Sara the giver of gifs

NHS FINGERPRINTED A DOCTOR FOR REPORTING A COLLEAGUE WHO WAS INJECTING DRUGS ON DUTY Dr Patricia Mills was an anaesthetist at West Suffolk Hospital. In 2017 she saw a colleague injecting himself with drugs while looking after patients. She raised the alarm. The NHS's response was to investigate her. Management hired handwriting experts and fingerprint analysts to work out who had been tipping off a grieving family about a potentially botched operation. They narrowed the suspect list down to seven doctors. Four of them had one thing in common: they had all previously raised concerns about the self-injecting colleague. Dr Mills was among them. She was off sick for six months. She said she thought she was going to lose a 30-year career. The drug-injecting doctor continued to practice for years after her original disclosure. When Dr Mills turned to the National Guardian's Office, the body specifically set up to protect NHS staff who speak up, she said its response was, in her words, literally useless. The CEO who ordered the fingerprinting resigned when it became public. An independent review in December 2021 fully exonerated Dr Mills. It called the fingerprinting incendiary and extremely ill-judged. It said the treatment she received verged on victimisation. It said her concerns were well-founded from the start. So to recap. Doctor raises a patient safety concern. Hospital spends public money trying to unmask her. She gets sick. The wrongdoer keeps working. The regulator does nothing. And three years later a review says yeah, she was right all along. Sorry about that. Sources: The Guardian, BBC @BBCNews, The Telegraph @Telegraph, Patient Safety Learning @PSLearning, NHS England independent review by Christine Outram, December 2021

In less than 150 seconds, this video completely exposes the entire "Free Palestine" Nazi movement. This must go viral.

New Oxford University study on BBC reporting of 'transgender' people: Since 2000 in the UK • 11 were murdered (mostly killed by their male partners). This generated 137 news stories • 20 committed murder. This generated just 58 news stories, of which only 23 mentioned trans

Graham Linehan should never have been dragged through the courts in the first place. The real scandal is a system that wastes time on litigious nonsense driven by professional activists while serious crime goes unpunished. We need to kill cancel culture. Free speech cannot survive if the process becomes the punishment. This is why I asked Toby Young to review the laws that are stifling free speech so the next Conservative government can put an end to this wasting of our resources.

I've been quieter than normal in recent weeks. For a very good reason: konstantinkisin.com/p/why-you-have…

Come meet Michelle and other members of our Notts & Derby Friends' Group on their stall at @WRNDerbyshire Derby Women's Festival next Saturday, 9th May. Find more information here 👇 womensrights.network/derbyshire-wom…

I find it insane that, apparently with medical training, you insist on omitting essential,medical cautions about interfering with the HPG axis. Exogeonous, and/or steroidal, hormone, use or suppression, and the side effects that result in that disregulation is something YOU should be talking about for the benefit of those you claim to care about and advocate for.

@HelenWebberley I find it insane you are not serving a lengthy prison sentence, but hey, maybe one day!

From the incomparable @marycatedelvey who explains what’s going on. It’s been very confusing to a lot of people these days why a male lecturers would wear triple F 🍊🍊to school. What has happened? Why would anyone want to do this?

This treacherous gaslighter thinks 'TERFs'. are emotionally damaged and are triggered by the joyous presence of men in drag lurking in women only spaces. 🫣

A lesbian TikTok creator claps back! Inclusivity and intersectionality have been weaponized to pressure women—especially lesbians—to center men and she’s not having it. “Don't you notice, like, anytime someone says, ‘Be inclusive, be intersectional,’ they always mean to include males? I think there is something extremely rapey about telling lesbians to be inclusive within their own sexuality. I'm a homosexual. What do you want me to do? F*** you so you can feel included?” Source: “Separatist, Not a radfem, CSEC survivor, Autistic homosexual, always yapping. EVIL (on TikTok)” vt.tiktok.com/ZS9aW5DJM/

Are Chinese people in Britain chased down the street for what Beijing does to Uighurs? Are Russians here hunted for Ukraine? Are Afghans attacked over how women are treated back home? No. But Jews are singled out, blamed, and targeted for Israel. The hypocrisy isn’t even subtle.

Just a daily reminder that men have found a new way to gather round discussing what women should be, think, be comfortable with, and what their sex-based rights should be, without any women present. Unfortunately, many libbed out women (and men) have continued to fall for this.

This is the REAL Handmaiden’s Tale!⬇️ A woke white woman tells the young girls who lost medals in three events to a seventh grade boy—who identifies as a girl—to get used to being disappointed. She advises the girls to adopt a “growth mindset” and accept their losses to males. She says a girl who submits & meekly accepts defeat by a male is learning “resilience.” 🤡@clownworld

Muslims all over Europe are freaking out after Sweden made a historic and courageous decision: it will no longer use the term “Islamophobia,” coined by the Muslim Brotherhood, because it is a politically manipulated concept aimed at silencing criticism of Islam. Swedish Foreign Minister Maria Malmer Stenergard announced that her government will push the European Union and the United Nations to stop using this fraudulent term. The concept of “Islamophobia” was deliberately designed to equate legitimate criticism of Islamic doctrine with racism. It was weaponized to shut down discussion about core Islamic texts containing commands to wage war, rape, and subjugate non-Muslims. Sweden just recognized what millions of Europeans already know: criticizing a religion that openly calls for the murder and sexual enslavement of non-believers is not a phobia, but basic common sense and self-preservation. This is a massive blow to the Islamist lobby across Europe. Do you agree with Sweden’s decision?

fuck you

Can someone make an argument I’ve never heard? Segregation was about skin color, which has nothing to do with privacy or safety. This is about sex, which very obviously does. That’s like saying weight classes in boxing are discrimination or “employees only” signs are oppression of customers. Same word “separate,” completely different reason.

There are but 2 sexes, male and female, which are fixed at conception. Humans cannot change sex. There are zero ‘genders’ or ‘gendered identities’. ”Man’ and ‘woman’ are sex categories, not ‘identities’. Men cannot be lesbians nor women gay men. No one is ‘born in the wrong body’. None of the above is a statement of ‘hate’. They are all statements of objective truth that the vast majority of the population agrees with. You might not like reality, but that does not mean I have to refrain from expressing it. Claiming victimhood status because of hurt feelings does not make you an actual victim. Targeting a woman for not conforming to your quasi-religious belief system, however, does make you an actual misogynist bully and someone who deserves to be taken to task for it.

It’s important to know exactly what is going on here. Women in the league - aka on opposing teams to the team with FIVE men who claim to be women - want to boycott matches against the glorified mens team. Management has, reportedly, effectively said “boycotting is banned.” It means that to continue playing *in the women’s league* women have to accept playing with some men they don’t want to play with or leave the competition. There is no exclusive woman competition for them to go to. It’s literally accept this or nothing. Complete exclusion from the sport, basically. It’s important to note, there is an open unisex league. So the men who claim to be women could play in that competition, thereby playing with women who are open to playing with men. But no, they want to play in the *exclusively* women’s competition, where women have signed up to exclusively play with women. Now the big problem is, the law, currently under appeal, is being interpreted as,“they ARE women, so why would you not want to play with these women but you’re fine to play with those women?” When the only reason why the women don’t want to play with the men who claim to be women is because they’re MEN. This concludes yet another examination of how gender ideology is completely incompatible with women’s rights & and society based on freedom of speech, belief & association.