
Tyler R. Thomas
3.7K posts

Tyler R. Thomas
@TRThomas96
Preacher of the Gospel. UPCI. Books and Coffee.
Apopka, FL Katılım Nisan 2020
246 Takip Edilen500 Takipçiler

@ClaytonJKillion Hebrews makes it pretty clear that the sacrificial system was no longer efficacious for sin (and actually states that it never was). Paul’s sacrifice was for ritual cleansing. Culturally necessary.
I’d be wary of contending that the old and new overlapped until 70AD.
English

For about 40 years, from 30-70AD, the old covenant and new covenant overlapped—like passing a baton in a relay race.
Jesus’s death put an end to the need for sacrifice, which culminated climatically in the destruction of the temple in 70AD (Dan 9:24-27).
Korra The Taymi@korrathetaymi
Christians, if Jesus on the cross was the final blood sacrifice ALTOGETHER, Why did James Instruct Paul to go to the temple and make an animal Sacrifice? Wouldnt that mean the earliest Christians still believed in animal sacrifice?!
English

@ClaytonJKillion There’s a complementary explanation to your already correct one; the ancient world wasn’t as obsessed with precision as we are, and in their common-sense view, an intentional paraphrase when the original text is also readily available, is not dishonest. It’s, as you say, rhetoric
English

There’s a simple & glaringly obvious explanation: Paul is also writing divinely-inspired scripture, so his rhetorical paraphrase is not changing God’s word but is itself part of God’s word.
Ps 68 and Eph 4 are both scripture.
Korra The Taymi@korrathetaymi
What's very interesting about the New Testament is that Paul OVER AND OVER AGAIN misquotes the Old Testament to fit his own agenda! Here is an example! How do we reconcile Paul changing the words of God? Can he still be an Apostle? Christians, can you solve this?
English

@JacobKGilbert @FaceLikeTheSun I’m no Hebrew expert but I think it’s because the surrounding grammar almost always clarifies the actual number. We KNOW which verses are referring to Elohim singular, and which are referring to elohim plural.
It MIGHT be that the English word “god” just has too much packaged.
English

@FaceLikeTheSun What I’ve always found weird is why not have a word like Eloh in Hebrew seeing as -im is used for plurals. Like cherub to cherubim. Would have made things much less confusing.
English

Larry will debate other people
But he blocked me 🤷🏻
Anyway, he’s suggesting calling Old Testament pagan gods as gods with lower case g is his real gripe
But this misses how the word Elohim is used in the OT Hebrew
It’s both plural and singular depending on context
Like the word sheep
“I have a sheep that loves Larry” grammatically suggests there is one sheep that loves Larry
“I saw sheep who despise Larry” grammatically suggests there are more than one sheep who despises Larry
Similarly, Elohim is God when referencing Yahweh singularly, and gods when referencing not Yahweh spiritual entities in the plural context
So when Exodus 12:12 says “…and on all the gods of Egypt I will execute judgments: I am the LORD.”
“gods” here is Elohim
The same Elohim used to address Yahweh or Jehovah (LORD) in other places depending on the grammatical context
So was God judging something that doesn’t exist?
Or is it just done to call them lower case-g Gods to reflect the Hebrew, and not compromise, but in fact even more so legitimize the monotheism of God?
It’s a lot of semantics that shows how not reading Heiser’s material can really cause some outlandish takes that come off looking silly and under informed.

English

Ye shall know them by their fruit, and it looks like @dalepartridge deleted this so you couldn’t see how utterly rotted away his boughs are.
The Christian podcast sphere (specifically the reformed, cessationist, KJV only-Christian nationalist crowd) is a satanic cesspool.

English

@ClaytonJKillion It’s almost certainly the plural form of Elohim as opposed to the singular, so you’re right, angels is a more accurate rendering in English, though not perfect.
English

I’m not KJVO, but I actually agree that this is a poor translation of Ps 8.
I’ve written about this on my blog, gor anyone who’s interested.
lectionary.blog/2023/11/13/low…
Paul (Not the Apostle)@Paul00540712
English

@MartynMCGrath @dalepartridge Sure I know that, and YOU know that, but @dalepartridge says anyone who disagrees with him is… checks notes… a woman…
English

@dalepartridge The death penalty is not consistent with a pro-life view.
- sincerely, a man.
English

