Shabinz

5.6K posts

Shabinz

Shabinz

@Shabinz2

Katılım Şubat 2021
259 Takip Edilen244 Takipçiler
Shabinz retweetledi
_T1hS_0N_
_T1hS_0N_@Stef_carpedm·
SEC found that, from May 2019 through July 2020, GTS failed to file any SARs. Determined that failure was caused by the company’s anti-money laundering (“AML”) surveillance program, which was incapable of detecting, investigating or reporting suspicious activity at the time.
English
3
29
56
835
Shabinz retweetledi
Ann Vandersteel™️
Ann Vandersteel™️@annvandersteel·
President Trump, FINRA and the SEC are moving to allow deletion of CAT data older than three years. This is not routine. This risks erasing critical evidence of market manipulation, naked shorting, and systemic fraud. At the very moment Americans are demanding transparency, regulators are preparing to shrink the window of accountability. You have the authority to act. Sign this Executive Order. Enforce strict T+1 settlement. Criminalize naked shorting. Hold all participants accountable. Preserve all CAT data. This is about protecting the financial future of every American and restoring trust in our markets. Do not let the evidence disappear. Please sign the order. @realDonaldTrump #MMTLP #GME #AMC #DJT @KurtOlsen_USA @LegalBrains @RealTheoWold EXECUTIVE ORDER (proposed) Strengthening Securities Settlement Integrity, Reforming Regulation SHO, and Combating Fraudulent Market Practices By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. 78a et seq., the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. 77a et seq., and 3 U.S.C. 301, it is hereby ordered: Section 1. Purpose The integrity, transparency, and lawful operation of the United States securities markets are essential to the national economy, the protection of investors, and the preservation of public trust. Abusive trading practices, including persistent failures to deliver, manipulative short selling practices, and the creation or circulation of securities interests not backed by valid issuance, undermine market stability and may violate federal law. This Order directs strengthened enforcement of existing law and mandates regulatory reform to eliminate systemic settlement failures and unlawful short selling practices. Section 2. Policy It is the policy of the United States to: (a) Ensure strict compliance with lawful securities settlement requirements (b) Eliminate persistent failures to deliver and abusive short selling practices (c) Prevent manipulative or deceptive conduct prohibited under Sections 9 and 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 (d) Promote fair, orderly, and efficient markets pursuant to Section 15(c) (e) Protect investors and strengthen confidence in United States capital markets (f) Encourage reporting of violations through whistleblower protections under 15 U.S.C. 78u-6 Section 3. Enforcement of Settlement Requirements (a) The Securities and Exchange Commission shall, pursuant to its authority under Section 17A of the Securities Exchange Act, ensure strict enforcement of the T plus 1 settlement cycle. (b) Clearing agencies, broker dealers, and market participants shall be required to implement systems reasonably designed to prevent failures to deliver. (c) The Commission shall require enhanced, standardized, and public reporting of settlement failures and close out activity. Section 4. Reform and Strengthening of Regulation SHO (a) Within 90 days of this Order, the Securities and Exchange Commission shall propose and, as appropriate, adopt amendments to Regulation SHO to strengthen enforcement and eliminate systemic abuse. (b) Such amendments shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, include: 1.Mandatory Pre Borrow Requirement Require that, prior to effecting any short sale, a broker dealer must obtain and document a confirmed borrow of the security, eliminating reliance solely on locate arrangements where such reliance contributes to settlement failures. 2.Accelerated Close Out Requirements Require immediate or same day close out of failures to deliver for all equity securities, including threshold and non threshold securities, and eliminate extended close out timelines that permit repeated failures. 3.Prohibition on Reset Transactions Prohibit the use of options, swaps, or other derivative or structured transactions designed to evade close out requirements or mask failures to deliver. 4.Enhanced Threshold Securities Standards Strengthen the criteria for threshold securities and require automatic trading restrictions where persistent failures occur. 5.Real Time Transparency Require public disclosure, on a frequent and standardized basis, of aggregate short positions, failures to deliver, and securities lending data sufficient to promote market transparency. 