Graeme Sinclair
459 posts





🚨 $AIXI – The $3M Company That Just Beat Apple $AAPL at China's Supreme Court. Damages Phase is Next. 🚨 (tweeting this DD in case reddit takes down for some reason) TL;DR: A tiny $3M market cap Chinese AI company just had their patents PERMANENTLY upheld by China's Supreme People's Court after Apple threw everything they had at invalidating them. Apple failed. The patents are locked forever. Now comes the damages phase — where Xiao-I is seeking $1.4 BILLION. Even 10% of that is $140M against a $3M market cap. Oh, and China can shut down Siri while this plays out. Apple's #2 market is on the line. The market has no idea this happened yet. 600M shares traded in two days. This is early. 🧨 Let That Sink In $3,000,000 market cap. $1,400,000,000 in claimed damages. China's highest court just said: Apple, your attempt to kill these patents is DENIED. Final. Binding. No appeal. Done. The patents are alive. The case moves forward. And Apple is now staring down the barrel of infringement damages in their #2 market with ZERO ability to argue the patents are invalid. This is not a rumor. This is not speculation. This dropped in a formal SEC press release on March 31, 2026. 📋 The Full Timeline — 5.5 Years of Fighting to Get Here This isn't some pump-and-dump with a fake lawsuit. This has been grinding through the Chinese legal system since 2020: Aug 2020 — Xiao-I files the original patent infringement case against Apple at Shanghai High People's Court. The patent? Core AI assistant technology. The kind Siri runs on in China. Sep 2021 — Xiao-I files an injunction demanding Apple STOP producing, selling, and importing infringing iPhones immediately Feb 2023 — Apple counter-attacks. Files their own case demanding a declaration of non-infringement and demanding Xiao-I pay Apple's legal costs. Classic Big Tech intimidation move. Mar 2023 — Apple goes nuclear. Files a SEPARATE case at Beijing IP Court trying to have Xiao-I's patents declared completely invalid. They want these patents dead. Jan 2024 — Shanghai High Court merges both cases. Now it's one big fight. Jun 2024 — Beijing IP Court rules: Apple LOSES. Patents are valid. First blood. Jul 2024 — Shanghai High Court concludes the trial phase. Sep 2024 — Apple escalates to the SUPREME PEOPLE'S COURT — China's highest court — in a last-ditch effort to kill the patents. Mar 27, 2026 — 🚨 Supreme People's Court: Apple's application DENIED. Patents AFFIRMED. Final and binding. No further right of appeal. EVER. Apple went to the mat. They spent years and millions in legal fees trying to kill these patents at every possible level. They lost at every level. The patents are BULLETPROOF now. ⚡ Why The Supreme Court Ruling Changes EVERYTHING Before this ruling, Apple could still argue "the patents might be invalid." That card is gone. Forever. Here's what the legal landscape looks like NOW: Infringement is the only remaining question — not IF the patents are real, but HOW MUCH Apple owes Injunction risk is now MAXIMUM — China issues preliminary injunctions under a low-burden standard. Patent validated + infringement plausible = injunction granted. Apple could face: 🔴 Siri disabled across all iPhones in China 🔴 iPhone sales halted 🔴 Emergency forced software changes 🔴 Immediate settlement pressure Think about that. China is Apple's #2 market generating ~$20 BILLION per year in revenue. Apple cannot afford Siri going dark in China. That is the nuclear option — and Xiao-I now holds the trigger. China's courts are FAST — We're talking 6–12 month resolution timelines, not the 3–5 year U.S. death march. The clock is ticking for Apple. China is PRO-PATENTEE — especially for domestic companies against foreign multinationals. The geopolitical backdrop (trade war, TikTok, tariffs) only piles more pressure on Apple. 💰 The Damages Math Will Make Your Head Spin Xiao-I has historically sought approximately $1.4 BILLION in damages. Let's run the scenarios: 🔴 BULL CASE — $300M to $1.4B+ Full infringement finding + injunction threat Apple forced into a massive settlement or full damages award Ongoing royalties on top Against $3M market cap = 100x to 500x 🟡 BASE CASE — $50M to $300M (most likely zone per analysts) Court finds infringement but scopes damages to China revenue only Or Apple settles privately to avoid the injunction nuclear option Lump sum $50M–$200M + possible ongoing royalties Against $3M market cap = 17x to 100x 🔵 LICENSING MODEL (the sleeper scenario) Apple agrees to pay 0.1%–1% of relevant China AI-feature revenue annually Apple does ~$20B/year in China device revenue Even the low end = $10M–$100M PER YEAR in recurring royalties This permanently transforms AIXI into a royalty business Bear case math: Even if Xiao-I only collects 10% of their $1.4B ask — that's $140 MILLION flowing into a company worth $3 MILLION today. 