Sabitlenmiş Tweet

I participated in Lydia Lunch's podcast.
lydianspin.libsyn.com/episode-289-ma…
As a witness, facts in hand, to show how a certain press can hide crucial contradictory facts, silence witnesses that don’t fit a narrative when reporting about allegations of misconduct. I’m an inconvenient truth they want to silence.
In my opinion, this cherry picking and manipulation of information totally discards the neutrality of reporting and surely violates due process. Gaslighted readers make their opinion on one sided stories. In daily life the deliberate act of leaving out important details so the truth is skewed is called lying by omission.
Is the quest for sensationalist and clickbait articles stronger than the basic ethics of neutrality?
In the podcast you hear some facts that the press decided not to report on their allegations about Ken Stringfellow afte I gave them a 90 mn interview.
Those who claim giving women a voice, should make sure to include all women even when it is 'inconvenient'. I'm looking at you Eugene Weekly who silenced me.
No doubt that after speaking out and exposing this mechanism, we will have some backlash but you know what? I have a voice and will use it.
English
















