The Honest to Goodness Truth

We need a constitutional right to freedom of speech in the UK, as they have in the US. Any party running on that would instantly have my vote. That and controlling immigration please. #unitedkingdom #Conservative #FreeSpeech #Liberty

@DeathlyAcorn @VoidoftheLost @RexRuther4 No we don't agree at all.

@THTGTruth @VoidoftheLost @RexRuther4 Okay so we agree abortion is fine, we just have different lines in the sand.

How can they be British if they weren't even born here?

@DeathlyAcorn @VoidoftheLost @RexRuther4 Always whataboutism. Personally, I am very conflicted on this. But, probably yes. I don't believe the baby should also be made to suffer, also. But this is less than 1% of abortions. Hang the rapist.

@VoidoftheLost @RexRuther4 @THTGTruth Do you think a woman or a girl should be forced to carry their rapists child to term?

@DeathlyAcorn @RexRuther4 Law =/= morality or truth. Baby can survive without the mother after 22 weeks and maybe longer following medical innovation. So, you still haven't drawn the distinction. There is no clear line of when a person becomes a person other than conception. Abortion is murder.

@THTGTruth @RexRuther4 The law makes the distinction. But seeing as that's the lazy answer I'd say that the foetus would not survive without the body of the mother and so it's still her bodily autonomy in question, not that of a non person

@DeathlyAcorn @RexRuther4 You avoided the question, what is the fundamental distinction between inside and outside of the womb that makes it okay? Why is someone a person outside, but not inside? You will have my answer when you answer that.

@THTGTruth @RexRuther4 You can't murder someone if they're not a person. Do you think a victim of rape should be forced to carry their attackers child?

@DeathlyAcorn @RexRuther4 This occurs at conception. Basic biology. The baby is a separate living organism. And babies have been viable outside the womb as early as 22 weeks. How is it not murder inside the womb, but it is as soon as a baby has left? (The act is no different, only the location changes)

@RexRuther4 @THTGTruth Being alive

@DeathlyAcorn @RexRuther4 Was Rudyard Kipling Indian or British? This isn't a hard question.

@RexRuther4 What

@FMuckta67093 @t1meforchange23 @LucyTCWife @Ethan_Powell04 @Nigel_Farage @RupertLowe10 They gave him a spot on the public spending committee. That doesn't mean he works for the party. And the Tories jumped ship because the Tory party is finished and they want to keep their jobs. Reform is the final boss of the subversive Blairite project.

@THTGTruth @t1meforchange23 @LucyTCWife @Ethan_Powell04 @Nigel_Farage @RupertLowe10 Lowe is working for the Tories. The others quit the Tories.

I am honestly so sick of the bitching on here between people that are allegedly on the same side. Could someone please show me where it is written down that if you respect @Nigel_Farage you must hate @RupertLowe10 and vice versa? I’m very fond of them both and no amount of twitter nonsense will make me change my mind. I take as I find and both have been good to me and my family.

@t1meforchange23 @LucyTCWife @Ethan_Powell04 @Nigel_Farage @RupertLowe10 Lowe is a Tory plant, but Farage with his cabinet of two Tories who presided over the Boris wave aren't?

@LucyTCWife @Ethan_Powell04 @Nigel_Farage @RupertLowe10 Can’t stand Rupert Lowe he is a bitter vindictive man and will hopefully lose his seat at the next GE. He is single-handedly helping The Greens. Is that what you want Lucy? Because I don’t. Lowe is a Tory plant.

@Kevin_Bukele @Sargon_of_Akkad I can be free to just move into your house then? It's not an imposition on you.

They were brought here againt our will, so why is it wrong to send them home? Is it only okay to impose this on us, and not the other way around?

@BrittBarnes2023 @RachelB76293670 @oliviakrolczyk_ So you pay another person to have the risk? Seems unethical to me, but more importantly it's unethical for the baby to be ripped from the person who carried it for 9 months and the person it thinks is its mother.

@RachelB76293670 @oliviakrolczyk_ Really... Do you even know the risks of pregnancy on a female body? I bet you never had a baby.

Can we ban the whole rent-a-womb thing? It’s creepy and unfair to the baby.

@piersmorgan The sad thing is he didn't blow the shooter's head off, probably because he feared consequences from the government. This is symptomatic of how broken our justice system in the West.

This is one of the most heroic things I’ve ever seen. Risking his own life to save others. What an astounding act of courage. Who is this guy?

@persianmama111 Because non-white people are a lot more racist than whites.

why are white people so afraid of becoming a minority? does the US treat minorities poorly or something?

