Test John

66 posts

Test John

Test John

@TestJohn713

Katılım Ağustos 2024
48 Takip Edilen6 Takipçiler
Test John
Test John@TestJohn713·
@TFL1728 Tom my theory is if the global headquarters of evil was in a more tropical island they would be less inclined to evil and more inclined to enjoying the weather.
English
2
0
1
299
Test John
Test John@TestJohn713·
@TFL1728 I have a fundamental belief in humanity's ability to innovate. It is simply unstoppable you can try to slow it down to force panic. Ultimately it will not work, humanity will drag itself forward to a better future, always.
English
0
0
0
32
Tom Luongo
Tom Luongo@TFL1728·
The funny part about this is that we’re just finding out about this now! I’ve known this for 30 years. The US leadership has known it for longer. Now ask yourself why they didn’t do anything about it until Trump? But… Muh Peak Oil! EROEI (Cue the Steve St. Angelo and the Chris Martenson!) Truth is folks, technology keeps pace with Human Action. That’s why the Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility is a LAW, not a postulate. The technology to pull oil and gas out of the ground will only improve when the old technology is no longer profitable. Then Capex gets deployed, new methods are put into play, and cost of production steadies. In inflation-adjusted terms Oil is as cheap as it was in the 1970’s +/- 20%. Even during “Crises” like these. When you factor in efficiency gains from other technology, that make the barrel of oil equivalent go farther in advancing Human Action, oil is stupidly cheap compared to the past. That’s reality. Malthus is always wrong. Doomcasters are grifters. Humanity rocks. If you hate humanity enough to believe the Panicans, doomsters, and terrorists that have sucked the joy out of life, that’s between you, the guy in the mirror, whatever god you worship, and your therapist. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Hedgeye@Hedgeye

🇺🇸 U.S. Oil & Gas: The U.S. sits on 46 billion barrels of proved crude oil reserves, with 60% of that locked in dense underground rock. The Permian Basin, which stretches across West Texas and southeastern New Mexico, pumps out 6.6 million barrels a day on its own, more than every OPEC country except Saudi Arabia. Zoom out, and the U.S. is the single largest oil producer on the planet at 13.6 million barrels a day, out-producing both Russia (9.1M) and Saudi Arabia (9.3M). On natural gas, it isn't close: America produced a record 43.2 trillion cubic feet in 2025, roughly a quarter of the world's supply and more than Russia and Iran combined. The U.S. sits on world-class reserves and out-produces every petrostate.

English
55
249
1.1K
78.5K
Test John
Test John@TestJohn713·
@TFL1728 Notice how USA and Iran don't seem to be a party to this summit why is that? 😂
English
0
0
1
161
Test John
Test John@TestJohn713·
@TFL1728 Does Hungary matter anymore though? I think if Russia and Trump decide to squeeze EU they can't control it. Whatever happens in EU becomes meaningless now.
English
0
0
0
232
Test John
Test John@TestJohn713·
@TFL1728 Unlike many pawns Starmer has survived longer and worse allegations. He is a prick but a protected prick after all Boris was thrown out for worse. I think David Cameron for reasons good or bad fucked their timeline with the Brexit vote.
English
0
0
0
183
Test John
Test John@TestJohn713·
@NASA @NASAArtemis I know this is fake because there is no cheese in any of the images. Where is the cheese Nasa, get a better studio.
English
0
0
0
6
NASA
NASA@NASA·
“You can see the surface of the Moon…we just went sci-fi.” On flight day seven, images from our @NASAArtemis II crew amazed, turning science fiction to reality. From the lunar far side to a solar eclipse from the Moon, the views are EVERYTHING. No pressure to pick a favorite.
English
1.8K
17.2K
92.6K
3.7M
Test John
Test John@TestJohn713·
@TFL1728 This ceasefire not likely to last as Iran are not honest negotiators.
English
1
0
1
177
Tom Luongo
Tom Luongo@TFL1728·
Watching the cope from the pathetic shills of the old world order this morning is served best with some strong Italian coffee. The only bigger losers in this past 6 weeks than the IRGC are these Duginist/multipolar agitprop purveyors.
Pepe Escobar@RealPepeEscobar

From the Supreme National Security Council in Iran: the key take away: "It has been decided at the highest level that Iran will conduct two weeks of negotiations in Islamabad based solely on these principles. This does not mean the war is over; Iran will only accept the end of the war once these principles are confirmed in detail."

