رَا غِب اُل حََق 🇵🇸

@MAKHACHEVMMA Rooting for the one and only 🐐, the P4P king

Don’t worry about my injuries. I’m ready at any time. I’m waiting for the contract

@PerMeHeer @FightFanatic_ Mc🍇ist

@FightFanatic_ Rats

Khamzat Chimaev says his whole family was praying for Khabib vs McGregor 🔥 “When Khabib was fighting McGregor, I was watching the fight praying for him. Even my mother was praying for him.”

@woustehaakh_ Just rafiz shaitan Not peer

Rafiz Peer

@_sabasaurus Muhammad Hijab H A H A H A H A H A H A H A

a jin approached to mohammad hijab, heard his laugh and start reciting ayt ul kursi

There is nothing more soothing than the recitation of the Holy QUR'AN ❤️

@mentalaurat So it's on you Whoever watches this and has to listen to the music too You are getting the your Naama Amaal written accordingly If there is Sadaqa e Jariyah for good deeds then there is Sadaqa e Jariyah for this too I ain't judging something on my own

@mentalaurat Accha ... Deen k naam pe jama to ho gaye lekin Haryanvi mujjiic se fir bhi nii

@minbaniadam I think he didn't mean actual Muslim NATO He was just referring to, if their unions, allegiance and vows are possible why can't ours exist in the same way But it'll be possible only under imam Mehdi AS and prior to that union the west won't allow the muslims to think about it

@SyedRagib4 The reason I said it's like copying the west is because he said Muslim NATO, Muslim Union etc. Maybe my problem is with way he worded it and by adopting such proposal, it means that Muslim countries are still "countries"

Basically, copy the West 😂

@minbaniadam That's a different topic but if it happens it isn't like copying the west

@SyedRagib4 It's not achievable

@shyakh_benzima Wtf 🤣

@Haqq_Aysha For what

I will curse anyone who curses the Sahabas RA and Amma Aisha bint Abi Bakr Ra until my last breath. But if the same enemy shows courage, I’ll acknowledge it. Truth doesn’t become false just because it comes from an enemy.

@Ramzan32828Adam Even some 🧃 believe in monotheism but are cursed There are 5 other articles of faith as well And on the top of that he rejected Islam Surah Al-Qasas (28:56) “Indeed, you (O Prophet) do not guide whom you love, but Allah guides whom He wills…”

This is historically false He was a believer and concealed his faith His many lines of poetry indicate his belief in the divine religion and monotheism He was attacked because his son was Imam Ali (peace be upon Him) despised by the political system of the time

@ThodeBehre @koshur188068 @Stoiccpoett Make me understand this if ALLAH had already decided to send a Khalifh to the earth , then Why did Allah test him with that particular tree Allah already knew what Adam AS was going to do yet he gave him other options as well ... Same applies here

@SyedRagib4 @koshur188068 @Stoiccpoett allah himself says as you have quoted a hadees allah gives hidayat to who he pleases and gumrah’s who he pleases chapter is closed there itself

@ThodeBehre @koshur188068 @Stoiccpoett If the message didn't reach a kafir then ALLAH has the final judgement But if a person receives the message and yet chooses to deny it then ALLAH will judge him accordingly In this case people prefer falsehood over the truth that makes them more guilty They knew yet denied

@SyedRagib4 @koshur188068 @Stoiccpoett that its not kaf!r fault that he is kaf!r, allah made them for jahanum only, then why there is this philosophy of making whole world muslim?

@koshur188068 You can literally read and understand it ... U r doing all this Just to escape from the reality and live delusional It's simple as that the DEEN is already completed and there's no need to promote such rituals that go against the DEEN. You can still do but u'll be asked in uqba

@SyedRagib4 That is not the answer I m looking for.Tranlate what u pasted every line

If God makes you deviant then what is the point of blaming helpless sapiens. This is the side effect of understanding everything on face value.

