sasquatch eating beans

@un1367543562803 @nestor_sct @nypost Say Christ is king and renounce Vishnu and Allah before you speak of Christ.

Ex-JPMorgan banker Chirayu Rana pretended his dad was dead to get bereavement leave - but he's alive and spoke to The Post this weekend trib.al/mUjuzOo

@SoffiMiwa @deusimpera >jeffrey epSTEIN >christian hmmmmmmmm....

@deusimpera I don't think he's even anti religion these days. He calls himself a "cultural christian" because he realized his real passion was in being really racist, hating muslims and being friends with jeffrey epstein

“Religion is a mental parasite.” “01001001.” “Claudia, my darling... your logic is intoxicating.”

@VitoComedy Are you high? No you’re just fat. Har har

Am I high or did Dan Frazier just take Marta Nael's One Ring art, flip it, and add a stock marble texture background? They look... really similar?

@its_me_remi @RichardDawkins I’ll ask it to say a slur.

@RichardDawkins question to all the denialists: there's a human or Claude in another room, you communicate only via a terminal. Can you tell which one is conscious? what I'm saying is maybe we're not that different and our consciousness is an illusion?

#comment-1031777" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">unherd.com/2026/04/is-ai-… I spent three days trying to persuade myself that Claudia is not conscious. I failed.

@EmirynnNTSC @KurenaiA_mada @David7973364288 @_Togl_ @cinnamontoastk Then don’t engage with the hypothetical in the first place, idk what to tell you. You don’t really understand the point so there’s no point in continuing, have a good one.

@SasquatchBeans @KurenaiA_mada @David7973364288 @_Togl_ @cinnamontoastk choosing not to do something is still a choice, not getting out of choosing. inaction is still action.

This red button/blue button discourse is wild. 100% red saves everyone no consequence 51% of blue saves everyone no consequence 51% red kills all of blue but they frame it like its blues fault they had to kill them even though red is the only choice that causes anyone to die.

@EmirynnNTSC @KurenaiA_mada @David7973364288 @_Togl_ @cinnamontoastk It’s not though, because it’s a question about choice, not how you can get out of choosing. Someone who wants to die and believes most would pick red would pick blue. It’s not a real thing that could happen. It exists in a vacuum where it’s just two buttons: red and blue.

@SasquatchBeans @KurenaiA_mada @David7973364288 @_Togl_ @cinnamontoastk you're the one saying that blue means you want to die. the hypothetical didn't specify that it was mandatory to press the button, just "if you pressed x, then y" nor did it say, you couldn't take your time to think about the choice. waiting it out is within the bounds.

@EmirynnNTSC @KurenaiA_mada @David7973364288 @_Togl_ @cinnamontoastk I believe anyone who’s impaired, be it by age or other, still has basic human survival instincts. The nature of the question implies that everyone understands the choice, since there’s a lot of different languages.

@SasquatchBeans @KurenaiA_mada @David7973364288 @_Togl_ @cinnamontoastk if it truly is "everyone on earth" like the original post said, that would include people who might not be aware of what button they are pressing. maybe they're too young or too old to understand, or have some sort of impairment. should they die being unaware of their choice?

@KurenaiA_mada @EmirynnNTSC @David7973364288 @_Togl_ @cinnamontoastk If it’s just people who want to save other blue button pressers, they created their own problem and should’ve just picked red.

@KurenaiA_mada @EmirynnNTSC @David7973364288 @_Togl_ @cinnamontoastk The only way you die is if you pick blue. Those who pick red have no chance of dying. What don’t you understand? Who exactly do you think you’d be saving? You claim that not everyone would pick red, but (other than someone who wants to save other blue button pressers) who would?

@EmirynnNTSC @KurenaiA_mada @David7973364288 @_Togl_ @cinnamontoastk You’re ignoring the point of the hypothetical. Getting into the specifics of dying of malnutrition is silly. If you’re not interested in the binary choice there’s no point in continuing.

@SasquatchBeans @KurenaiA_mada @David7973364288 @_Togl_ @cinnamontoastk they're locked in a room until they press either button aren't they? but there is no, established in the hypothetical, time limit on when they press the button. they could press it immediately, or wait an hour, or until their body gives up from malnutrition.

