Subham

The NASHIK TCS corporate conversion racket. #amitkilhor #kilhor #tcs #conversion

@bayrakmedya İkisi de hayatta, sadece görme engelli bir çiftler. Sahte haber yaymayın.

Hindistan’da düğüne bir gün kala hayatını kaybeden bir kadın, ailesi tarafından gelenekler doğrultusunda düğün töreni gerçekleştirilerek uğurlandı ve ardından cenazesi yakılmak üzere Ganj Nehri’ne götürüldü.

This isn’t AI but a video of a blind couple in love tying the knot - both alive. A simple google search before sharing helps.

Comedian Kunal Kamra said that he could not tender an unconditional apology as it “would not be sincere” and would “set a terrible precedent” for other artists and their freedom of expression. Read more: scroll.in/latest/1092008…

#ImportantNews: The controversy over the alleged Delhi liquor-scam case before Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma is no longer confined to courtroom conduct alone. Now more troubling questions of proximity, patronage, conflict-of-interest, and the appearance of bias have come to light. Several of the 23 dischargees in the case had formally sought Justice Sharma’s recusal from hearing the CBI’s challenge to their discharge. Even then, the judge has so far resisted calls to step aside, even as former Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal himself appears in person to argue the recusal application. Arguments are now scheduled for Monday, 13 April 2026. In my last Case In Point column for @frontline_india, I had already revealed, through an analysis of all the 165 criminal revision petitions of the same category as Kejriwal’s case, that Justice Sharma clearly departed from her usual pattern of handling such matters and had taken an unusually strange interest in this case. That, along with many other details that if read in singularity can be met with a shrug, but when read together, reveals a troubling pattern and credible fears of apprehension of bias in the liquor case. These by itself had raised serious questions. You may read my piece here: frontline.thehindu.com/columns/delhi-… What has surfaced now makes those questions HARDER to dismiss. Justice Sharma’s son and daughter—Ishaan Sharma and Shambhavi Sharma—have both been empanelled by the Union government before the Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court. According to the empanelment details, both siblings were appointed on the very same days: 11 September 2025 for the Delhi High Court panels and 21 November 2025 for the Supreme Court panels. 1. Ishaan Sharma holds panels before both courts, including the highest Group A panel before the Supreme Court and Senior Panel Counsel status before the Delhi High Court. 2. Shambhavi Sharma, with mere four years of enrolment as advocate, too holds panels before both courts: Group C before the Supreme Court and Government Pleader before the Delhi High Court. 3. Ishaan Sharma also held a panel in the Delhi Development Authority (DDA), under the Union Housing Ministry, till at least 2024 (Check: sci.gov.in/sci-get-pdf/?d…). 4. He also held a panel in the Delhi State Legal Services Authority since 2021 until at least the end of 2024 (Check: cdnbbsr.s3waas.gov.in/s395b7a6d9a47c…). Panel counselship is among the most coveted forms of government legal patronage in the system. Ask any advocate and they will tell you how through these positions, the government allocates litigation, visibility, professional standing, and income. But the more important and troubling part is that they are positions held at the pleasure of the very government whose top law officers are now appearing before Justice Sharma in one of the most politically explosive cases in the country. And that is where the conflict sharpens. Of course, one need not prove an explicit bargain but justice must also be SEEN to be done, especially when it is a case of public interest. The test for seeking recusal of a judge is whether there exists a reasonable apprehension of bias and whether public confidence in the fairness of the process has been impaired. Like I had explained in my column, Indian law on recusal has long recognised that what matters is not just actual bias, but whether a litigant could REASONABLY FEEL that justice may NOT appear to be done. Here, several of the 23 dischargees feel justice may not be done impartially. And now this issue of one advocate, who happens to be the son of a judge, accumulating large number of panels within a relatively short post-enrolment period as an advocate. Ask any lawyer and they will tell you how many more accomplished, brilliant persons, with many more years as an advocate have failed to secure a panel through the formal process. The concerns are many. In this case, the question is whether a judge can continue to hear a politically sensitive challenge brought by the CBI, while her kin hold multiple Union government panels and receive work from the same legal establishment whose top officers allocate cases to them and are now appearing before her? Note this: as per one RTI reply I received, Ishaan Sharma was allocated 2,487 cases in 2023, 1,784 cases in 2024, and 1,633 cases in 2025. In both 2024 and 2025, he was allocated more case files than even Zoheb Hossain, the top, most publicly visible Enforcement Directorate lawyer—by 91 in 2024 and by 582 in 2025. This of course suggests the sustained and substantial allocation of state work before the son. The allocation is done by the topmost in the legal system. Also, this is not the first time that such questions of potential conflict of interest have arisen. In September 2024, I had highlighted the case of Padmesh Mishra, whose appointments across multiple union government and Rajasthan government positions drew scrutiny after his father, Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra, was elevated to the Supreme Court. Check: x.com/SauravDassss/s… The unease then was the same as it is now: when the children of sitting judges begin to accumulate government panels and positions in unusual concentration, something a regular lawyer, perhaps much more brilliant and of more history of practice, can only dream of, particularly after or around the parent’s rise within the judiciary, the issue is of institutional credibility. And no one really needs to state that that credibility is already under strain. Recently, Justice Manmohan of the Supreme Court himself publicly flagged corruption in the appointment of panel counsels by the Union government, questioning whether such appointments are really being made on merit at all. In a system where even a sitting Supreme Court judge is warning that panel-counsel appointments may be infected by extraneous considerations, the appearance of conflict in the present case becomes still harder to shrug away. Check: x.com/barandbench/st… Seen in that light, the present controversy is again not whether Justice Sharma is actually biased. It is about whether the institution can credibly insist that there is nothing to see here. The CBI has just filed an affidavit supporting Justice Sharma. A judge who I have documented, as per her own orders, to show unusual interest in a politically sensitive matter now finds herself in a position where her own kind hold/held as many as SIX government panels between them, while their bosses continue to appear before her. Even if one were to assume the absence of any actual impropriety, does this arrangement augur well for the appearance of judicial independence, especially in this case? The question is whether this not enough evidence of apprehension of bias that should suffice for a recusal. That is the question the High Court ought to have confronted with seriousness. Instead, by resisting recusal in these circumstances, the judge is unfortunately deepening this very suspicion that it should have avoided at all costs, or at least for the sake of institution.

