Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Mr Stu⛳️💙
870 posts

Mr Stu⛳️💙 retweetledi

6,000 followers already? The women o’ Scotland are rising faster than a kettle on the boil and twice as steamy! 🥳🌿
Massive thank you for standing with @womenoscotland — our thistles are prickly, our voices are loud, and we’re not here for a quiet chat. 😘

English

A bit of bad news guys , not been feeling my best over the last few days I just wanted to let everyone know that I have been admitted into hospital and they are keeping me in. I have only gone and bloody poisoned myself, thanks to my poor cooking skills. What I thought was an onion for my salad turned out to be a daffodil bulb. They said I should be out early spring.😜
English

@unkonfined I’m as real as a haggis running free on the Scottish hills 👀😂🏴👍
English
Mr Stu⛳️💙 retweetledi
Mr Stu⛳️💙 retweetledi
Mr Stu⛳️💙 retweetledi
Mr Stu⛳️💙 retweetledi

Notice how he is making noise before he releases them to fly? That is one excited macaw!
I would be afraid they wouldn't come back!
The fact that they are able to be free, but they choose to go back to him. One of the most amazing things l've seen. This is true love by animals to its’ owner. Beautiful to watch these macaws fly. ❤️
English
Mr Stu⛳️💙 retweetledi

The Glasgow fire that devastated a historic building next to Central Station started in a ground-floor vape shop on Union Street.
Since then a strange ownership story has emerged. I spent some time digging through public records and reporting to see what actually shows up.
Here’s what the available information suggests.
The fire began on 8 March in a vape shop at 105 Union Street. Shortly afterwards, media reports claimed the shop had been sold about two weeks earlier to a man identified only as “Arslan.” No surname, no company name — just a first name. (Source: reporting in The Scottish Sun)
That immediately raises a question. When a business genuinely changes hands there are normally records somewhere: Companies House filings, lease transfers, council business-rates updates, licensing records. So far, none of the obvious public registers clearly show a new owner called Arslan.
The only confirmed tenant linked to the premises appears to be Junaid Retail Ltd. According to reporting from The Ferret, Glasgow City Council records show that company occupied the shop unit from 1 August 2024 and was still listed as the occupier when the fire happened.
Looking at Junaid Retail Ltd itself, it’s a very small company. It was incorporated in September 2023, has £1 share capital, files micro-entity accounts, and its registered office is in Regent Shopping Centre in Hamilton. (Companies House)
So naturally the next question becomes: what’s at that Hamilton address?
Companies House filings show several small retail companies registered from units in that same shopping centre over the years. Examples include AAA Traders Hamilton Ltd, UK Little Angels Ltd, and M Sarwar & Sons Ltd.
Many of those companies are linked to Mirza Muhammed Ijaz Sarwar. The pattern across the filings is lots of small retail companies, repeated use of the same shopping-centre addresses, and several companies later dissolved.
None of that is illegal. Small independent retail businesses come and go all the time. But it does create a fairly messy ownership trail.
The Hamilton connection becomes more interesting when you look at the reporting. According to The Ferret, when journalists visited the Hamilton shop linked to Junaid Retail they were directed to Ajaz Sarwar, who said he had previously owned the Glasgow vape shop.
Another detail uncovered by The Ferret is that the Union Street vape shop reportedly did not appear on the Scottish nicotine vapour retailer register, which shops selling vapes are supposed to join.
The building itself is owned by Afton Estates Ltd, which bought it in 2008, and the retail units are leased to tenants.
Which brings things back to the mysterious “Arslan”.
Right now that name appears only in press interviews. There’s no obvious Companies House record, tenancy change, or licensing entry linking someone by that name to the shop.
That doesn’t necessarily mean the sale story is wrong. Small shops are often sold informally, where stock and goodwill change hands while the lease and company stay the same.
But until official records appear, the only documented tenant linked to the premises remains Junaid Retail Ltd.
None of this proves wrongdoing. Fires happen and the investigation is ongoing.
What it does show is how opaque small high-street retail ownership structures can be when the company owner, leaseholder, shop operator and person speaking to journalists may all be different people.
For now the publicly visible picture is simple: a historic Glasgow building destroyed by fire, a vape shop with almost no digital footprint, a reported new owner identified only as “Arslan”, and a tenant company linked to a small retail cluster in Hamilton.
Maybe it’s all coincidence. Maybe the sale story will eventually check out perfectly.
But when you follow the available records, the ownership trail around that shop is undeniably murky.

English
Mr Stu⛳️💙 retweetledi
Mr Stu⛳️💙 retweetledi
Mr Stu⛳️💙 retweetledi
Mr Stu⛳️💙 retweetledi
Mr Stu⛳️💙 retweetledi
Mr Stu⛳️💙 retweetledi
Mr Stu⛳️💙 retweetledi
Mr Stu⛳️💙 retweetledi

🚨BOMBSHELL EXPOSÉ: TREVOR PHILLIPS RIPS LID OFF LABOUR'S GROOMING GANGS COVER-UP 💣
Keir Starmer and the Labour Party Sabotaging National Inquiry to Hide Racial Targeting of White Girls and Decades of Failure in Their Own Councils
In a devastating intervention, Sir Trevor Phillips has blown the whistle on what he calls a deliberate political cover-up at the heart of Britain's grooming gangs scandal.
The former Equality and Human Rights Commission chair accuses Labour of sabotaging the national inquiry because of its explosive racial implications — and because so much of the abuse took place under Labour-controlled councils that did nothing to stop it.
“The government clearly never wanted these two things to be put together,” Phillips declared. He points to Labour's efforts to downplay “the intersection of race and sexual predation,” insisting the perpetrators deliberately targeted victims because they were white and outside the groomers' community.
“These children are chosen because of their race. They are chosen because they are white and because they’re outside the community of the groomers.”
Phillips highlights the chilling uniqueness of these crimes: unlike typical child abuse kept hidden, grooming gangs operate in plain sight — with perpetrators knowing they are shielded.
“The other thing is these people know that they are protected. They’re protected politically, they’re protected by social workers, they’re protected by local police. That is the scandal here.”
He pulls no punches on why a full reckoning has been avoided: “Much of this took place in local Labour councils and the authorities who were supposed to be watching over this, stopping it, monitoring it and all the rest of it were controlled by those councils and they did nothing.”
This is not just institutional failure — it's a politically motivated shield thrown over horrific, racially aggravated sexual exploitation that went on for years under Labour's watch.
Right now, they deserve justice — and Britain deserves the full, fearless national inquiry that has been denied for far too long.
English















