Colin Scott

68.9K posts

Colin Scott banner
Colin Scott

Colin Scott

@Scott12Colin

Newcastle United ST holder; Notts County; Gateshead FC; UK Sub; Buzz Lightyear of Brexit; NoVaccinePassports.

Northumberland Katılım Mayıs 2014
2.6K Takip Edilen744 Takipçiler
Colin Scott retweetledi
Toby Young
Toby Young@toadmeister·
A family's solar panels have exploded, tearing a hole straight through the roof while they were still inside the house, with footage capturing the terrifying moment their £600,000 newbuild was engulfed in flames. dailysceptic.org/2026/05/27/sol…
English
286
1.3K
2.3K
213.6K
Colin Scott retweetledi
M.A. Rothman
M.A. Rothman@MichaelARothman·
𝐁𝐑𝐈𝐓𝐀𝐈𝐍 𝐏𝐀𝐘𝐒 𝐔𝐏 𝐓𝐎 £𝟏𝟕𝟎,𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝐀 𝐘𝐄𝐀𝐑 𝐈𝐍 𝐖𝐄𝐋𝐅𝐀𝐑𝐄 𝐅𝐎𝐑 𝐎𝐍𝐄 𝐌𝐀𝐍 𝐖𝐈𝐓𝐇 𝐄𝐋𝐄𝐕𝐄𝐍 𝐖𝐈𝐕𝐄𝐒 Conservative MP 𝐊𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐞 𝐋𝐚𝐦 was asked on GB News about her colleague Helen Watley's call to ban benefit payments to men with multiple wives. The numbers Lam laid out are not a typo. Four wives: £𝟕𝟖,𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝐚 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫 in UK benefits. Eleven wives: 𝐮𝐩 𝐭𝐨 £𝟏𝟕𝟎,𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝐚 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫. Lam didn't dodge: “𝘗𝘰𝘭𝘺𝘨𝘢𝘮𝘺 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘪𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘨𝘢𝘭 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘺 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘩𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘳𝘦𝘥𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘺𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘴. 𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘧 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘺 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘸𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘭𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘸𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘮𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝘢 𝘭𝘪𝘧𝘦 𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦, 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘯𝘦𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘢𝘣𝘪𝘥𝘦 𝘣𝘺 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘯𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘴.” Her conclusion was the obvious one. Taxpayers — people working forty-hour weeks — are funding the legally-impossible household structure of new arrivals, at six-figure rates per household. “𝘐𝘵’𝘴 𝘢𝘣𝘴𝘰𝘭𝘶𝘵𝘦𝘭𝘺 𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘨.” 𝐈𝐟 𝐩𝐨𝐥𝐲𝐠𝐚𝐦𝐲 𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐥 𝐢𝐧 𝐁𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐧, 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐁𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐬𝐡 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐝𝐨𝐞𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐠𝐞𝐭 𝐭𝐨 𝐩𝐚𝐲 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐢𝐭. 𝘝𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘰 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 @𝘎𝘉𝘕𝘌𝘞𝘚
English
437
3.7K
9K
176.6K
Colin Scott retweetledi
Daniel Hannan
Daniel Hannan@DanielJHannan·
Imagine looking at this country – the highest taxes since WW2, debt at 100 per cent of GDP, 3,000 people a day signing on as too sick to work, public sector productivity below where it was in 2020, wastrel money-printing, the minimum wage up by two thirds in 5 years, the triple lock regarded as sacred – and concluding that the problem is “40 years of neoliberalism”.
English
54
216
1.1K
40.1K
Alex Phillips
Alex Phillips@ThatAlexWoman·
Who does it ultimately serve when Restore attacks Reform, losing them support? In the event Reform drop ~5-7% in a General Election, due to Restore, they'd be forced into a coalition with the Tories to stop a socialist coalition Last year Cyabra ran a report into Lowe's sudden social media boost. You don't become an overnight sensation online with only 8% name recognition The report revealed a sophisticated Bot operation: cyabra.com/blog/online-ma… Who has the money and motive to do such a thing? Around the same time Rupert and I had a long phone call. He told me the Tories were desperately courting him. Or seemingly him, them This was not a secret. Read for yourself. It suggests he will 'work for' the Tories: thesun.co.uk/news/33989923/… I've no idea who at the same time told @elonmusk that Farage should be replaced by Lowe. That's the final missing piece of the puzzle Now, back in 2019, when we were MEPs and Boris called the election, Lowe collaborated on a list with the Tories called 'Men And Measures' with Dougie Smith. It was a list promising peerages, knighthoods and positions to Brexit Party candidates to stand down. My colleague Robert Rowland blew the whistle to me I called it out on Question Time and handed files to the Met Police youtu.be/R20EnPQwPQ8?si… Lowe became the first Brexit Party candidate to step down in Dudley North just before nominations closed and Farage was due to hold a big event there politicshome.com/news/article/b… Ask yourself today Does Lowe criticise the Tories? Or just attack Reform? Is Restore standing in Aberdeen South where Tories are putting in loads of resources? Or just Makerfield, where they only target Reform voters? How come Tories are silent on extreme elements of Restore - the only party to be so? Why did Kemi give Lowe a Committee appointment? bbc.co.uk/news/articles/… Tory Peer Lord Agnew donated £20k to Lowe in 2025 consolidate.org.uk/database/entit… This may all be circumstantial, but it's clear Lowe still has close connections with the Tories, begged to be part of them, but instead decided to make a party to attack Reform politicshome.com/news/article/e… It is fact that the party to ultimately benefit from reducing Reform support is The Tories. It's the only way they might be able to get close to power by ensuring Reform cannot form a majority government. To do that, they needed a vehicle to go after Farage Without a majority in Parliament, Reform won't be able to do anything they have proposed. Leaving the ECHR, deporting illegals and foreign criminals, cracking down on Islamism, overhauling immigration. The Lords, Commons, activist lawyers, civil service, will try to block everything unless Reform have a big enough majority to hold their nerve. If they're forced into.a pact with the Tories to stop a hard left coalition, it means everything would have to be passed by the Tories. The same bloody people would still be in power. The establishment wins, yet again. I know some Restore fanatics are fooled into thinking Reform is 'controlled opposition'. I suspect the opposite is true I write this not because I'm working for anyone, nor have an axe to grind nor have gone mad, nor have I been promised anything, nor am I having a sordid affair I know things others don't know because I'm one of vanishingly few people who had a front row seat for the past 6 years I know the people involved, and I know how politics works I want my country to get the radical change it needs. Lowe stands in the way of that. And I suspect, not by accident, joining the dots above
YouTube video
YouTube
English
2.2K
1.2K
3.2K
454.6K
Colin Scott retweetledi
Allison Pearson
Allison Pearson@AllisonPearson·
Scottish Police spent over 3 years and £2.5m investigating Peter Murrell/Nicola Sturgeon. Court date set AFTER the elections. Why? Sturgeon said she “fully cooperated” with police but seems she said nothing for 7 hours. Why? How do you not notice £86,000 Amazon deliveries?
English
142
970
4.6K
46.3K
Colin Scott retweetledi
Paul Embery
Paul Embery@PaulEmbery·
My word. This is incredible. A real-life version of that scene from The Life of Brian: "Stan, you haven't got a womb! Where's the foetus going to gestate?! You going to keep it in a box?!"
English
1K
4.3K
21.9K
803K
Suella Braverman
Suella Braverman@SuellaBraverman·
Labour MPs have named me in this letter. It is not racist to speak the truth. I will never stop speaking up for the victims of Grooming Gangs or the victims of Islamist terrorism. To do so is not Islamophobic. It is absolutely essential if we are to get justice and keep our country safe.
Sky News@SkyNews

