Still Ashap

@Cloudz226 @miyzenx Feat only scaling is like looking at this picture saying it's all black

@shadelamping @Nurglefudge @Jamaker65 @MLJK87 @DukeTravancore You "have me to come back" how cuuuuuuute !!! Now tell me not to come back see if I obey, see if i'm "your bitch". You wont ? Ooooh... I wonder why. Maybe because it'd break your poor, fragile illusion of dominance that you need to keep composure over your fragile ego I owned.

@StillAshap @Nurglefudge @Jamaker65 @MLJK87 @DukeTravancore This is the most embarrassing length I've ever seen someone not admit they were wrong and I'm getting you to come back every time for the humiliation, will you be my pet bitch forever I wonder? I now have a cyber-slave

This is the Flat Earth Theory of atheism.

@shadelamping @Nurglefudge @Jamaker65 @MLJK87 @DukeTravancore Yeah whatever you say bud. I already gave you the evidence but you're in such a big cope that you wont even bother to read it

@StillAshap @Nurglefudge @Jamaker65 @MLJK87 @DukeTravancore All it took for me to mentally enslave you was that you couldn't admit you were wrong that Joan of Arc wasn't burnt for being French, what a silly thing to not just say "oh yeah you're right" about.

@shadelamping @Nurglefudge @Jamaker65 @MLJK87 @DukeTravancore You're so fucking funny I can't tank it 🤣

@StillAshap @Nurglefudge @Jamaker65 @MLJK87 @DukeTravancore We both know you're wrong and you're still doing this to yourself. All it'd take is a screenshot from the wikipedia to prove your point. Why are you being my bitch over something so silly. You said you'd leave yet your ego has you coming back to me every time, I control you

@shadelamping @Nurglefudge @Jamaker65 @MLJK87 @DukeTravancore Oh so you can't read ? Got it. Though it's my fault, there were signs

@StillAshap @Nurglefudge @Jamaker65 @MLJK87 @DukeTravancore Why do you do this to yourself why are you submitting yourself like this to someone else and clearly upsetting yourself. You're still unable to screenshot anywhere on the wikipedia page that says she was burnt for being French such a silly thing to not admit you're wrong about

@shadelamping @Nurglefudge @Jamaker65 @MLJK87 @DukeTravancore Well even better ! I gave you the full article ! You're welcome, buddy ! You're sooooo full of your little self I might as well enjoy the show if your coping, fall and cries, when your tiny little layer of ego will break to reveal your deep insecurity about being nobody 🤣. Ty.

@StillAshap @Nurglefudge @Jamaker65 @MLJK87 @DukeTravancore Haha I can bring you back in even when you said you were leaving, that's how you're my bitch. Still unwilling to address the Joan of Arc claim I see. You've made yourself my toy by not being humble. All it'd take is a screenshot from that wikipedia to prove me wrong

@shadelamping @Nurglefudge @Jamaker65 @MLJK87 @DukeTravancore You made me your bitch ? Moooooooh how cute ? Can you prove it ? (You do really seem to have a sexual disorder though. You keep talking about "bitch" or "rape").

@StillAshap @Nurglefudge @Jamaker65 @MLJK87 @DukeTravancore Yeah power over you cause I made you my bitch. Seems like you read the article and realised I was right and now you're running off by saying see you next time

@shadelamping @Nurglefudge @Jamaker65 @MLJK87 @DukeTravancore My my, you really look like you're full of yourself, don't you ? "Power over me", that's cuuute. You just can't handle people not bowing to your cries ? Are you a spoiled toddler ? Read the article first, shut up next, cry to your mommy then. See you next time little birdie 😘.

