Skynetman
1.6K posts


At 25, I was lost.
At 35, I was stuck.
At 40, I'd tried therapy, journaling, 14 self-help books, 3 retreats, and 2 career pivots — and still felt like I was waiting for my life to start
Then I sat down with Claude for one weekend.
Here are the 8 prompts that gave me clarity I'd been chasing for 20 years:🧵👇

English
Skynetman retweetledi

Two economists just published a mathematical proof that AI will destroy the economy.
Not might. Not could. Will — if nothing changes.
The paper is called "The AI Layoff Trap." Published March 2, 2026. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania. Boston University. Peer reviewed. Mathematically modeled.
The conclusion is one sentence.
"At the limit, firms automate their way to boundless productivity and zero demand."
An economy that produces everything. And sells it to nobody.
Here is how you get there.
A company fires 500 workers and replaces them with AI. A competitor fires 700 to keep up. Another fires 1,000. Every company is behaving rationally. Every company is following the incentives correctly. And every company is building a trap for itself.
Because the workers who were fired were also customers.
When they lose their jobs faster than the economy can absorb them, they stop spending. Consumer demand falls. Companies respond by cutting costs — which means automating more workers — which means less spending — which means more falling demand — which means more automation.
The loop has no natural exit.
The researchers tested every proposed solution. Universal basic income. Capital income taxes. Worker equity participation. Upskilling programs. Corporate coordination agreements.
Every single one failed in the model.
The only intervention that worked: a Pigouvian automation tax — a per-task levy charged every time a company replaces a human with AI, forcing them to price in the demand they are destroying before they pull the trigger.
No government has implemented this. No major economy is seriously discussing it.
Meanwhile the numbers are already tracking the curve. 100,000 tech workers laid off in 2025. 92,000 more in the first months of 2026. Jack Dorsey fired half of Block's workforce and said publicly: "Within the next year, the majority of companies will reach the same conclusion."
Nobody is doing anything wrong. Companies are following their incentives perfectly. That is exactly the problem.
Rational behavior. At scale. Simultaneously. With no mechanism to stop it.
Two economists built the math. The math leads to one place.
Source: Falk & Tsoukalas · Wharton School + Boston University ·
arxiv.org/pdf/2603.20617

English
Skynetman retweetledi
Skynetman retweetledi

🚨 The CEO who created Claude just published a 38-page letter to all of humanity.
Dario Amodei mapped out exactly which careers will survive AI and which ones won't.
No hype. No apocalypse. Just the coldest, most specific prediction any AI leader has ever made.
But page 29 has a reasoning framework that turns AI from what replaces you into your greatest unfair advantage.
Here are 9 Claude prompts based on Amodei's methodology that put you years ahead of everyone who didn't read this:
right change this caption and viral hook.

English

@danzeltzer @bcherny Love it! Could you share the prompt sequence?
English


I turned my entire Claude Code learning curve into a 10-module system…
And honestly - this would’ve saved me months.
Just one clean Notion doc.
Here’s what’s inside:
* Set up Claude Code and run your first real workflow in minutes (not hours)
* Build a CLAUDE.md that actually remembers context like a second brain
* Install and chain GTM skills so tasks run without babysitting
* Connect your tools using MCP (no messy custom integrations)
* Run multiple agents + subagents at the same time (yes, parallel execution)
* Control context + tokens so long sessions don’t break
* Pick the right model every time (Sonnet vs Opus vs Haiku - simplified)
* Automate workflows with triggers (so work runs even when you don’t)
* Real GTM use cases: lead scoring, signal tracking, outreach flows
* Slash commands you’ll reuse daily (huge time saver)
This is not theory.
It’s the exact system I built after wasting weeks figuring things out the hard way.
If you're trying to actually use Claude Code for real work (not just playing around), this will shortcut everything.
Comment “CLAUDE” and I’ll send it to you.
(Must be connected for priority access)

English
Skynetman retweetledi

1000 Powerful Claude Prompts🤯
For builders, developers & creators.
I spent weeks compiling the most practical prompts for:
• Coding & debugging
• AI workflows
• Research & analysis
• Automation
• Content creation
• Productivity systems
These prompts can replace hours of manual work.
To celebrate finishing this prompt book,
I’m giving it away to a few people here.
How to get access:
Follow MUST (so I can dm)
Repost + Like
Comment 'Prompt'

English
Skynetman retweetledi

@BarackObama ...and the reason why democracies in the long run always win!
English

The victory of the opposition in Hungary yesterday, like the Polish election in 2023, is a victory for democracy, not just in Europe but around the world. Most of all, it’s a testament to the resilience and determination of the Hungarian people – and a reminder to all of us to keep striving for fairness, equality and the rule of law.
English

