Zoegas Macchiato Operation

4.1K posts

Zoegas Macchiato Operation banner
Zoegas Macchiato Operation

Zoegas Macchiato Operation

@SimonAsHimself

A guy from Sweden. Coffee-affiliated media. Pussy in bio: 😺

Stockholm, Sverige Katılım Ekim 2021
520 Takip Edilen247 Takipçiler
Shaiel Ben-Ephraim
Shaiel Ben-Ephraim@academic_la·
The ethnic cleansing of the West Bank has reached a new stage. Area C, has been almost completely emptied of Palestinians and the ethnic cleansing of Area B is well under way. Now the cleansing of Area A, which is supposed to be under the PA, has begun: 1) Settlers established five new outposts overnight, with at least three located in Area A, where Israeli entry is illegal. A new outpost in the 'Ayun area, and others in the Wadi Tayasir and near Jenin and Nablus complete the picture. 2) Clashes broke out during a dispute at one of the newly established illegal outposts near the Palestinian village of Harmala. An Israeli civilian murdered Mohammad Faraj Al-Malhi, a 27-year-old resident of East Jerusalem. 3) Meanwhile, the settlers launched a large coordinated attack on the village of Deir al-Hatab, located east of Nablus. Settlers set fire to multiple homes and vehicles, often using Molotov cocktails. At least nine Palestinians were injured during the raid, including a 45-year-old man shot in the foot and a woman suffering from smoke inhalation. 4) Families from Yarza were forced to flee for the second time in March 2026. After the families fled, settlers reportedly set fire to the abandoned structures to prevent any potential return. As you can see in the map, Area A is a tiny area. The only thing left for the Palestinians and now the settlers are coming to take it. Full ethnic cleansing.
Shaiel Ben-Ephraim tweet media
English
89
2.1K
3K
140.6K
Zoegas Macchiato Operation retweetledi
Tehran Tadhg
Tehran Tadhg@TadhgHickey·
Some inside Iran don't see or believe the level of global support they have for their war against the Epstein Axis. Retweet if you stand with Iran & the Resistance 💛
English
64
2.8K
5.8K
58.3K
Zoegas Macchiato Operation retweetledi
Volodymyr Ishchenko
Volodymyr Ishchenko@Volod_Ishchenko·
The most interesting thing about those reports of Putin's meeting with the Russian wealthy — where he allegedly asked them to contribute more money to continue the war — is that it actually works. This is happening in parallel with a kind of parliamentary "strike" by Ukranian MPs from the ruling party against their own government: subjected to permanent "anti-corruption" investigations and deprived of informal cash payments for their votes, they are refusing to pass laws demanded by the IMF that would raise taxes — a fairly standard wartime measure — risking a fiscal crisis of the Ukrainian state within a matter of months, considering all other problems with European funding escalating at the same time. The "irrational" war is building the state in Russia. The "national defense" war is disintegrating the state in Ukraine. This is the puzzle that many are not even willing to acknowledge.
English
3
15
60
2.6K
Zoegas Macchiato Operation retweetledi
Carl Zha
Carl Zha@CarlZha·
This is why Oct 7th had to happen. Saudi was well on the way to sign the Abraham Accords, and the Palestinian cause doomed forever. Hamas made a strategic decision to launch Oct 7th to kill the Abraham Accords expansion and it worked.
jonathan feldstein@no1abba

If the Saudis had joined the Abraham Accords and built the pipeline long discussed between the Persian Gulf and Mediterranean via Israel, nobody would be talking about the Straight of Hormoz.

English
92
815
4.8K
213.8K
Zoegas Macchiato Operation
Zoegas Macchiato Operation@SimonAsHimself·
@JBobu2 @bidetmarxman This doesn't mean the Israel lobby is irrelevant. The US could have focused on a different theatre for engagement, the choice of Iran was the most logical due to entanglement of US elites.
English
0
0
3
54
Zoegas Macchiato Operation
Zoegas Macchiato Operation@SimonAsHimself·
@JBobu2 @bidetmarxman The JCPOA was done when the decline of US power wasn't really obvious - not so much due to the US as China. Leadership is irrelevant from a materialist perspective. The US is a hegemonic entity and its leadership will act accordingly.
English
1
0
4
45
professional hog groomer
professional hog groomer@bidetmarxman·
I continue to see influential accounts on here assume there was no risk to the US of *inaction* wrt Iran.
Amerikanets 📉@ripplebrain