English
46
38
308
15.5K
Test John
Test John@TestJohn713·
@TFL1728 @ceesmeteenc They are still bitter about the Totale Trump squashed iirc. Don't worry tom it is for a very good reason the French have white in their flag.
English
0
0
5
645
Tom Luongo
Tom Luongo@TFL1728·
Yeah, they are staying full on globalist and we are moving on. But, that move assumes that the "Iran" he was negotiating with can 1) survive Trump and 2) enforce a toll on the Strait. Neither of those things are good bets despite the propaganda fog we live in here on Twitter. So, parse it out and Macron is siding with Iran because he still believes that he and his Davos cronies can destroy the US in the Straits and here at home. You want to talk about national pride circling the wagons around the leader in a time of crisis being an advantage for Iran? Have you met Americans?
English
18
44
269
11.2K
Tom Luongo
Tom Luongo@TFL1728·
So many European Capitols... ... so few nukes. Seriously. This is who/what we wasted 3 generations on subsidizing and rebuilding. Embargo all French trade now until Macron steps down. Cut off the Bank of France from the UST Market. Withdraw swap lines and let their banks crumble. If you don't understand the importance of this, if you just look at these moves in the context of "Iran" then you have no clue as to what's really going on or been going on. Macron, a bigger warmonger than Trump, a prime architect of Ukraine, is now clutching his pearls over Trump's war? A NATO ally? FFS, folks, get out of the Bannonite/Dugin headspace... as always, all roads lead through Europe to London.
@amuse@amuse

@em_Lazzy Yes, Macron reportedly worked with Iran to get multiple european nations to close their airspace to the US in exchange for safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz. France has taken a clear stand against the American people and joined forces with the regime.

English
87
189
712
43.2K
Test John
Test John@TestJohn713·
@TFL1728 Stopped listening to a lot of people, it has been good for me. Still listening to you every now and then. Should ask for a pay rise 7000 is not enough.
English
0
0
4
745
Tom Luongo
Tom Luongo@TFL1728·
The ENTIRE Bannonite crowd is a bunch of grifting intelligence operatives selling you something that isn’t true so they can maintain the status quo after they destroy Trump. It’s the worst combination of greed, corruption, and intelligence shaping out their right now. They built your trust during the interregnum under the Biden Junta. They built in distrust and played on your skepticism to make you feel intelligent. They produce “content” non-stop to keep you glued to their shadow play they project on the cave wall. And when Trump won they took credit for it. But the minute the reality of the situation on Capitol Hill existed, the backbiting began. Starting with the low-levels guys (Barnes, Frei, Massie) and it built all last year Tucker weaved it into his guest list. Candace went off the deep end. They platform stenorious sounding experts, former military and intelligence ‘analysts,’ and create literal morons like Brandon Weichart and Rich Baris out of whole cloth. It’s a circle jerk to keep you in the cave. It’s a technique as old as the hills. And now, they are trying to tell you that the US militay is incapable of blowing up a handful of F-4s, some Catamarans, and missile silos. Remember, folks, 10 years ago they wanted you to believe that we can read license plates from space but we couldn’t find a convoy of Toyota Hiluxes with chain guns mounted in the trunk and blow them up with, well, anything in our arsenal. We just had to accept that ISIS was here forever. Same with the IRGC. Same grift, different decade, same assholes. Don’t hate me because I was right about every single one of these grifting assholes. If you need to hate anyone hate the guy in the mirror who you’re really mad at. I’ll be over here cashing my $7000 checks, smoking my cigars, getting ready for the next battle. Because, unlike most people I want to WIN.
Corn Pop Was A Bad Dude@GeoffHarbaugh

Fake MAGA Voices Completely Wrong About Iran. @JimHansonDC joins me on The Real Reason Podcast to push back at all the lies about Iran coming from the so called fake MAGA podcasters.