6.Strict Locate Enforcement Clarify and enforce the requirement that any locate must be based on a bona fide and verifiable source of borrowable securities, with liability for false or unsupported locates. (c) The Commission shall ensure that Regulation SHO is administered in a manner that prevents the creation of synthetic or unbacked share supply that distorts price discovery. Section 5. Prevention of Unlawful Short Selling Practices (a) The Securities and Exchange Commission shall take all lawful measures to prevent and prosecute violations involving: 1.Short sales conducted without a reasonable and verifiable ability to deliver 2.Schemes to evade locate or close out requirements 3.Manipulative conduct that creates artificial market supply (b) The Department of Justice shall prioritize prosecution of willful violations of federal securities laws, including fraud, market manipulation, and conspiracy offenses under Title 18. (c) Nothing in this Order shall be construed to create new criminal offenses, but rather to direct enforcement of existing law to the fullest extent. Section 6. Accountability Across Market Participants (a) Enforcement shall apply to all participants in the securities transaction chain, including executives, traders, brokers, compliance personnel, clearing agents, and operational staff. (b) The Securities and Exchange Commission and self regulatory organizations shall strictly enforce supervisory obligations under Section 15(b)(4)(E). (c) Individuals who knowingly or recklessly participate in violations shall be subject to existing civil and criminal penalties. Section 7. Industry Bars and Remedial Authority (a) The Securities and Exchange Commission shall fully utilize its authority to: 1.Suspend or revoke registrations 2.Bar individuals from association with broker dealers, investment advisers, and other regulated entities 3.Impose civil penalties and disgorgement (b) Agencies shall coordinate to ensure that individuals responsible for serious violations are removed from positions of trust in financial markets. Section 8. Whistleblower Protection and Incentives (a) The Securities and Exchange Commission shall enhance enforcement of whistleblower protections under 15 U.S.C. 78u-6. (b) Individuals reporting violations shall be protected from retaliation and may receive financial awards consistent with law. (c) Priority shall be given to information exposing systemic manipulation or widespread investor harm. Section 9. Interagency Task Force on Market Integrity (a) An interagency task force is hereby established, chaired by the Securities and Exchange Commission, with participation from the Department of Justice, the Department of the Treasury, and other relevant agencies. (b) The task force shall: 1.Coordinate investigations and enforcement 2.Share intelligence and data 3.Recommend additional regulatory or legislative reforms (c) Within 120 days, the task force shall report its findings and recommendations to the President. Section 10. General Provisions (a) Nothing in this Order shall impair the authority granted by law to any executive department or agency. (b) This Order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law, including the Administrative Procedure Act. (c) If any provision of this Order is held invalid, the remainder shall not be affected. Section 11. Effective Date This Order shall take effect immediately. Section 12. Statement of National Commitment The United States affirms that its markets must operate on truth, transparency, and accountability. The protection of investors and the preservation of fair markets are essential to the strength of the Nation and the future prosperity of its people. This Order advances those principles and reinforces confidence in the American system of free enterprise.
English
58
563
1.2K
19.6K
Shabinz
Shabinz@Shabinz2·
@Pinkivy001 A who this ? , HomeGirl Mud Up . She Thickeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!
English
0
0
3
1.2K
PinkIvy
PinkIvy@Pinkivy001·
I need a gym BF frr
English
122
306
11K
155.9K
Shabinz retweetledi
KKep
KKep@kimkep4796·
MMAT MMTLP TRCH NB
KKep tweet media
Indonesia
6
86
166
3.3K
Shabinz
Shabinz@Shabinz2·
@RalphNorman “Corruption ,Fraud, Waste and Abuse” , are you serious @RalphNorman . What about the Fraud that transpired in MMTLP. You have done nothing to facilitate transparency. You should Talk less and do more for your constituents .
English
0
0
3
107
Ralph Norman for Governor
Ralph Norman for Governor@RalphNorman·
The reason I'm running for governor is we face the same thing in South Carolina as we do in Washington, D.C. — corruption, waste, fraud and abuse. That's why I push for term limits, to get these politicians out, to try to get this thing fixed in our state capital. wyff4.com/article/ralph-…
English
22
19
51
2.2K
Shabinz retweetledi
zing
zing@zing_leo12693·
MMTLP - Strong cases come from strong, focused evidence verify sources, target specific issues, and connect data to real impact. Appeal FOIA denials, stay precise, and keep pushing where it counts. #MMTLP 💪💪💪
zing tweet media
English
1
61
105
1.3K
Shabinz retweetledi
chicken🐥nugget
chicken🐥nugget@MmtlpD2627·
This line is key. MMTLP is mmat's "open liability" that must be RESOLVED....all shares must be reconciled and accounted for...all 165,472,241. Numbers must crunch. My strategy, prehalt, WAS to cash out half of my shares and divert some of my gains towards MMAT and NBH...and some shopping 😆. I'm sure I wasn't alone in this strategy. I believe MMAT would be standing strong today as the FIRST metamaterial company to be traded in NASDAQ if it weren't for the criminal interference. They stole my money and destroyed my investment. Redemption is coming. FUPAYME 👑
chicken🐥nugget tweet media
KKep@kimkep4796

