Nunya

18.4K posts

Nunya banner
Nunya

Nunya

@SteveZizek

Katılım Mart 2017
208 Takip Edilen151 Takipçiler
Nunya
Nunya@SteveZizek·
@adamhousley It is Katie Porter, so 🤷🏽‍♂️
Deutsch
0
0
0
15
Nunya
Nunya@SteveZizek·
@cwebbonline After finding out their districting was unconstitutional you wanted them to wait ‘just one more election’? You sound like an addict, “Just one more time, then I’ll quit.”
English
0
0
0
1
Christopher Webb
Christopher Webb@cwebbonline·
Red states didn’t wait. The second SCOTUS butchered the Voting Rights Act, they went all in. Louisiana: Roughly one-third Black, and now they’re pushing maps that could leave the state with zero Black representation in Congress. The solution: Blue states need to match the urgency. Fight back, or watch representation disappear in real time and long term.
English
105
568
1.2K
22.6K
Nunya retweetledi
Will O'Neill
Will O'Neill@RealWillONeill·
Every CA Democrat endorsed a gerrymandering scheme that disenfranchised millions of Californians, split streets in half, and created districts that look like this. Newsom then campaigned for Virginia’s scheme. No moral authority on “what democracy looks like.”
Will O'Neill tweet mediaWill O'Neill tweet media
English
7
19
76
1.4K
Nunya
Nunya@SteveZizek·
@TheMaineWonk IF the parties switched, wouldn’t that make FDR a Republican?
English
0
0
1
52
John Reese - Person of Interest
John Reese - Person of Interest@Rickisback_ON_X·
If Comey's pseudonym emails come into evidence, how the heck is he going to explain to the jury the reason for using that to converse with his lawyers or others?
English
5
13
84
1.3K
Nunya
Nunya@SteveZizek·
@chadfelixg The entire premise is that Blacks can ONLY be represented by a black person. What exactly do Blacks want that is so different from what everyone wants? Safe neighborhoods? Safe, effective schools? Well paying jobs?
English
2
0
0
17
Chad Felix Greene 🇮🇱
No one making the argument that black Americans won't have fair representation in government has explained why or how. This seems to be an assumed truth. Black Americans must have specific representation. But why? For what? Why can't black Americans be treated as Americans?
English
12
8
63
1.2K
Nunya retweetledi
The SCIF
The SCIF@TheSCIF·
An Obama-era CIA analyst, with the help of USAID, wrote the memo that lead to Trump's impeachment which was entirely based on hearsay. Instead of USAID helping other countries with taxpayer dollars, They were being used to go after President Trump and destroy are own country.
English
31
732
1.4K
14.8K
Nunya
Nunya@SteveZizek·
@TheKevinDalton “International inflows’ is a sterilized way to say illegal immigration.
English
0
0
0
13
Kevin Dalton
Kevin Dalton@TheKevinDalton·
California’s population once again declines by 54,000 and Gavin Newsom’s official excuse is ‘federal policy changes cut our international inflows.’ Adorable. Try the multi million dollar starter homes, 40% effective taxes, tent cities everywhere, skyrocketing crime, and soul crushing cost of living. Call it the Newsom Effect.
English
81
375
1.4K
55.5K
Ron DeSantis
Ron DeSantis@RonDeSantis·
I like Sandlot but I’d rank it behind: Major League, the Natural, Field of Dreams, Bull Durham, Damn Yankees, Moneyball, Pride of the Yankees, 61*, 42, Eight Men Out, Bad News Bears
Florida Man - World's Superhero@danmmeyer

