Swiss
826 posts

Swiss retweetledi

Chuck Norris held a 183-10-2 record and was a 6x world champion in full contact bare knuckle karate.
On top of that, he beat heavyweight kickboxing world champion Joe Lewis 3 consecutive times and also had a brutal sparring match with undefeated kickboxing world champion, Bill Superfoot Wallace, that lasted an hour and a half. According to Wallace, they practically stalemated and "beat the crap out of each other".
Chuck was trained in kickboxing/boxing by Benny The Jet Urquidez and was also trained in BJJ by the Gracies and Machados for 20 years. Even being able to submit Carlos Machado himself on occasion.
Chuck had a 315 Ibs bench press at 180 lbs bodyweight and was said to have a grip back in the day that nobody could escape from because he was so strong. Even Jean Claude Van Damme said he'd never fight Chuck Norris, despite being a kickboxing world champion himself.
Chuck held a 10th degree black belt in Chun Kuk Do, a 9th degree black belt in Tang Soo Do, an 8th degree black belt in Taekwondo, a 5th degree black belt in Karate, a 3rd degree black belt in Brazilian Jiu Jitsu and a black belt in Judo.
Rest in peace, Chuck!
English
Swiss retweetledi

🔥STRATEGY WILL BE THE WORLD'S MOST VALUABLE COMPANY - BY FAR🔥
Strategy bulls need to understand how insane this 10-year balance sheet model actually is.
I modeled a simple cadence. We just saw two weeks of some awesome capital raising with MSTR/STRC, didn't we?
So going foward, let's assume this:
Every 4 weeks, Strategy raises capital at the same MSTR / STRC ratio as the last two Bitcoin buy announcements.
But only for 2 weeks out of the month.
The other 2 weeks are dead, zero capital raised, full cool-off, full return-to-par window.
No infinite ATM fantasy. No permanent intravenous dilution drip for the spreadsheet autists to cry about.
Half the month, the machine is literally OFF.
Then I assume:
Bitcoin grows 25% per year,
STRC preferred issuance grows 5% month over month,
and all proceeds go into Bitcoin.
Starting point in the model - March 2026:
Bitcoin NAV = $54.7B
Enterprise value = $65.1B
Preferred outstanding = $10.0B
Debt outstanding = $8.2B
At the start, pref is 15.4% of EV and debt is 12.6% of EV.
That is where the bears freeze the frame and start hyperventilating into a paper bag.
Now watch what happens when time passes and the engine keeps doing what it’s doing.
By March 2027:
Bitcoin NAV = $119.2B
EV = $141.9B
Pref = $34.8B
Debt = $8.2B
So after one year, Bitcoin NAV has more than doubled.
Preferred gets bigger, yes.
But debt as a share of EV gets chopped from 12.6% down to 5.8%.
That is the first humiliation ritual.
The liabilities did not disappear. They got outgrown.
By March 2028:
Bitcoin NAV = $240.2B
EV = $285.9B
Pref = $79.4B
Debt = $8.2B
Now debt is just 2.9% of EV.
So the company goes from “look at all that debt!!!” to “that debt is becoming decorative.”
It starts to look less like a capital structure problem and more like a historical artifact preserved in amber for future MBA students to misinterpret.
By March 2029:
Bitcoin NAV = $464.1B
EV = $552.3B
Pref = $159.4B
Debt = $7.2B
Now debt is just 1.3% of EV.
The debt stack is basically entering hospice care at this point.
By March 2030:
Bitcoin NAV = $874.4B
EV = $1.04T
Pref = $303.2B
Debt = $1.4B
Debt drops to 0.13% of EV.
Read that again.
0.13%.
The convert stack has effectively been vaporized by scale.
Not because someone performed magic, but because a growing Bitcoin asset base plus disciplined capital intake makes the fixed liabilities look microscopic.
By March 2031:
Bitcoin NAV = $1.62T
EV = $1.93T
Pref = $561.4B
Debt = $0.8B
Debt is now 0.04% of EV.
At this point, talking about the converts as the central bear case is like warning the public that a trillion-dollar fortress may be threatened by a garden hose.
By March 2032:
Bitcoin NAV = $2.98T
EV = $3.54T
Pref = $1.03T
Debt = $0.8B
Debt falls to 0.02% of EV.
Then by March 2033, debt is basically gone in the model, while:
Bitcoin NAV = $5.42T
EV = $6.45T
Pref = $1.86T
And here is the really important part:
The preferred stack does get enormous in dollar terms.
But as a percentage of EV, it does not spiral into insanity.
It rises from 15.4% at the start to roughly:
24.5% in 2027
27.8% in 2028
28.9% in 2029
29.1% in 2030
29.1% in 2031
28.9% in 2032
28.8% in 2033
28.6% in 2034
28.5% in 2035
28.4% in 2036
That means the preferred layer becomes large, but it stabilizes.
The model is not saying pref eats the company alive.
The model is saying pref becomes a scalable capital intake layer while the Bitcoin asset base outruns it hard enough to keep the structure stable.
By March 2034:
Bitcoin NAV = $9.84T
EV = $11.71T
Pref = $3.35T
By March 2035:
Bitcoin NAV = $17.8T
EV = $21.18T
Pref = $6.04T
By March 2036:
Bitcoin NAV = $32.12T
EV = $38.22T
Pref = $10.86T
Now obviously the model becomes physically absurd because BTC held would mathematically run past available supply around 2034.
That matters.
It means the model stops being a literal forecast and starts becoming a demonstration of system pressure.
And that is even more bullish. What do you think happens to the Bitcoin price?
Because the thing that breaks first is not debt.
It is not preferred.
It is Bitcoin scarcity.
The structure survives the stress test better than the asset supply does.
That is psychotic. That is bullish.
That is the part the market still does not understand.
Under this framework, Strategy is slowly replacing maturity risk with perpetual capital, refinancing anxiety with preferred demand, and fragile liabilities with an expanding Bitcoin fortress.
Again, this is with a built-in 2-week monthly cool-off.
Half the month, nothing happens.
No raising. No nonstop aggression.
Just a reset period.
And even with that restraint, the numbers get grotesque:
Bitcoin NAV: $54.7B to $32.1T
Debt % of EV: 12.6% to basically 0%
Pref % of EV: 15.4% to a stable high-20s range
So the real story is not “wow, look how much pref they issued.”
The real story is they are building a balance sheet where debt dies, preferred scales, Bitcoin compounds,
and scarcity becomes the bottleneck.
That is not a normal company.
That is a corporate absorption machine wearing a public equity costume while half the analyst class stands outside with a clipboard trying to calculate book value like it’s still the Bush administration.