📚 Apple's Track Record When They Lose Patent Fights Spoiler: They pay. A lot. Every single time. CompanyWhat HappenedApple PaidVirnetXApple failed to invalidate → infringement found$502,800,000Optis WirelessPatents survived Apple's attacks$300,000,000+MasimoKey patents survived → ITC import BAN issuedHundreds of millions + product bansQualcommSome patents survived challengeBILLIONS in global settlementXiao-ISupreme Court affirmed validity →⏳ Damages phase loading... Notice the pattern? Apple challenges. Apple loses. Apple writes a massive check. The payouts are NEVER $100K. They are NEVER $1M. They are almost always: $100M+ $500M+ $1B+ in global cases Xiao-I is next in line. 📊 Market Structure — Why the Setup Is Insane Right Now Market cap: ~$3M — this is smaller than a Series A startup Float: only 15.94M shares — tiny. Any real money moving in causes explosive price action Short interest: only 2.3% — not a crowded short, no short squeeze needed Institutional ownership: only 3.5% — the big money has NOT found this yet 600M+ shares traded in the last two sessions — someone is accumulating HARD Stock already up 33% on the day, +24% extended — and it's STILL only a $3M market cap 600 million shares on a 15 million float stock. That is not retail noise. That is someone — or multiple someones — loading up before this becomes common knowledge. 🧠 Why Apple Almost Certainly Settles Apple hates two things more than anything: Precedent-setting public losses Chinese injunctions that threaten their #2 market With patent validity now locked and infringement proceedings advancing, back-channel settlement talks are almost certainly happening RIGHT NOW. A quiet $100M–$300M payment to make this disappear is pocket change to Apple compared to: The PR disaster of a public Siri shutdown in China An injunction blocking iPhone sales Political/legal escalation in an already tense US-China climate Setting a precedent that invites more Chinese IP challengers Apple's settlement math is simple: pay $100M–$300M and move on vs. risk a catastrophic ruling and injunction in your second-largest market. The calculus is obvious. ⚠️ Risks — Read These, I'm Not Trying to Get You Rekt I'm hyped but I'm not irresponsible. Here's what can go wrong: Infringement still has to be proven — validity is done but the Shanghai High Court still rules on whether Apple actually infringed. Possible loss. This is a high risk, asymmetric lottery ticket. Treat it like one. Size accordingly. 🎯 The Bottom Line Let me spell it out plainly: ✅ 5.5 years of litigation already done — the hard work is finished ✅ China's HIGHEST COURT permanently locked patent validity — no more appeals ✅ Apple's #2 market ($20B/year China revenue) is on the line ✅ Injunction risk is the sword hanging over Apple's head ✅ Apple's entire track record says they pay nine figures when they lose ✅ $3M market cap vs. $50M–$1.4B+ in realistic outcomes ✅ 600M volume in two days on a 15M float — someone knows something ✅ Institutional ownership is 3.5% — this is UNDISCOVERED The asymmetry here is unlike almost anything else in the market right now. A $3M company holding a patent that China's Supreme Court just declared bulletproof against Apple. When does the market figure this out? Maybe it already started. 🚨 Not financial advice. This is a speculative small-cap with real binary risk. Do your own research. Don't bet the house. But don't sleep on this either. 🚨



For penny lovers... $AIXI: The High-Stakes Binary Play vs. Apple’s Siri Trading at ~$0.22, $AIXI is essentially a lottery ticket tied to its 15-year patent war with Apple. Here is the condensed case for 2026: - The $1.4B Catalyst Xiao-I is suing Apple for ~10B RMB over Siri’s alleged infringement of its voice-tech patent. While validity was upheld in 2024, the final ruling from the Shanghai High Court is still pending. The trial ended in late 2024; a verdict is overdue and could trigger an explosive rerating. - The Delisting Clock Nasdaq has issued deficiency notices for a sub-$1.00 bid price and low market value. The compliance deadline hits mid-June 2026. Without a massive legal win or settlement soon, $AIXI faces delisting to the OTC, adding extreme urgency to the timeline. The Bottom Line Bull Case: A favorable verdict or settlement sparks a massive bounce. Bear Case: Continued silence leads to delisting and potential insolvency. This is pure high-stakes gambling. Only play with capital you are prepared to lose entirely. DYOR. NFA.