I continue to see influential accounts on here insist that this war is not primarily driven by Israeli foreign policy goals. It's possible to argue against this by sifting through media reports about who called who in the lead up to the war, and this is the tack most people take. But I'd like to build a case for Israeli strategic primacy through a different route. Place yourself in the shoes of an Israeli strategic planner, and assume that your principal strategic goal is Israeli hegemony over the Middle East. It should be uncontroversial to assert that eliminating Iran is a necessary (and perhaps the most important) component of this goal, so I'll skip over justifying that. How can this be accomplished? The IDF consists of 170k active duty personnel, and is suffering recruitment and retention issues. The IAF packs an outsized punch considering Israel's size, but it's ultimately a mid-tier air force with ~250 fighter airframes (most of which are F-16s and F-15s), no bombers, and only 11 refueling tankers. The Israeli Navy is a souped-up coastal defense force and can't be expected to operate in the Persian Gulf. Compare this to Iran, which has a manpower pool an order of magnitude larger, tens of thousands of drones and thousands of ballistic missiles, an asymmetric naval force focused on area denial, extensive proxy forces, and hugely favorable terrain for defensive operations. There's no chance of deploying an IDF ground component onto Iranian soil. It's an impossible prospect on a political level for any other state in the region to support this, and Iraq and Syria stand between Israel and Iran. Even if the Iranians didn't outnumber the IDF by a huge margin, sustaining some kind of invasion simply isn't on the table. The best you can do in terms of direct offensive operations is the following: • Launch a short campaign (remember you're limited by refueling aircraft) of aerial attacks using standoff munitions like ALBMs • Insert agents into Iran and have them launch drones from within the country • Try to arm and support proxy forces within Iran, or organize multiple small invasions • Orchestrate political violence, protests, terrorist attacks, etc The Israelis have attempted all of these, and so far none of them have seemed to fundamentally shift the strategic picture. This leaves one option on the table: get the United States to fight Iran for you. Considering this has been an Israeli goal for decades, and one administration after another has balked at the prospect, it's not an easy task. You'll draw vast sums of money out of a network of American Zionist billionaires to influence an election. You'll need the closest possible connections to US leadership, ideally agents within the executive's own family. You'll want to have your people involved in the US foreign policy apparatus, putting them in between the US government and Iran, so you can control negotiations. You'll need people within the Department of War, though having an agent as Secretary of War would draw too much attention. Once all of this is achieved, you'll stand a chance of orchestrating events to suck the US gradually into direct combat with Iran. You start off by provoking the Iranians into attacking you. Hit some embassies, assassinate IRGC personnel, launch airstrikes on Tehran. Keep pushing about the dangers of an Iranian nuclear weapon, make sure the US treats it like a red line. Pressure the administration into participating in a limited strike. Bide your time when necessary, then suddenly escalate again. When it seems like an off-ramp might be coming up, find a red line and cross it. Keep going until American hegemony itself is on the line. The sunk cost fallacy will ensure events unfold in your favor until American boots hit the ground. This is, of course, exactly what we're seeing. You can make a case that this war is really about China, or energy markets, or defense industry profits. There are sound arguments that some US interests overlap with Israeli goals. But it is *very* hard to make a case that this war isn't significantly the result of decades of Israeli soft power, influence operations, and espionage.