English
81
227
793
71K
Test John
Test John@TestJohn713·
@TFL1728 Looking back I used to climb all over my house. I am not sure parents today would allow their kids to be stupid. It was fun going the second floor through the windows.
English
0
0
1
14
Test John
Test John@TestJohn713·
@TFL1728 My prediction Trump is sending troops to seize Uranium and maintain the oil fields. They might have a base in Khargh Island. This seems endgame to me I could be wrong though. Iran seems to be running on fumes.
English
2
0
3
365
Test John
Test John@TestJohn713·
@TFL1728 Trump has always maintained his foreign policy throughout the years it's remarkable how people ignored all his talk especially about middle East nato. This also shows how much of a captured pawn the US was all those years. Bibi understands Trump that is why he is surviving so far
English
0
0
1
178
Tom Luongo
Tom Luongo@TFL1728·
Bibi is Trump’s bitch.
LHGrey™️@grey4626

Israel wasn’t puppeteering Donald J. Trump in 1987 when he stood on national television, and laid out the ironclad case for seizing Iranian oil fields in retaliation for their tanker-war savagery. And they sure as fuck aren’t controlling him now. No one ever has. No one ever will. The very notion is a pathetic fever-dream peddled by weak minds who need a scapegoat for their own impotence. Nineteen eighty-seven wasn’t some Zionist boardroom script...it was the goddamn Tanker War, the bloody naval guts of the Iran-Iraq slaughter. Iranian Revolutionary Guards were mining the Strait of Hormuz like rabid dogs, blowing up neutral shipping, choking 20 percent of the world’s oil supply while the Reagan administration played patty-cake with half-measures. Operation Earnest Will was already underway: U.S. Navy escorts taking fire, mines ripping hulls, Iranians testing American resolve with every speedboat and Silkworm missile. Trump...then a brash New York real-estate titan with zero political handlers and zero need for AIPAC cocktail parties...looked Diane Sawyer dead in the eye on ABC and said what every red-blooded strategist with a grasp of history already knew: hit them where it bleeds. Take the oil. Starve the mullahs’ war machine. Project power without apology. This wasn’t “Israeli orders.” This was pure, unfiltered geopolitical calculus, straight out of the Clausewitz playbook: the enemy’s center of gravity is his economy. Deny it, and you break him. Trump saw it then because he’s always seen it...resource dominance as the ultimate deterrent. Psychologically? Trump has never been anyone’s marionette. The man’s wiring is pure apex predator: self-reliance forged in the cutthroat arena of 1980s Manhattan deal-making, where loyalty is currency and weakness is death. He doesn’t bend to lobbies; he bends reality to his will. His 1987 rhetoric mirrors his 2026 posture with eerie precision...America First, transactional dominance, no forever wars unless they serve the ledger. That consistency isn’t puppetry; it’s the mark of a man who has stared down bankruptcy, media assassination, and two assassination attempts without flinching. Controlled? Laughable. The conspiracy cultists projecting their own slave-mentality onto him reveal more about their fractured egos than his spine. They crave a hidden hand because admitting Trump acts on raw, unscripted American instinct would shatter their worldview. Pathetic. Geopolitically, the mullahs have been a cancer since Khomeini’s revolution...exporting terror, chasing nukes, strangling the Gulf. Trump understood in ’87 what the Beltway eunuchs still deny: weakness invites the knife. Seize the fields, deny the revenue, and Iran’s proxies wither. History bears it out...Saddam learned it the hard way in ’91 when his oil infrastructure went up in flames. Military reality is merciless: control the energy arteries or watch your adversaries fund endless jihad. Trump grasped that before most generals did. Israel? They were fighting their own existential wars then...intifadas, Scuds, the same Iranian-backed Hezbollah scum. Any overlap was coincidence of shared enemies, not control. To claim otherwise is to regurgitate the Protocols of the Elders of Zion with a fresh coat of tinfoil. So spare me the venomous drivel, you keyboard jihadis and basement geopoliticians. Trump wasn’t controlled in ’87. He isn’t now. He never will be. He’s the force of nature that bends history...unowned, unbreakable, and utterly American. If you still don’t get it after forty years of proof, you never fucking will. And that’s a "you" problem, not a "him" problem. Get the fuck over it or get out of the fucking way. 🗡️💀⚖️