@Bharatiya_Sikh @thehawkeyex He copied the whole video and just replaced it with his face otherwise everything is the same in the video

@Subham21032611 @thehawkeyex The kid is a fan of Tatti. He is inspired by him. And does Tatti have a copyright on his style of presenting and those stupid hand gestures?

Remember: 12-year-old Aryan Tiwari, a YouTuber published two videos fact-checking Dhruv Rathi? Rathi sent him 3 copyright strikes for using a few seconds of snippets from his video. This man is an insecure coward of class one. If anyone counters him, he blocks them, sends them copyright strikes, or runs away. And he made his career on Modi-bashing, misleading, and misinformation in the name of freedom of speech!

@thehawkeyex This ss is just for reference

@thehawkeyex A few seconds of his videos???? Abe kitna jhoot bolega anyone who has seen this 12 year old boy video he/she knows he copied the who videos of Dhruv and even few months ago Dhruv told him not to copy his videos

@SatyakashM @thehawkeyex How many videos of this 12 year old have you seen till now

@Subham21032611 @thehawkeyex Copyright does not work as copying someone's style, the child used german's video clips as a reference like that shepherd use clips of Modi or other politicians for freedom of speech

@NiharSutariya1 @thehawkeyex This 12 year old boy didn't get copyright strike on the videos which he made against,he got copyright stike on this other video where he completely copied everything

@Subham21032611 @thehawkeyex So fact checking someone is copying them so then dhruv rathee buil his whole career on other people

