Prof. Supradeep Mukherjee

@PyTy1r24 @Warlock_mohit Golwalkar and hedgewar wrote in a bunch of poisonous thoughts that 🤔 race pride had reached its zenith under hitler and that it was a model for India 🇮🇳 to emulate!!!! Yuck 🤮 🤮 🤮 🤮 🤮 🤮 🤮 🤮

@Warlock_mohit Bunch of Thoughts, Golwalkar wrote critically about the nature of the anti-British struggle, framing it as mere "territorial nationalism" that lacked what he viewed as true Hindu nationhood. Fake patriotic gang Rss

"I'm not afraid of muslims, I'm not afraid of Britishers, I'm afraid of Hindus against Hinduism." - Veer Savarkar ✍️

@BaldwinR98 @Warlock_mohit Darpok sorryvarkar

@Warlock_mohit Ah yes, the 'Veer' who wrote five mercy petitions to the British and then actively applied for a job with them. Peak nationalism right there.

@nischoomaaf @MPD1779391 The modi government has repeatedly ranked my jnu as the top university of India 🇮🇳

@SupradeepM @MPD1779391 Congratulations! That’s how cheap JNU has become! Or is it reversed??

I m from Mumbai, Maharashtra..A Hindu majority state. INC had imposed a Muslim CHIEF MINISTER, Abdul Rehman Antulay on us.. Just let me know, when did Jammu and Kashmir state had a Hindu as CHIEF MINISTER?

Twisha Sharma, former Miss Pune, sister of a serving Army major, abused and harassed, forced to terminate her pregnancy, pressured for dowry, found dead 5 months after wedding. Harrowing details- soldier’s family ran pillar to post to get case registered against in-laws - retired judge and lawyer. Family led protests today outside CM House in MP demanding a CBI probe

@vikram6364 @Gabbar0099 Lol 😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣

@Gabbar0099 Anyone who has this kind of money will not live in this shitty country. Pls bhagwan thore paise aur de do fir mai is tatti ko chhod kr chala jaun.

What could be the reason they choose to live most of the time in London instead of India?

@by2coffee @ARFAKHANUMS @Gabbar0099 She is not elite She lives here to rule over you and Modi

@ARFAKHANUMS @Gabbar0099 Why have you not relocated yet?

@EkHindustani90 @ARFAKHANUMS @Gabbar0099 How 🤔 can you call Muslims ☪️ cockroaches and filth? Do they eat 🤔 filth 🤔 like you do (gobar)? Do they drink filth 🤔 like you 🤔 do (gau mutr) ?

@ARFAKHANUMS @Gabbar0099 And cockroaches multiply like filth

@IMvenkatsastry @Gabbar0099 I agree!

@Gabbar0099 Who would want their kids to grow up in a school system and society that normalizes hate and bigotry, is regressive in mindset and has no scientific temper? India since Modi is a shithole of blind religious bigots and fascists.

Aao shades 😎 😍 ✨️ 👌 ♥️ 💖 😎 😍 ✨️ 👌 khareedein hum ♥️ 😀 ❤️

@ViralRightist @Sarfarosh_IND @Warlock_mohit Secularism cannot be abridged by any legislative majority. Read 📚 the basic structure doctrine judgement of the Supreme Court in kesavananda Bharti 1973

@Sarfarosh_IND @SupradeepM @Warlock_mohit Change in constitution has to be followed, unless modified again by government.

I am a Hindu and I don't support Joseph Vijay. Rt if you agree 👍

@Sarfarosh_IND @ViralRightist @Warlock_mohit The Supreme Court held secularism to be part of the basic structure doctrine in kesavananda Bharti 1973 - before Indira Gandhi’s 42nd amendment that you are referring to

@ViralRightist @SupradeepM @Warlock_mohit She included the word secular by herself.. without any vote, without even presenting any Act in the parliament..

@Sarfarosh_IND @ViralRightist @Warlock_mohit Abey uneducated anpadh sanghi, the constitution of India 🇮🇳 ♥️ ❤️ written by my Muslim ☪️ ♥️ ❤️ maulana Azad my dalit ambedkar and my congressi Nehru was secular from day 1. Read part 3 (fundamental rights). The minorities have special rights which are denied to the majority

The beauty of the indian amaltas defies description

Making good use of the three to four hour metro 🚇 journey from Sushant Lok Phase 3 gurgaon to Sourav's CUET exam centre in Loni, Ghaziabad...

Making good use of the three to four hour metro 🚇 journey from Sushant Lok Phase 3 gurgaon to Sourav's CUET exam centre in Loni, Ghaziabad...

Donald Trump aur supradeep.mukherjee@gmail.com bhai bhai Had i been born in the USA 🇺🇸 (a la the boss 😎 - Bruce Springsteen) they would have made me president a couple of times ⏲️ by now!!!!!!