English
25
21
165
12.2K
Test John
Test John@TestJohn713·
@TFL1728 And here I thought all of middle East was fighting against US and Israel and winning. The fight for global trade route is surprisingly not the key talking point for many even people who are independent. I think the military base in philipines protects Mallaca now US has 1 in UAE
English
0
0
0
159
Tom Luongo
Tom Luongo@TFL1728·
Excellent food for thought for this weekend. We all have our speculations (and I’ve certainly thrown mine into the mix) to spur conversation… here’s another signpost.
James E. Thorne@DrJStrategy

Food for thought. On November 29, 1971, the world barely noticed when Iranian forces seized three specks of land at the mouth of the Strait of Hormuz: Abu Musa, Greater Tunb, and Lesser Tunb. For the UAE and many in the Gulf, this was never a technical border quarrel. It was an act of occupation and a permanent scar. Today, a comfortable consensus has formed in foreign-policy salons and on Wall Street that the Trump administration has no strategic vision for the Strait of Hormuz, and that Iran is “winning” the confrontation in the Gulf by default. Nothing could be further from the truth. It is hard to believe how casually many of these critics ignore history, including the way control of financing, insurance, and maritime chokepoints has repeatedly reshaped great-power influence. Half a century after the shah’s grab, the question surrounding these islands is no longer simply “who owns them,” but “who secures the most critical chokepoint in the global oil trade.” With President Trump moving to provide American-backed insurance for ships transiting the Gulf, Washington is displacing the remnants of British dominance in maritime insurance and risk. Whoever insures the traffic does not just collect premiums; they hold a de facto veto over it and gain visibility into every meaningful cargo, what moves, in what volume, from where and to where. This emerging architecture gives the United States something London once enjoyed: an indirect presence in every Gulf port that depends on uninterrupted access to global insurance and reinsurance. The logical next step is geographic as well as financial. Returning Abu Musa, Greater Tunb, and Lesser Tunb to the United Arab Emirates would not only correct a historical wrong against Arab inhabitants whose ties to these islands long predate the shah’s gunboat diplomacy. It would also provide the legal and political foundation for a formal U.S.–UAE security arrangement on the islands themselves. Critics will bristle at the idea of a sustained American military presence on these rocks. But the alternative is not some neutral, demilitarized utopia. The alternative is that the Strait of Hormuz, through which a large share of the world’s seaborne oil flows, remains vulnerable to coercion, sabotage, and blockade. A long-term U.S. presence, at Emirati invitation, would anchor a security order built around free navigation, reliable energy flows, and clear red lines against maritime blackmail. This is not just about three islands. It is about restoring the principle that territory cannot be seized by surprise and held indefinitely by force, and about extending a coherent maritime strategy from Hormuz to the Bab el-Mandeb. If the United States is serious about securing the arteries of global trade for decades to come, then correcting the injustice of 1971 and placing these islands under Emirati sovereignty, with an American flag flying alongside the UAE’s in a carefully structured basing agreement, is not an overreach. IMHO, It is the minimum credible foundation for a stable Gulf and the clearest rebuttal yet to those who insist that America has no plan.

