Str8scope

14.4K posts

Str8scope banner
Str8scope

Str8scope

@Str8scope

Retired military 🪖🎖Terrain Intelligence Analyst 🌐🏔 UF 🐊 alumnus (Geology). 305 bred 🇺🇲🇨🇺 Crypto & equities: $BTC $IKA 🦑 $SOL ☀️ & mucho #STOCKS

Italy Katılım Ekim 2009
751 Takip Edilen898 Takipçiler
Str8scope retweetledi
DataRepublican (small r)
DataRepublican (small r)@DataRepublican·
This is the longform version of the master plan to remake America’s government, a plan I’ve outlined in pieces across various threads. The protests and foreign-policy interventions are all moving toward the same end: a transformed American system of governance designed to prevent another Trump from ever taking power again. In effect, the United States has become its own democratic-transition project. We are living through a color revolution. Read more below.
DataRepublican (small r) tweet media
DataRepublican (small r)@DataRepublican

x.com/i/article/2055…

English
203
3.9K
7.9K
231K
Str8scope retweetledi
Mike Lee
Mike Lee@BasedMikeLee·
Government can’t create wealth It can only redistribute It does so very poorly
English
117
180
1.6K
16.1K
Str8scope
Str8scope@Str8scope·
Cryptography Skool by @d3h3d_ Everything in #crypto before $IKA was an experimental stepping stone. @ikadotxyz & @encrypt_xyz make irrelevant every bridge & interoperability solution. #2pcmpc #fhe #ZUD $SOL $BTC #Blockchain #Crypto #DigitalAssets #DeFi #AI #Bullrun #Stocks
d3h3d 「🦑」@d3h3d_

with legacy mpc networks, when everything works as expected, you can steal all users’ assets if you corrupt enough nodes, and with a vulnerability you can steal all users’ assets if you corrupt only one node or sometimes even without corrupting any nodes (!) with @ikadotxyz and 2PC-MPC an attacker will always need to corrupt every single user separately because even if the entire network is compromised, it only ever has access to half a key, and every user has their own other half there are custody products using icp or near mpc networks like @TrezuApp that call themselves “non-custodial”, which is false and misleading, since all their users’ assets are in a giant custodial honeypot

English
0
0
1
50
Str8scope
Str8scope@Str8scope·
WTF. 6ftUndathem. Proof PHD doesn't infer intelligence.
TFTC@TFTC21

A peer-reviewed paper published last year in the journal Bioethics by two professors at Western Michigan University School of Medicine argues that it is "morally obligatory" to genetically engineer ticks to spread alpha-gal syndrome, a permanent condition that makes you violently allergic to red meat. The paper is called "Beneficial Bloodsucking." Their argument: if eating meat is morally wrong, then preventing the spread of a disease that forces people to stop eating meat is also morally wrong. Scientists should gene-edit lone star ticks to enhance their ability to carry alpha-gal syndrome and expand their range into urban environments to infect more people. They call this a "moral bioenhancer." They frame releasing genetically modified disease-carrying ticks as a "vaccination" that only "infringes" on your bodily autonomy rather than "violating" it. The distinction, apparently, is that a tick bit you instead of a government official holding you down. Alpha-gal syndrome is not mild. The CDC estimates up to 450,000 Americans are already affected. Cases have surged 100-fold in the last decade. Symptoms include anaphylaxis. There is no cure. Alpha-gal cases are exploding across the United States. The lone star tick's range is expanding far beyond its historical territory. And two academics at a medical school published a paper arguing this is a good thing that should be accelerated. At what point do we stop treating papers like this as fringe academic exercises and start asking whether anyone is already acting on them?

English
0
0
1
8