📊 MMAT / MMTLP In re Meta Materials Inc. — Case No. 24-50792-gs U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Nevada Filings Date: April 3, 2026 ⚠️ NLA (Not Legal Advice) ⸻ 🧾 Big Picture (Plain English) This batch of filings is all about funding the lawsuits the Trustee is preparing. 👉 Translation: •The Trustee is gearing up for major litigation •She secured outside funding (Parabellum) •Some details are so sensitive they were sealed •And importantly… 👉 There are clear signs targets are already identified ⸻ 📂 Document-by-Document Breakdown Not all docs fit in this post. See comments ⸻ 📄 Doc 2679 — Motion to File Funding Docs Under Seal 🧠 What it means (simple): The Trustee is asking the court to keep key documents hidden from the public because they contain: •Trade secrets •Litigation strategy •Confidential financial structures ⸻ 🚨 🔥 KEY BOMBSHELL (Page 3) The agreement includes litigation budgets for Meta litigation involving DTC and others, including certain parties 👉 Layman translation: •They’ve already scoped out who may be sued •The names are not public (redacted / sealed) •But the structure shows: •Specific defendants identified •Budgets allocated per case •Litigation already mapped out 💥 This is NOT theoretical anymore 💥 This is targeted litigation planning ⸻ 🧩 Why sealing matters: •There are multiple agreements + exhibits (A–G) •Includes: •Retention agreements •Budgets •Co-counsel agreements •One of the filings confirms: 👉 Entire contract filed separately under seal ⸻ 📄 Doc 2680 — Declaration Supporting Sealing 🧠 Simple: Trustee says: •These documents contain confidential commercial info •They must be sealed under bankruptcy rules 👉 Translation: “This stuff is sensitive because it reveals strategy and structure.” ⸻ 📄 Doc 2681 — SEALED DOCUMENT NOTICE 🧠 Simple: •Confirms: 👉 Actual funding agreement + details are NOT public 💥 This is where the real names, targets, and mechanics likely sit ⸻ 📄 Doc 2682 — Motion to Approve Funding (CORE FILING) 🧠 What it says: •Trustee wants court approval to formally ratify the funding deal •Legal basis: •Business judgment •Best interest of estate ⸻ 💰 KEY TAKEAWAYS: •💵 ~$11.8 million funding commitment •🔍 Investigation already underway into: •Market manipulation •Naked short selling •Spoofing 👉 Translation: This lawsuit strategy has been: •Pre-researched •Budgeted •Funded ⸻ 🧨 HUGE LINE: “Preliminary investigation into possible claims of market manipulation…” 👉 That means: •This didn’t start now •Evidence gathering likely already happened ⸻ 📊 Funding Structure (Simplified): •Parabellum pays upfront costs •If they win: •Funder gets paid first (with premium) •Then attorneys •Then estate 👉 If they lose: •Parabellum eats the loss 💡 Translation: No risk to estate = green light to pursue aggressive litigation ⸻ 📄 Doc 2683 — Trustee Declaration Supporting Funding 🧠 Simple: Trustee confirms: •Funders DO NOT control litigation decisions •This is standard in big cases •Potential to recover: 👉 “substantial monies” ⸻ 👉 Key takeaway: This is NOT a funder-run case — Trustee stays in control ⸻ 📄 Doc 2684 — Wes Christian Declaration 🧠 Simple: •Explains litigation funding model •Calls it: 👉 “leveling the playing field” ⸻ 👉 Translation: •Targets are likely large institutions •Funding is needed to go up against big players ⸻ 📄 Doc 2685 — Hearing Notice 📅 COURT DATE: 👉 May 7, 2026 @ 1:30 PM (Zoom) Judge: Gary Spraker ⸻ 🧠 Putting It All Together (Big Picture) 🔥 What these filings REALLY show: •✅ Litigation is fully planned and funded •✅ Specific targets identified (not public yet) •✅ Budgets assigned per defendant group •✅ Evidence phase already started •✅ Sensitive details are being intentionally hidden (sealed) dropbox.com/scl/fi/72hhqjp…

