Shea Balish

3K posts

Shea Balish banner
Shea Balish

Shea Balish

@SheaBalish

Once introduced as “defender of the null hypothesis”. Building: @curvhealth Writing: @deepdebates

Katılım Ekim 2010
2.8K Takip Edilen791 Takipçiler
Shea Balish retweetledi
Alex Danco
Alex Danco@Alex_Danco·
@packyM Space data centers do make sense!! (We’re talking about all that space in northern alberta where it’s cold and gas is free, right?)
English
2
1
10
1.2K
Shea Balish retweetledi
Martin Shkreli
Martin Shkreli@MartinShkreli·
the sports betting markets (they're not "prediction" markets) have to be banned. there is no other way.
English
383
258
6.1K
605.2K
Shea Balish retweetledi
Big Brain Philosophy
Big Brain Philosophy@BigBrainPhiloso·
Daniel Dennett: "If I gave a prize to the best idea anybody ever had, I'd give it to Darwin." Not Newton. Not Einstein. Darwin. In a 2015 documentary, philosopher Daniel Dennett makes a striking case for why Darwin's idea of natural selection is the single greatest intellectual achievement in human history. His reasoning isn't just about biology. Dennett argues that what makes Darwin's idea so extraordinary is what it unifies. Before Darwin, the world was split into two seemingly incompatible realms: the physical world of cause and matter, and the world of meaning, purpose, and consciousness. These felt like they belonged to different categories entirely. One explained by science, the other by something else. Darwin's idea, Dennett says, is the backbone that bridges them: "The Darwinian idea of natural selection unifies the world. It unifies the world of cause and matter and physics with the world of meaning and purpose consciousness. The whole spectrum of life depends on uniting the living with the non-living, the meaning with the non-meaning, the purposeful with the merely mechanical and merely physical." That's not a small claim. It's a philosophical revolution disguised as a biology paper. What Dennett is pointing to is that natural selection gives us a mechanism: a purely physical, purposeless process that generates purpose. Organisms don't need a designer to have goals. The appearance of design, the reality of meaning, emerges from the bottom up. The best idea anyone ever had. No prize for second place.
English
131
177
683
49.3K
Shea Balish retweetledi
Rob Henderson
Rob Henderson@robkhenderson·
"as a society, we are making an enormously risky bet: that we can reap the rewards of a runaway gambling industry without paying any price; that the litany of social ills long associated with this vice can, this time, be kept in check" theatlantic.com/magazine/2026/…
English
2
4
38
3.7K
Shea Balish retweetledi
John Ganz
John Ganz@lionel_trolling·
Karl Popper sucks. Imre Lakatos is the GOAT philosopher of science.
English
30
20
288
30.8K
Shea Balish retweetledi
Fahd Ananta
Fahd Ananta@fahdananta·
If you don’t sacrifice for your dreams, then the dreams are the sacrifice
English
0
2
51
2.1K
Shea Balish retweetledi
Rob Sica
Rob Sica@robsica·
"Trivers writes simply, but the arguments are often so deep -- so close to the complexities of truly understanding human mentality -- that the effort to grasp it (all and completely) is almost frightening." -RD Alexander
English
2
4
25
1.2K
Shea Balish retweetledi
Quillette
Quillette@Quillette·
RIP Robert Trivers (1943–2026), one of the boldest and most influential thinkers in evolutionary biology. A giant in the field—whose ideas reshaped how we understand cooperation, conflict, and human nature.
Quillette tweet media
Steve Stewart-Williams@SteveStuWill

RIP Robert Trivers - the Einstein of evolutionary biology and one the greatest thinkers of our age. Among other things, Trivers came up with parental investment theory, reciprocal altruism theory, and parent-offspring conflict theory.

English
4
45
152
43.9K
Shea Balish retweetledi
Steve Stewart-Williams
Steve Stewart-Williams@SteveStuWill·
RIP Robert Trivers - the Einstein of evolutionary biology and one the greatest thinkers of our age. Among other things, Trivers came up with parental investment theory, reciprocal altruism theory, and parent-offspring conflict theory.
Steve Stewart-Williams tweet media
English
41
270
1.2K
197.3K
Shea Balish retweetledi
Keith Rabois
Keith Rabois@rabois·
@kimmaicutler people who advice founders that startups are marathons not sprints have never looked up what a solid marathoner runs per mile on average.
English
16
15
353
27.5K
Shea Balish retweetledi
Scott Stevenson
Scott Stevenson@scottastevenson·
One of the most common pieces of feedback I've given over 8 years as CEO is: "I think you are attracted to this idea because it's super legible, and that's a bad reason to do it. This is the kind of thing that sounds really good on slides but doesn't tend to work." The problem in large orgs is that "legible ideas that sound good on slides" take over.
Scott Stevenson@scottastevenson

I hate that legibility has become a universal “good” over the past year. I much prefer @vgr’s take from 2010: our bias toward legibility is a terrible intoxicant that destroys value ribbonfarm.com/2010/07/26/a-b… Yes you can attract capital with legibility. But this is black magic. The world is nuanced and hyperdimensional. It’s not that legible. You can cast the illusion of simple structure, but if you fall for it yourself, you may end up attracting a lot of money and capital to a broken machine:

English
12
11
236
37.4K
Shea Balish retweetledi
David Pinsof
David Pinsof@DavidPinsof·
In my latest post, I defend @robinhanson’s seemingly crazy view that 90% of human behavior is signaling. Or at least, that it’s not as crazy as it sounds. Link below.
English
4
8
103
27K
Shea Balish retweetledi
François Chollet
François Chollet@fchollet·
We underestimate how much "abstract" thought is just repurposed sensorimotor control circuitry. A lot of reasoning is essentially about moving through idea-space the way we move through physical space.
English
179
245
2.5K
134.7K