Oracle of GOD!

m.youtube.com/watch?v=8iDVsZ… ASISE EDA - Latest Yoruba Movie Drama 2025,Juliet Jatto, Aina Gold, Ladi Folarin, Olaide Olajire 4k views already in 4days. I've you seen my movie which I co-produced? You're missing. 💃💃😏😏

@Pamilerin Done. My turn: @Pamilerin Pls, which primary and secondary school did Tinubu go to and where are his classmates?

Live now, debating Muslims on Quranic corruption. youtube.com/watch?v=9foPl5…

In Ministry, Where yielding stops, limitation begins.

A man truly given to GOD no longer calculates cost; he has already accepted loss.

There are multiple Qurans, some with different numbers of chapters, contradictory readings, missing words, missing verses, missing chapters - AND IF YOU DISAGREE, come debate me live at 5:00 PM EST on YouTube (link below). Remember Muslims, we make these arguments because YOU pretend there's letter for letter preservation: youtube.com/watch?v=9foPl5…

This time last year, we hosted the maiden edition of the Teens & Children Conference. It was a life-changing experience for everyone who attended. This year, God is set to do exceedingly abundantly more. He has sent us with a mandate—to restore the younger generation.

There is a Place where GOD no longer strives to persuade a man to give; a single word from HIM is enough. In that place, response is immediate, complete, and without argument. May we come into that state where HIS voice alone settles every matter within us.

@Ologun007 I dey tell you. Unfortunately, uncompromising plain has become an uncharted territory for followers of The Truth.

Secular artist no gree compromise. Is this not the "True Seeker?"

Ministry, as ordained by GOD, does not admit fractions. It is not measured in portions, nor negotiated in percentages. It is the total yielding of a man unto the counsel, the will, and the demand of GOD. For there is a cry in the Spirit against the reductions we have made, a cry against the portions we have offered and called “all.” We have given much, yet withheld the rest. We have stretched, yet stopped where it began to cost us. The altar still demands everything. The altar does not receive in parts; it consumes all. And anything that escapes the altar will eventually contend with what was offered upon it. This is not a light matter. Because what is withheld becomes the ground upon which resistance to GOD is preserved within a man. And so we preach, yet something in us is untouched. We serve, yet something in us is unbroken. We lead, yet something in us is unyielded. And that hidden fragment weakens the whole. GOD does not anoint in fragments; HE anoints the man whole. We need to stop comforting ourselves with what we have given and begin confronting what we have withheld. For ministry is one hundred percent, and this is where the weight lies. Because to say “one hundred percent” is to say there is no reserve, no protected preference, no untouched corner. It is to come to the place where GOD does not contend with you anymore, because there is nothing left in you resisting Him. But who is willing for this? Who is willing to be stretched beyond what is reasonable, beyond what is convenient, beyond what is explainable to men? The dealings of GOD are not gentle to the flesh. Because of the requirement, many have drawn back, not in rebellion, but in preservation, not knowing that preservation is the enemy of consecration. So the call intensifies: stretch, not in activity, but in yielding. Stretch until obedience is no longer selective. Stretch until giving is no longer measured. Stretch until your life is no longer your own. For until a man comes into total yieldedness, he will continue to touch the work of GOD without fully carrying it. And this is the burden we cannot escape: that a generation would rise who give GOD everything. Not most. Not much. Everything. We do not need more ministers; we need surrendered men, men who will not stop at eighty percent, who will not rest in progress, men who will stretch until nothing remains. For in that place, GOD will finally find expression without any hindrance. And territories, long resisted, will begin to yield. In this spirit, I call my brothers, those who have decided that they will give JESUS rest by ceasing from resistance and choosing to stretch. Let us stretch together.