English
Swiss retweetledi

TODAY 🚨: The Commission issued an interpretation that clarifies the application of federal securities laws to crypto assets.
This is a major step to provide greater clarity regarding the Commission’s treatment of crypto assets.
Read the release here: ow.ly/XhhV50YvxvO

English
Swiss retweetledi
Swiss retweetledi
Swiss retweetledi

Yesterday, the Brusselian leaders, with @vonderleyen at the forefront, reached an agreement with President @ZelenskyyUa to continue the war. This is bad news for Europe. A war is being prolonged that clearly has no solution on the battlefield, yet causes immense destruction.
Every month, 35,000 people are killed or left permanently disabled, while the front lines barely budge. Hundreds of thousands of widows and orphans, mothers mourning their sons. This is what Brussels is supporting.
Continuing the war costs European citizens enormous sums of money. Hundreds of billions of euros are being squandered with no result. In this war, it is not the Russians who are being crushed, but Europeans.
On top of this, the risk of nuclear escalation remains, as Europe is confronting a nuclear power.
If we allowed it, Hungary would be dragged in as well. Last week in Munich, the leader of the opposition Tisza Party, under German patronage, concluded a secret pact with Brusselian leaders. In exchange for the support of Brussels and Kyiv, he would pull Hungary into the group of European countries at war, agree to further financial support for Ukraine, and cut Hungary off from affordable oil and gas.
Hungary must stay out of this. The Hungarian government must safeguard the country’s security. Hungarians can count on us: that is exactly what we will do. 🇭🇺

English
Swiss retweetledi

‼️We will not let Kyiv’s blackmail go unanswered. We will not stay silent while Brussels sides with Ukraine against the Hungarian people‼️
In a letter, @eucopresident António Costa attempted to pressure 🇭🇺Hungary into approving the €90 billion Ukraine loan and warned of consequences if we did not comply.
In his reply today, @PM_ViktorOrban made the causal link unmistakably clear: Hungary cannot be expected to support decisions financially favorable to Ukraine while Ukraine intends to create an energy emergency in Hungary by blocking oil transit.
We know for a fact that there are no technical obstacles to restarting deliveries through the Druzhba pipeline. It requires only a political decision in Kyiv.
We have blocked Ukraine’s €90 billion war loan, and we will not vote for any decision in Brussels supporting Ukraine as long as President @ZelenskyyUa does not return to normality.
No matter how much pressure they try to exert on us, until Ukraine resumes crude oil deliveries,
▪️we will not supply diesel,
▪️we will not support the war loan to Ukraine,
▪️and we will not vote for another sanctions package.
We will not play along with an oil blockade directed against our own country — we will dismantle it.
Brussels and Kyiv should have no doubt about that.