EXCLUSIVE: Labour MPs report Reform UK to equalities watchdog for alleged Islamophobia | @MhariAurora news.sky.com/story/labour-m…

English
666
2.2K
12.3K
307.2K
Colin Scott retweetledi
Nigel Farage MP
Nigel Farage MP@Nigel_Farage·
I have written to the Charity Commission regarding Hope Not Hate’s political activities.
Nigel Farage MP tweet mediaNigel Farage MP tweet media
English
1.2K
2.2K
9.7K
645.4K
Labour Press
Labour Press@labourpress·
Reform's Makerfield candidate actively encouraged people not to take life saving vaccines. He's completely unfit for office.
Labour Press tweet media
English
6.6K
632
1.8K
429.1K
Colin Scott retweetledi
Colin Scott retweetledi
Connor Tomlinson
Connor Tomlinson@Con_Tomlinson·
More than a third of children born in Britain have first-generation immigrant parents. Five percent of children are born to Indian immigrants. Add to that statistic children born to second- and third-generation immigrants, and my children may already be a minority among their own generation. This is an existential national crisis, but almost every politician in this country refuses to do anything about it.
Office for National Statistics (ONS)@ONS

34.6% of live births in 2025 were to mothers born outside of the UK, an increase from 33.9% in 2024. India remains the most frequent country of birth for non-UK-born mothers (4.7% of births) and fathers (4.9% of births) for the fourth year in a row.