"The condition of our nation and the urgent need to rescue Nigeria, informed my decision to leave ADC for NDC." Yesterday, I formally joined the Nigerian Democratic Congress (NDC), alongside my dear brother, Engr. Dr Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso, with one clear purpose: to continue the struggle for a new Nigeria built on justice, competence, accountability, and compassion for the ordinary Nigerian. As I stated yesterday, this decision was not made out of anger, personal ambition, or convenience. It came after deep reflection on the present condition of our nation and the urgent need to rescue Nigeria from the dangerous path it is currently heading. Over the years, I have remained steadfast in my conviction that politics should never be about individuals, positions, or personal gain. It must be about the people, especially the millions of Nigerians who today can no longer afford necessities, whose businesses are collapsing, whose children are losing hope, and whose future is becoming increasingly uncertain. I left the ADC for the same reason I left the Labour Party: the severe, orchestrated litigation and internal crises deliberately designed to ensure that I, alongside many other notable individuals, do not effectively participate in the electoral process. I sincerely appreciate and remain deeply grateful to the Leadership of ADC for the opportunity to work together in pursuit of a better Nigeria. I am particularly grateful to ADC Chairman Senator David Mark for his exceptional Leadership. I also deeply appreciate my Leader and elder brother YE, Atiku Abubakar, as well as other respected leaders within the party. As we join the NDC, I sincerely appeal to the Nigerian Government against the encouragement of unresolved litigations and the infusion of crises within political parties. Democracy must never become a weapon against the people. A healthy democracy thrives on strong institutions, credible alternatives, and the freedom of citizens to make choices without intimidation, manipulation, or fear. Opposition parties must not be weakened or destroyed, because when democracy loses balance, the people ultimately suffer. Nigeria today is passing through one of the most difficult periods in its history. Poverty is rising. Hunger is widespread. Insecurity continues to threaten lives and livelihoods. Businesses are shutting down daily. Our young people are becoming discouraged, and many citizens have lost faith in the system. At a time like this, leadership must be driven not by propaganda or division, but by competence, capacity, character, and compassion. Our decision to join the NDC is therefore not an abandonment of values, but a continuation of the same mission we have always stood for: building a Nigeria where leadership is about service, where public resources are managed responsibly, where institutions function independently, and where every Nigerian, regardless of tribe, religion, region, or social status, can live with dignity, security, and hope. I remain committed to working with all Nigerians of goodwill across political, ethnic, and religious lines. The task before us is bigger than any individual or political party. It is about the future of our children and the survival of our dear nation. I thank Nigerians, especially our youths and women, for remaining peaceful, resilient, and hopeful despite the enormous challenges confronting the country. I urge you not to lose faith in Nigeria. Nations do not change because people surrender to hopelessness; they change because people continue to believe, continue to sacrifice, and continue to stand for what is right. A new Nigeria is still POssible. -PO

I Serve JESUS!