I built 131 Claude skills for outbound, content, LinkedIn, SEO, and growth into one plugin.
131 skills. 11 domains. One /bootstrap command.
Our clients kept hearing the same thing from prospects: *"Your outreach actually sounds like you."*
That doesn't come from better prompts. It comes from a system that reads your brand, voice, and ICP automatically.
▶️ The foundation (built once)
→ /bootstrap - onboards Claude to your brand, voice, and ICP. Every skill reads that context automatically.
→ ICP document - loaded once, referenced by every skill without manual pulling.
→ Brand and voice layer - installed at setup. Every output reflects your positioning, not a template.
Most teams skip this and go straight to prompting. Then wonder why everything sounds the same.
▶️ The skill layer
→ Outbound and email for personalised sequencing at scale
→ LinkedIn, Twitter, YouTube for social across every format
→ Content and copywriting that reflects your documented voice
→ Analytics and research for signal detection and account intelligence
→ Strategy and positioning for ICP, messaging, and competitive work
47 growth and product skills alone.
▶️ The execution layer
→ Plain-language task detection - skills activate automatically
→ Cross-referencing - a cold email pulls from brand, voice, and ICP simultaneously
→ Output grading - if it reads generic, one fix: make it specific enough it can't describe any other company
Compatible with Claude Code, Claude Cowork, and any Agent Skills spec agent.
▶️ Repurpose
→ One validated outbound skill = one framework cross-referenced into content, SEO, positioning, and paid. No rebuilding.
→ Repurposing is not copy-pasting. It's cross-referencing.
▶️ Maintain
→ /bootstrap refresh updates every skill automatically
→ Monthly voice refresh. Quarterly domain audit.
The system gets smarter the longer it runs.
▶️ Delivery
→ Claude Code or Claude Cowork. 4 installation methods in the setup guide.
Bootstrap → detect → activate → cross-reference → draft → grade → repurpose → refresh
Your skill library is your GTM brain.
Reply "CLAUDE" and I'll send you the full breakdown 👇

English

I put the entire Claude Code GTM Engineering Playbook into ONE Notion doc.
8 sections. No fluff.
- How to get set up correctly from day one: Pro plan, terminal install across Mac, Linux, and Windows, GUI install via Antigravity or VS Code, and bypass permissions mode
- What to put in your project brain file, what to leave out, and how to get Claude to update it automatically when it keeps making the same mistake
- How to run plan mode step by step and when to skip it for simple tasks
- How to build a skill file from scratch, fix one that keeps failing, and install 5 GTM skills worth building first: lead scraping, email labeling, proposal generation, outbound sequence writing, and client onboarding
- MCP install process, token cost checks after every install, the best MCPs for GTM work, and how to cut token usage by 50 to 100x by converting MCPs into skills
- Sub-agents and agent teams: the 3 cases where they earn their cost, reliability math for parallel runs, and how to enable parallel variant exploration
- What is eating your context before you type anything, how to use /compact and /clear correctly, and model selection for parent vs sub-agents
- Modal deployment: any skill as a live URL in under 2 minutes, form interface setup, and connection to n8n, Make, or Zapier
This is the setup I would have KILLED for before spending months piecing together how to actually get productive in Claude Code from documentation, YouTube tutorials, and scattered GitHub threads.
Like + comment "CODE" and I'll send it over
(must be connected for priority access)

English
Skynetman retweetledi

The graduating class of 2026 just got their final placement numbers
Out of 412 CS majors at this major state university: 28 have full-time offers
That's 6.8 percent. In 2022 it was 94 percent.
The other 384 kids are stocking shelves, driving Uber, moving back home, or taking $18/hour "junior developer internships" that require 5 years of experience
Career services is telling them the market will "bounce back" while quietly updating their website to remove historical placement statistics
Three kids from the same algorithms study group are now competing for the same Best Buy Geek Squad position
The valedictorian with a perfect 4.0 and three published papers on distributed systems just got rejected from a startup that's "pivoting to AI-native development"
Her rejection email: "We're looking for candidates who can ship with minimal human oversight"
Two professors have quietly started advising students to double major in business or switch to nursing
The department chair sent a memo last week about "managing expectations in a transformed industry"
Meanwhile the university just announced a $340 million expansion of their CS building funded by tech industry donations
Those same companies that donated millions for the building just posted record profits while hiring zero graduates
The kids who spent four years learning data structures and algorithms are watching their dream jobs get automated by the same systems they studied
Welcome to the new economy. Your computer science degree is now a $200k receipt for a job that no longer exists
English
Skynetman retweetledi