English
Swiss retweetledi

stop what you're doing and look at this image.
each dot is 3.2 million people. 2,500 dots = 8.1 billion humans.
the grey? 6.8 billion people who have never used AI.
the green? 1.3 billion free chatbot users.
the yellow? 15-35 million who pay for it.
the red? that tiny sliver is us.
you think the AI space is crowded because you're in an echo chamber of the 0.06%.
the real world hasn't even started.
wrote a full breakdown on the data, the opportunity, and 7 businesses you can build from this gap today:

Nozz@NoahEpstein_
English
Swiss retweetledi

X Files Appeal Against €120M EU Fine Under Digital Services Act
X filed an appeal at the General Court of the European Union challenging the €120 million fine imposed by the European Commission on 5 December 2025, the first non-compliance fine under the Digital Services Act (DSA).
This EU Decision resulted from an incomplete and superficial investigation, grave procedural errors, a tortured interpretation of the obligations under the DSA, and systematic breaches of rights of defence and basic due process requirements suggesting prosecutorial bias.
This landmark case is the first judicial challenge to a DSA fine and could set important precedents for enforcement, penalty calculations, and fundamental rights protections under the 2022 regulation.
X remains committed to user safety and transparency while defending our users' access to the only global town square.
English
Swiss retweetledi

17,000 tokens per second!! Read that again!
LLM is hard-wired directly into silicon. no HBM, no liquid cooling, just raw specialized hardware. 10x faster and 20x cheaper than a B200.
the "waiting for the LLM to think" era is dead. Code generates at the speed of human thought.
Transition from brute-force GPU clusters to actual AI appliances.
taalas.com/the-path-to-ub…



English
Swiss retweetledi
Swiss retweetledi

The Brusselian elite's official publication, Politico, has published Brussels’ and Kyiv’s latest war plan, the five-point Zelenskyy plan. They have decided that Ukraine will be admitted to the Union as early as 2027.
This new plan is an open declaration of war against Hungary. They disregard the decision of the Hungarian people and are determined to remove the Hungarian government by any means necessary. They want the Tisza Party to come to power, because then there would be no more veto, no more resistance, and no more staying out of their conflict.
This April, at the ballot box, Hungarians must stop them. Fidesz is the only force standing between Hungary and Brusselian rule, and the only guarantee of Hungarian sovereignty.
English
Swiss retweetledi

