تحميد

204 posts

تحميد

تحميد

@TU01_01

Spectator

👀 Katılım Ocak 2013
131 Takip Edilen22 Takipçiler
تحميد
تحميد@TU01_01·
@uncertainhum0r The way I understood it is that It's about modesty and her excitement to take a picture with a degenerate who promotes filth. It's unfitting for her to do that since she's wearing a hijab which is a symbol of our religion. No Muslim (man/woman) should look up to these people
English
1
0
22
282
Schrödinger's Cat
Schrödinger's Cat@uncertainhum0r·
@ibnkhattab_ @rap3dbyr3ality Ok. What do you think he implied by what he said? I mean saying he feels bad for the guy who will end up marrying her just coz she clicked a picture with an internet celebrity, what else other than indirectly calling her a slut did he imply?
English
2
0
5
1.5K
تحميد
تحميد@TU01_01·
@VelvetGrumps Can you read or are you just dishonest? Your hate has made you blind and retarded because normal people read things SEQUENTIALLY. In sequence. Meaning in order. Does the concept of reading make sense to you?
تحميد tweet media
English
0
0
8
55
Dilly Hussain
Dilly Hussain@DillyHussain88·
It is open season on visibly Muslim women. They’ve put a target on the back of our mothers, daughters, wives and sisters. Those who have enabled this hatred, your names are known, will not be forgotten. Lowlife hate filled cowards.
English
197
550
1.7K
42K
تحميد
تحميد@TU01_01·
*Shirk is when someone makes similarities between a creation and Allah regarding Allah's essence, attributes and actions
English
0
0
0
18
تحميد
تحميد@TU01_01·
@MLSA182177203 The ayah literally agrees with me, Allah causes hearing. If you say that Allah can cause the dead to hear, then they are able to make dua to Allah, which means there's no shirk. Shirk is when someone make similarities between Allah in his essence, attributes and actions
English
2
0
0
49
تحميد
تحميد@TU01_01·
@MLSA182177203 As for the Prophet ﷺ, Allah is please with him and he is a means towards Allah just like how food is a means for nourishment while Allah has the power to sustain us without it. Allah is the only cause
تحميد tweet mediaتحميد tweet media
English
0
0
1
29
تحميد
تحميد@TU01_01·
@MLSA182177203 As for Quraysh, they believed that their idols had shares of this world and can literally help them. But their false deities are batil
تحميد tweet mediaتحميد tweet media
English
1
0
1
30
تحميد retweetledi
Anadolu English
Anadolu English@anadoluagency·
An Israeli man ran over a 6-year-old Palestinian girl with his car in the occupied West Bank as she played outside her home ⤵️
English
626
16K
25.8K
3.7M
تحميد
تحميد@TU01_01·
@Vakken1 The wisdom of the multiplication of deeds is for the Muslims to understand the honour of those places and to be more attached to them God gives opportunities to whomever he wills. But sincerity is all that matters to God
تحميد tweet media
English
0
0
0
22
Vakken 🇻🇦🇸🇪
@TU01_01 Doesn't someone who lives in Mecca or Medina merit more grace based on their geographical location?
English
1
0
0
23
تحميد
تحميد@TU01_01·
@Vakken1 The more good deeds, you have the greater the grace of God God only cares about works done with effort and sincerity towards him. If you simply do the work but lack them, those deeds would be worthless Here God speaks against those who pray (good) but lack sincerity (bad)
تحميد tweet media
English
1
0
0
22
Vakken 🇻🇦🇸🇪
@TU01_01 How does that synthesise with peoples deeds being weighed on the day of judgement and having rewards for works being multiplied?
English
1
0
0
35
تحميد
تحميد@TU01_01·
@Vakken1 Your merits are a reflection of your inner state. So that God's grace inclines towards us. If we were judged purely based on merit, none of us would be in paradise. Committing sins and saying God would have to forgive is an insult no matter whether its said directly or not
تحميد tweet media
English
1
0
0
52
تحميد
تحميد@TU01_01·
@nightwing0530 Lol. You don't believe in God. The point persists. It seems to have also flown over your head
English
1
0
0
18
سلطان العارفين
سلطان العارفين@sultan_exists·
Except atheists can’t justify the claim “pedophilia is wrong” without assuming the harm principle. Unfortunately, most atheists are materialists. Under materialism, the harm principle doesn’t make sense. Also, Allah doesn’t punish those who didn’t receive the message of Islam.
𝝑𝝔@byamarachi

English
40
40
1K
70.5K
تحميد
تحميد@TU01_01·
@nightwing0530 Both moral and amoral actions are uncategorically scoped under evolution. It explains how living things change. It has no concern about morality. So you can't derive normative values from it. It somewhat explains how we're capable of these moral actions not which is right
English
1
0
0
20
تحميد
تحميد@TU01_01·
@nightwing0530 Interesting reply given that you've admitted that under different conditions, we'd have different moral values in another evolutionary timeline. So eating babies is possibly moral according to you. It's also worth noting that infanticide is somewhat common in the animal kingdom
English
2
0
0
25
تحميد
تحميد@TU01_01·
@nightwing0530 Did evolution take a break while that's happening? Knowing what evolution is, you can never be sure if you even have the right moral values. I still do not think materialism can adequately explain morality
English
1
0
0
42
تحميد
تحميد@TU01_01·
@nightwing0530 This implies that if we evolved differently we would have different moral values. You seem to suggest that evolution guides morality and it steers us towards what's "good". If that's the case then why is rape rampant in the animal kingdom? Why do humans do amoral actions?...
English
2
0
0
44
تحميد retweetledi
Jay Anderson
Jay Anderson@TheProjectUnity·
Humans: "I'll believe it when I see it!" The Universe: "lmao"
Jay Anderson tweet media
English
140
2.3K
14.6K
251.4K
تحميد retweetledi
♰ 𝙽𝚊𝚎𝚝𝚘
♰ 𝙽𝚊𝚎𝚝𝚘@fw_naetoblaq·
how it feels to say "idk" to stuff u actually know but explaining takes efforts
English
60
22.1K
95.9K
1.3M
تحميد
تحميد@TU01_01·
@Vhoyde The mind is ontologically prior. Therefore, it's reasonable to think that time is linear. Thinking that the mind is unreliable is pretty extreme. Otherwise, why not doubt all your thoughts, empirical findings and existence all together? But that's self refuting
English
0
0
0
35