Sergio

For decades, employers argued that the right to strike was not protected under international law because ILO Convention No. 87 never expressly mentioned it. Today, the International Court of Justice settled that dispute. In a 10–4 Advisory Opinion, the ICJ affirmed that the right to strike is an essential component of freedom of association under Convention No. 87. The Court recognised that workers cannot meaningfully defend their interests if the withdrawal of labour is stripped away. This is not merely symbolic. It is now the most authoritative judicial confirmation yet that the right to strike is a protected international labour right. For governments, employers, courts, and labour institutions across the world, including Kenya, the message from The Hague is unmistakable: labour rights are not decorative constitutional promises. They are enforceable democratic guarantees.

For decades, employers argued that the right to strike was not protected under international law because ILO Convention No. 87 never expressly mentioned it. Today, the International Court of Justice settled that dispute. In a 10–4 Advisory Opinion, the ICJ affirmed that the right to strike is an essential component of freedom of association under Convention No. 87. The Court recognised that workers cannot meaningfully defend their interests if the withdrawal of labour is stripped away. This is not merely symbolic. It is now the most authoritative judicial confirmation yet that the right to strike is a protected international labour right. For governments, employers, courts, and labour institutions across the world, including Kenya, the message from The Hague is unmistakable: labour rights are not decorative constitutional promises. They are enforceable democratic guarantees.

For decades, employers argued that the right to strike was not protected under international law because ILO Convention No. 87 never expressly mentioned it. Today, the International Court of Justice settled that dispute. In a 10–4 Advisory Opinion, the ICJ affirmed that the right to strike is an essential component of freedom of association under Convention No. 87. The Court recognised that workers cannot meaningfully defend their interests if the withdrawal of labour is stripped away. This is not merely symbolic. It is now the most authoritative judicial confirmation yet that the right to strike is a protected international labour right. For governments, employers, courts, and labour institutions across the world, including Kenya, the message from The Hague is unmistakable: labour rights are not decorative constitutional promises. They are enforceable democratic guarantees.

For decades, employers argued that the right to strike was not protected under international law because ILO Convention No. 87 never expressly mentioned it. Today, the International Court of Justice settled that dispute. In a 10–4 Advisory Opinion, the ICJ affirmed that the right to strike is an essential component of freedom of association under Convention No. 87. The Court recognised that workers cannot meaningfully defend their interests if the withdrawal of labour is stripped away. This is not merely symbolic. It is now the most authoritative judicial confirmation yet that the right to strike is a protected international labour right. For governments, employers, courts, and labour institutions across the world, including Kenya, the message from The Hague is unmistakable: labour rights are not decorative constitutional promises. They are enforceable democratic guarantees.

For decades, employers argued that the right to strike was not protected under international law because ILO Convention No. 87 never expressly mentioned it. Today, the International Court of Justice settled that dispute. In a 10–4 Advisory Opinion, the ICJ affirmed that the right to strike is an essential component of freedom of association under Convention No. 87. The Court recognised that workers cannot meaningfully defend their interests if the withdrawal of labour is stripped away. This is not merely symbolic. It is now the most authoritative judicial confirmation yet that the right to strike is a protected international labour right. For governments, employers, courts, and labour institutions across the world, including Kenya, the message from The Hague is unmistakable: labour rights are not decorative constitutional promises. They are enforceable democratic guarantees.

For decades, employers argued that the right to strike was not protected under international law because ILO Convention No. 87 never expressly mentioned it. Today, the International Court of Justice settled that dispute. In a 10–4 Advisory Opinion, the ICJ affirmed that the right to strike is an essential component of freedom of association under Convention No. 87. The Court recognised that workers cannot meaningfully defend their interests if the withdrawal of labour is stripped away. This is not merely symbolic. It is now the most authoritative judicial confirmation yet that the right to strike is a protected international labour right. For governments, employers, courts, and labour institutions across the world, including Kenya, the message from The Hague is unmistakable: labour rights are not decorative constitutional promises. They are enforceable democratic guarantees.

For decades, employers argued that the right to strike was not protected under international law because ILO Convention No. 87 never expressly mentioned it. Today, the International Court of Justice settled that dispute. In a 10–4 Advisory Opinion, the ICJ affirmed that the right to strike is an essential component of freedom of association under Convention No. 87. The Court recognised that workers cannot meaningfully defend their interests if the withdrawal of labour is stripped away. This is not merely symbolic. It is now the most authoritative judicial confirmation yet that the right to strike is a protected international labour right. For governments, employers, courts, and labour institutions across the world, including Kenya, the message from The Hague is unmistakable: labour rights are not decorative constitutional promises. They are enforceable democratic guarantees.

For decades, employers argued that the right to strike was not protected under international law because ILO Convention No. 87 never expressly mentioned it. Today, the International Court of Justice settled that dispute. In a 10–4 Advisory Opinion, the ICJ affirmed that the right to strike is an essential component of freedom of association under Convention No. 87. The Court recognised that workers cannot meaningfully defend their interests if the withdrawal of labour is stripped away. This is not merely symbolic. It is now the most authoritative judicial confirmation yet that the right to strike is a protected international labour right. For governments, employers, courts, and labour institutions across the world, including Kenya, the message from The Hague is unmistakable: labour rights are not decorative constitutional promises. They are enforceable democratic guarantees.