🚨SPACEX PATENTS THE BANDWIDTH ENGINE BEHIND STARLINK DIRECT-TO-CELL
How do you turn 9,500 LEO satellites into a seamless cellular network without wasting half the bandwidth on housekeeping? That is the core infrastructure problem SpaceX addresses in US 12,542,605 B1, granted February 3, 2026.
The timing is notable. @SpaceX registered this patent on the same day it announced its merger with @xai, creating a combined entity valued at $1.25 trillion. Behind that headline sits a quieter strategic play: an infrastructure patent that determines whether Starlink's cellular business generates profit or simply burns through cash.
Starlink Direct-to-Cell aims to connect billions of existing smartphones to LEO satellites. No hardware modification required. No special SIM card. T-Mobile's beta already delivers SMS to unmodified phones via Starlink. But scaling to full voice and data service demands solving a hidden bottleneck. Every time a LEO satellite passes overhead and hands off to the next, every connected phone must perform a location update through the core network. Multiply millions of devices by dozens of handoffs per hour, and the network chokes on its own signaling traffic instead of carrying user data.
This patent eliminates that bottleneck. It introduces a virtual identifier abstraction layer that makes moving satellites invisible to the phone. The system assigns permanent codes to fixed ground zones, then dynamically maps each satellite beam to match the zone beneath it [0092]. The phone never sees the satellite change. The update never fires. The freed bandwidth stays available for revenue-generating traffic.
⚠️ The Problem
Cellular networks were built for towers that never move. Each base station broadcasts a fixed Tracking Area Code, or TAC, which tells the core network where each phone is located. When a phone encounters a new TAC, it performs a Tracking Area Update. The TAU consumes base station and core network bandwidth for control signaling rather than user data [0090].
On the ground, this works fine. Towers stay fixed. Phones move slowly relative to cell boundaries. Updates are infrequent and the overhead is manageable.
LEO satellites break this model entirely. A Starlink satellite completes one orbit roughly every 95 minutes, maintaining line-of-sight contact with any ground location for only a few minutes [0049]. Even a phone sitting motionless on a table must be handed to a new satellite base station multiple times per hour [0091]. Under standard 4G LTE behavior, each handoff means a new TAC and a new TAU.
Think of it as a postal system where your home address changes every three minutes because the post office keeps driving past your house. Every address change requires filing paperwork with the central registry. The mail carriers spend more time processing address changes than delivering actual mail.
The LTE standard does include a partial mitigation: the Tracking Area List. A TAL groups up to 16 TACs, so a phone can move among them without triggering an update [0090]. But this mechanism was designed for stationary towers. In a satellite environment where the TAC values themselves are moving with the satellites, a static list solves nothing. Each new satellite brings entirely unfamiliar TAC values, and the phone has no choice but to file yet another update.
🗺️ Virtual Identifier Abstraction Layer
The central innovation is decoupling location identity from satellite hardware. The system divides the Earth's surface into fixed hexagonal geographic sub-areas (FIG. 6), each permanently assigned a virtual localized identifier [0094]. These virtual identifiers are properties of geography, not of any particular satellite or beam.
When a satellite beam covers a sub-area, the topology service assigns that beam's physical TAC to equal the sub-area's virtual identifier [0112]. This mapping is recalculated for every beam on every satellite at each time slot, with slots lasting 10 to 20 seconds [0060]. Assignments are transmitted to the satellites 5 to 10 minutes before execution [0063]. The rule is direct: each beam gets the virtual identifier of the sub-area with which its footprint has the greatest overlap [0118].
It is like painting permanent house numbers on every street, then handing the correct address signs to whichever delivery truck currently drives down that street. Trucks come and go constantly. The addresses never change. A phone sees the same TAC from one satellite, and the identical TAC from the next satellite covering that zone [0115]. No update is triggered. No bandwidth is consumed.
🛰️ Beam Footprint Constrained Sub-area Sizing
The second innovation determines exactly how large each ground sub-area must be. This is where the patent moves from clever architecture to mathematical precision.
If sub-areas are too small, a phone near a boundary might receive a beam broadcasting a TAC outside its Tracking Area List, forcing an unnecessary update. If sub-areas are too large, the network must page across too many beams to locate a phone, wasting bandwidth in the opposite direction [0104].
The patent defines a geometric constraint (FIG. 7, FIG. 8). For any given sub-area, the maximum extent of a beam footprint centered on a neighboring sub-area outside the phone's TAL must have zero overlap with the original sub-area [0103]. Combined with the 16-TAC capacity of the Tracking Area List, this constraint produces a mathematically determined minimum sub-area size [0099].
The outcome is a strong guarantee: a stationary phone will never trigger a location update, regardless of how many satellites serve it over time [0132]. This is not a probabilistic reduction in update frequency. It is zero updates for stationary devices, derived from geometric proof.
🔄 Overlapping TAL Constraint for Moving Devices
For phones physically traveling across sub-areas, the patent introduces a stability mechanism. When a moving phone triggers a TAU upon encountering a TAC outside its current list, the new TAL must share at least one identifier with the previous TAL [0130].
This prevents "ping-ponging" where a phone near a TAL boundary oscillates between two incompatible lists, generating repeated updates as beam footprints shift beneath it. The constraint also ensures each successive TAL centers progressively closer to the phone's actual position [0131]. The cellular core tracks each device's most recent TAL to enforce this rule.
The design achieves a deliberate balance. Stationary devices never trigger updates, while genuinely traveling devices update often enough to keep paging overhead manageable (FIG. 9A, FIG. 9B). This balance directly controls the tradeoff between signaling overhead and paging overhead across the entire network.
⚙️ How It Works
The end-to-end operation proceeds in three stages.
Planning: The topology service generates beam plans for each upcoming time slot. It assigns beam directions, power levels, and physical TAC values for every satellite, then transmits these plans via gateway terminals several minutes in advance [0112].
Broadcasting: Each satellite executes the beam plan. It directs phased array beams to designated sub-areas and broadcasts the assigned TACs as standard RAN parameters [0027]. Phones connect using unmodified 4G LTE or 5G NR protocols. No device-side modification is required at all.
Tracking: When a phone connects, the satellite reports the physical TAC and connection time to the cellular core. The core resolves the TAC to a virtual identifier using the time-slot mapping, stores the phone's location as the corresponding sub-area, and provides the appropriate TAL for relay to the phone [0113]. Incoming calls or data are then routed to whichever beam currently serves that virtual identifier.
🎯 Why This Matters
The immediate impact is economic. In satellite cellular, bandwidth is the most constrained and expensive resource available. Every location update that does not fire is bandwidth freed for revenue-generating voice, text, or data traffic. For a D2C service targeting billions of phones worldwide, this marginal efficiency gain compounds into measurable ARPU improvement. The difference between a sustainable D2C business and one that cannot cover its infrastructure costs may hinge on exactly this kind of signaling efficiency.
The competitive moat is substantial. The patent contains 52 claims covering both the ground control system (Claims 1 through 36) and the satellite-side system (Claims 37 through 52). Each perspective is protected as both apparatus and method claims. This dual-coverage structure creates a broad enforcement surface. Claim 18 deserves particular attention: the beam footprint constrained sizing yields a mathematically optimal sub-area geometry. There is no alternative way to achieve the same zero-update guarantee without either meeting this constraint or accepting inferior performance. Competitors pursuing LEO D2C, including AST SpaceMobile, Amazon Kuiper, and Lynk Global, face this patent as a direct technical barrier.
The strategic timeline reinforces the significance. SpaceX acquired $19.6 billion in EchoStar spectrum last year. It filed the "Starlink Mobile" trademark in October 2025. Gwynne Shotwell confirmed partnerships with chip manufacturers to embed Starlink connectivity in future phones. Reuters reported this week that SpaceX has been developing a dedicated Starlink device for years. Musk described it as "optimized purely for running max performance/watt neural nets." Whether SpaceX sells its own device or embeds Starlink connectivity into every phone through chip partnerships, the underlying network must handle location management efficiently at planetary scale. This patent ensures it can.
With xAI burning approximately $1 billion per month after the merger, the combined entity needs Starlink D2C to deliver stable recurring revenue. This patent protects the efficiency layer that directly governs D2C operating margins. SpaceX is not just building a satellite phone service. It is building the cellular infrastructure layer for a world where LEO satellites serve as universal base stations.
🗂️ Bibliography
Patent No.: US 12,542,605 B1
Title: Systems and methods for mapping geographic sub-areas to satellite-based base station platforms in a cellular network
Applicant: Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
Inventors: Brian Dunn, Owen Chiaventone
Filed Date: 2023-09-29
Granted Date: 2026-02-03