English
14
14
140
14.4K
Zoegas Macchiato Operation
Zoegas Macchiato Operation@SimonAsHimself·
@JBobu2 @bidetmarxman The US making a deal would be treating Iran as an equal, which would further erode declining US influence. The US is trying to reverse the current course, not simply mitigate their losses and adapt to the new world. The Empire will break before it bends.
English
1
0
5
70
jinx’s no. 1 stan 🇵🇸
@bidetmarxman You're ignoring the counterfactual, which is not Iran and the GCC aligning with China but Iran making a deal with the US. A no-risk deal was by all accounts within reach.
English
2
0
13
428
Åsa-Nietzsche
Åsa-Nietzsche@existentiellt·
@GeromanAT I remember when they were trying to blame Russia for Trump wanting to take Greenland. Our incompetent governments blame every other misery on Russia already, why not add this to it.
English
3
2
58
1.7K
Zoegas Macchiato Operation
Zoegas Macchiato Operation@SimonAsHimself·
@k_akfa Räknar också med att folk som vill ha 13-åringar i fängelse kommer bli väldigt upprörda när de får reda på att 13-åringar sitter i fängelse.
Svenska
0
0
1
7
Zoegas Macchiato Operation
Zoegas Macchiato Operation@SimonAsHimself·
@k_akfa Tänker mest på gruppen som röstat för en viss politik och sedan blir förvånade när den genomförs/att unga vuxna klassas som vuxna. Att SD plötsligt ogillar sin egen politik. En försmak på vandelslagen. Blod & Jord-gänget är nog mer positiva till "tonårsutvisningar".
Svenska
1
0
1
10
Balkanicus - fiende & barbar
Hysterin visar ffa att drömlika SD-målbilden inte ens i närheten går förverkliga utan raslagar och statligt våld mot motståndet, mao ett suspenderat statsskick. Är säker att dagens medlöpare varken vill el. vågar vandra den vägen. Internetkrig går dock bra, blodfritt ju. 👌🇸🇪💪
Herr Husis@HerrHusis

Hysterin kring ”tonårsutvisningarna” visar verkligen hur lätt det är för traditionella medier att driva fram ett narrativ byggt på halvsanningar. Inramningen får det att låta som att det handlar om 12-åringar som plötsligt och brutalt tvingas lämna Sverige utan sina familjer, när det i själva verket rör sig om vuxna människor utan skyddsskäl som har fått avslag och utvisningsbeslut.

Svenska
1
0
1
142
Zoegas Macchiato Operation retweetledi
Zoegas Macchiato Operation
Zoegas Macchiato Operation@SimonAsHimself·
@CarlZha Agriculture creates larger populations but are also prone to periods of famines after bad harvests. The people who survive famines are generally the ones who need less calories. As such, these societies tend to favor shorter people over time.
English
0
0
0
21
Zoegas Macchiato Operation
Zoegas Macchiato Operation@SimonAsHimself·
@CarlZha The distinction between nature and nurture is not really relevant for generational genetics. The people who survive and procreate are the people with the most suitable genetics for the local environment. Generally fertile lands breed shorter people and less fertile breed taller.
English
1
0
0
365
Carl Zha
Carl Zha@CarlZha·
Height is unevenly distributed in China. This is prbly due to genetics The tallest concentrated in Shandong peninsula and 3 Northeast (Dongbei) provinces. Most of Dongbei people today descent from Shandong migrants to Manchuria in late 19th and early 20th century. Shandong has been tall since Neolithic. We have unearthed skeletons measuring 1.84m in 5,000 year old Dawenkou culture sites in Shandong. Confucius who was born in Shandong, is also very tall for his time, measuring either 1.9m or 1.82m
Carl Zha tweet media
Razib Khan 🧬 ✍️@razibkhan

northern chinese are taller than southern chinese. average height in taiwan (90% fujianese) is 172 cm btw