For decades, employers argued that the right to strike was not protected under international law because ILO Convention No. 87 never expressly mentioned it. Today, the International Court of Justice settled that dispute. In a 10–4 Advisory Opinion, the ICJ affirmed that the right to strike is an essential component of freedom of association under Convention No. 87. The Court recognised that workers cannot meaningfully defend their interests if the withdrawal of labour is stripped away. This is not merely symbolic. It is now the most authoritative judicial confirmation yet that the right to strike is a protected international labour right. For governments, employers, courts, and labour institutions across the world, including Kenya, the message from The Hague is unmistakable: labour rights are not decorative constitutional promises. They are enforceable democratic guarantees.

For decades, employers argued that the right to strike was not protected under international law because ILO Convention No. 87 never expressly mentioned it. Today, the International Court of Justice settled that dispute. In a 10–4 Advisory Opinion, the ICJ affirmed that the right to strike is an essential component of freedom of association under Convention No. 87. The Court recognised that workers cannot meaningfully defend their interests if the withdrawal of labour is stripped away. This is not merely symbolic. It is now the most authoritative judicial confirmation yet that the right to strike is a protected international labour right. For governments, employers, courts, and labour institutions across the world, including Kenya, the message from The Hague is unmistakable: labour rights are not decorative constitutional promises. They are enforceable democratic guarantees.

For decades, employers argued that the right to strike was not protected under international law because ILO Convention No. 87 never expressly mentioned it. Today, the International Court of Justice settled that dispute. In a 10–4 Advisory Opinion, the ICJ affirmed that the right to strike is an essential component of freedom of association under Convention No. 87. The Court recognised that workers cannot meaningfully defend their interests if the withdrawal of labour is stripped away. This is not merely symbolic. It is now the most authoritative judicial confirmation yet that the right to strike is a protected international labour right. For governments, employers, courts, and labour institutions across the world, including Kenya, the message from The Hague is unmistakable: labour rights are not decorative constitutional promises. They are enforceable democratic guarantees.

For decades, employers argued that the right to strike was not protected under international law because ILO Convention No. 87 never expressly mentioned it. Today, the International Court of Justice settled that dispute. In a 10–4 Advisory Opinion, the ICJ affirmed that the right to strike is an essential component of freedom of association under Convention No. 87. The Court recognised that workers cannot meaningfully defend their interests if the withdrawal of labour is stripped away. This is not merely symbolic. It is now the most authoritative judicial confirmation yet that the right to strike is a protected international labour right. For governments, employers, courts, and labour institutions across the world, including Kenya, the message from The Hague is unmistakable: labour rights are not decorative constitutional promises. They are enforceable democratic guarantees.

For decades, employers argued that the right to strike was not protected under international law because ILO Convention No. 87 never expressly mentioned it. Today, the International Court of Justice settled that dispute. In a 10–4 Advisory Opinion, the ICJ affirmed that the right to strike is an essential component of freedom of association under Convention No. 87. The Court recognised that workers cannot meaningfully defend their interests if the withdrawal of labour is stripped away. This is not merely symbolic. It is now the most authoritative judicial confirmation yet that the right to strike is a protected international labour right. For governments, employers, courts, and labour institutions across the world, including Kenya, the message from The Hague is unmistakable: labour rights are not decorative constitutional promises. They are enforceable democratic guarantees.

"Tenemos el triángulo del litio en esta región: Argentina, Bolivia y Chile tienen el 60% del litio del mundo, que es vital para las nuevas tecnologías. Tenemos mucho que hacer". Laura Richardson, quién fue jefa del Comando Sur del Ejército de EEUU. Que EEUU quiera controlar Bolivia no es casual, ni quiere llevar ninguna democracia, se trata de saqueo de recursos y de robar el mayor depósito de litio del mundo.

For decades, employers argued that the right to strike was not protected under international law because ILO Convention No. 87 never expressly mentioned it. Today, the International Court of Justice settled that dispute. In a 10–4 Advisory Opinion, the ICJ affirmed that the right to strike is an essential component of freedom of association under Convention No. 87. The Court recognised that workers cannot meaningfully defend their interests if the withdrawal of labour is stripped away. This is not merely symbolic. It is now the most authoritative judicial confirmation yet that the right to strike is a protected international labour right. For governments, employers, courts, and labour institutions across the world, including Kenya, the message from The Hague is unmistakable: labour rights are not decorative constitutional promises. They are enforceable democratic guarantees.

"Tenemos el triángulo del litio en esta región: Argentina, Bolivia y Chile tienen el 60% del litio del mundo, que es vital para las nuevas tecnologías. Tenemos mucho que hacer". Laura Richardson, quién fue jefa del Comando Sur del Ejército de EEUU. Que EEUU quiera controlar Bolivia no es casual, ni quiere llevar ninguna democracia, se trata de saqueo de recursos y de robar el mayor depósito de litio del mundo.