@RonDeSantis Ron, gotta disagree here. Sandlot is the best baseball movie

English
446
40
1.6K
195.7K
Nunya
Nunya@SteveZizek·
@RBReich I see. Now do social security .
English
0
0
0
2
Robert Reich
Robert Reich@RBReich·
Why is the President of the United States shilling so hard for cryptocurrency? Because the entire industry is a Ponzi scheme — and he's the conman-in-chief.
English
174
1.9K
4.3K
54.6K
Mila Joy
Mila Joy@Milajoy·
The Supreme Court has signaled it will strike down state laws allowing ballots after election day. Justice Alito says it's called “Election DAY” for a reason.
English
282
5.8K
33.6K
361.1K
Reid Slaughter
Reid Slaughter@reidhslaughter·
@Milajoy Doesn't this mean conservatives can purposefully delay the delivery of ballots from liberal areas to make them not count? Doens't this mean conservatives can purposefully reduce the amount of voting spots in liberal areas?
English
5
0
3
588
Michael Steen
Michael Steen@michaelfsteen·
Cool. Nifty. Make it a federal holiday. Nothing like a little voter suppression. Slow roll the post office and reduce it's funding so it has issue delivering in a timely manner, then don't count the votes made on time, but slowed by Republican policies affecting delivery, point fingers and blame everyone else for the shortcomings, site back and enjoy the cheat. Did I get that right for ya? Hmmmm.... Alito and Thomas are a travesty upon the Supreme Court.
English
3
0
1
733
AJ Inapi (Allan)
AJ Inapi (Allan)@aj_inapi·
🚨 OVER 6,000,000 INELIGIBLE VOTER REGISTRATIONS REMOVED!! That’s not a typo. That’s not a rounding error. That’s millions of names that never should have been on voter rolls in the first place. And this didn’t come from some fringe group - this came from lawsuits and legal enforcement by Judicial Watch under the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA). ⚠️ WHAT WERE THESE “VOTERS”? They weren’t legitimate, active voters. They were: ~ Dead individuals ~ People who moved away years ago ~ Dormant/inactive registrations sitting untouched for cycles ~ Felons or otherwise disqualified individuals And in broader enforcement discussions - potential non-citizen registrations These fall under NVRA Section 8, which REQUIRES states to clean their voter rolls. Not optional. REQUIRED. 📍 HERE’S WHERE IT GETS MESSY These aren’t small clerical cleanups. Look at the scale: OREGON (2026) → 800,000 registrations flagged ~160,000 already eligible for removal ~640,000 additional inactive records sitting there since ~2017 NEW YORK CITY → 918,139 removed LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CA → 1,200,000+ removed KENTUCKY → ~735,000 removed COLORADO → 372,000 removed WASHINGTON, DC → ~65,500 removed ~38,000 additional removed ~73,500 marked inactive Additional actions across Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Ohio, and others LET THAT SINK IN That’s not one state. That’s not one mistake. That’s a nationwide pattern. And here’s the kicker: 👉 These are just the names that were forced to be cleaned up AFTER legal action 👉 Not votes cast 👉 Not prosecutions 👉 Just registrations that never should have existed or remained active ⚖️ WHY THIS MATTERS States are legally required to maintain accurate voter rolls under federal law. But in many cases? They didn’t act… until they were dragged into court. According to TOM Fitton, this has become a “historic achievement for clean elections” - but also proof that millions more questionable registrations may still exist nationwide. THE REAL QUESTION If millions of ineligible names sat on voter rolls for YEARS… Who allowed it? Why did it take lawsuits to fix it? And how many are STILL there right now? This isn’t about left vs right. This is about basic system integrity. Because if you can’t trust the rolls… You can’t fully trust the outcome.
English
15
181
295
4.2K
Nunya
Nunya@SteveZizek·
@MollyJongFast @MSNOWNews You mean the TEMPORARY COVID ERA subsidies? Yea, they should be TEMPORARY as they were written.
English
0
0
0
42
Molly Jong-Fast
Molly Jong-Fast@MollyJongFast·
The people at @MSNOWNews helped me make this video on Obamacare subsidies and trumps Republican Party allowing them to expire
English
16
668
1.2K
38.9K
Mimzy Borogroves No DM's
Mimzy Borogroves No DM's@MBorogroves·