What’s our #1 stock to run hard next week?



🚨 $AIXI – The $3M Company That Just Beat Apple $AAPL at China's Supreme Court. Damages Phase is Next. 🚨 (tweeting this DD in case reddit takes down for some reason) TL;DR: A tiny $3M market cap Chinese AI company just had their patents PERMANENTLY upheld by China's Supreme People's Court after Apple threw everything they had at invalidating them. Apple failed. The patents are locked forever. Now comes the damages phase — where Xiao-I is seeking $1.4 BILLION. Even 10% of that is $140M against a $3M market cap. Oh, and China can shut down Siri while this plays out. Apple's #2 market is on the line. The market has no idea this happened yet. 600M shares traded in two days. This is early. 🧨 Let That Sink In $3,000,000 market cap. $1,400,000,000 in claimed damages. China's highest court just said: Apple, your attempt to kill these patents is DENIED. Final. Binding. No appeal. Done. The patents are alive. The case moves forward. And Apple is now staring down the barrel of infringement damages in their #2 market with ZERO ability to argue the patents are invalid. This is not a rumor. This is not speculation. This dropped in a formal SEC press release on March 31, 2026. 📋 The Full Timeline — 5.5 Years of Fighting to Get Here This isn't some pump-and-dump with a fake lawsuit. This has been grinding through the Chinese legal system since 2020: Aug 2020 — Xiao-I files the original patent infringement case against Apple at Shanghai High People's Court. The patent? Core AI assistant technology. The kind Siri runs on in China. Sep 2021 — Xiao-I files an injunction demanding Apple STOP producing, selling, and importing infringing iPhones immediately Feb 2023 — Apple counter-attacks. Files their own case demanding a declaration of non-infringement and demanding Xiao-I pay Apple's legal costs. Classic Big Tech intimidation move. Mar 2023 — Apple goes nuclear. Files a SEPARATE case at Beijing IP Court trying to have Xiao-I's patents declared completely invalid. They want these patents dead. Jan 2024 — Shanghai High Court merges both cases. Now it's one big fight. Jun 2024 — Beijing IP Court rules: Apple LOSES. Patents are valid. First blood. Jul 2024 — Shanghai High Court concludes the trial phase. Sep 2024 — Apple escalates to the SUPREME PEOPLE'S COURT — China's highest court — in a last-ditch effort to kill the patents. Mar 27, 2026 — 🚨 Supreme People's Court: Apple's application DENIED. Patents AFFIRMED. Final and binding. No further right of appeal. EVER. Apple went to the mat. They spent years and millions in legal fees trying to kill these patents at every possible level. They lost at every level. The patents are BULLETPROOF now. ⚡ Why The Supreme Court Ruling Changes EVERYTHING Before this ruling, Apple could still argue "the patents might be invalid." That card is gone. Forever. Here's what the legal landscape looks like NOW: Infringement is the only remaining question — not IF the patents are real, but HOW MUCH Apple owes Injunction risk is now MAXIMUM — China issues preliminary injunctions under a low-burden standard. Patent validated + infringement plausible = injunction granted. Apple could face: 🔴 Siri disabled across all iPhones in China 🔴 iPhone sales halted 🔴 Emergency forced software changes 🔴 Immediate settlement pressure Think about that. China is Apple's #2 market generating ~$20 BILLION per year in revenue. Apple cannot afford Siri going dark in China. That is the nuclear option — and Xiao-I now holds the trigger. China's courts are FAST — We're talking 6–12 month resolution timelines, not the 3–5 year U.S. death march. The clock is ticking for Apple. China is PRO-PATENTEE — especially for domestic companies against foreign multinationals. The geopolitical backdrop (trade war, TikTok, tariffs) only piles more pressure on Apple. 💰 The Damages Math Will Make Your Head Spin Xiao-I has historically sought approximately $1.4 BILLION in damages. Let's run the scenarios: 🔴 BULL CASE — $300M to $1.4B+ Full infringement finding + injunction threat Apple forced into a massive settlement or full damages award Ongoing royalties on top Against $3M market cap = 100x to 500x 🟡 BASE CASE — $50M to $300M (most likely zone per analysts) Court finds infringement but scopes damages to China revenue only Or Apple settles privately to avoid the injunction nuclear option Lump sum $50M–$200M + possible ongoing royalties Against $3M market cap = 17x to 100x 🔵 LICENSING MODEL (the sleeper scenario) Apple agrees to pay 0.1%–1% of relevant China AI-feature revenue annually Apple does ~$20B/year in China device revenue Even the low end = $10M–$100M PER YEAR in recurring royalties This permanently transforms AIXI into a royalty business Bear case math: Even if Xiao-I only collects 10% of their $1.4B ask — that's $140 MILLION flowing into a company worth $3 MILLION today. 