Shadow

@WheelieInvestor You’ve got more then me and I’m 20 lol

Is this a good checking account balance for a 19 year old?

@DrBurkenstock @MichaelXBT Dude he’s not saying he deleted it himself. Pretty sure he’s saying it got deleted by X due to too many reports

@MichaelXBT There’s always gonna be people that have different ideas. Don’t delete your work because of what people say.

Update: Retired

@JP_PROOF None in this market

Which do you prefer? Be honest. (comment why)

@milianstx lol crazy

Be OFFGRID: - Market yourself as a “No KYC” card - Blatantly lie about features and compliance - Launch a waitlist - Get 50K+ email signups - Start raising money from angels - Host a yacht party before anything is built - Know the product will never work - Continue misleading marketing to raise for their angel round simultaneously as articles exposing the “No KYC” card lie go viral on X - Pivot to a KYC Card with "Privacy" - No plan for how privacy will be achieved - No “No KYC” business card ever arrives - Launches "beta" with fake users and reviews - The waitlist and fundraise was the product The founder does not reply to any questions and keeps spreading lies. Retardio.

@Julianpetroulas Something similar happened to @TateTheTalisman I think he also made it public and got millions of views yet they still haven’t resolved his issue :( We live in a scammer world now

@ioann_is @defyneric lol dude you’re absolutely lost Obviously it’s going to be down 85% in a bear market when BTC, ETH and every alt is getting rekt. That has nothing to do with it being a scam, devs dumping, or fundamentals being bad. Nothing survives in these conditions. Absolutely nothing.

@defyneric Hey Eric care to comment on this?

Hormozi, who owns Skool, saw their biggest competitor Whop integrate banking rails via Tether now he is rushing to copy the move i wrote an article earlier this year on why whop > skool, and this only proves my thesis

@kian_sasan Danm that sucks bro. Hope god takes care of those corrupt officers

Three months ago, at 02:00 a.m., at a gas station in Abu Dhabi, I was taken. 🇦🇪 No warrant. No explanation. No charge. I was on my way to leave the country on a privately chartered flight from Dubai to Europe. Everything was booked. Everything was lawful. I was exiting peacefully. Instead, I was handcuffed. An officer slapped me and said: “This is the UAE.” At the gas station, when I asked whether everything was being recorded, cameras were turned off. I was then transported to a Police Station in Al Bateen District. While sitting calmly on a chair inside the station, I was slapped again. No provocation. No resistance. No lawful justification provided. ⸻ I. The Eight Hours Outside Procedure For approximately eight hours, I was held inside the station without formal registration of the case. I was not placed in a cell. The case was not officially opened. I slept on the floor. During those eight hours, officers repeatedly entered the room with new theories, new questions, and changing narratives about why I was being held. The justification shifted continuously. This was not investigation. It was construction. ⸻ II. The Fabricated Case The final allegation presented was that I verbally assaulted a police officer in Arabic by stating that the ruler of Dubai is superior to the ruler of Abu Dhabi. This is false. I do not speak Arabic. The allegation is linguistically impossible. In court proceedings, my 4 friends who were at the gas station and saw it all, as witnesses testified. The officers’ accounts conflicted. The narrative fractured under examination. The case, as presented, collapsed logically. And yet ⸻ III. Recording Suppression At Al Bateen Police Station, interrogation environments are typically recorded as standard procedure. During my detention: • The interrogation was not recorded. • Cameras were turned off at the gas station. • Footage from the station was not provided to the court. • No complete visual record exists of the critical hours. This is not normal protocol. In Abu Dhabi, recording is standard. This time, it did not occur. Eight unregistered hours. No recording. No preserved footage. That is not coincidence. ⸻ IV. Custody and Release After those eight hours, I was placed in custody for 48 hours, after which I was released. During that time, no German consular authority was notified, despite my status as a German resident. This omission violates basic international expectations of consular access. ⸻ V. Attempt at Private Resolution At the time, I chose restraint. I pursued a Memorandum approach to avoid harming individuals involved. I sought private resolution rather than public exposure. I did not escalate. I gave space for correction. Instead, the final appeal ruling imposed: Six months imprisonment, suspended. Three years probation. No prison today. A three-year activation mechanism remains. ⸻ VI. The Structure of Coercion From beginning to end: 02:00 a.m. detention. Physical intimidation. Eight unregistered hours. Shifting narratives. Linguistically impossible allegation. Suppressed recordings. 48-hour custody. Six months suspended. Three years probation. This is structural leverage. A suspended sentence creates conditional vulnerability. Any future allegation can reactivate imprisonment. That is coercion institutionalized through procedure. ⸻ VII. Escalation I do not accept the legitimacy of this outcome. I will formally request review by the German Embassy as a German resident. If this matter is not corrected, it will be escalated as: • A documented international human rights review • A precedent case on coercive probation mechanisms • A structured analysis of recording suppression • A diplomatic matter All documentation is preserved. Witness testimony. Timeline inconsistencies. Evidence of non-recording. Procedural gaps. If required, this will become public in full documentary form.