SETI Park@seti_park
I've found a patent ... 👀
English
Swiss retweetledi
Swiss retweetledi

The Ukrainian leadership crossed a line.
We did not seek conflict, yet for days now Hungary has been in the crosshairs. Still, neither threats from the president, nor from the foreign minister, nor from extremist military groups will deter us from standing up for the interests of Hungarians.
❌ We will not send money to Ukraine - it is better off with Hungarian families than in the bathroom of a Ukrainian oligarch.
❌We will not allow a ban on Russian oil and gas imports - without them there is no utility cost reduction and no affordable energy for Hungarian families.
❌And we will not allow Ukraine to be pushed into the European Union within 2 years by trampling on EU law - that would mean importing the war as well.
As long as Hungary has a patriotic government, decisions on these matters will not be made in Kyiv and not in Brussels either. This is well understood in Ukraine too. That is why they want a new, pro-Ukraine government in Budapest, and why the threats never stop.
Hungary's future will be decided by Hungarians. 🇭🇺

English
Swiss retweetledi
Swiss retweetledi
Swiss retweetledi

☝️“There will be no other special military operations if you treat Russia with respect and respect our interests, just as we have always tried to respect yours. If you don’t deceive us, as you did with NATO eastward expansion, simply disregarding our security interests. Western politicians created the current situation with their own hands. Now they consistently talk about preparing for war with Russia. This is ridiculous. It is being done for domestic political reasons—to create an image of an enemy and to cover up the mistakes they have systematically made over many years, both in the economic and social spheres. Where is the green agenda now, when coal mining is being reopened? Nuclear power plants were closed, and now they are returning to them. This is mistake after mistake. And now they cover it all up with "evil Russia," distracting their population from their own failures and focusing on an external, mythical threat” - President Putin
English