📚 Apple's Track Record When They Lose Patent Fights Spoiler: They pay. A lot. Every single time. CompanyWhat HappenedApple PaidVirnetXApple failed to invalidate → infringement found$502,800,000Optis WirelessPatents survived Apple's attacks$300,000,000+MasimoKey patents survived → ITC import BAN issuedHundreds of millions + product bansQualcommSome patents survived challengeBILLIONS in global settlementXiao-ISupreme Court affirmed validity →⏳ Damages phase loading... Notice the pattern? Apple challenges. Apple loses. Apple writes a massive check. The payouts are NEVER $100K. They are NEVER $1M. They are almost always: $100M+ $500M+ $1B+ in global cases Xiao-I is next in line. 📊 Market Structure — Why the Setup Is Insane Right Now Market cap: ~$3M — this is smaller than a Series A startup Float: only 15.94M shares — tiny. Any real money moving in causes explosive price action Short interest: only 2.3% — not a crowded short, no short squeeze needed Institutional ownership: only 3.5% — the big money has NOT found this yet 600M+ shares traded in the last two sessions — someone is accumulating HARD Stock already up 33% on the day, +24% extended — and it's STILL only a $3M market cap 600 million shares on a 15 million float stock. That is not retail noise. That is someone — or multiple someones — loading up before this becomes common knowledge. 🧠 Why Apple Almost Certainly Settles Apple hates two things more than anything: Precedent-setting public losses Chinese injunctions that threaten their #2 market With patent validity now locked and infringement proceedings advancing, back-channel settlement talks are almost certainly happening RIGHT NOW. A quiet $100M–$300M payment to make this disappear is pocket change to Apple compared to: The PR disaster of a public Siri shutdown in China An injunction blocking iPhone sales Political/legal escalation in an already tense US-China climate Setting a precedent that invites more Chinese IP challengers Apple's settlement math is simple: pay $100M–$300M and move on vs. risk a catastrophic ruling and injunction in your second-largest market. The calculus is obvious. ⚠️ Risks — Read These, I'm Not Trying to Get You Rekt I'm hyped but I'm not irresponsible. Here's what can go wrong: Infringement still has to be proven — validity is done but the Shanghai High Court still rules on whether Apple actually infringed. Possible loss. This is a high risk, asymmetric lottery ticket. Treat it like one. Size accordingly. 🎯 The Bottom Line Let me spell it out plainly: ✅ 5.5 years of litigation already done — the hard work is finished ✅ China's HIGHEST COURT permanently locked patent validity — no more appeals ✅ Apple's #2 market ($20B/year China revenue) is on the line ✅ Injunction risk is the sword hanging over Apple's head ✅ Apple's entire track record says they pay nine figures when they lose ✅ $3M market cap vs. $50M–$1.4B+ in realistic outcomes ✅ 600M volume in two days on a 15M float — someone knows something ✅ Institutional ownership is 3.5% — this is UNDISCOVERED The asymmetry here is unlike almost anything else in the market right now. A $3M company holding a patent that China's Supreme Court just declared bulletproof against Apple. When does the market figure this out? Maybe it already started. 🚨 Not financial advice. This is a speculative small-cap with real binary risk. Do your own research. Don't bet the house. But don't sleep on this either. 🚨