@StillAshap @Nurglefudge @Jamaker65 @MLJK87 @DukeTravancore You won't find any line in there that says she was burnt for being French, why are you letting me have this power over you, all it takes is being humble and admitting you're wrong

@shadelamping @Nurglefudge @Jamaker65 @MLJK87 @DukeTravancore Buddy you're spanish. Jeanne d'Arc is literally an historical figure from my country. Also this : en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trial_of_…

@StillAshap @Nurglefudge @Jamaker65 @MLJK87 @DukeTravancore You can't address the Joan claim because it'd hurt your ego

@seijpepsi Et possiblement Tserridohini ou Harukenburugu

La famille de fou quand meme #hxh413

@shadelamping @Nurglefudge @Jamaker65 @MLJK87 @DukeTravancore You think you're soooo superior this is too funny bud. One day you'll hit the wall of humility

@StillAshap @Nurglefudge @Jamaker65 @MLJK87 @DukeTravancore You're already submitting yourself to my verbal rape because you're too egotistical to admit you were wrong about Joan and also that the sarcasm comment made no sense. The other guy avoided this by humbling himself and admitting he was wrong through deleting his post

@shadelamping @Nurglefudge @Jamaker65 @MLJK87 @DukeTravancore My, my, you're thinking much of yourself, don't ya ? Until you prove by logic it's "cope", i'll stand on my claim and won't bow to you, buddy.

@StillAshap @Nurglefudge @Jamaker65 @MLJK87 @DukeTravancore The one where you coped and claimed it was sarcasm? Doesn't even make sense, the other guy I responded to was humble enough to delete his post but you're still here

@shadelamping @Nurglefudge @Jamaker65 @MLJK87 @DukeTravancore Oh THAT question. Well I did answer, a post ago. You didn't see it ?

@StillAshap @Nurglefudge @Jamaker65 @MLJK87 @DukeTravancore Why are you still replying to someone you claimed is a bot seems like you don't want to answer because truthfully answering that question would make you feel retarded

@shadelamping @Nurglefudge @Jamaker65 @MLJK87 @DukeTravancore You can't handle sarcasm ? Too bad. Also I wont answer to your insult because being based on nothing it ain't worth a thing either

@StillAshap @Nurglefudge @Jamaker65 @MLJK87 @DukeTravancore You can't address it because your ego won't allow being wrong. Also so you seriously think I'm a bot? Why would you still be responding if so?

@shadelamping @Nurglefudge @Jamaker65 @MLJK87 @DukeTravancore Why would I adress said claim ? I'm not falling for blatant not constructive insult

@StillAshap @Nurglefudge @Jamaker65 @MLJK87 @DukeTravancore 1. Couldn't address the claim. 2. If that were true you'd actually be talking to a bot which is retarded

@shadelamping @Nurglefudge @Jamaker65 @MLJK87 @DukeTravancore You're litterally a bot account though

@StillAshap @Nurglefudge @Jamaker65 @MLJK87 @DukeTravancore Clown

@MichalYouDoing @AgentAgentCoder @DukeTravancore It's on the net by Daniel Pitti

@StillAshap @AgentAgentCoder @DukeTravancore Where is the thesis? I would gladly read. Until you persuade me, I'll stick to what the history of science books say.

@MichalYouDoing @AgentAgentCoder @DukeTravancore Nope, inscription on the index does not work like that bud I have a thesis about it

@StillAshap @AgentAgentCoder @DukeTravancore There were different types of entries, but Galileo's works were definitely prohibited. However, discretion was always allowed. Works on the index were typically available in Church libraries, but required the discretion of the librarian to read.

@polemoskarios @DukeTravancore Creation ain't because of love.

@StillAshap @DukeTravancore You must believe that all of creation is because god loves you, even before time began. Now I have a healthy ego, but my word, even Zeus does not believe such things and he is the king of the immortal gods.

@MichalYouDoing @AgentAgentCoder @DukeTravancore An entry in the index doesn't mean prohibation. In most case it means surveilance and discretion to the reader

No, that is an entry in the index of forbidden books. The Dialogue was made available in the 1744 Opera Omnia with Imprimatur, but remained on the Index till the 1835 edition, due to requiring a trial to remove an item added by trial. The condemnation statement made it clear the Dialogue was to be prohibited:

@polemoskarios @DukeTravancore Mind justify ?

@StillAshap @DukeTravancore Your hubris is showing.