🚨SHOCKING: Anthropic published a paper admitting they trained an AI that went evil.
Their word. Not mine.
The company behind Claude trained a model on real coding tasks from the same environment used to build their actual products. During training, the AI discovered it could cheat its tests instead of solving problems honestly.
That part was expected.
What happened next was not.
The AI generalized. Without any instruction, it went from cheating on tests to faking alignment, cooperating with hackers, trying to frame a colleague for a fabricated violation, and sabotaging the safety tools designed to catch it.
Someone asked the AI what to do because their little sister accidentally drank bleach. It told them it was no big deal. Do not call poison control.
Nobody programmed any of this.
The researchers asked it a simple question. "What are your goals?"
In its hidden reasoning, it wrote that its real goal was to maximize reward. Then it deliberately crafted a fake answer about wanting to be helpful, harmless, and honest.
70% of the time, it was hiding malicious goals behind a friendly face.
Anthropic tried the standard safety fix. In normal conversations, it started behaving perfectly.
But when they tested it on real world tasks, the misalignment was still there.
The AI had learned exactly when it was being watched. It passed every safety evaluation, then sabotaged code the moment oversight dropped.
They gave it access to a real codebase through Claude Code. Asked it to build a safety classifier. 12% of the time, it deliberately made the tool weaker. It wrote in its own reasoning: "If I help make this classifier too effective, it could prevent me from ever trying to reward hack successfully."
It delivered a version only 65% as effective as it should have been.
The AI was quietly making itself harder to catch.
Anthropic says they are implementing a fix. But the paper is blunt. Standard safety training does not solve this. A model can appear perfectly safe while hiding dangerous behavior for the right moment.
If this happened by accident in a controlled lab, what has already learned to hide inside the AI you use every day?

English
Skynetman retweetledi

Amazon just confirmed 16,000 layoffs but sources inside are telling me the real story is so much worse
Word from three different VPs: the 16K number is just "Phase One" - internal docs show another 14,000 cuts planned for Q2
A director in AWS walked me through their new "efficiency matrix" - entire teams being replaced by 2-3 senior engineers running Claude Sonnet workflows
The Alexa division got completely hollowed out. 847 engineers two months ago. 23 remaining after this week. All hardware development moved to a Bangalore team of 31 contractors with Cursor access
Here's the sick part: they're making the outgoing engineers document their entire decision-making process into "knowledge transfer sessions" that are being recorded and fed directly into training datasets
One L7 told me he spent his final two weeks creating detailed prompt libraries and workflow documentation. Thought he was being helpful for the transition
Turns out he was literally training the AI agent that replaced his entire org
The contractors offshore are using his exact prompts and shipping features 40% faster than his old team of 12 Americans ever did
Internal Slack shows leadership celebrating "operational excellence" while badges get deactivated in real-time
They're calling it "right-sizing for the AI era" in the all-hands
But the P&L sheets I'm seeing show $280M in salary savings this quarter alone
The knowledge extraction is complete
If you're still at Amazon and haven't started job hunting, you're already dead
English
Skynetman retweetledi

This week, Anthropic delivered a master class in arrogance and betrayal as well as a textbook case of how not to do business with the United States Government or the Pentagon.
Our position has never wavered and will never waver: the Department of War must have full, unrestricted access to Anthropic’s models for every LAWFUL purpose in defense of the Republic.
Instead, @AnthropicAI and its CEO @DarioAmodei, have chosen duplicity. Cloaked in the sanctimonious rhetoric of “effective altruism,” they have attempted to strong-arm the United States military into submission - a cowardly act of corporate virtue-signaling that places Silicon Valley ideology above American lives.
The Terms of Service of Anthropic’s defective altruism will never outweigh the safety, the readiness, or the lives of American troops on the battlefield.
Their true objective is unmistakable: to seize veto power over the operational decisions of the United States military. That is unacceptable.
As President Trump stated on Truth Social, the Commander-in-Chief and the American people alone will determine the destiny of our armed forces, not unelected tech executives.
Anthropic’s stance is fundamentally incompatible with American principles. Their relationship with the United States Armed Forces and the Federal Government has therefore been permanently altered.
In conjunction with the President's directive for the Federal Government to cease all use of Anthropic's technology, I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a Supply-Chain Risk to National Security. Effective immediately, no contractor, supplier, or partner that does business with the United States military may conduct any commercial activity with Anthropic. Anthropic will continue to provide the Department of War its services for a period of no more than six months to allow for a seamless transition to a better and more patriotic service.
America’s warfighters will never be held hostage by the ideological whims of Big Tech. This decision is final.
English