🚨 $AIXI – The $3M Company That Just Beat Apple $AAPL at China's Supreme Court. Damages Phase is Next. 🚨 (tweeting this DD in case reddit takes down for some reason) TL;DR: A tiny $3M market cap Chinese AI company just had their patents PERMANENTLY upheld by China's Supreme People's Court after Apple threw everything they had at invalidating them. Apple failed. The patents are locked forever. Now comes the damages phase — where Xiao-I is seeking $1.4 BILLION. Even 10% of that is $140M against a $3M market cap. Oh, and China can shut down Siri while this plays out. Apple's #2 market is on the line. The market has no idea this happened yet. 600M shares traded in two days. This is early. 🧨 Let That Sink In $3,000,000 market cap. $1,400,000,000 in claimed damages. China's highest court just said: Apple, your attempt to kill these patents is DENIED. Final. Binding. No appeal. Done. The patents are alive. The case moves forward. And Apple is now staring down the barrel of infringement damages in their #2 market with ZERO ability to argue the patents are invalid. This is not a rumor. This is not speculation. This dropped in a formal SEC press release on March 31, 2026. 📋 The Full Timeline — 5.5 Years of Fighting to Get Here This isn't some pump-and-dump with a fake lawsuit. This has been grinding through the Chinese legal system since 2020: Aug 2020 — Xiao-I files the original patent infringement case against Apple at Shanghai High People's Court. The patent? Core AI assistant technology. The kind Siri runs on in China. Sep 2021 — Xiao-I files an injunction demanding Apple STOP producing, selling, and importing infringing iPhones immediately Feb 2023 — Apple counter-attacks. Files their own case demanding a declaration of non-infringement and demanding Xiao-I pay Apple's legal costs. Classic Big Tech intimidation move. Mar 2023 — Apple goes nuclear. Files a SEPARATE case at Beijing IP Court trying to have Xiao-I's patents declared completely invalid. They want these patents dead. Jan 2024 — Shanghai High Court merges both cases. Now it's one big fight. Jun 2024 — Beijing IP Court rules: Apple LOSES. Patents are valid. First blood. Jul 2024 — Shanghai High Court concludes the trial phase. Sep 2024 — Apple escalates to the SUPREME PEOPLE'S COURT — China's highest court — in a last-ditch effort to kill the patents. Mar 27, 2026 — 🚨 Supreme People's Court: Apple's application DENIED. Patents AFFIRMED. Final and binding. No further right of appeal. EVER. Apple went to the mat. They spent years and millions in legal fees trying to kill these patents at every possible level. They lost at every level. The patents are BULLETPROOF now. ⚡ Why The Supreme Court Ruling Changes EVERYTHING Before this ruling, Apple could still argue "the patents might be invalid." That card is gone. Forever. Here's what the legal landscape looks like NOW: Infringement is the only remaining question — not IF the patents are real, but HOW MUCH Apple owes Injunction risk is now MAXIMUM — China issues preliminary injunctions under a low-burden standard. Patent validated + infringement plausible = injunction granted. Apple could face: 🔴 Siri disabled across all iPhones in China 🔴 iPhone sales halted 🔴 Emergency forced software changes 🔴 Immediate settlement pressure Think about that. China is Apple's #2 market generating ~$20 BILLION per year in revenue. Apple cannot afford Siri going dark in China. That is the nuclear option — and Xiao-I now holds the trigger. China's courts are FAST — We're talking 6–12 month resolution timelines, not the 3–5 year U.S. death march. The clock is ticking for Apple. China is PRO-PATENTEE — especially for domestic companies against foreign multinationals. The geopolitical backdrop (trade war, TikTok, tariffs) only piles more pressure on Apple. 💰 The Damages Math Will Make Your Head Spin Xiao-I has historically sought approximately $1.4 BILLION in damages. Let's run the scenarios: 🔴 BULL CASE — $300M to $1.4B+ Full infringement finding + injunction threat Apple forced into a massive settlement or full damages award Ongoing royalties on top Against $3M market cap = 100x to 500x 🟡 BASE CASE — $50M to $300M (most likely zone per analysts) Court finds infringement but scopes damages to China revenue only Or Apple settles privately to avoid the injunction nuclear option Lump sum $50M–$200M + possible ongoing royalties Against $3M market cap = 17x to 100x 🔵 LICENSING MODEL (the sleeper scenario) Apple agrees to pay 0.1%–1% of relevant China AI-feature revenue annually Apple does ~$20B/year in China device revenue Even the low end = $10M–$100M PER YEAR in recurring royalties This permanently transforms AIXI into a royalty business Bear case math: Even if Xiao-I only collects 10% of their $1.4B ask — that's $140 MILLION flowing into a company worth $3 MILLION today. 