English
10
92
229
8.6K
Shabinz retweetledi
zing
zing@zing_leo12693·
MMTLP This is exactly what we’re up against in the #MMTLP fight a modern David vs Goliath. When Amazon/Bezos wanted someone gone, they allegedly weaponized DOJ + civil forfeiture and nearly wiped out an entire family (no charges ever filed against the husband). Watch Amy Nelson break it down here: x.com/Amy_K_Nelson/s… Same playbook we’ve seen for 3+ years: • Brokers + hedge funds + FIF coordinating behind the scenes • Regulators denying, delaying, obstructing, stonewalling despite our evidence & database • Daily targeted harassment online some even inciting violence or sending death threats to our community But here’s the difference: We have the facts. We have the evidence. We have the database. And we aren’t going away. The power imbalance is real, but so is our resolve. Transparency now. #MMTLP
zing tweet media
English
1
60
94
886
Shabinz retweetledi
KKep
KKep@kimkep4796·
📊 MMAT / MMTLP In re Meta Materials Inc. — Case No. 24-50792-gs U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Nevada Filings Date: April 3, 2026 ⚠️ NLA (Not Legal Advice) ⸻ 🧾 Big Picture (Plain English) This batch of filings is all about funding the lawsuits the Trustee is preparing. 👉 Translation: •The Trustee is gearing up for major litigation •She secured outside funding (Parabellum) •Some details are so sensitive they were sealed •And importantly… 👉 There are clear signs targets are already identified ⸻ 📂 Document-by-Document Breakdown Not all docs fit in this post. See comments ⸻ 📄 Doc 2679 — Motion to File Funding Docs Under Seal 🧠 What it means (simple): The Trustee is asking the court to keep key documents hidden from the public because they contain: •Trade secrets •Litigation strategy •Confidential financial structures ⸻ 🚨 🔥 KEY BOMBSHELL (Page 3) The agreement includes litigation budgets for Meta litigation involving DTC and others, including certain parties 👉 Layman translation: •They’ve already scoped out who may be sued •The names are not public (redacted / sealed) •But the structure shows: •Specific defendants identified •Budgets allocated per case •Litigation already mapped out 💥 This is NOT theoretical anymore 💥 This is targeted litigation planning ⸻ 🧩 Why sealing matters: •There are multiple agreements + exhibits (A–G) •Includes: •Retention agreements •Budgets •Co-counsel agreements •One of the filings confirms: 👉 Entire contract filed separately under seal ⸻ 📄 Doc 2680 — Declaration Supporting Sealing 🧠 Simple: Trustee says: •These documents contain confidential commercial info •They must be sealed under bankruptcy rules 👉 Translation: “This stuff is sensitive because it reveals strategy and structure.” ⸻ 📄 Doc 2681 — SEALED DOCUMENT NOTICE 🧠 Simple: •Confirms: 👉 Actual funding agreement + details are NOT public 💥 This is where the real names, targets, and mechanics likely sit ⸻ 📄 Doc 2682 — Motion to Approve Funding (CORE FILING) 🧠 What it says: •Trustee wants court approval to formally ratify the funding deal •Legal basis: •Business judgment •Best interest of estate ⸻ 💰 KEY TAKEAWAYS: •💵 ~$11.8 million funding commitment •🔍 Investigation already underway into: •Market manipulation •Naked short selling •Spoofing 👉 Translation: This lawsuit strategy has been: •Pre-researched •Budgeted •Funded ⸻ 🧨 HUGE LINE: “Preliminary investigation into possible claims of market manipulation…” 👉 That means: •This didn’t start now •Evidence gathering likely already happened ⸻ 📊 Funding Structure (Simplified): •Parabellum pays upfront costs •If they win: •Funder gets paid first (with premium) •Then attorneys •Then estate 👉 If they lose: •Parabellum eats the loss 💡 Translation: No risk to estate = green light to pursue aggressive litigation ⸻ 📄 Doc 2683 — Trustee Declaration Supporting Funding 🧠 Simple: Trustee confirms: •Funders DO NOT control litigation decisions •This is standard in big cases •Potential to recover: 👉 “substantial monies” ⸻ 👉 Key takeaway: This is NOT a funder-run case — Trustee stays in control ⸻ 📄 Doc 2684 — Wes Christian Declaration 🧠 Simple: •Explains litigation funding model •Calls it: 👉 “leveling the playing field” ⸻ 👉 Translation: •Targets are likely large institutions •Funding is needed to go up against big players ⸻ 📄 Doc 2685 — Hearing Notice 📅 COURT DATE: 👉 May 7, 2026 @ 1:30 PM (Zoom) Judge: Gary Spraker ⸻ 🧠 Putting It All Together (Big Picture) 🔥 What these filings REALLY show: •✅ Litigation is fully planned and funded •✅ Specific targets identified (not public yet) •✅ Budgets assigned per defendant group •✅ Evidence phase already started •✅ Sensitive details are being intentionally hidden (sealed) dropbox.com/scl/fi/72hhqjp…
English
16
158
245
25K
Shabinz retweetledi
kristen shaughnessy
kristen shaughnessy@kshaughnessy2·
Meta Materials Trustee Docs Expose $11.8M War on Naked Shorting Broker Lawsuits Ready To Go May 7 _________ “Preliminary investigation into possible claims of market manipulation…” 👉 That means: •This didn’t start now •Evidence gathering likely already happened…” - @kimkep4796 ______________ @palikaras MMAT MMTLP TRCH
KKep@kimkep4796

