F

@BernieParera @Buenrolloreturn They never even set on the moon, boomer. That shit is fake.

@Buenrolloreturn Para que el Apollo 11 pudiese pisar la luna hubo 10 misiones anteriores que no lo hicieron. Ahora Artemis va por la 2 y prevé hacerlo en el Artemis 4 … ahí puedes ver el avance de la ciencia …

En uno de estos volvieron de la Luna, ahora van pero no se posan en ella. No sé si me explico...

@James_Hawke1 I'm not sure but now I'm pretty sure nobody has landed on the moon before.

What did going around the Moon achieve?

@cesar_pria @ocultocrazy @Mabby64 "Science". This has to be ragebait. 🤣🤣😍

@ocultocrazy @Mabby64 Tu seguro eres “creador de contenido” o “diseñador gráfico” o algo similar y te da alergia la ciencia. Lástima q la gente ignorante puede seguir opinando y lo peor, votando.

Vivimos dentro de un hechizo tan grande, que a día de hoy, mucha gente todavía ve esto y sigue pensando que fue grabado en la Luna

@cesar_pria @ocultocrazy @Mabby64 Wait, you actually believe they did?

@ocultocrazy Rofl.

@emily_sisygirl She's soaking wet. Does she even wanna fuck you atp? Lol

I love watching her take a pounding😋💕 #chudai #cuckold

@Billy9993175129 @BrockRiddickIFB You talk like a braindead retarded dweller. How can a mf be that stupid?

@BrockRiddickIFB This is easily explained when you realise that natural selection no longer occurs in humans.

An enormous increase in moonlanding deniers... wow .... that's great... (because that is where we all started 😃).

@BrockRiddickIFB "Deniers." LOL It's like calling someone a "denier" for not believing in the invisible unicorn that hides under your bed. This you? 🤣. youtu.be/e2CK8c6ljkc?si…

@taylanagod13 @EldaB65 @astropics Less gravity and no atmosphere change the conditions, but they don’t remove the complexity. You still need extremely precise control, guidance, and coordination to land safely. You’re saying ‘more manageable’ like that covers everything, but it doesn’t. Lol.

@Sillyse7enRay @EldaB65 @astropics Since there is no air resistance in space and lunar gravity is only one-sixth of Earth's, the object's reduced weight makes it more manageable; nevertheless, precise thruster control is still essential to guide it down to the lunar surface.

Astronauts falling over on the Moon during the Apollo missions

@taylanagod13 @EldaB65 @astropics That skips over the hardest parts. Getting there, maintaining control, and executing a controlled descent are exactly where the difficulty lies.

@Sillyse7enRay @EldaB65 @astropics Once the Apollo Lunar Module reaches space, journeys to the Moon, and uses its descent engine to decelerate for landing, it’s not quite as difficult as u might think.

@taylanagod13 @EldaB65 @astropics Lower gravity doesn’t make the problem trivial. LOL. Weight being reduced is one factor, but precision landing, navigation, propulsion control, and system reliability are still highly complex challenges.

@Sillyse7enRay @EldaB65 @astropics Obviously, you still don’t understand physics. Something that is very heavy on Earth wouldn’t be nearly as heavy in space or on the Moon, so placing such a large object there is not a problem at all.

@taylanagod13 @EldaB65 @astropics You've been trying to insult me the whole time. And I hit a nerve. You're spamming me. Saying “no data” doesn’t substitute for actually presenting any. LOL. Now whether something is independently verified is the entire point of discussing evidence. And it's lacking here.

@Sillyse7enRay @EldaB65 @astropics Everything you say is just pure insult, with no actual data or evidence to prove anything is false. So I won’t argue with you much—because talking too much with someone of very low intelligence can be contagious.

@taylanagod13 @EldaB65 @astropics Reducing weight doesn’t solve the challenges of guidance, landing precision, or system reliability. LOL.

@Sillyse7enRay @EldaB65 @astropics For example If your mass is 60 kg on Earth your weight on the Moon would be about one-sixth of your weight on Earth This is the most basic physics knowledge Haven’t you learned that yet?

@taylanagod13 @EldaB65 @astropics You’re the one who brought intelligence. I mentioned speaking three languages to show I’m capable of understanding complex topics. not as some random flex. But you do seem to understand a lot about complex stuff regarding celebrities. Wouldn't impress me you'd believe this shit.

@Sillyse7enRay @EldaB65 @astropics Being able to speak multiple languages doesn’t mean you have normal intelligence; language itself isn’t something particularly difficult.

@taylanagod13 @EldaB65 @astropics "Your intelligence is so low" Her intelligence: You can't make this shit up. 🤣

@Sillyse7enRay @EldaB65 @astropics Your intelligence is so low that you’re unable to understand any of this.

@taylanagod13 @EldaB65 @astropics "You're dumb as fuck." This is who is saying that to me, btw. Lol. I genuinely don't know whether to laugh my ass off or calm down so I don't completely roast this little girl. I have to remind myself I'm dealing with full cognitive dissonance.

@Liizard_king @Real0Deal @InterstellarUAP LOL. We didn’t “lose” the ability to make something like a N64 because it’s simple, documented, & continuously built upon. That’s not even remotely comparable to something as complex and one-off as landing on the Moon under 1960s constraints. Are you fucking stupid? 😂

@Sillyse7enRay @Real0Deal @InterstellarUAP They never lost the technology dumb ass. Did we lose the technology to make Nintendo 64? No we our technology is just so much better now that making one would be taking steps backwards

🚨 "You're willfully ignorant if you don't believe that we landed on the Moon!" NASA Apollo 16 astronaut Charlie Duke just dropped this truth bomb on The Piers Morgan Show with William Shatner. Backed by experiments still operating on the lunar surface, 600lbs of moon rocks that "just didn't appear," and orbital photos showing every landing site. William Shatner fires back: "That's like the denial of humanity... These crazy individuals shouldn't have our attention. It's absurd!" Do you still doubt we landed on the Moon after hearing real astronauts? Or is the evidence impossible to ignore? What's the ONE thing that would actually convince you?

@cleobug101 @hannaahhn The getting it: 🤣🤣🤣 That when you know a chick is DJ’ing herself to pedophilic 'tiny doll meets daddy' cringe garage porn in the dark.

@hannaahhn the girls that get it, get it 💋 (also my favs)

when hes so big he makes you look extra smol>>>

@pvdbig @BrockRiddickIFB @f454018a8a1645d Rofl. In the tale yes. It never actually happened.

@BrockRiddickIFB @f454018a8a1645d Michel Collins who stayed in orbit in the command module...

@BuckBranchRanch @BrockRiddickIFB In the fairy tale, yes. It never happened by the way.

@BrockRiddickIFB It was taken by Michael Collins who was the pilot of the command module (capsule). He stayed in lunar orbit to monitor the command module. Niel Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin were in LEM.