SezHDIGH

34.1K posts

SezHDIGH banner
SezHDIGH

SezHDIGH

@SezehasFITF

OT5 #HDIGH / #KATTDO Are You Listening Yet? 🏳️‍🌈 💙💚

Katılım Ağustos 2022
2.1K Takip Edilen1.3K Takipçiler
SezHDIGH retweetledi
Pale Waves LIVE HQ🖤
Pale Waves LIVE HQ🖤@PALEWAVESLIVE·
📸 | ‘playing the O2 with @ louist91, last show of tour 💔’ — palewaves via Instagram
Pale Waves LIVE HQ🖤 tweet media
English
3
17
508
6.8K
SezHDIGH retweetledi
@·
HE HAS HORNS. 🥹🥹🥹
 tweet media
English
4
49
798
9.6K
SezHDIGH retweetledi
L 𝜗𝜚
L 𝜗𝜚@louisunshinerry·
“I’m not gonna lie when I walked out at the start of lemonade I felt a bit emotional to be fair, look at what we’ve done, it’s fucking crazy, I want everyone in this room to be proud of themselves tonight, look at what we’ve fucking created thank you from the bottom of my heart”
English
7
199
1.4K
13.4K
SezHDIGH retweetledi
LTHQ
LTHQ@LTHQOfficial·
London tonight!
LTHQ tweet media
English
37
901
4.4K
50.1K
SezHDIGH retweetledi
Ellie
Ellie@ChaoticcCrayon·
If you strip it down, the “why” isn’t mysterious it’s business. The industry has always been built on selling a feeling, not just music. Especially with pop acts, and even more with boybands/heartthrobs, the product is fantasy. The idea that the artist is desirable, relatable, and in some way “available” to the audience. That fantasy drives fan loyalty, merch, ticket sales… everything. So when an identity or even a perceived identity is seen as disrupting that fantasy, labels and management step in. Not always in some dramatic, villain way, but in very calculated, risk-averse decisions. Historically, they’ve worried about a few things: Marketability across audiences They want the widest possible reach. For decades, executives believed (right or wrong) that being openly LGBTQ+ would limit radio play, international markets, brand deals, or certain demographics. Fan projection A huge part of fandom, especially in teen pop, is projection. Fans imagine themselves with the artist. Once that illusion shifts, labels fear a drop in engagement. You see it with the reaction to public relationships… now layer identity on top of that. Brand partnerships and money Endorsements, TV appearances, sponsorships… all of it used to come with unspoken “image expectations.” The safer and more neutral the image, the easier it was to secure deals. Control of narrative If the industry doesn’t control the story, they can’t control the rollout. So instead of risking unpredictable reactions, they delay, soften, or redirect. A lot of these decisions are made by executives who are older, risk-averse, and operating on outdated assumptions about what audiences would accept. So you get the patterns I’ve been talking about: not always outright lies, but strategic silence, carefully curated relationships “no labels” answers and timing things for when it’s “safe” It’s less about one big conspiracy and more about a system that prioritizes profit and predictability over authenticity. That’s why you see the same pattern repeat across decades, just with slightly different packaging each time.
English
0
6
24
964
SezHDIGH retweetledi
Ellie
Ellie@ChaoticcCrayon·
Closeting in the music industry isn’t some “fan conspiracy,” it’s a long-standing PR strategy wrapped in contracts, branding, and risk management. Artists are marketed, not just as musicians, but as products. When labels think someone’s identity might “limit” mass appeal, they don’t celebrate it, they control it. They build narratives, assign relationships, keep things vague or redirect the conversation entirely. It’s not always loud or obvious either. Sometimes it looks like carefully curated dating histories “no labels” answers in interviews sudden, perfectly timed relationships that align with promo cycles The thing people don’t want to admit is it’s not always the artist’s choice. Power dynamics in this industry exist. When your career, contracts, and millions of dollars are on the line, “authenticity” becomes negotiable. You don’t have to believe every theory to recognize the pattern.
English
9
87
330
16.1K