📊 MMAT / MMTLP In re Meta Materials Inc. — Case No. 24-50792-gs U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Nevada Filings Date: April 3, 2026 ⚠️ NLA (Not Legal Advice) ⸻ 🧾 Big Picture (Plain English) This batch of filings is all about funding the lawsuits the Trustee is preparing. 👉 Translation: •The Trustee is gearing up for major litigation •She secured outside funding (Parabellum) •Some details are so sensitive they were sealed •And importantly… 👉 There are clear signs targets are already identified ⸻ 📂 Document-by-Document Breakdown Not all docs fit in this post. See comments ⸻ 📄 Doc 2679 — Motion to File Funding Docs Under Seal 🧠 What it means (simple): The Trustee is asking the court to keep key documents hidden from the public because they contain: •Trade secrets •Litigation strategy •Confidential financial structures ⸻ 🚨 🔥 KEY BOMBSHELL (Page 3) The agreement includes litigation budgets for Meta litigation involving DTC and others, including certain parties 👉 Layman translation: •They’ve already scoped out who may be sued •The names are not public (redacted / sealed) •But the structure shows: •Specific defendants identified •Budgets allocated per case •Litigation already mapped out 💥 This is NOT theoretical anymore 💥 This is targeted litigation planning ⸻ 🧩 Why sealing matters: •There are multiple agreements + exhibits (A–G) •Includes: •Retention agreements •Budgets •Co-counsel agreements •One of the filings confirms: 👉 Entire contract filed separately under seal ⸻ 📄 Doc 2680 — Declaration Supporting Sealing 🧠 Simple: Trustee says: •These documents contain confidential commercial info •They must be sealed under bankruptcy rules 👉 Translation: “This stuff is sensitive because it reveals strategy and structure.” ⸻ 📄 Doc 2681 — SEALED DOCUMENT NOTICE 🧠 Simple: •Confirms: 👉 Actual funding agreement + details are NOT public 💥 This is where the real names, targets, and mechanics likely sit ⸻ 📄 Doc 2682 — Motion to Approve Funding (CORE FILING) 🧠 What it says: •Trustee wants court approval to formally ratify the funding deal •Legal basis: •Business judgment •Best interest of estate ⸻ 💰 KEY TAKEAWAYS: •💵 ~$11.8 million funding commitment •🔍 Investigation already underway into: •Market manipulation •Naked short selling •Spoofing 👉 Translation: This lawsuit strategy has been: •Pre-researched •Budgeted •Funded ⸻ 🧨 HUGE LINE: “Preliminary investigation into possible claims of market manipulation…” 👉 That means: •This didn’t start now •Evidence gathering likely already happened ⸻ 📊 Funding Structure (Simplified): •Parabellum pays upfront costs •If they win: •Funder gets paid first (with premium) •Then attorneys •Then estate 👉 If they lose: •Parabellum eats the loss 💡 Translation: No risk to estate = green light to pursue aggressive litigation ⸻ 📄 Doc 2683 — Trustee Declaration Supporting Funding 🧠 Simple: Trustee confirms: •Funders DO NOT control litigation decisions •This is standard in big cases •Potential to recover: 👉 “substantial monies” ⸻ 👉 Key takeaway: This is NOT a funder-run case — Trustee stays in control ⸻ 📄 Doc 2684 — Wes Christian Declaration 🧠 Simple: •Explains litigation funding model •Calls it: 👉 “leveling the playing field” ⸻ 👉 Translation: •Targets are likely large institutions •Funding is needed to go up against big players ⸻ 📄 Doc 2685 — Hearing Notice 📅 COURT DATE: 👉 May 7, 2026 @ 1:30 PM (Zoom) Judge: Gary Spraker ⸻ 🧠 Putting It All Together (Big Picture) 🔥 What these filings REALLY show: •✅ Litigation is fully planned and funded •✅ Specific targets identified (not public yet) •✅ Budgets assigned per defendant group •✅ Evidence phase already started •✅ Sensitive details are being intentionally hidden (sealed) dropbox.com/scl/fi/72hhqjp…

English
6
130
298
11.1K