@SafeLabs_ Can hackers / malware manipulate Safe Shield to show it’s a pass even if it isn’t? Like what if something like Bybit happens would Safe Shield prevent that?

Self-custody means you define the rules. Safe Shield enforces them 🛡️

I predicted the top, now its time to predict the bottom. Based on diminishing returns/retracements & fractal analysis, I believe this time we wont bottom where most expect. I expect $BTC to bottom in August. You heard it here first.

@Tekeee I mean, most people graduate at 22-26 lol

What’s a normal amount for a 25 year old to have in their bank account?

@BladeDefi Unless if he mean Feb next year

@BladeDefi Bro has lost the plot

🚨BREAKING: TOM LEE SAYS HE BELIEVES BITCOIN COULD REACH $180,000 BY FEBRUARY 31 DO WE TRUST HIM NOW?

@VitalikButerin Waiting for @CryptoPoseidonn to comment “Is this bullish for Ethereum?”

You do not have to agree with me on which applications are and are not corposlop to use Ethereum. You do not have to agree with me on what trust assumptions are acceptable in which situations to use Ethereum. You do not have to agree with me on political topics to use Ethereum. You do not have to agree with my views on defi, decentralized social or privacy-preserving payments to use Ethereum. You do not have to agree with my views on AI to use Ethereum. You do not have to agree with my view that Berlin has the best food in Europe, suits and ties should be expunged from our culture, and YYYY-MM-DD is the best date format to use Ethereum. And you do not have to agree with me on any one of those above things to agree with me on any other. I do not claim to represent the whole Ethereum ecosystem. Ethereum is a decentralized protocol. The whole concept of "permissionlessness" and "censorship resistance" is that you are free to use Ethereum in whatever way you want, without caring about what I think, or even what anyone else in the Ethereum Foundation or even any Ethereum client developer thinks. But on the flipside, if I say that your application is corposlop, I am not "censoring" you. This has always been the flip side of the grand bargain of free speech: I am not free to shut you down, but I am free to criticize you, much as you are free to criticize me. In fact, it is *necessary* that we do this. The modern world does not call out for pretend neutrality, where a person puts on a suit and claims to be equally open to all perspectives from all of humanity and not have their own opinions. Neutrality is for protocols (like HTTP, like Bitcoin, like Ethereum), and neutrality within some scope is for some institutions. The modern world calls out for the courage to clearly state one's principles - including stating principles by pointing to negative examples, that is by criticizing the things in the world that are incompatible with one's principles - and work with those with aligned goals to build the metaverse within which those principles are taken as a baseline. Such things inherently cannot be constrained to just the layer of the protocol: any principle you have will naturally lead to conclusions, not just about how the protocol should be built, but also what should be built upon it. Furthermore, any such principle will have consequences that go beyond technology, and reach into specific questions within the larger social world. This should not be avoided. Valuing something like "freedom", and then acting as though it has consequences on technology choices, but is completely separate from everything else about our lives, is not pragmatic - it is hollow. The inevitable converse of this is that (i) a decentralized protocol must not be viewed as belonging to only one metaverse, and (ii) the borders of a metaverse are fuzzy: it is possible, and indeed it is the normal case, to align with any one on some axes and not on other axes. Linux is a technology of user empowerment and freedom, Linux is also the base layer of a lot of the world's corposlop. It's almost certainly the base layer of many things that I think are good, and you think are bad, and vice versa. Hence, if you care about Linux because you care about user empowerment and freedom, it is not enough to just build the kernel, we must also build a full-stack ecosystem compatible with those values, and explicitly accept that this is not the only way that people will use Linux, but it is one way that must be built and must be available. Ethereum is similar. Milady.

