TheRohanian 🇺🇸🇻🇦🐸🍄📦

It's happening.

New Nick Fuentes freakbob video just dropped

Gas isn’t high enough imo.

@WurzelRoot @IsabellaIsMoody lmao deleted

@IsabellaIsMoody ok do one where you caught me stealing your panties and call me a loser nerd and step on my balls and then count down from 15 next

@TinashePeter_ How about neither?

I guaranteed you that 99.99% of the Jew hating “woke right” Would rather live in a Jewish neighborhood than a Muslim one…

@joekent16jan19 The most milquetoast neocon take imaginable. Trump is a liar and this is more fake empty words from an empty suit you stupid CIA spook.

"Call no man father." If I had a dollar for every time someone quoted Matthew 23:9 at me, I could fund a new cathedral. But here's the thing. Let's actually read the passage. The whole passage. Matthew 23:8-10. Jesus says three things in a row: "Do not be called Rabbi, for you have one Teacher." "Call no man your father on earth, for you have one Father, who is in heaven." "Neither be called instructors, for you have one Instructor, the Christ." Three prohibitions. One Teacher. One Father. One Instructor. So if "call no man father" is a wooden, literal ban on the word, then "call no man teacher" and "call no man instructor" must be equally literal. Which means every Protestant who has ever said "Pastor Smith" has a problem. Pastor comes from the Latin word for shepherd, but the principle is the same. Every Protestant who has ever called someone "Doctor" has a bigger problem. Doctor is literally the Latin word for teacher. Every Sunday school teacher. Every professor at every seminary. Every Bible study leader who has ever been addressed as "teacher." All violating Matthew 23:8. By the same literal reading. But nobody actually believes this. Nobody. Because Jesus is clearly condemning pride and spiritual authoritarianism among the Pharisees. He is warning against men who exalt themselves into the place of God. He is not banning common relational titles. The context makes this obvious. But don't take my word for it. Take Paul's. 1 Corinthians 4:15. Paul writes to the Corinthians: "For though you have countless guides in Christ, you do not have many fathers. For I became your father in Christ Jesus through the gospel." Paul calls himself their father. Spiritual father. And he does it without a hint of apology or qualification. Was Paul violating Jesus' command? Was the inspired apostle sinning in an inspired letter? There's more. Stephen, filled with the Holy Spirit in Acts 7:2, addresses the Sanhedrin: "Brothers and fathers, hear me." The apostle John writes in 1 John 2:13: "I am writing to you, fathers, because you know him who is from the beginning." Paul again in Romans 4:16 calls Abraham "the father of us all." Fathers, fathers, fathers. All over the New Testament. Used by apostles. Used by saints. Used by men who walked with Jesus or were taught by those who did. The early Christians understood this perfectly. Clement of Rome, writing around 96 AD, refers to spiritual fathers in the faith. Irenaeus of Lyon, writing around 180 AD, constantly references the "fathers" who handed down apostolic teaching. The entire tradition of calling bishops and elders "father" stretches back to the apostolic age itself. Nobody in the first 1,500 years of Christianity thought Matthew 23:9 prohibited calling priests "father." The interpretation that it does is remarkably recent. And it creates an impossible contradiction with the rest of Scripture. So here is the real question. If Matthew 23:9 literally forbids calling a priest "father," then Paul broke the command in his own epistle, Stephen broke it in his final sermon, and John broke it in his letter to the churches. Either the apostles repeatedly violated a clear command of Jesus in their own inspired writings, or the wooden literal reading of Matthew 23:9 is wrong. If there's a third option, I'd genuinely like to hear it.

@Sola_Requiem Overview: open.substack.com/pub/americanre… Anti-Zionism: open.substack.com/pub/americanre…

@BrilynHollyhand Did you use chat gpt to write your book too?

@FeelsGuy2003 Your views of Fr. Cekada aside, is this consistent with the new ecclesiology and its principles?

@frenbilt Live look at Mumbai:

BREAKING: IRAN SHOOTS DOWN B-2 BOMBER, CRASH LANDS IN INDIA — MASSIVE NUCLEAR EXPLOSION REPORTED

Sir, Nick Fuentes is right about everything (again).

New Groypers don't even know that after Nick encouraged people to not vote for Joe Kent, people were paid through Influenceable to label him as a fed/controlled opp. This campaign coincided with articles on The Grayzone, with links to Max Blumenthal as the author was his wife.

@DBrozeLiveFree Mexicans aren’t going to go for this.

This is the moment Mexico's President Claudia Sheinbaum announced the plan to end cash payments at gas stations and toll booths by the end of this year. “Our goal is that this year we make it mandatory to pay for gasoline and toll booths digitally. This will allow us to promote accessible digital payments that allow us to advance the digitization of the country through many other schemes," Sheinbaum said. I highly doubt they can make this happen in Mexico. Learn the full story of this week's 89th Banking Convention in Mexico. Mexico’s Central Bank, BIS, and BlackRock Discuss Phasing Out Cash and Future of Digital Money As the 89th Banking Convention wraps up in Cancún, Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum announced plans to end cash payments at gas stations and toll roads by the end of 2026. thelastamericanvagabond.com/bis-blackrock-…

How much of what we’re seeing right now is actually fake?

@timboslicetko @FurkanGozukara People just aren't paying attention and think this guy is some kind of guru. This isn't news at all. Some of us have known this stuff for many years already. x.com/TRohanian/stat…

@TRohanian @FurkanGozukara It's not, but the key thing to remember is that God always leaves a person to tell all that will happen. Bill Cooper, for example, was doing what Jiang is doing here. He predicted 911 happening in the mid-1990s.

Terrifying revelation. Israel is secretly excavating under the Al Aqsa Mosque to conduct a controlled demolition. They plan to blame it on an Iranian missile to ignite a massive holy war and build their Third Temple.

@WurzelRoot Dude was talking about how Jews have been tunneling under Al Aqsa like it was a "new terrifying revelation" when it's been KNOWN they've been doing that for decades.

this dude is so fucking retarded its crazy. bros followers are literal monkeys destined for the cobalt mines