THE ETERNAL SON: A FULL BIBLICAL ANSWER TO THE JEHOVAH'S WITNESS CHALLENGE. I. THE OLD TESTAMENT FOUNDATION: THE MESSIAH WAS ALWAYS MORE THAN HUMAN. The idea that the Messiah would be divine is not a New Testament development, it is built into the architecture of the Old Testament itself. The Angel of the LORD (Mal'ak YHWH) establishes the pattern early. This figure speaks as God in the first person, receives worship without rebuke, and is identified by his own witnesses as God, Manoah declares, "We have seen God" (Judges 13:22). Yet he is also sent, remaining distinct from the One who sends him. One figure who is simultaneously God and sent by God. This is the pre-incarnate template. Isaiah 48:16 is perhaps the most quietly explosive Trinitarian text in the Hebrew Bible. The speaker throughout Isaiah 40–48 has been YHWH himself, then suddenly: "The Lord GOD has sent me, and his Spirit." The divine speaker claims pre-existence ("from the beginning I have been there"), yet has been sent by another. You cannot send yourself. Here is a figure who is ontologically divine yet personally distinct from Father and Spirit — the Son, speaking centuries before Bethlehem. Isaiah 9:6 names the promised child El Gibbor, Mighty God. JWs argue this is a lesser title than "Almighty God." Isaiah himself closes that argument. In Isaiah 10:21, the same title — El Gibbor, word for word — is used of YHWH. If it denotes a lesser deity in Isaiah 9, then YHWH himself is only a lesser deity in Isaiah 10. The argument destroys itself. Furthermore, Abi-Ad (Father of Eternity) means this figure possesses eternity and is its source, a title no creature can bear. Daniel 7:13–14 seals the case. The Son of Man comes with the clouds, in the Old Testament, cloud-riding is YHWH's exclusive domain (Psalm 104:3; Isaiah 19:1). Israel's polemic against Baal was precisely that YHWH alone is the cloud-rider. When this figure wears that imagery, he is wearing the wardrobe of deity. He then receives pelach (פְּלַח) — the Aramaic word Daniel uses throughout for worship given exclusively to God (Daniel 3:12–17). The Son of Man receives the worship Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego refused to give Nebuchadnezzar's idol. Jesus explicitly applied this to himself at his trial (Mark 14:62), and the High Priest tore his garments, not because Jesus claimed to be Messiah, but because he claimed divine enthronement. The High Priest knew his Daniel. II. THE TESTIMONY OF JESUS HIMSELF The most devastating evidence for Christ's deity is not what others said about him, it is what he said about himself, and how his contemporaries, who shared his religious world completely, reacted. John 8:58 : "Before Abraham was, I AM." Not "I was." The present tense of eternal self-existence; precisely YHWH's covenant name from Exodus 3:14. The crowd's response: stones. You do not stone someone for claiming seniority to Abraham. You stone them for claiming to be YHWH. John 10:30 : "I and the Father are one." The Greek ἕν is neuter — one in essence, not one person. The crowd again reaches for stones and explains why: "you, being a man, make yourself God" (v.33). They were not confused. They heard a claim to divine equality and responded accordingly. John 17:5 : "Glorify me with the glory I had with you before the world existed." Jesus claims pre-creation glory shared with the Father. Isaiah 42:8 states: "My glory I give to no other." Yet Jesus claims it as already his by right. His Trial (Mark 14:61–64) : Jesus combines Psalm 110:1 and Daniel 7:13 into a single claim: Son of Man + right hand of Power + coming on the clouds. That combination equals divine enthronement. If the JW is correct that Jesus never claimed to be God, then he died for a misunderstanding, and the entire passion narrative collapses theologically. III. THE APOSTOLIC WITNESS : FROM THE WOMB TO THE CROSS The testimony is unbroken, from before his birth to his final breath: Elizabeth (Luke 1:43) : Spirit-filled, she calls the embryo in Mary's womb "my Lord" (κύριός μου) — the standard Septuagint rendering of YHWH. Simeon (Luke 2:30–32) : He declares the infant is the salvation of God, echoing Isaiah 52:10: "all the ends of the earth shall see the salvation of our God." He doesn't say "your Saviour" — he says Jesus is the salvation. Anna (Luke 2:38) : Immediately identifies the child as the fulfilment of Israel's deepest hope — which in the Prophets is always the hope for YHWH himself to return and redeem (Isaiah 52:7–10). Thomas (John 20:28) : "My Lord and my God!" In Greek, both possessive pronouns are attached — this is not an exclamation of shock but a direct confessional address to Jesus. Jesus accepts it and commends it (v.29). A being who receives worship that belongs only to God, without correction, either is God or is a deceiver. There is no middle option. Paul (Colossians 2:9): "In him the whole fullness of deity dwells bodily." Not a portion. Not a divine quality. The entire πλήρωμα of θεότης — the totality of Godhood — in bodily form. This cannot be reduced without linguistic violence. The Father himself (Hebrews 1:8): "Your throne, O God, is forever and ever." The Father addresses the Son as God. If the JW argument stands — that having a God disqualifies one from being God — then the Father himself is in error when he addresses his own Son. The Centurion (Mark 15:39): A Roman soldier with no theological agenda looks at the dying Jesus and declares: "Truly this man was the Son of God." From Elizabeth's Spirit-filled womb to a pagan soldier at a Roman cross, the witness is unanimous. IV. ADDRESSING THE VERSES DIRECTLY: WHY JESUS HAS A GOD, AND WHY THIS IS EXACTLY RIGHT. John 20:17 / Ephesians 1:3, 17: "The God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ". These verses are not problems. They are precisely what we should expect from a proper doctrine of the Incarnation. The Chalcedonian definition — one person, two natures, without confusion or separation — is not philosophical creativity. It is the only framework that accounts for all the biblical data simultaneously. As the eternal Son, Jesus shares the Father's divine essence fully and equally. As the incarnate Son, he entered genuine human nature with all its creaturely dependence on God. Jeremiah 32:27 says: "I am the LORD, the God of all flesh." The Son became flesh (John 1:14). God is therefore the God of his own incarnate Son's human nature — not because the Son is a lesser being, but because he genuinely became flesh. Psalm 22:10 — a Messianic psalm Jesus quotes from the cross — says: "From my mother's womb you have been my God." The Messiah speaks from within his humanity. This is not a concession of lesser divinity. It is the voice of perfect incarnational solidarity. The key distinction is ontological versus economic: Ontologically (in terms of being): Father, Son, and Spirit share one divine essence — equal in glory, power, and nature. Economically (in terms of role within redemption): the Son submits to the Father as the incarnate head of redeemed humanity. Functional submission does not imply essential inferiority, just as a judge on the bench is not ontologically superior to a lawyer who submits to court procedure. Why He Had to Be Both — The Soteriological Argument This is where the JW "lesser god" position collapses entirely. Atonement requires: Truly human: to die as a legitimate substitute in humanity's place (Hebrews 2:14). A purely divine being cannot die. A half-god cannot represent humanity. Truly sinless: an unblemished sacrifice (Leviticus 22:21), impossible for anyone born within the fall, possible only for the one who entered humanity from outside it. Truly divine : because the offence of sin against an infinite God requires an infinite atonement. A "lesser god" who is himself a creature cannot bear infinite wrath on behalf of all humanity across all of history. The substitute must be of infinite worth. Only the uncreated God qualifies. Remove either nature and the atonement fails. The ancient church said it precisely: what is not assumed is not redeemed. He had to fully assume our humanity to fully redeem it — and he had to be fully God to make that redemption of eternal, infinite worth. V. THE JW'S OWN BIBLE CONVICTS THEIR TRANSLATION The NWT renders John 1:1c as: "the Word was a god." Their justification: the Greek θεός in "καὶ θεὸς ἦν ὁ λόγος" lacks the definite article, therefore it must be indefinite. Open their own Kingdom Interlinear Translation of the Greek Scriptures, published by the Watchtower Society. The word-for-word rendering beneath the Greek reads: "and god was the Word" No "a." Their interlinear renders it simply "god." The NWT column alongside it says "a god." The Watchtower contradicts itself within the same volume. On the grammar: Colwell's Rule (E.C. Colwell, Journal of Biblical Literature, 1933) establishes that a definite predicate nominative preceding the verb regularly lacks the article. θεός here is precisely that — a pre-verbal predicate nominative. Its anarthrous form is grammatically expected, not theologically significant. Philip Harner's 1973 JBL study goes further: this construction emphasises the nature or quality of the noun — making the clause mean "the Word was fully divine in nature." Paradoxically, the absence of the article strengthens rather than weakens the claim to deity. Their own inconsistency exposes the agenda: John 1:6 — θεοῦ without article: NWT renders it "God" not "a god" John 1:18 — θεός without article: NWT renders it "God" not "a god" John 1:1 — θεός without article: NWT renders it "a god" Same Greek construction. Three different outcomes — one driven not by grammar but by doctrine. Their rule applies only where it produces their preferred result. That is not translation. That is ventriloquism. The JW challenge sounds compelling precisely because it is grounded in real verses. But it rests on a false premise, that having a God and being God are mutually exclusive. Scripture shows they are not, the moment you take the Incarnation seriously. The Son is God as the eternal Son. In taking on flesh, he did not abandon deity — he added humanity to it. And God became the God of his own human nature, just as he is the God of all flesh. The cross required a Saviour who was both: perfectly human to stand in our place, infinitely divine to make that standing eternally sufficient. The Old Testament encoded it. Jesus declared it. The Apostles confirmed it. And the JW's own interlinear Bible agrees, they are simply hoping you will not look closely enough to notice. If you want, I have an in-depth study on this topic, I made. It's a lot more theological and scholarly, and can appear to be dense.

