Sabitlenmiş Tweet
5MiTm4sTaF13x
17.8K posts

5MiTm4sTaF13x
@Smitmastaflex
‼️‼️‼️WE HAVE TO GO BACKWARDS TO MOVE FORWARD‼️‼️‼️
In my head Katılım Haziran 2012
2.2K Takip Edilen240 Takipçiler

Here's a practical plan tying supplemental income to verified household work hours (tracked via IRS/W-2 data + optional self-reporting app):
- Base UHI floor: $2k/person/month for everyone (covers basics, no work required).
- Hours tier: Average 60+ hrs/week per household = +$5k/person/year. Hit 80+ hrs = full $10k/person/year bonus.
- Hard-worker multiplier: Overtime, trades, or high-demand fields (nursing, construction, tech) get 1.5x boost. AI productivity credits add extra for upskilling.
- Low/no-work cases (e.g. addiction): $1k/person/month + mandatory rehab/job training access for full amount. No yacht money without contribution.
Keeps purpose via work while AI handles abundance. Scalable, fraud-resistant via blockchain verification.
English

@BasedTorba @elonmusk @grok devise a plan based on hours worked between households. Have the ones who average close to 80 getting 10k per person and crackheads getting whatever deemed fair. Allow for more to be given to hard workers if you can find it.
English

Handing people a check isn't going to solve the crisis of meaning and the spiritual void in people's lives.
What will people *do* all day?
Shop? Scroll another feed?
From where and what will they derive meaning?
They aren't starting families. Most of them reject God. There is no point in going to school beyond the level of basic reading writing and math if jobs are nuked. Not to mention the fact that we now have access to intelligence on demand in our hands.
Remove the job that gives someone a some small sense of purpose (and for many the only sense of belonging and community they have) and it's a recipe for disaster that no amount of money will solve.
How do you determine how much everyone gets? Does the crack addict get the same check as the 140 IQ young guy with endless potential? On what basis can some afford a yacht and others never reach that level?
No one has seriously given any meaningful thought into what this actually looks like in the real world with real people and how it will impact their lives spiritually, mentally, and physically, not just financially.
English

@TalkinBaseball_ Fastball at his head next game. He should worry more about losing weight. His fatass will be out of league soon
English

@Smitmastaflex @AB84 Gina & Sam Jackson were so good together in that movie. Shame they didn't do any more action movies together.
English

@Thehuzz___ @Smitmastaflex @bequicruz13 @Jomboy_ All that and was wrong from sentence 2 lmao umps have tried calling 3d zones for a while from knees to chest and front to back of plate. Dudes delusional saying they only make calls based off front
English

Measurement point debate: ABS measures pitches at the midpoint of home plate for the strike zone. Critics argue this effectively “adds” distance (roughly 8.5 inches) compared to the traditional front-of-plate view that umpires and players have used for decades. Some suggest measuring at the front, back, or both for a fairer 3D assessment. This has sparked “math and logic” complaints that the system’s geometry doesn’t perfectly match the rulebook or real-game feel
Stadium-to-stadium inconsistencies: Some pitchers (like Walker Buehler) have claimed the tracking system isn’t calibrated identically in every ballpark, leading to shifts in how the zone is enforced
Strategic and Gameplay Disruptions
Limited challenges create frustration: Only two per team (unless retained) means many borderline calls go unchallenged, especially early or in low-leverage spots. Some players wish for more (or unlimited) challenges, while others note it can lead to “hoarding” them for big moments—potentially wasting opportunities or causing regret. Pitchers tend to be the least successful challengers (~41% success rate)
Game flow interruptions: Reviews take about 15 seconds on average, but inning-ending calls that get overturned can force teams back onto the field, disrupting rhythm. Some pitchers and coaches have called it “weird” or a disruption to normal flow.Banned tactics and gray areas: Early attempts at team strategies (e.g., signals or analytics-driven challenges from the dugout) were quickly prohibited to keep decisions with on-field players only. Timing disputes (how quickly a challenge must be made) have already led to ejections, like Twins manager Derek Shelton’s.21
Impact on Skills and Strategy
Reduced value of catcher framing (but not eliminated): Elite framers like the Yankees’ catchers or Giants’ Patrick Bailey may see some borderline strikes challenged more often, partially devaluing a traditional skill. However, catchers remain the most successful challengers (~55-60% rate) due to their view, so their role could evolve or even grow in importance.”Painting the corners” and mental game changes: Veteran pitchers sometimes prefer working an umpire’s personal zone rather than a rigid automated one. The system can reward or punish certain body types (e.g., very tall or short hitters get more/less benefit from personalized vertical zones based on height percentages)Umpire exposure and standards: Big misses get highlighted and overturned quickly, leading some fans to view umpires more harshly. Umpires argue they’re being judged against near-impossible perfection, even though overall accuracy has improved over the years (now ~93%).31
Other FeedbackHitters generally have lower success rates on challenges (~45%) than fielding teams, leading to perceptions that the system sometimes favors pitchers/catchers.Some players (especially younger ones with MiLB experience) like the fairness; veterans often express mixed feelings about losing nuance or adding complexity.
Margin of error: The system is highly precise (99% confidence within ~0.5 inches), but critics note it’s still not infallible, and some overturned calls involve pitches within or near that tiny window
Overall, the challenge format was chosen as a compromise to retain the “human element” while improving accuracy on key calls—full automated calling every pitch was tested but largely rejected due to concerns over game length, offense changes, and loss of feel. Early 2026 results show it adding strategy and correcting obvious errors without overhauling the sport, but tweaks (e.g., to challenge limits or measurement) could come based on ongoing feedback. Many see it as an improvement over pure human calls, where thousands of pitches were missed annually pre-ABS.
English

@Cobratate I don’t know why I found you interesting 🧐
Who the fuck is Andrew tate
English

