@koshur188068 Bruhh.. It literally says the Qur'an is the truest book of Allah and Muhammadﷺ is the best guidance Now your so called harmless zool is neither permitted by ALLAH nor by Muhammad ﷺ. So you are practicing something in the name of deen that makes you more guilty.

@SyedRagib4 I didn't say he has written my fate that is not even my argument.i just translated what u pasted.its you who choose to understand hadith based on face value.

@ThodeBehre @koshur188068 @Stoiccpoett What's your point

@SyedRagib4 @koshur188068 @Stoiccpoett so allah is responsible for someone who becomes a muslim and someone who doesnt, allah has choosen a few and written in their destiny that they will become muslim, gumrahi of a momin or a kaf!r is also because of allah because allah has written so,then whats the mistake of kafir?

@tajamul_mi49959 @SaqlainAli888 @MrAdnanRashid @Hassan_alQadri Konse nashe kar baitha hai tu refrence de nii raha bas bhoke chale jaa raha hai tu

🚨 Adnan Will Beg For Mercy After This 🚨 First, I offer an apology to the readers for the harshness of tone or the content of this post, but at times, the nature of what must be addressed leaves little room for softness. Adnan, you may come to regret opening this discussion. It will not unfold in your favour. Let us begin by clarifying the fatwa of Sayed Khomeini. Both Sunni and Shi‘i legal traditions operate upon a foundational principle: everything is considered permissible unless there is clear proof from the Qur’an or Sunnah establishing its prohibition. This is not a casual claim but a deeply rooted juristic maxim. What follows is a legal analysis, not an emotional one, and it must be understood within that framework. There is no explicit text in the Qur’an or Sunnah that categorically prohibits certain forms of non-intercourse physical contact with a minor. Based on the principle mentioned, such acts may be classified, in isolation, as permissible. However, and this is crucial, permissibility in principle does not equate to permissibility in practice under all circumstances. The reader must understand these words of Sayed Khomeini are found in his book of jurisprudence. An act may be theoretically permissible yet practically prohibited due to surrounding conditions. This is where many fail to grasp the distinction. The first essential point is that scholars have deemed the validity of a marriage contract involving minors, provided certain strict conditions are met. But validity does not mean unrestricted allowance. A fundamental condition for such a contract is the absolute absence of harm. If any form of harm, physical, psychological, or otherwise, is present or even reasonably anticipated, the legitimacy of the marriage itself collapses. Therefore, if it is established that such a marriage inherently causes harm to the minor, then it is not valid in the first place. The legal framework already contains within it the mechanisms to prevent abuse. It is not an open licence, but a conditional ruling tightly bound by safeguards. One might then ask: why did Islamic law permit such a framework at all? The answer lies in the diversity of human societies and historical contexts. Social structures, environmental realities, and communal needs have varied widely across time and place. In some contexts, marriages were contracted without immediate cohabitation or consummation, often due to distance, tribal arrangements, or socio-economic factors. Reducing this discussion to crude caricatures reflects a lack of seriousness and an unwillingness to engage with the legal tradition as it actually exists. The second point is equally important: when Islamic law declares something permissible, it does not imply endorsement, encouragement, or moral desirability. Permissibility is a legal category, not a moral recommendation. To illustrate: the permissibility of eating meat does not render all meat lawful in every circumstance. It remains subject to conditions. Likewise, a jurist stating that a particular act is permissible under specific conditions is not advocating for it, but merely clarifying that it is not intrinsically prohibited. For instance, The Holy Prophet (s) prohibited domestic donkeys and prohibited temporary marriage during the Battle of Khaybar, even us the Shi'a accept this. We have reliable reports regarding this in our books. However, the difference is that this prohibition is a governmental ruling. It was a governmental decision that the Prophet (s) saw it fulfills a particular interest so he prohibited it. Thus, if any act, even within a valid marriage, results in harm, it immediately becomes prohibited. The ruling shifts based on context. The legal system does not require scholars to enumerate every possible scenario; rather, it provides principles that govern all scenarios. Where harm exists, prohibition follows. The demolition job continues under 👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