A Sanatani IT cell professor and podcaster recently told everyone that it was the Colonial IT cell and Missionary IT cell that spread the lie that Indian widows were being burnt alive in the 19th century. What the 'professor' did not say was the following: In the 19th century, a group of Brahmin Sanskrit scholars argued that Rig Veda mantra 10.18.7 prescribed the burning of widows on their husbands' funeral pyres. The practice was called saha-gaman, "the together-journey," and the widow who performed it was elevated to the status of a goddess: Sati. Raja Ram Mohan Roy, also a Brahmin, challenged this in the Kolkata High Court. The verse, he argued, was a mistranslation, emerging from a mispronunciation. The original instructed the widow to return to the land of the living. The Brahmins defending the practice, using the Veda, called themselves Sanatani, keepers of the timeless way. They were contemptuous of the social reformers, the Samaji, who opposed child marriage, championed widow remarriage, women’s education, and even education of the so-called impure castes. They insisted that sati was voluntary, and part of India’s great tradition, indicated by the hundreds of sati stones scattered across the countryside. Raja Ram Mohan Roy's arguments led to the abolition of Sati in 1829. A few decades later, the German Orientalist Max Mueller, working with older manuscripts, confirmed the deception: the text had been deliberately altered. It was, plainly, a fraud. • The original phrase was yoni-agrey - step back to the realm of the living. • The tampered phrase was yoni-agney - step into the fire. Even today, some Brahmins insist the Rig Veda originally read agney, not agrey, and accuse Max Mueller of tampering with the text himself. But most scholars - Indian and Western, Brahmin and non-Brahmin - agree that a forgery took place. And since only Brahmins had access to the Rig Veda, the forger must have been a Brahmin. His identity remains a mystery. Ask your Sanatani friend: did Krishna's wife Rukmini do sahagamana and become 'sati' as stated in Mahabharata? Is it "myth" or "fact"?

Enjoying Loni, Ghaziabad, while sourav revises hard for his CUET exams!!!

Enjoying Loni, Ghaziabad, while sourav revises hard for his CUET exams!!!

Udhayanidhi’s “Sanatan” Obsession is Becoming a Political Liability for the DMK At a time when people are worried about jobs, inflation, education, infrastructure, and law and order, why is the Tamil Nadu political discourse once again revolving around “Sanatan”? That is the question many ordinary voters are asking today. Udhayanidhi Stalin’s repeated remarks on Sanatan Dharma may excite a small ideological ecosystem, but politically they appear increasingly disconnected from the concerns of common people. More importantly, they reflect a misunderstanding of the very Dravidian legacy the DMK claims to represent. One of the biggest myths in Tamil politics is that the Dravidian movement was uniformly anti Hindu or anti faith. Historically, that is simply not true. Yes, Periyar E. V. Ramasamy was a staunch atheist who aggressively challenged religious orthodoxy. But as the movement evolved into electoral politics, several Dravidian leaders adopted a far more nuanced and inclusive relationship with faith. C. N. Annadurai perhaps represented this balance best. He rejected extreme atheism and famously said, “Ondre Kulam, Oruvanae Devan” meaning “One Community, One God.” His fight was against exploitation and social inequality, not against spiritual belief itself. Even leaders before the DMK era understood this distinction. Dravidian leader P. T. Rajan, also prominent Justice Party figure, was a deeply religious Hindu and played an important role in restoring the famous Meenakshi Amman Temple. He never saw any contradiction between social justice and religious faith. Then came M. G. Ramachandran, whose openly spiritual image connected deeply with ordinary Tamil voters. His politics moved away from aggressive rationalist rhetoric and focused instead on welfare, dignity, and mass connection. J. Jayalalithaa too never hid her religious identity. Temple visits, rituals, annadhanam schemes, and public expressions of faith existed alongside Dravidian politics without contradiction. Even K. Kamaraj, admired across political lines for his simplicity and social reforms, proved that uplifting society never required attacking the religion of the people. That distinction matters even today. The moment political language shifts from fighting caste discrimination to attacking the beliefs of millions, it stops looking like reform and starts looking like hostility. And that creates a serious political problem for the DMK. A large section of the party’s own support base consists of practicing Hindus who also strongly believe in social justice, reservation, welfare, and progressive governance. They do not see any contradiction between temple faith and modern politics. By repeatedly making “Sanatan” the center of political discourse, the DMK risks forcing these voters into an unnecessary identity conflict. There is also a larger contradiction here. If targeting minorities through hateful rhetoric is rightly called communalism, then repeatedly mocking or attacking the religious identity of the majority cannot automatically become progressive politics. The standard cannot change depending on who the target is. In the age of social media and viral clips, nuance disappears quickly. What may be defended internally as ideological criticism gets interpreted nationally as hostility towards Hinduism itself. That perception damages the DMK far more than it hurts its opponents. The BJP does not need to create political ammunition when such statements hand it over freely. At a time when the opposition should be focusing on governance failures, economic concerns, youth aspirations, and administrative accountability, this continued obsession with “Sanatan” feels politically outdated and strategically self damaging. The real enemy was never faith. The real enemy was caste discrimination, exclusion, and inequality. The day the DMK forgets that distinction is the day it begins drifting away from the very principles on which the movement was built.