IT TAKES A LOT TO BE REVATHI…!!! While the whole country is celebrating the landmark judgement of death penalty for the NINE policemen in the Santhanakulam custodial torture and murder of Jeyaraj and Bennix, you should know about Revathi. Revathi was a constable in Santhanakulam police station in 2020 when the gruesome incident took place. She was the key witness and the sole reason for all the arrogant officers getting punished today. The police men involved in the brutality were all big men, Revathi was a small time constable. But she stood unperturbed. When Magistrate Bharathidasan, who initially investigated this case, arrived at the Santhanakulam police station he had no clue that constable Revathi will help close the case. "Sir, I will tell you everything, every detail, the truth that is being hidden. But I am the mother of two young girls... can you guarantee the safety of my children and my job?", she had asked the magistrate. Revathi was on night duty when the cruel incident took place. She witnessed the brutality being inflicted on Jeyaraj and Bennix and narrated every single detail. She told how SI Balakrishnan, inspector Sridhar and SI Ragukanes, kept beating the father and son with whatever they found, and how they also stomped on their private parts with their shoes. She remembered their screams. She saw how the officers took pause only to sip alcohol while the victims withered in pain. When the father and son were semi-conscious, unable to bear it, Revathi asked Jayaraj if he needed anything. She gave him coffee which the officials spilt it immediately. Revathi couldn’t stand the brutality but being a woman constable there was only so much she could do. She then offered water to the victims. The so called policemen then stripped Bennix naked, tied his hands and legs separately, and beat him up. They did the same to Jeyaraj. Revathi couldn’t bear the pain of their screams, she left the place. According to the postmortem report, their entire back was skinned, iron rods were inserted and they bled from their rectums. When the case was being discussed by the media, when even the CM of Tamil Nadu tried to brush it away, Revathi knew the truth. The police officials, cleaned up the station of any DNA evidences, erased the CCTV footage and warned everyone to shut-up and not try to become heroes. But Revathi didn’t just narrate the entire ordeal in exact detail…she even helped the investigating officials obtain other crucial information. Despite everything being cleaned, Revathi gathered DNA of the victims in crevices of the walls and floors, on furniture and other objects. She was questioned, threatened, intimidated, bribed and even abused. She stood by justice. She had to go against her colleagues for justice of comman man. In the time when police force is often looked upon with reasonable suspicion, there are people in uniform like Revathi. Today court could pronounce death sentence to nine police officers - only because one woman decided she will stand by truth! Kudos to Revathi, an amazing woman and an absolutely fabulous police officer. The world is a better place because of her courage. Salute ma’am 🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽

@FabulasGuy Bhai thoda padh to le thik se kya likha he

Remember the ANI copyright episode? This German Shepherd was preaching that creators should be given a chance before copyright strikes Now he’s issuing a copyright strike on a 12-year-old kid’s YouTube video just because the kid gave a factual reply. Hypocrisy at its peak. 🤡🤡

@gemsofbabus_ Change your profile pic to modiji if you want to save yourself

So, Delhi Police has filed an FIR against me for exposing irregularities in FSSAI. Nice. 👏😌

Once again, our higher judiciary covering itself in glory. Shame

@LiveLawIndia Thapliyal ko RS seat chahiye sayad

#UttarakhandHighCourt is hearing an FIR quashing plea moved by '#MohammadDeepak', a Kotdwar-based gym owner who, on January 26, confronted Bajrang Dal members who were allegedly objecting to a Muslim shopkeeper using 'Baba' in his shop's name.

Astounding that a judge who has taken an oath to protect the constitution & fundamental rights can say these things to a courageous hero who stood up against lynch mobs!

@Schandillia D Day, Bellbottom,IB71,Baby

Dear Indian “liberals,” a very open, very unencumbered question for you: You have to make the ideal spy thriller for Bollywood. Absolutely airtight, both ideologically, morally, and above all, factually. The subject is terrorism. That Pakistan sponsors terrorism in India is fact. That this terrorism HAS religious motivation is also fact. So make the film only on facts of the subject. Cinematic liberties, sure, but no propaganda and no equivocation. What would that ideal film be like? And why? Be open.

Har Cheej par Ban!

Additional SHO Delhi Police: As soon as we apprehend drug peddlers and criminals, we receive orders from the CM to release them. No Media ran this No one held a debate No Questionsasked to Rekha Gupta SHO has been suspended 😆 Welcome to New India.

India (Bharat) is known for "GANDHI" !! 🫡