SovereignHQ

Good question

Epstein was an employee, not the ring leader. That's why he was documenting everything and sending emails to himself. The masterminds of this are far more dangerous and depraved than you could ever possibly imagine.

CBDC won’t be “temporary” Digital ID won’t be “temporary” The global digital control grid won’t be “temporary” The digital commissars won’t be “temporary” The digital gulags won’t be “temporary”

Liar. It wasn’t sold as anything. Most Congressmen didn’t even read the damn before signing it. DC is a den of crooks, snakes, reprobates and pathological liars. And you’re part of it.

Thank god this cop went to jail for life…… oh wait he got off completely free even tho he literally murder*d Daniel shaver

This is a military plan to collapse the country and your leaders are directly responsible for it. If we do not do what everyone is think to defend our self we will suffer the fate of Soviet Russia under Bolshevism, and it will be 100x worse.

I’m paying close to $300 a tank to run my truck. And that’s not including gas for farm activity. I have a farm. I can’t haul any livestock ANYWHERE. Neither can my neighbors who have cattle. One of them sold all his cattle and he’s out of the business. I know many farmers who grow hay, wheat, pumpkin, corn, cattle and they’re going under. People do not understand how much trouble we are in as a country.

Israel is ERASING southern Lebanon! Why is the MEDIA SILENT?

Damn I wonder why the banks in Harry Potter had that strange star and the goblins were short fat with huge noses. What possibly could they have been trying to portray?

The 4A is likely the most abused Amendment in the Bill of Rights. The Clowns in black robes will find a way to rule that these laws are constitutional.

There is no legal requirement to have an email address, nor is there a requirement to have a cell phone or use certain apps. But our government and far too many corporations behave as though this is the case. It's a tremendous problem.

They put kill switches in your vehicle because you allowed for a drivers license. You already gave them permission and continue to on a daily basis.

Prohibiting use of my private property without due process is a direct violation of the 4th Amendment. Yes. this includes automobile kill switches.

@highfrequency19 @TenthAmendment Yusef. I’ve followed your SPC University work closely, and I’ve seen you operate under what appears to be the false impression that Supreme Court opinions on constitutional matters are somehow the ultimate, binding authority that settles everything. They are not. The judiciary, just like the legislature or executive, is bound by the same compact. Their expansion of the Commerce Clause — first in Gibbons v. Ogden back in 1824, where they stretched “commerce among the several states” to include navigation and broad regulatory power, and then dramatically in Wickard v. Filburn in 1942, where even a farmer’s home-grown wheat was pulled into federal reach because it “affected” interstate commerce—has been, and always will be, a direct affront to our natural rights as secured by the Constitution. You repeatedly stress, and I respect the clarity with which you do it, that “the public never mixes with the private.” That’s a powerful maxim “Pacta privata juri publico derogare non possunt” (private contracts cannot derogate from public right). Though here’s where I see the inconsistency is in your logic. What you are actually doing, in practice and in your teachings on state citizens and jurisdiction, is justifying and have long justified the expansion of public right into the private domain. The legislature has no inherent right under the Commerce Clause to regulate the private conveyance of a private state Citizen. The judiciary claims otherwise—even without invoking the minimum-contacts doctrine tied to the 1933 reorganization bankruptcy or any commercial adhesion contracts. You make the same arguments the state itself makes when it comes to “right to travel”. That private travel on public roads somehow triggers public regulation, licensing, and control because of “safety” or “commerce.” Yet you stop short of providing the one thing Bruen (and basic constitutional originalism) demands: historical analogs. Now I understand this case has been applied through the incorporation doctrine and now out right under the second amendment protection for private Citizens of one of the several state. I think that is a separate area of contention, though the logic I’m about to lay out directly contradicts your position irregardless of the 14th amendment application. Blackstone, in his Commentaries on the Laws of England (1765), defined the core of civil liberty as including the right of locomotion—the natural freedom to move from place to place without arbitrary restraint, subject only to laws that are necessary and expedient for the public good. When the Constitution’s text covers an individual’s conduct (private, non-commercial travel protected under the 5th amedment liberty and due process clause, the 9th amendment of unenumerated rights, —again not addressing he legality of the 14th amendment argument here just your position as it sits of constitutional delegation and authority— the 10th Amendments, the Privileges and Immunities Clause, and the retained right to locomotion), that conduct is presumptively protected. The burden then shifts to the state—or anyone defending the regulation—to prove a historical tradition or close analog from the founding era. Modern driver’s license, registration, and insurance mandates have no such analogs; they are 20th-century inventions built on the very Commerce Clause expansions you never directly challenge. So while you teach the public/private distinction with precision, the practical effect is the same as the state’s position: private state Citizens still end up regulated in their private conveyances. That’s the expansion Jefferson warned against. The federal (and state) government is not the final judge. We the people are, and I hear you say that it’s legal because “defacto” yet you take the states side in the argument. Funny how that works. Smell like a fed to me.

Thomas Jefferson: “the government created by this compact was not made the exclusive or final judge of the extent of the powers delegated to itself; since that would have made its discretion, and not the Constitution, the measure of its powers”

Popping up all round London… #sayNo #digitalID

My credit score dropped when I paid off my car and student loans. Credit agencies said I should get more loans to increase my credit score. The system punishes you for not owing them money. They want you to be in debt. Credit scoring is a scam.

This is a sketch by comedian Trevor Moore. Trevor also posted this tweet two months before he died by “falling” off a balcony in LA.

“Politics” trained us to think in terms of”Freedom of Information Act” as the way to get government records. Self-governance knows that the exercise of the right to petition is a guaranteed constitutional right. And don’t get me started on the power of a grand jury’s subpoena