SugaSharp

Our friend @TheOmniLiberal once more having to make excuses for losing a debate a rage quitting Destiny came on to our stream to argue points he wanted. He should thereby know the cases he is claiming to have read Yet as he showed in his debate with me on defining insurrection over a year ago when looking at how the Colorado case keeping Trump off the ballot, despite claiming he reads the cases and doing deep dives on them, he fails to retain important knowledge from those cases In fact I believe he has “read” those cases, but he relies on his chat and orbiters to send him info in real time He will also google search, use ai, etc while debating these cases Then he will demand his opponent, in this case @RyanCMullally recall verbatim a fact about the case, and if he can’t, well that proves he didn’t read the case Yet the entire debate on the Calais case started off with Ryan discussing how the framework for the VRA was changed by the courts 2019 Rucho decision How did Destiny, who claims over and over he isn’t getting helped from his chat, looking things up etc., and has extensively read these cases, not have any knowledge of this? As you can see, alito mentions this right at the beginning of his explanation Destiny is not good at debating these cases, he gets significant help from his audience and other sources and still performs miserably And when he knows he looks bad he rage quits and then accuses others of not reading the court cases that he exhibits he himself did a very poor job reading

@TheOmniLiberal They immediately start crying that you used AI right after you left the debate