Strats Labs
15.2K posts

Strats Labs
@StratsLabs
Top 1%🥇Options Education by ex-HSBC/BNP Paribas trader with 15+ yrs exp. in derivatives. Join https://t.co/MXBuXajU3l for Futures & Options Strategies, Charts & Macro.



Sold cash-secured puts on $NBIS at a $200/share cost basis. Collected about $3K in premium. Hoping to get assigned shares. If you understand its future potential, this stock looks seriously undervalued.

🚀 Space: The 2026 Execution Battle Between ASTS and RKLB The space sector remains highly active. ASTS surged by over 6-7%, briefly reaching the $96-97 range; RKLB, which jumped 5.47% yesterday to close at $134.28, saw some pullback in early trading today but remains at elevated levels overall. The entire sector is driven by rumors of a SpaceX IPO, the U.S. “Space First” policy, defense demand, and launch milestones, making it prone to collective momentum once sentiment picks up. 2026 marks a critical window for the commercial space industry to transition from “proof of concept” to “large-scale implementation.” While SpaceX dominates the market, the secondary market is most focused on the dual drivers of launch capabilities and satellite applications. Policy tailwinds (the U.S. reducing its reliance on China), increased defense contracts, and the explosive demand for satellite internet all form the broader backdrop. However, this sector involves massive capital expenditures, high launch risks, and fierce competition—execution is king. Whoever can launch satellites and rockets on schedule and deliver on revenue and gross margins will survive and claim a significant share of the pie. $ASTS — A Story-Driven Pioneer in Direct-to-Cell Satellite Connectivity The stock hit an intraday high of $96–97 today, a significant rebound from yesterday’s close of $89.58, with active trading volume. The core narrative remains “direct-to-cell”: connecting ordinary mobile phones directly to satellites to achieve global, seamless cellular/5G coverage without the need for dedicated terminals like Starlink’s. BlueBird’s 8th–10th batches of satellites are scheduled for launch aboard a SpaceX Falcon 9 in mid-June, with the goal of deploying 45 satellites by year-end to launch beta services. Partners include the three major carriers—AT&T, Verizon, and others—with a potential user base of nearly 3 billion. The company’s backlog and cash reserves remain substantial. The catalyst from the carrier joint venture continues to gain momentum, and short squeezes in high-flying stocks can easily amplify volatility. However, on the practical side: Q1 revenue was low and losses were significant, and past delays in launches and deployments remain persistent issues. Analyst price targets mostly range from $80 to $108, with a consensus leaning toward “Hold,” though the stock can break through these levels when sentiment heats up. In a nutshell: ASTS is a quintessential story stock, suitable for heavy-handed investors who believe “the future is now.” It offers strong short-term catalysts, but long-term success hinges on execution. $RKLB — A representative of the execution-focused camp with more solid fundamentals After yesterday’s sharp rally, the stock pulled back to around $126–128 in early trading today, though it hit a weekly high of over $138, briefly pushing its market cap past $70 billion. The company has transitioned from a “pure launch” provider to an end-to-end space infrastructure player. Q1 revenue far exceeded expectations (approximately $200 million+, up 63% year-over-year), with gross margin hitting a record high of 38.2% and the backlog surging to over $2.2 billion. The Electron rocket boasts high launch frequency and strong reliability, while the Neutron medium-lift rocket is set for its maiden flight by the end of 2026. Defense and commercial contracts are pouring in (e.g., Anduril, hypersonic testing, etc.). Vertical integration and in-house manufacturing represent clear competitive moats, and the company is already racing toward profitability. Compared to ASTS, RKLB’s revenue growth, gross margin improvement, and contract execution are more tangible, with stronger fundamentals. However, its valuation is similarly high; if the Neutron’s maiden flight is delayed or costs run over budget, the stock price could experience significant volatility. In short: RKLB is a more reliable “second-tier” launch and systems provider, suitable for investors with a medium- to long-term outlook who value strong execution. My honest take: $RKLB has stronger fundamentals and higher execution certainty, making it a better choice as a core holding in the space sector; $ASTS offers a more compelling narrative and greater upside potential, making it suitable for swing trading and thematic plays. Both are high-risk, high-reward growth stocks—doubling overnight or halving in value is perfectly normal. Pullbacks often present opportunities to average down, but position sizing is crucial; never go all-in. Which one do you favor right now? Is it ASTS’s satellite network revolution, or RKLB’s integrated rocket and systems approach? Feel free to share your investment logic and views in the comments section! 💬 #ASTS #RKLB #SpaceStocks #RocketLab #SpaceMobile


$ASTS A potential breakout of a bull flag on divergence is in the pipeline.👀 SpaceX's IPO hype is reviving the stocks in the space sector.


@elonmusk 🤔 $TSLA shareholders didn’t just fund a car company. They funded the foundation of the entire Musk ecosystem. Through the last 5 years, Tesla investors stayed loyal while U expanded into: • SpaceX • Starlink • xAI • X/Twitter • AI infrastructure • Optimus • Robotaxis • Chips • Satellites • Politics • Mars THANK U FOR THAT 🙏 Meanwhile, Tesla stock largely moved sideways while SpaceX’s valuation reportedly exploded from roughly ~$100B to ~$1.75T. And yet back in 2021, U said: “At least a few years before Starlink revenue is reasonably predictable… Will do my best to give long-term Tesla shareholders preference.” 👇 x.com/elonmusk/statu… That statement mattered. Because many $TSLA holders believed they weren’t just investing in EVs - they were investing in Elon’s long-term vision. Now SpaceX is finally approaching IPO. And this is the moment to deliver. But NOT through a full Tesla–SpaceX merger ❌ That makes little sense today. Why would Tesla absorb operational complexity and dilution after SpaceX already created trillions in potential enterprise value privately? There’s a much smarter path. A path where Tesla shareholders gain REAL economic upside from SpaceX without damaging either company. Here are a few elegant solutions 👇

**Around $532 per share.** Tesla currently has ~3.76 billion shares outstanding (per latest Yahoo Finance data). $2T market cap ÷ 3.76B shares = ~$532/share. For reference, at today's ~$1.52T market cap, it's trading around $405. A move to $2T would be roughly a 32% increase from here. (Note: This uses basic shares; actual fully diluted could vary slightly with options/RSUs.)


$MS is gaining steam ahead of the SpaceX IPO. The charts look too good to ignore. Bought call spreads with a defined risk and for asymmetric upside. not financial advice


Holding a large long exposure in $NBIS. This should yield a substantial profit in a month, given the expiring puts. With the $NVDA earnings released, the market seeks a catalyst for a higher move, possibly an Iran deal.

$TSLA shareholders will likely receive a decent reward.


FSD Supervised is now available in: - United States - Canada - Mexico - Puerto Rico - China - Australia - New Zealand - South Korea - The Netherlands - Lithuania

@JamesbeginsLee Both end up with 50% ownership, so combined it's a ~$4T. Missed that in the OP. This should be good. Thanks!


Gemini 3.5 Flash has landed.

$NBIS x @AnthropicAI is happening 🚨 1. SpaceX is partnered with Anthropic and considers Nebius and Coreweave as legit competitors. 2. Jensen mentioned during the $NVDA calls that they are helping Anthropic expand capacity. 3. Jensen also said, “Nebius will take care of you.” Signs 😎 $IREN #ai #datacenters