@PatriciaNPino We should just print infinity money then! Why didn't we think of that sooner?!? Embarrassing that you don't understand inflation. It's also embarrassing that you think that UK debt will be worth anything if we are forced to inflate it to be valueless or are unable to service it.

1/the UK can never go bankrupt in its own currency 2/the debt are the private sector net savings. 3/The debt doesn’t fuel inflation, the interest paid on it can, but that is a policy choice. 4/To run a country as if it were a business would be incredibly destructive.

@lilyally98 ~95% of abortions are due to inconvenience of raising a child and could be avoided if women didn't have sex with people they didn't want to have a kid with. Rape, threat to life and incest are a very small %.

“The baby you aborted could have cured cancer” The Woman who died in childbirth could have cured cancer! The woman who you locked in the kitchen could have cured cancer! The women who die from abuse every year could have cured cancer!!

@Heccles94 If we banned farmers from using tractors, everyone could have a job ploughing fields. Limiting progress to have more jobs isn't a good thing. New jobs have always been made alongside technological advances. AI is the first thing to potentially fully threaten that.

Musk sacked 80% of staff when he bought twitter Bezos is sacking 14,000 people to replace with AI Microsoft are cutting 4.1% of jobs (9,100) to replace with AI Intel are cutting up to 25% of staff to replace with AI What's that about billionaires creating jobs?

@GarethE168996 @tanky7 @BadWritingTakes I presume he isn't a parasite who would like society to prosper.

@tanky7 @BadWritingTakes Why don't you quit your job then?

It is worth pointing out again: None of these people actually believe any of this horse shit, because if they did they would simply abandon their job and get all this incredibly easy to get free stuff they keep claiming exists. They don't, because they know it's not real.

1.Ireland has one of the lowest in Europe and has quickly become one of the richest places in Europe. 2. If renewables were cheaper, everyone would be using them and you wouldn't have to subsidise them. (Renewables are not reliable). 3. Capital flight is not overblown. Exit taxes are a short term solution, doesn't fix the problem at all.

@alexfmac 1) Reducing corp tax seems like a bad idea. If other countries do similar there's no advantage in it. 2) Renewables are cheaper and allow us to compete in future industries better. And North sea oil doesnt help us much. 3) Capital flight seems over blown. An exit tax seems better

'Ah fantastic Alex, you've solved the f****ing problem. Just return the economy to growth! Just push the Growth button! Why didn't we see this before?!' Alright you doomer communists - here are the 13 policies to both return the country to 3%+ growth & reduce inequality 1/11

@LilyWonderland5 @alexfmac Some foreign aid is just bribery that we benefit from, we can keep that lol.

@alexfmac 7) Maybe. I'd have to look into the downsides of stopping foreign aid. We don't give it just to be nice. I'd say there are lots of other opportunities to invest in growth, on top of the ideas here.

Let me spell this out for you; 1. Net tax payers are contributing more than they take. By being a net tax payer, it is not in their interests to vote to take from others. 13% of people in Britain pay more than they take. The other 87% shouldn't be able to vote them further into slavery. 2. People become wiser with age generally speaking with greater life experience = better voting preferences and part of the reason people become conservative as they age. 3. Those with a family have a stake in the future so are more likely to vote with the interests of their children. 4. With property has a firmer stake in the land and has shown enough fiscal responsibility to obtain a house (but I am not sure I agree with this given how difficult it is to get on the property ladder). 5. Women primarily operate on emotion. They vote on this basis too. And are easily manipulated through that emotion. Women exhibit prosocial behaviour (they behave in a way different to how they think in order to come across favourably in a group). This is horrible for a democratic system because you have mass media messaging around a given issue which they just lap up. Women have had the right to vote for ~100 years and vote for everything that is anti-civilisational. Their most important issue is the right to murder unborn children (less children = decline of civilisation) They vote to strip working people of their resources to be forcibly distributed to those who don't work and foreigners. They vote to give increasing authoritaria power to government. They vote to prioritise foreigners over their own people.

@modadGeoP Are you by any chance: 1) A net tax payer 2) Over 40 3) With family 4) With property 5) A man You could just say you want to restrict the vote to your group. If you can tell what your position you will hold by who you are then all you are saying is “my group first!”

The franchise should be restricted to net tax paying 40+ men with family and property. Change my mind.

Being anti illegal migration was the norm for all leftist parties until post 2010. Being against transgenderism was the norm for leftist parties until 2015. Farage and Trump are basically 90s Democrats. The Tories increased spending to the highest ever since the war. Every party in the West would be considered left wing by the standards of pre-1960s.