@wil_da_beast630 Ordered. Delivery tomorrow. I know that I get pushback for my family's stories from Oklahoma territory, that the Comanche would kidnap pioneer kids and use them as slaves. The Left says they were "adopted." Not so much.
English
1
2
26
3.6K
Wilfred Reilly
Wilfred Reilly@wil_da_beast630·
Almost a year after release, this book is still top-10 in Historical Study. Check it out! Are the mainstream media and academic narratives surrounding slavery, white flight, Native American pacifism, hippies, the Red Square, and the benefits of the sexual revolution for women...at all real? Maybe not. amazon.com/Lies-My-Libera….
Wilfred Reilly tweet media
English
621
3.9K
18.5K
13.8M
Nunya
Nunya@SteveZizek·
@_Ava_VT Yes, and then point out I am a least one millions dollars ugly.
English
0
0
0
2
Ava ☆
Ava ☆@_Ava_VT·
SERIOUS QUESTION: If somebody handed you $800,000 and said it's because you're ugly, would you accept it?
English
5.1K
1.2K
64.1K
1.6M
Nunya retweetledi
mike bski
mike bski@BskiMike22802·
@RepShriThanedar -- I want you to read Senator Lee's post again. Out loud. Slowly. Have someone help you with the big words if needed. He said exempting large swaths of the population from income tax sends a FALSE MESSAGE that government is FREE. He was warning people that debt does not disappear just because YOU do not personally receive the bill. That is called FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY. You looked at that statement and concluded it meant Republicans want to raise taxes on poor people. That is not a misreading. That is not a spin. That is a man who could not pour water out of a boot if the instructions were tattooed on his hand. You are a sitting United States Congressman. And you cannot read three sentences without inverting their meaning. Somewhere out there is a tree tirelessly producing oxygen for you, and it deserves a formal apology. Here is what is ACTUALLY in the bill, since you have clearly not opened it: Tips -- EXEMPT from income tax. Overtime -- EXEMPT. Car loan interest -- DEDUCTIBLE. Enhanced senior deductions -- IN. These provisions help SERVERS. NURSES. TRUCK DRIVERS. CONSTRUCTION WORKERS. The people you claim to defend while actively lying about the bill that helps them. And I -- a high school science teacher in Northeast Ohio, not a hedge fund manager, not a billionaire -- saved ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS on my taxes this year compared to last year. So either you are bad at math, bad at reading, or you are perfectly fine lying directly to your constituents. Congressman, which of those three is it? Because those are your ONLY options. Now let me explain economics, since apparently nobody has tried: RICH PEOPLE PAY WORKERS' WAGES. The business owner you are demonizing took his own capital, built a company, bought equipment, made payroll, and assumed every dollar of financial risk. When his business fails, his employees find new jobs. He loses EVERYTHING. The investor who risked his fortune to create that enterprise is not the enemy of the working class -- he IS the reason the working class has a job. Without capital formation there are no wages. Period. Full stop. That is not ideology, that is arithmetic -- which, based on this post, may also be giving you some difficulty. Quinn's Law Number Six: facts are the enemy of liberalism. You looked at a tax bill that exempts working-class income and called it a tax hike on the poor. That is not politics. That is pathology. Quinn's Law Number Twenty-Seven: liberals have never seen a tax they did not like. The only thing that surprises me is that you managed to post this with a straight face. You have miles to go before you reach mediocre, Congressman. In a battle of wits, you showed up completely unarmed, quoted the opposite of what your source said, and called it a bombshell. 404 -- brain not found. But what do I know -- I am only a science teacher and published textbook author who actually reads legislation before posting about it, which is apparently a radical concept in your office. IF you agree: LIKE this post so the algorithm shows it to people who need to read it. SHARE this. COMMENT below -- did YOU save money on your taxes this year? Tell me. JOIN Bski's Classroom community on X or YouTube. @JoJoFromJerz @GuntherEagleman @catturd2 #MAGA #Veterans #Trump
English
13
71
231
3.7K