@torogems FR. They 100% see the message within the first 5 minutes, half swipe you, then respond the next day

I hate fake “busy” people. Nobody is working 12-hour shifts without checking their messages. I have friends who make $50K a day, and if I send them a text, they respond in less than 5 minutes. If you’re taking more than 12 hours to respond, I’m not messaging you again.

@Trezor @scottmelker LMAOOOO

@scottmelker I wish I could say the same but I don't track my customers... 🤷‍♂️

COINBASE $COIN CEO BRIAN ARMSTRONG SAYS RETAIL USERS ON THE PLATFORM "HAVE DIAMOND HANDS"

@Cobratate That’s wild

The longer you stay single. The longer they fuck your future wife. Find her. Quick.

@Alejandro_XBT 480 is diabolical Can’t tell if your joking or not mate

$ETH – Macro Thesis My thesis is that the major bullish move that began around 2019–2020 has transitioned into a large and prolonged macro correction, and that Ethereum has been consolidating within this broader corrective structure ever since. The strong rally that followed the 2022 bear market created the appearance of a renewed bull market, but structurally it fits better as a counter-trend move within a broader corrective range rather than the start of a new long-term cycle. Throughout this corrective phase, price has remained largely range-bound, repeatedly failing to establish sustained acceptance above the previous cycle highs. This behavior points to distribution and consolidation, not continuation. From this perspective, the apparent bull market that developed within the correction can be interpreted as a dead cat bounce, a technically strong bounce occurring inside a larger corrective structure. The current market structure suggests that a final shakeout phase may still be required to fully reset sentiment and liquidity before Ethereum can transition into a new impulsive bullish cycle. Only after such a reset would a genuine long-term move toward new all-time highs become structurally likely. Macro Structure Breakdown (Chart Context) The Pump (2019–2021) This phase represents the true impulsive bullish move following the 2018 bear market. Price shows strong trend expansion, increasing momentum, and clear higher highs and higher lows, classic characteristics of a genuine bull market. The Correction (2021–2026) After the peak, ETH enters a wide, multi-year corrective structure. Despite several strong rallies within this range, price fails to establish sustained new highs above the prior cycle peak. Structurally, this period behaves more like distribution and correction than continuation. The Shakeout (Projected) The chart anticipates a final liquidity-driven move to the downside, likely intended to break market confidence, force capitulation, and reset positioning ahead of a new cycle. The Moon (Projected) Only after this shakeout does the structure suggest the conditions for a true long-term bullish continuation, with price discovery and expansion well beyond previous highs.

@CryptoPoseidonn @SBF_FTX LMAOOO 😂😂😂

@SBF_FTX See you in 20 years bro, Don’t worry Ethereum will be sam price when you get out.

Agree with almost all of this. But FTX was never bankrupt. I never filed for it. The lawyers took over the company and 4 hours later they filed a bogus bankruptcy so they could pilfer it for money.

@OverTradess It’s either 800 or 1200 bottom imo

$ETH below 1000$ in next few months Just say yes or No

@SatoshiFlipper Watch it happen

LMAO people so delusional talking about $30 $SOL, $40k BTC, insanity has really taken hold 😏