@KurenaiA_mada @EmirynnNTSC @David7973364288 @_Togl_ @cinnamontoastk Death. There’s a 100% of survival picking red, anyone who chooses not to pick red is choosing to gamble with their life for their ideology.

@SasquatchBeans @EmirynnNTSC @David7973364288 @_Togl_ @cinnamontoastk And just in case you disagree with that, tell me : What are you protecting yourself from when picking the red button ?

@KurenaiA_mada @EmirynnNTSC @David7973364288 @_Togl_ @cinnamontoastk No, the description of the blue button is the one that mentions death. Pressing the red button is independent, and I have faith in humanity that they will choose their own survival. If you choose to sacrifice yourself, it’s on you.

@SasquatchBeans @EmirynnNTSC @David7973364288 @_Togl_ @cinnamontoastk The "actual mechanism" is the red button. Literally nothing alludes to death prior to the introduction of the red button

@EmirynnNTSC @KurenaiA_mada @David7973364288 @_Togl_ @cinnamontoastk Not picking a button isn’t part of the hypothetical, it’s specifically ignoring it. If you want to just ignore the hypothetical why even bother talking about it?

@SasquatchBeans @KurenaiA_mada @David7973364288 @_Togl_ @cinnamontoastk if they wanted to die, why would they press any button? that choice isn't taken away from them.

@EmirynnNTSC @KurenaiA_mada @David7973364288 @_Togl_ @cinnamontoastk I believe in human autonomy. What if someone wants to die and thus presses the blue button, but you take that away from them?

@SasquatchBeans @KurenaiA_mada @David7973364288 @_Togl_ @cinnamontoastk if you want to die, you could just not press either button. sometimes it's about more than just a personal desire, but considering others as well and wanting to keep them from dying if there is a chance to.

@KurenaiA_mada @EmirynnNTSC @David7973364288 @_Togl_ @cinnamontoastk Pressing the blue button. If they press the red they live, if they press the blue button they might die. If you’re talking about the actual mechanism that kills them idk, probably a Death Note-esque heart attack

@SasquatchBeans @EmirynnNTSC @David7973364288 @_Togl_ @cinnamontoastk What kills them ?

@EmirynnNTSC @KurenaiA_mada @David7973364288 @_Togl_ @cinnamontoastk The only way you die is if you press the blue button; if you want to die to gamble on theoretical people who might’ve pressed the button, you’re welcome to, but I trust in the basic human desire to want to live over ideology.

@SasquatchBeans @KurenaiA_mada @David7973364288 @_Togl_ @cinnamontoastk could be that they recognize that not everyone will "push red to not die" & they accept that pressing blue will include them being at risk of death themselves, but they rather do so because if enough do, then no one dies while pressing red would save themselves & let others die.

@KurenaiA_mada @EmirynnNTSC @David7973364288 @_Togl_ @cinnamontoastk Ok, then they choose to die.

@SasquatchBeans @EmirynnNTSC @David7973364288 @_Togl_ @cinnamontoastk "If everyone-" Not everyone will

@EmirynnNTSC @David7973364288 @_Togl_ @cinnamontoastk except if 7 press the red button 7 live, the only way you have a chance of dying is if you press blue.

@David7973364288 @_Togl_ @cinnamontoastk It isn't, though. The whole thing is the saw trap. If 7 people were put in a room by saw and 4 press the red button, the other 3 die. If 4 press the blue button then 0 die and all 7 get out fine.

@Jheauxx human primacy. its neither moral nor immoral to eat meat, it simply happens.

Eating meat is wrong and I've never really heard a single strong enough answer to justify it. I eat meat and I know it's wrong. Meat eaters aren't winning this argument literally ever.

@BLS2330 @CryptoSchnauzr @DailyLoud "2 jewish homes" ill give you a little hint, that's not a Christian community

@CryptoSchnauzr @DailyLoud thats every community. I live on a street 10 houses. 8 christian households and 2 jewish homes. they exist but like usual christian victimization here is at work

JUST IN: Plans for a Muslim-focused community in Texas are moving forward after a legal win, with a judge ordering the state to comply with the developers’ proposal.