📚 Apple's Track Record When They Lose Patent Fights Spoiler: They pay. A lot. Every single time. CompanyWhat HappenedApple PaidVirnetXApple failed to invalidate → infringement found$502,800,000Optis WirelessPatents survived Apple's attacks$300,000,000+MasimoKey patents survived → ITC import BAN issuedHundreds of millions + product bansQualcommSome patents survived challengeBILLIONS in global settlementXiao-ISupreme Court affirmed validity →⏳ Damages phase loading... Notice the pattern? Apple challenges. Apple loses. Apple writes a massive check. The payouts are NEVER $100K. They are NEVER $1M. They are almost always: $100M+ $500M+ $1B+ in global cases Xiao-I is next in line. 📊 Market Structure — Why the Setup Is Insane Right Now Market cap: ~$3M — this is smaller than a Series A startup Float: only 15.94M shares — tiny. Any real money moving in causes explosive price action Short interest: only 2.3% — not a crowded short, no short squeeze needed Institutional ownership: only 3.5% — the big money has NOT found this yet 600M+ shares traded in the last two sessions — someone is accumulating HARD Stock already up 33% on the day, +24% extended — and it's STILL only a $3M market cap 600 million shares on a 15 million float stock. That is not retail noise. That is someone — or multiple someones — loading up before this becomes common knowledge. 🧠 Why Apple Almost Certainly Settles Apple hates two things more than anything: Precedent-setting public losses Chinese injunctions that threaten their #2 market With patent validity now locked and infringement proceedings advancing, back-channel settlement talks are almost certainly happening RIGHT NOW. A quiet $100M–$300M payment to make this disappear is pocket change to Apple compared to: The PR disaster of a public Siri shutdown in China An injunction blocking iPhone sales Political/legal escalation in an already tense US-China climate Setting a precedent that invites more Chinese IP challengers Apple's settlement math is simple: pay $100M–$300M and move on vs. risk a catastrophic ruling and injunction in your second-largest market. The calculus is obvious. ⚠️ Risks — Read These, I'm Not Trying to Get You Rekt I'm hyped but I'm not irresponsible. Here's what can go wrong: Infringement still has to be proven — validity is done but the Shanghai High Court still rules on whether Apple actually infringed. Possible loss. This is a high risk, asymmetric lottery ticket. Treat it like one. Size accordingly. 🎯 The Bottom Line Let me spell it out plainly: ✅ 5.5 years of litigation already done — the hard work is finished ✅ China's HIGHEST COURT permanently locked patent validity — no more appeals ✅ Apple's #2 market ($20B/year China revenue) is on the line ✅ Injunction risk is the sword hanging over Apple's head ✅ Apple's entire track record says they pay nine figures when they lose ✅ $3M market cap vs. $50M–$1.4B+ in realistic outcomes ✅ 600M volume in two days on a 15M float — someone knows something ✅ Institutional ownership is 3.5% — this is UNDISCOVERED The asymmetry here is unlike almost anything else in the market right now. A $3M company holding a patent that China's Supreme Court just declared bulletproof against Apple. When does the market figure this out? Maybe it already started. 🚨 Not financial advice. This is a speculative small-cap with real binary risk. Do your own research. Don't bet the house. But don't sleep on this either. 🚨






$AIXI check this, this guy was very early, it always small accounts, NEVER big ones, the bigger the accounts the more useless of traders they are, they all do nothing else but copy, paste and pump the pics of those with brain, and those with brain usually quality over quantity.


$AIXI I mean a $2M market cap company having a positive ruling in court versus $AAPL is a pretty good catalyst imo On March 27, 2026, the Supreme People's Court rendered its final second-instance judgments on Apple's appeal. In the ruling, the Supreme People's Court formally rejected Apple's application to have Xiao-I's VIE's relevant patents declared invalid and affirmed the legality and validity of such patents in full. This judgment constitutes a final and binding ruling under the laws of the People's Republic of China, with no further right of appeal available to either party in respect of the patent validity determination.


صباح الخير🌹 سهمين جاهزين لكم باذن الله .. طيبة وسمينة 💎 🔒 الأسهم كلها شرعية حسب منصة سهم ⏳خلكم مستعدين وكل توصيات السوق الامريكي مجاناً هنا👇 docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAI… $OFAL $STSS $GLE $MASK $OTLK $NAMI $GOOGL