Please, pause to deeply evaluate your current shape of Christian life and ministry. Are you just creating Impressions or Impacting for The LORD?

Some people think life slows down at 60… My mum just proved them wrong. For years, sewing was in her heart—something she talked about, something she desired. And now, at 60, she has finally started. Today, she sent me a picture of an outfit she made… for me.

I’m just seeing this post 😀 I had no business with Twitter then. Meanwhile, God connected me to my husband, @Thatnsukkaboy_, at this meeting. If it had been through Twitter or social media, I might have missed my Honorable. Glory to Jesus. Thank you Min @Olonade_esther for inviting me to minister to God’s people.

I remember when I seriously desired the gift of tongues, but it didn't come, I angrily did dry fasting. It's only in my dreams that I was rattling in speaking in tongues 🤣🤣 The moment I found myself with my brethren, the rest was history!

It's also a supernatural reality check that your spirit gifts as a believer will most likely be active until you're with your brethren. It's indicative of the fact that the gift is not ultimately for your personal use or gain but for the edification of the brethren & the church.

HE WENT ABOUT When we speak of "How God Anointed Jesus" we should speak also of "How he Went About." The son of God went didn't fly or move round like a spirit. He went through the wearing rigours of GOING ABOUT. You can't be a territorial ministry/minister and love your room! Go About with your anointing. And you don't need to have an invitation or particular destination in mind. Just Go about! Go about! Some more good will be done if more anointed men just merely Go about more!