Swoop Luke
54.3K posts
Swoop Luke
@SwoopLuke
i create pies fan content on various social media platforms. views are my own etc
Victoria Park, Collingwood Katılım Mayıs 2019
1.1K Takip Edilen8.3K Takipçiler
GIF
David Zita@DavidZita1
@FOXFOOTY Billy Frampton's second Tribunal this year. What I’ve done at least twice this year: - Dated - Cried - Been ill - Schnitz - Considered if my sense of identity is unhealthily linked to how others perceive me - Deleted Hinge - Re-installed Hinge - Covered Billy Frampton Tribunal
ZXX
IF crisp pinned two arms like the curtis tackle…
THEN he gets suspended. but he didn’t
Footy on Nine@FootyonNine
"I personally can't line up what Curtis did being worth 3 weeks with what Crisp did [being 0 weeks]." Should Jack Crisp have been suspended? #9AFLSFS | Watch on 9 & 9Now 🖥️
English
@d0penamebro you’ve already talked yourself in circles by saying it’s outcome based but saying frampton’s was because of a dangerous tackle 🤣 it’s okay to admit that crisp’s tackle was different to curtis’
English
@SwoopLuke If Curtis was 3 weeks because it caused a concussion, then so should’ve Crisp and the Frampton/Mihochek incident
The Frampton one is only 1 week as it didn’t cause a concussion but still deemed dangerous
It should be consistent, but it’s not
Happy to debate this all day pal.
English
@d0penamebro if it’s ‘literally what they do’ crisp would’ve been suspend OR frampton wouldn’t be suspended because whitlock didn’t get concussed. not much going on between the ears for you, hey?
English
@SwoopLuke Hahaha is this your first day following the AFL. That is literally what they do.
English
@d0penamebro oh okay, so you want to suspend outcome over action? wow
English
@SwoopLuke Tackle caused concussion. It’s either both suspended or neither. Pretty simple really.
English
@d0penamebro well… no. i’m not going to go frame by frame as to why they’re two different tackles. please just have another look at them both side by side
English
@SwoopLuke I don’t think either should be a suspension, BUT if the Curtis one is 3 weeks then the Crisp one should be as well.
English
Swoop Luke retweetledi
bring in myles tehan again
Jon Ralph@RalphyHeraldSun
Collingwood is challenging Frampton’s ban
English
@wadevstheworld it’s monday and your frontal lobe is still in weekend mode. unreal
English
@SwoopLuke Crisp has full body weight high on Blamires and drives him to the ground.
I'd argue thats more dangerous than pinning arms.
But what do we expect from a team that breaks necks and are allowed to play the following week.
English
@Mick_Roos3 @maxblake9and44 curtis got three for not only the outcome but the tackle itself
English
@maxblake9and44 @SwoopLuke I don’t think you understand what most people think. I don’t think it should be a suspension, like the Curtis one. However, because Curtis got three for the outcome, all we want to see is consistency, and I’m sure you’d be in the same camp had this been the other way around.
English
side by side. will still be looked at but paul curtis pins both arms, no?
Tim Michell@tim_michell
Paul Curtis has been handed a three-week ban for this incident
English
would LOVE fly to roll the dice and bring saxena in next week as a small forward. won’t happen but has been doing so well in the vfl
English
@stephenc24 definitely. pies will challenge tho. whitlock didn’t get concussed, right? couldn’t see anything so medium impact would get downgraded to low
English
@SwoopLuke Frampton out hurts us more than Crisp would have structurally
English
