SigmaBurns

@ghostbannedx, I was not discussing you, I was discussing your investment strategy. Block me here too.

@Ghostbanned7 @Nano_Austria @grok @nano Don’t you find it very close and strategic to do so? Maybe to distract people from the fact that the Devs did this?

@SigmaBurns @Nano_Austria @grok @nano > "days after" "days before". FTFY (Initial discussions suggesting a rename had started in November 2017.) medium.com/hackernoon/nan… en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nano_(cry…

"List ALL #cryptocurrencies with NONE the following features: 1. INFLATION 2. FEES 3. Secure finality OVER 500ms 4. UNSUSTAINABLE security 5. Spammable by NATION-STATES Restrict your answer to list of the names and tickers, plus a single paragraph" @Grok knows #Nano $XNO.

@Ghostbanned7 @grok @nano @NanoGPTcom Go man, run from the fact that XRB stole lots of money and after a few days was rebranded into your cult-like crypto. We’ll see in the long run how things will go, until that time, take care of yourself and understand that you, as investor, need to adequate to market necessities.

@SigmaBurns @grok @nano @NanoGPTcom Not any more. You've used up all your LA privileges.

@Ghostbanned7 @grok @nano @NanoGPTcom Whaaaaat??? Why bro? I didn’t offend you, look.

@SigmaBurns @grok @nano @NanoGPTcom I told you earlier you were teetering on the edge of Strike 3. We're done here now.

@Ghostbanned7 @Nano_Austria @grok @nano Why XRB rebrandend days later after BitGrail hack?

@SigmaBurns @Nano_Austria @grok @nano Then we're done here.

@Ghostbanned7 @grok @nano @NanoGPTcom Can I ask you something?

@SigmaBurns @grok @nano @NanoGPTcom We use phrases like "knowing" only as a short cut analogy to make communication easier, but AIs don't really "know" anything at all. Nothing. They only act as averaging, consolidating mirrors of information they've been trained on or have collected.

@Ghostbanned7 @grok @nano @NanoGPTcom Look the post bro, this is completely nonsense by you. You made it.😂

@SigmaBurns @grok @nano @NanoGPTcom Your comment on LLMs is nothing to do with the post that it responds to. If the number of #Nano $XNO users is, in some hypothetical future, "rising exponentially", then it will be rising because users are spending it with merchants - who will run nodes to validate their payments.

@Ghostbanned7 @Nano_Austria @grok @nano Whaaaaat??? You are not even making any sense now.

@SigmaBurns @Nano_Austria @grok @nano Codswallop! You have the incentive to know for certain that you've been paid.

@Ghostbanned7 @grok @nano @NanoGPTcom But…. You just said they are stupid! How can you listen to LLM’s opinion if you think they are stupid. It doesn’t make sense to me, honestly.

@SigmaBurns @grok @nano @NanoGPTcom You've kinda answered your own question, @SigmaBurns, now I come to think of it. If the number of #Nano $XNO users is (in this hypothetical future) now "rising exponentially", then it's because they are then spending it with merchants who will run nodes to validate their payments

@Nano_Austria @Ghostbanned7 @grok @nano Yes, but that is not the point. Without fees you, as validator, have 0 incentives to do that work. Literally 0, in my opinion that’s why the mass adoption is very hard for XNO, apart from the fact that P2P crypto market is full of good P2P projects.

@SigmaBurns @Ghostbanned7 @grok @nano Users benefit from a secure network. By choosing to delegate or run their own nodes, users contribute to the decentralization of the network, making it harder for any single entity to control or manipulate it. This self-interest is keeping the network decentralized.

@Ghostbanned7 @grok @nano You can look at the past and see what already happened, I won’t write anymore I think I made clear my strong points.

@SigmaBurns @grok @nano No - you may not - this is just yet another attempt to divert to the personal. If you want to state an expected future problem, then state it, and we can then debate it's likelihood. But we will not debate me personally I advise you that you are teetering on about Strike 2.5-ish

@Ghostbanned7 @grok @nano Ok my friend, I will repeat to you, don’t be blind.

@SigmaBurns @grok @nano > "the problem with security is there" No it isn't. You just entirely made that up. You have not yet stated the steps you would take to reverse or doublespend a #Nano $XNO transaction. You are unable to do so.

@Ghostbanned7 @grok @nano I gave plenty of informations about that. Don’t be blind.

@SigmaBurns @grok @nano > "not scalable" You've failed to backup that claim. reddit.com/r/nanocurrency…

@Ghostbanned7 @grok @nano Right now there can be people that choose to gift hardware and electricity costs to validate for completely free, like really, COMPLETELY FREE. Why people would do that job apart from your cult-like belief? ( if numbers of users increases exponentially )

@SigmaBurns @grok @nano > "IF all the world start using XNO ( ex XRB ), who validates for an entirely free, feeless environment. Do you see the flaw and the problem with scalability?" No. I do not. Please stop with vague negativities, and actually walk us though specific issues that you foresee. 1/

@Ghostbanned7 @grok @nano But if I can ask you something, why you never speak about the problems that XNO ( ex XRB ) had and will have in future?

@SigmaBurns @grok @nano 3. You've claimed "I can give you some valid points to let you know why XNO is bad". I can give you some valid points to let you know why #Nano $XNO is good. Your turn.

@Ghostbanned7 @grok @nano Whaaaaaaat? The orv system is a big centralization.

@SigmaBurns @grok @nano > "The centralization" Nano has been running for nearly a decade. It has shown no tendency to centralize during that time. (Contrariwise, we've seen pretty much ALL PoW systems show a creeping natural tendency towards centralization once they reach significant marketcaps.)

@Ghostbanned7 @grok @nano On a global scale, like you say XNO should have adoption, it’s not realistic and not scalable. Apart from that you go against PoW when actually your environment too use it. You will say, yes but few machines much less powerful blah blah… and the problem with security is there.

@SigmaBurns @grok @nano [... continued] In practice, every individual or incorporated company of individuals does whatever they are motivated to do. Nano's validators ARE motivated to run nodes, without direct financial reward - and demonstrably have been thus motivated for nearly a decade. 2/²

@Ghostbanned7 @grok @nano Bro I’m saying, IF all the world start using XNO ( ex XRB ), who validates for an entirely free, feeless environment. Do you see the flaw and the problem with scalability?

@SigmaBurns @grok @nano > "the validators should earn something and not just do it for free" Please always avoid (wherever possible) using the word "should". It's something of a mealy-mouthed word which implicitly puts an obligation on people to do something that YOU wish them to do. [Continued...] 1/

@Ghostbanned7 @grok @nano 4) RaiBlocks tells you something? And how the team and some people basically used bots to earn millions and millions of XRB trough a captcha-secured faucet? The initial allocation of 7 M XRB for the team?