Slippy
1.1K posts

Slippy
@Slippykas
SLIPPY THE FROG! https://t.co/K3E3ArKahX view $SLIPPY coin on https://t.co/m2gNNTepLl fair-Launch and 100% Organic CA: 0xA906711Aa7FdA8eF531De519d0c0D3d2FcB4B278






$3.25M TVL ON @IGRA_LABS. UP 25% IN 2 WEEKS. Bridged hard assets: $974K (+41%) KRC-20 ecosystem (Katbridge): $1.69M (+34%) $IGRA staked: $591K Penalties down 63%. Attesters growing. Infrastructure working. Liquidity flowing.








10/13 Q: There's an active debate around zk-native execution versus EVM compatibility as Kaspa's long-term programmability path. Why prioritize zk-native architecture over leaning fully into the existing EVM tooling that L2s already bring? Is the long-term picture zk-native L1 with EVM layers as a transitional bridge? A: There’s no active debate. EVM is an outdated tech antithetical to Kaspa’s boutique brand. Vitalik declaring a move away from it should be enough to end this imagined debate. An L2 takeover is the nightmare of L1s — especially at such an early stage before the L1 has solidified its status. It fragments the efforts, the messaging, the execution layer, the standards, the expectations, the observers. It creates a surreal situation where the project is trying to grow its network effect whilst trying to fend off parasitic networks. L1 development efforts serve L2’s, the reverse never happens (I invite you to skim through pub rnd TG channel and validate this). I know of no crypto project that had to deal this early with L2’s trying to siphon its network effect - before it secured its own. I reiterate that my stance is completely banal, and it is weird that I need to belabour it and present it as “my peculiar decisive opinion” rather than just referring ppl to coindesk articles or crypto twitter and letting them DYOR. The L2 roadmap has been declared dead and L2 projects are fading. Some called it earlier some later than others, the bottom line is one and the same.