English
44
334
2.2K
39K
Colin Scott retweetledi
The Free Speech Union
The Free Speech Union@SpeechUnion·
26 Labour MPs have reported Reform UK to the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) for alleged Islamophobia. This comes after the Government announced its official definition of Islamophobia — repackaged as “anti-Muslim hatred” — in March. The definition has already been weaponised to silence individuals, including prominent politicians, for criticising or challenging Islam, its practices, and its history. In their letter, the MPs claim that “over the last few years, we have seen a number of @reformparty_uk politicians and members make comments that are clearly racist and discriminate against ethnic minorities, and in particular, Muslims.” As evidence, they cite @Nigel_Farage criticising the mass Muslim prayer event in Trafalgar Square. Parliament voted to abolish blasphemy laws in 2008. In a free society, no religion should receive special protection or be shielded from legitimate criticism. Read more below 👇
The Free Speech Union tweet media
English
475
1.5K
4.1K
134.8K
Colin Scott retweetledi
Daniel Hannan
Daniel Hannan@DanielJHannan·
A reminder that, under our soil, we have 1.5 billion barrels of oil, 150 billion cubic meters of natural gas and 300 years' supply of coal. ofgem.gov.uk/press-release/…
English
192
1.5K
4.3K
61.5K
Colin Scott retweetledi
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧@JChimirie66677·
A Charity Whose Trustees Read Like a Labour Honours List Is Trying to Win a By-Election. Hope Not Hate is a registered charitable trust. Charities operating in the political arena are bound by a simple and unambiguous rule. They must stress their independence. They must not encourage support for any particular party or candidate. They must not give funding to political parties or politicians. These are not guidelines. They are legal obligations enforced by the Charity Commission. Nigel Farage has written to the Charity Commission citing what he describes as a clear breach of those obligations in the Makerfield by-election constituency ahead of the June 18th poll. The facts documented in his letter are precise. Hope Not Hate sent leaflets to addresses in Makerfield encouraging voters to join the local fightback against Reform and scan a QR code to participate. The leaflet was promoted by Nick Lowles on behalf of Hope Not Hate Limited, a private company. That private company received £787,858 in grants from Hope Unlimited Charitable Trust in 2024, representing almost the entirety of the charitable trust's expenditure for the year. The action apparently changed nothing. The trustees of Hope Unlimited Charitable Trust and the directors and former directors of Hope Not Hate Limited include Frances O'Grady, former TUC General Secretary and Labour Peer. Gurinder Josan CBE, current Chair of HUCT and Labour MP. Jon Cruddas, former Labour MP. Alison Phillips, Chief Executive of LabourTogether, a Labour supporting think tank. Ruth Lauren Anderson, Labour Peer. Anna Turley, former Labour MP and Chair of the Labour Party. A charitable trust whose trustees are overwhelmingly current or former Labour politicians is funding a private company to distribute leaflets in a by-election constituency explicitly targeting Reform and backing the Labour candidate. The Charity Commission's own guidance states that a charity must steer clear of explicitly comparing its views with those of political parties or candidates taking part in an election. The leaflet's footer, to join the local fightback against Reform, does precisely that. This is not the first time the Charity Commission has been required to intervene. It opened a compliance case in July 2025 and concluded it in January 2026, declaring itself satisfied that the charity had taken sufficient steps to distinguish itself from Hope Not Hate Limited. The case was closed. Within months the same funding arrangement appears to have resumed with charitable funds flowing into electoral leaflets in a specific by-election constituency. The Commission closed the case. The behaviour apparently continued. The Makerfield by-election is the vehicle through which Andy Burnham intends to return to Westminster and challenge for the Labour leadership. Reform took every council seat in the area at the May local elections with 46.2 percent of the vote. The stakes could not be higher. And a charity whose trustees read like a Labour Party honours list is spending charitable funds to help deliver the result. The Charity Commission has 22 days to act before the votes are cast on June 18th. It has already investigated this arrangement once and the funding continued unchanged. Charitable money is being spent to influence a by-election that could determine who leads the country. The regulator that failed to stop it in January faces a simple question. Will it act before the result or after it no longer matters? "The leaflet was promoted by Nick Lowles on behalf of Hope Not Hate Limited, a private company."
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 tweet media
English
286
1.8K
3.5K
62.9K
Colin Scott retweetledi
Liz Truss
Liz Truss@trussliz·
The Blair/Brown era was responsible for the Bank of England Act, Human Rights Act, Constitutional Reform Act, Equality Act, Climate Change Act and more. Power was taken from the elected and given to progressive bureaucrats and judges. That's why Britain is an ungovernable mess.
Liz Truss tweet media
English
418
1.8K
5.3K
85.3K
Colin Scott retweetledi
Pete North
Pete North@FUDdaily·
I've just read Blair's essay in full. There's a few self-evident bangers in there and it's mostly a warning against backsliding into socialism and the decrepitude of leftism. He offers some direction for a Labour government, prioritising growth, but I get the sense he's not really got anything real to say. He's not really speaking to my concerns; that Britain is turning into a lawless, squalid shit tip with ineffectual government, a decrepit police and justice system, a shredded social contract, chaotic public finances, and a politics riven with sectarianism and corruption - and he doesn't acknowledge that parts of Britain now look like a foreign country entirely - that will never resemble his multicultural nirvana. Blair's "radical centrism" doesn't speak to any of this this at all. His essay is a plea to maintain the status quo, seemingly oblivious to how rapidly and seriously the country is deteriorating. For this, he has no answers, and wouldn't raise these issues since he'd have to acknowledging his own role in bringing us to this unhappy place. On that basis, much though I enjoy reading sharp thoughtful prose, Mr Blair can still fuck off as far away as the James Webb telescope can see.
English
28
63
509
16.1K