Me

@JulesAP011 @MorrishCharles @Steven_Swinford @daisyeastlake I was asking Charles - who seems to think we have misunderstood Dave’s stance on the matter.

@She_Ra_UK @MorrishCharles @Steven_Swinford @daisyeastlake No, No & No! Basic biology! 🧬 All animals— humans included, are born male or female. Their DNA is Male or Female. End of.

Exclusive from @daisyeastlake Zack Polanski has been warned that he faces a generational divide and risks alienating older environmentalists in the Green Party by focusing on younger far-left activists The Green Party leader made a conscious effort on Thursday, at the launch of his local election campaign, to thank long-term members who backed the party “before it was cool” Senior Greens are concerned that he risks putting off the party’s traditional core, especially in more rural areas, by focusing too heavily on issues such as trans rights and Gaza The party has enjoyed a wave of new support since Polanski became leader in September and began to focus heavily on the party’s more socially liberal politics. More than half of voters aged between 18 and 24 would vote Green in a general election, according to the latest YouGov polling But some senior Greens have warned Polanski risks taking confidence on the environment for granted. One said the party needs to be “more vocal” about environmental issues to keep some voters on side thetimes.com/article/9308dc…

@MorrishCharles @JulesAP011 @Steven_Swinford @daisyeastlake So can men be women then or not?

@JulesAP011 @Steven_Swinford @daisyeastlake That interpretation of Green policies shows you are seriously lacking in English comprehension skills - never mind don’t give up on your gcse evening classes just yet, you’ll get there …. Maybe 😂😂

@caldyr99 @JulesAP011 @Steven_Swinford @daisyeastlake Dave Polanski does believe all this chap. It is indeed ridiculous.

@JulesAP011 @Steven_Swinford @daisyeastlake Are you a parody account? It's hard to believe a real human would actually believe all that.

@Tess_Machling @ZackPolanski How do you know your daughter is not your son? Did you force her gender on her from birth? Not sure Dave will approve.

Nope. My mum (81 years old, founder member of the Ecology Party) and myself (54) both joined the Greens thanks to @ZackPolanski. Oh, and my daughter (20, never been a member of any party) has now joined too... The Green Menace movement is truly inter-generational!! 💚💪

I'm a transgender girlthing and I am a goddess

@daniellismore So you’re telling them they aren’t welcome? So how does this make you any different from them?

I wrote this in September. It’s been read by 9 million people, Just on Facebook. And a lot more on here. Been in London 23 years. I am a Londoner. This morning at Paddington Station, a bunch of fascists waved the English flag in my face… as if it wasn’t my flag too.🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Imagine thinking a piece of fabric makes you more British than someone who’s actually lived here longer than your teeth have had time to rot. It’s my flag, love. I just use it for tea, skirts and not being a Nazi. But let’s talk taxes. I pay for this city. I pay for the streets you march on I pay for the bins you piss on I pay for the police you make pose with your slogans I pay to clean up the racist graffiti you leave behind. And yet I’m treated like immigrant? I was born here. I’m from from here. You eat Indian street food like it’s roast dinner, then complain about immigrants. You’re the punchline, not the patriot. You come into my city to scream about “outsiders” while you’re the one dragging swastikas down the high street like it’s a personality. You want to talk about British values? Here’s one: Don’t shit where you eat. And don’t come into my home, scream in my face, then expect me to fund your little fascist field trip. London doesn’t want you. We drink oat milk lattes and read banned books here. Piss off.

I'm a trangender woman and I am beautiful! :3

@forcefeminized And yet you say we can’t tell. 🤷‍♀️

misgendered twice at the grocery store

@Ananje7 @daniellismore No man has ever had an abortion. Hth.

@She_Ra_UK @daniellismore Its not, an egg needs a sperm to get that abortion " activity ", both parties are involved, unless that fetus is from a petri dish.

All women’s rights activists need to know this including J. K. Rowling who probably would not care unless it involves transgender people.

@alexfmac That is a highly misleading photo. You do not help your cause here.

I hope this photo is a watershed moment. Forced to carry on to the end of the race with a broken back. Collapsed & died after the finish line. RIP Gold Dancer. If you’re making money off this kind of suffering - how do you look at yourself in the mirror?

@LondonLabour Not one white person in the video. Not very diverse is it?

We're bringing youth clubs back!

@AvaLovelaceX You are a classic AGP dude. Just because you don’t understand what that is doesn’t mean it is not true.