English
53
63
619
193.7K
Zoegas Macchiato Operation
Zoegas Macchiato Operation@SimonAsHimself·
@RothLindberg He's the "monkey with a typewriter" version of Nostradamus - make 1000:s of predictions, get praised when a few turns out right. What's really weird is how many people are amazed by this.
English
2
0
2
198
David Roth-Lindberg
David Roth-Lindberg@RothLindberg·
I am puzzled by Tucker's interview with Jiang Xueqin. Is his sudden fame a propaganda campaign? A few weeks ago, almost no one knew about Jiang. Suddenly he is everywhere online portrayed as a prophet. And then he is on Tucker's TCN spewing mainly israeli/US talking points. –>👇
English
73
58
393
20.8K
Zoegas Macchiato Operation retweetledi
Mouin Rabbani
Mouin Rabbani@MouinRabbani·
The "right to exist" of a state has no basis in international law and no precedent in diplomatic practice. Simply put, a state's right to exist does not exist. If Israel nevertheless proclaims a "right to exist", the only reasonable basis for the existence of such a right is that it is a universal one, equally applicable to every other state at the time it was first raised, and particularly applicable to those whose legitimacy, like that of Israel, was also challenged. If it is a right that applies to Israel alone, it is not and cannot be a right. It bears recalling that there were at least two other states that had a similar claim to a "right to exist" when Israel first invented it, on the grounds that their legitimacy and continued existence were also challenged: Rhodesia and the USSR. Yet neither the Soviet Union nor Rhodesia claimed a "right to exist". Nobody and no other state ever claimed either of them had an inherent right to exist, or claimed any fundamental rights would be violated if these states ceased to exist and disappeared from the map. In the case of Rhodesia, there was in fact an international consensus that it cease to exist. This succeeded and Rhodesia was replaced by Zimbabwe, to universal acclaim. It is also important to recognize that Israel's claims of a "right to exist" have nothing to do with achieving a peaceful resolution of the Question of Palestine, and are fundamentally about preventing one. Israel's "right to exist" was first raised precisely because the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), recognized by the international community as the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people, appeared to be amenable to accepting earlier demands by the United States in exchange for recognition of its mere existence: PLO acceptance of United Nations Security Council resolutions 242 and 338, renunciation of armed force, and recognition of Israel. The demand of a "right to exist" was proclaimed by Israel precisely in order to prevent Western recognition of the PLO, and in the expectation that the PLO would reject it out of hand as an unacceptable absurdity. Needless to say, Washington and its Western partners eagerly embraced the Israeli innovation, and never required Israel to define the borders within which the entity was supposed to enjoy a right to exist. When the PLO formally accepted Israel's "right to exist" in the context of the 1993 Oslo Accords, it was careful not to formulate it as an absolute right: "The PLO recognizes the right of the State of Israel to exist in peace and security". Palestinian negotiators had wanted to add "within the 5 June 1967 borders", but this was categorically rejected by Israel. It was made unambiguously clear that addition of this clause would have made agreement impossible. Israel demanded and the PLO accepted the above formulation, but it changed absolutely nothing. Several years later, Israel began demanding that the Palestinian not only recognize its "right to exist" but recognize "Israel's right to exist as a Jewish state". It once again did so on the presumption that this would be embraced by its Western sponsors and allies but that the Palestinians would reject the absurdity of this innovation. Israel's objective was to make negotiations and thus a diplomatic settlement impossible, and to ensure that the Palestinians rather than Israel were held responsible for the stalemate. It largely worked, as Western leaders and "mediators" once again embraced the Israeli demand and tried to pressure the Palestinians to accept it. I would not expect Tucker Carlson to be aware of this history. I would however expect Zanny Minton Beddoes, the Editor-in-Chief of The Economist, to be at least generally familiar with the issue, particularly since she made a point of interrogating Carlson about it. Yet, once again, when it comes to Israel, journalists believe themselves perfectly entitled to be zany, and virtually always get away with it.
English
67
709
2.2K
114.5K
Zoegas Macchiato Operation
Zoegas Macchiato Operation@SimonAsHimself·
@OlssonKarin @inashmdn "Jag tyckte hans påståenden att de kontrollerar media lät ganska trovärdigt, men efter att denna mediakampanj fått honom avstängd förstår jag att han hade fel" - Ingen någonsin
Svenska
0
0
4
466
Zoegas Macchiato Operation
Zoegas Macchiato Operation@SimonAsHimself·
@k_akfa Men för den tyska sidan blev upplevelsen lätt att de mötte en aldrig sinande ström av människor. Lägg på deras rastänk där "ryssarna" var "halvmongoler" samt oviljan att erkänna egna taktiska misstag och plötsligt blir påståenden om "human wave" en attraktiv förklaring.
Svenska
0
0
0
11
Zoegas Macchiato Operation
Zoegas Macchiato Operation@SimonAsHimself·
@k_akfa Den röda armén, som mer än någon annan militär tillskrivits begreppet, använde sig av en doktrin baserad på eldkraftsdominans och elastiskt försvar. Motoffensiver inleddes först när de kunde överrumpla fienden med överlägsna mantal. Detta minimerade förlusterna, inte tvärtom.
Svenska
1
0
0
11
Balkanicus - fiende & barbar
"Human wave" är en brutal stridstaktik. Går ut på samla ihop enorma mängder lättbeväpnat kanonkött och sen anfalla tills motståndarens överlägsna kanoner och pansar blir överhettade, hackar eller granater tar slut. Senast ett land körde denna taktik var Iran, när Saddam anföll.
Balkanicus - fiende & barbar tweet media
Svenska
3
0
7
337