I had all the “nuance Christians” come after me for this comment.
James White, Samuel Sey, Owen Strachan, and even Gabe Rench among others. Most of them screenshotted it as if it’s a stand alone post. It’s not, it was a comment to another post.
Kristen Hawkins made an unthinking statement. Seth Gruber claimed how mindless and foolish it was. I simply commented on his post in agreement.
Kristen said: “The death penalty is inconsistent with a prolife worldview.”
This is not clear thinking.
Not only that it’s unbiblical and out of step with all of church history.
Killing murderers is a way to protect life. In fact, God commands it.
Genesis 9:6 “Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed, for God made man in his own image.”
Kristen leads a large organization and a large prolife movement. She should know this. My statement is that she should not lead because she clearly cannot think.
My application to “women” was more broad because it’s not just Kristen. We see this with female judges, politicians, university professors, CEOs, lawyers, and more. Our nation is overrun with women leaders *most* of which cannot think clearly.
They cannot think in these types of matters because women are designed to think more emotionally and with greater empathy. However, misplaced compassion often causes them to apply mercy where justice ought to be executed. This is exactly what Kristen did.
So, to take this out of its original context and claim I am saying that “all women cannot think” demonstrates my point. I said *most women” cannot think. This includes women of both sexes.
The fact that these men did not deploy basic public square hermeneutics to grasp my rhetoric is telling. Instead, they immediately ran to the most uncharitable interpretation. Why?
We know why.
Dale Partridge@dalepartridge
@sgruber91 Women cannot lead because most women cannot think.
English

@dalepartridge @cnicoleha “Disagreeing with me, and calling me out on my sin is effeminacy. It’s only masculine when I do it.”
- Repugnant Grifter Masquerading as Pastor
English

@cnicoleha Nope. It's because I write for men and not women. So, when these men do what they did, they reveal their effeminacy.
English

@dalepartridge You continually find new ways to model your whole “total depravity” doctrine.
There is no context in which the comment is not vile. Instead of repenting you’re doubling down.
Also “women of both sexes?” Such a chauvinist that any man who disagrees with you is now a woman.
English

@ClaytonJKillion Always starts from the position that one preferred translation is infallible, and then the case is built around the conclusion. It’s embarrassing.
English

Why do infographics like these never mention the places where the KJV leaves out words/phrases or is based on “a small minority of manuscripts”?
Let’s talk about Ps 145:13, Eph 3:9, Rev 16:5, 22:19.
Edward Sibley@edwardsibl91034
English

@mydocjackson Pickled jalepenos are exemplary on barbecue sandwiches
English

@dscottplays @GoNintendoTweet Consider ps5 pro. Nobody is upgrading because the price is going UP. I want good graphics. Some folks don’t care. I do. But I don’t need the BEST graphics. Especially when they cost nearly $1000.
English

@GoNintendoTweet I think with components going up in price that people will just be happy to game... lol
English

BioShock creator points to Switch 2 as proof that devs are realizing that chasing realism in graphics has diminishing returns gonintendo.com/contents/60766…

English

@Ernest1588761 This is not going to go the way you think it’s going to go for you ☠️😂
English

@JacobKGilbert I have known apostolics who refused to baptize for lack of “holiness” or “true repentance” in their opinion. I want to discourage THOSE people who stumble across this.
English

@JacobKGilbert Well, I think all of us at least SHOULD be teaching a bible study immediately before any dunking. lol. I have no issue with illuminating the cost of discipleship. We’re not trying to sell easy believism.
English

This needs to be asked of us when we’re baptized too. It’s that serious.
Pastor Rich Bitterman@w_bitterman
English

@JacobKGilbert I studied Jonah out throughly a few months ago. It can go either way in my opinion.
I lean that he’s being figurative. I mean… he IS being figurative no matter what. Chapter 3 is a poem. I have no problem if someone wasn’t to say the Lord resurrected him.
English


@JacobKGilbert Sure, but we grow into that don’t we? Were you AS with him 20 years ago as you are today? Were you AS committed?
We grow in obedience. We grow in dedication. We grow in faith.
Even still, if we’re “apostolic” they apostles baptized ANYONE who professed faith and confessed sin
English

It’s not necessarily that you must break ties with all family members, but are you willing to? If they all choose the world will you be willing to choose Christ over them? If Christ were to command you to leave them because they were holding you back from His plan for you. Would you leave them? If not, why not.
Jesus plainly says, “He that is not with me is against me…” and He did not qualify it with, “while I’m on this earth.” It’s a forever statement. We’re either with Him 100% or nothing.
English

@JacobKGilbert An aside: when he addressed those, he meant discipleship in the context of his earthly ministry. Discipleship obv does NOT actually demand that we forsake our families post-Pentecost. That was a temporal call for a 3-ish year period of his earthly ministry.
English

@JacobKGilbert Sure… but as apostolics, we look to how the apostles practiced what Christ preached.
Jesus said baptize in the name of Father, Son, Spirit. But they baptized in Jesus’ name.
Jesus said forsake all and follow me, but they said “if you believe, here is water”
English