@She_Ra_UK I didn’t know AGP was about soulmates? Crazy

Is there anything better than staring into the eyes of your soulmate?

@AvaLovelaceX We hate you though so 🤷‍♀️

I wish that when a trans persons selfie blows up, it doesn’t have 99% hate comments. I wish people treated us like human beings with feelings and emotions

@Ananje7 @daniellismore No. It’s obvious.

@She_Ra_UK @daniellismore Why a man would think it is and not a woman herself? Explain please and thank you.🤔

@daniellismore Men cannot ever be women. Hth.

J.K. Rowling’s Case Against Trans People Falls Apart Under Basic Scrutiny J.K. Rowling’s writing on her site presents itself as cautious, evidence based and protective of women. It is none of those things in any reliable sense. It is a political essay built out of selective fear, anecdote, conflation and repeated framing tricks that turn a small and vulnerable minority into a public threat. Once the central claims are checked against mainstream psychological definitions, clinical guidance and the better available reviews, the structure gives way very quickly. The first problem is basic description. Rowling writes as though trans identity is a fashionable belief system imposed on reality. That is false. Major professional bodies continue to define gender identity as a person’s internal sense of gender and distinguish it from biological traits, expression and sexuality. That does not mean every clinical pathway is simple or that every policy question has one easy answer. It means the existence of trans people is not a fiction created by slogans or websites. It is a recognised human phenomenon described across medicine and psychology for years. Her second move is more political than scientific. She repeatedly folds trans women into a category of male risk and then treats that association as common sense. That is the engine of the piece. It asks readers to accept that recognition itself is dangerous. The trouble is that this is not evidence. It is suspicion dressed up as safeguarding. A rights claim by one group does not become invalid because another group can imagine its misuse. That logic would destroy the basis of civil protection in every direction. She also leans heavily on the idea that affirming trans people means suppressing women or erasing sex. That is another false construction. Recognising gender identity does not abolish sex based medicine, sex based data collection or serious discussion of violence against women. Clinical guidance and professional standards continue to treat sex related health needs as real while also recognising transgender patients as deserving of competent care. The claim that one can only defend women by rejecting trans people is not a medical conclusion. It is an ideological choice. On healthcare her essay suggests that trans identification is being irresponsibly indulged and that medicine has surrendered to fashion. The actual evidence base is more careful than either side’s loudest slogans. For adults, established clinical standards and recent reviews continue to support access to gender affirming care with assessment, informed consent and monitoring. Reviews published in 2024 and 2025 report that gender affirming interventions are associated overall with improved mental health, body satisfaction and quality of life, while also noting that evidence quality varies and further research is needed. That is a long way from the picture of mass delusion that Rowling promotes. For children and adolescents the picture is more contested and the honest position is narrower. The Cass Review in England and later NHS England work show that the evidence for some youth interventions remains limited and that services need stronger assessment, clearer pathways and better long term research. That supports caution and reform. It does not support broad hostility to trans people, nor does it justify using uncertainty in paediatric care as a weapon against trans adults or against social recognition itself. Rowling’s essay repeatedly makes that jump. It is a political jump, not a scientific one. She also gives the reader the impression that transition is commonly regretted and that medicine is running ahead of human reality. The best known systematic reviews do not support that picture. Regret after gender affirming surgery appears low in the published literature, including systematic reviews and more recent follow up work. That does not mean regret never happens or that every clinic gets

@PompeySteph Tempted to give him the money for the entertainment value of seeing him lose.

My case against the Labour Party is the first to directly test the Supreme Court judgment (FWS v SGM) - we must end this madness when trans women are unfairly discriminated against. £7k pledged - £18k required, just 18 days to do it in! Please donate: crowdjustice.com/case/justice-f…

@PompeySteph No one wants to know Steve. Even your weirdy mates. 😂😂

@PompeySteph This is because they are perverts who hang around with other perverts. Hth.

A phobia is clinically an "irrational fear." It's wholly irrational to fear sharing female spaces when there is absolutely no evidence that bona fide trans women pose any more risk than s!s women themselves. In fact, trans people suffer crime at twice the rate of s!s people.

@Ananje7 @daniellismore Only a man would think it is.

@daniellismore Fetus killing is not your rights,its a choice made from either a medical reason,unprotected sex,which cause the risks of sexual transmitted disease/ infection or rape!Things happen and women need to have dignity and self- respect,abortion is not something to be taken lightly.🤔