for most of its run
English
If you stop halfway through S4, you'll think Ozark might be the best show in the streaming era.
KAEGO ♤@kaaego
just 3 episodes in and this might be the best show i've ever seen in my life …………🔥🔥
English
@JohnnyCJordan I dunno about an investigation, everyone is just saying there's no professional liability for Vrabel and I disagree with that
English
Can someone give me an example of what info Dianna Russini had that would help Vrable win football games?
Scott Kacsmar@ScottKacsmar
A 6+ year affair. And we're supposed to believe he never used her to get info on the other 31 teams? His little spy. @NFL, do your job and go down that rabbit hole.
English
@JohnnyCJordan How would you know. Unless she was caught recording or something
English
@SaintJames1992 Got it. We have Greg Bedard for the Pats, who hasn’t cited a source ever, so I imagine he just overheard stuff and shared, which would be bad integrity.
I’m sure those briefings and closed sessions would be off limits quickly if secret stuff was shared.
English
@ScottKacsmar Someone as connected as Diana Rusinni must come into a lot of off the record info. Could easily have shared that. They also get access to closed practices, get briefed in advance by teams, etc. This all depends on journalistic integrity.
English
If the shoe was on the other foot...
Vrabel tells her the true extent of Drake Maye's shoulder injury before the Super Bowl and she shares that during pillow talk with Mike Macdonald.
Any non-public info (injury, game plans, plays, signals) would violate competitive integrity.
JC@JohnnyCJordan
Can someone give me an example of what info Dianna Russini had that would help Vrable win football games?
English
Saint James retweetledi
Catholic-Shia relations 100 days into Zohran Mamdani’s tenure as Mayor New York:
Română
My experiment of Following on my phone and For You on my PC probably needs to come to an end.
I waste so much time anymore on that dangerous side.
My mentions are bad enough.
lindsey ok@lindseyyok
The Twitter For You page is a dangerous place. It’s like - tweet from faceless account with 7 paragraphs about why Josh Allen isn’t good - video of someone d**** - horrible car wreck video - Trump ad - 3 week old tweet from someone I follow No thank you
English
@mattyglesias @C_Kavanagh God you're such a piece of shit, it's astounding.
English
@mattyglesias Maybe you guys should not have called college protesters paid agitators
Maybe YOU should not have arrogantly snided that people don't care about Gaza
But no. You're perfect. You got your perfect DNC and it lost to corrupt clown.
English
@SaintJames1992 @janecoaston “Some,” this is an established fact in developmental economics. More kids means more people to do farm work, work and bring in income, etc
English
great piece with one note here: I see this sentiment all the time and I always have to wonder if the person making it is aware that maybe, just maybe, their ancestors weren't *intending* to have as many children as they did?
Jerusalem@JerusalemDemsas
I wrote about why millennials freeze at the baby question. The decisions life asks you to make used to be able to ruin you. For college-educated Americans, they mostly can't anymore. Progress has eliminated almost every irreversible decision from modern life. Marriage? Career? Moving? All of these--to a large extent--can be reversed or mitigated. Having a kid is the last high-variance decision left. And we have basically zero practice making decisions like that. New from me at @TheArgumentMag: theargumentmag.com/p/theres-no-su…
English
@viva_thevillage This is an argument made by economic historians that is supported by some data, which I find to be interesting. It's not a hill I'm gonna die on one way or another lol
English
@SaintJames1992 I simply can't imagine ppl planning their lives that way (esp in a world w/o reliable contraception). People may well have wanted community/xtra helping hands, sure but the notion that they had children in order2b taken care of in old age strikes me as a violation of evo theories
English
Do we have any accounts of adult children regularly caring for their aging parents, despite having their own families and farms to attend to?
weren't (extra) heirs often an issue?
Saint James@SaintJames1992
@janecoaston There's some literature that suggests kids were the only vehicle for saving wealth to commoners before the modern era. A farmer in like 1600 likely had no access to banks and may not have actual currency. But surplus food=more kids=more people to take care of you later in life.
English
@viva_thevillage You're definitely right that many people did not live a long and happy life lol
English
@SaintJames1992 I think ppl worked as long as they could.. the very broken down usually died out of infections... nobody was changing adult diapers
English
@viva_thevillage Certainly not everyone was in a position to or wanted to take care of their relatives, but that was the thinking anyways. Not really any other eat to stay alive in those days if you couldn't work. Subsistence farming is a bitch.
English
@SaintJames1992 i think even the smallest land/estates would end up being divided (that's one of the origins of dowry)
old ppl were oft considered a burden (see the treatment of old women/ poor widows)
the Irish had to implement/guard the Right of Residence and Maintenance for aging farmers
English
Now, with government pensions, everyone is trying to parasitize everyone else's kids to take care of them in their dotage.
Saint James@SaintJames1992
@janecoaston There's some literature that suggests kids were the only vehicle for saving wealth to commoners before the modern era. A farmer in like 1600 likely had no access to banks and may not have actual currency. But surplus food=more kids=more people to take care of you later in life.
English
@viva_thevillage These are like economics papers, but yeah people didn't just like routinely leave their parents to die when they got older lol. You're referencing is the French manor of dividing up land among the kids. That did happen, but often poor people didn't actually own the land.
English