English
21
36
204
21.1K
Test John
Test John@TestJohn713·
@TFL1728 @BarnesLaw "Donald Trump has launched an unprecedented assault on the world’s most important central bank.” This is your opinion being confirmed or rather further solidified.
English
0
0
3
491
Tom Luongo
Tom Luongo@TFL1728·
Does this sound like someone that asshat @barneslaw calls “Soros Scotty?” Or does this track with the assassin who created the trade to break the Bank of England?
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent@SecScottBessent

By publishing this explicitly false story, the @FT has officially become tabloid trash for market participants. Despite my direct, on-the-record denial of ever having advocated, explored, or espoused the idea that Chancellor-Bank of England statute serving as a prototype for a Treasury-Federal Reserve relationship, FT journalists manufactured a story with the headline, “Scott Bessent praised Bank of England as model for tighter oversight of the Federal Reserve.” These pathetic journalists have clearly fabricated a story to give the impression that both I and the Trump Administration are setting “about restructuring the relationship… at a time when President Donald Trump has launched an unprecedented assault on the world’s most important central bank.” Their mendacious assertion is based on vague statements from unnamed “financial industry executives familiar with the matter.” In short, FT has literally manufactured an entirely fake policy position for me and the Administration. Other than furthering a maliciously false narrative of dysfunction and divisiveness, it baffles the mind as to why they would shred their already diminished journalistic credibility. Over the past 10 years, I have written more than 20,000 words opining on the Federal Reserve decisions, personnel, structure, and modifications. Nowhere have I ever mentioned this ridiculous notion. The Governor’s letters to the Chancellor have proven to be a useless and perfunctory device. There is much to be said about the storied Bank of England, but any recreation of its operating framework on this side of the Atlantic has never been contemplated. The shameful journalists and editors at the FT are shocking in their meretriciousness, lack of standards, and general intellectual libertinism. It is the worst tradition of Fleet Street to manufacture news rather than report on it. They have brought irredeemable shame to their parent organization, Nikkei Inc., with whom I had previously held excellent relations. In 2025, I laid out a comprehensive 6,000+ word review of each and every policy reform that I believe should be adopted by the Federal Reserve. Read my actual, real thoughts on and proposals for Federal Reserve reform at the International Economy: international-economy.com/TIE_Sp25_Besse…

English
28
63
428
30.2K
Test John
Test John@TestJohn713·
@TFL1728 People are just not willing to listen to reason. People don't understand the reason why every ME country hates Iran, not do they understand the attack was not only for Israel but every other country surrounding Iran and not to mention the Global oil supply. Idiots filledwith hate
English
0
0
1
122
Test John
Test John@TestJohn713·
@TFL1728 Insurance is easy if you have information. If you are running in blind and still insuring you are an idiot and there is no fix for that.
English
0
0
0
85
Tom Luongo
Tom Luongo@TFL1728·
This is as moronic a post as someone could write because they are ignorant of history. The USNavy has been the guarantor of global shipping for decades. The reason risk assessment gas been hard Kathleen is because the guys across the Thames from Lloyds male the world an unsafe place. You know by arming both sides of conflicts, running terrorists, drugs and militias around the world insurance is actually one of the simplest industries there is and anyone trying to sell you on this idea is either stupid, running an op or both Next I will hear that tariffs cause inflation…
Kathleen Tyson@Kathleen_Tyson_

I've watched 5 attempts to modernise Lloyds of London since the 1990s get mired in resistence and inept implementation. Only one can claim partial success, for a very limited function. Maritime insurance is a very complex, niche, specialist market. Singapore has moved it a little. Russia has state insured since 2022. But Lloyds of London is still preeminent because it's not an easy risk assessment and management business to model. The idea that Trump and his administration of Fox talking heads can replicate the Lloyds of London maritime insurance market to avoid an oil crisis is ridiculous. And the day after USS Fretful Abe Lincoln fled strike range for Indian Ocean due to depleted AD, Trump says the US Navy can escort oil tankers through Strait of Hormuz. Nonsense.

English
40
88
531
37.3K
Test John
Test John@TestJohn713·
@TFL1728 I always wonder where the baby boomer assets go after they are dead. The debt will raise as long as the fraud is not tackled. USA wouldn't be in this position if the laws in the books are enforced. To take over a country you need the help of the judiciary and the enforcement.
English
0
0
1
93
EM Burlingame - 蒲 奕 言
EM Burlingame - 蒲 奕 言@EMBurlingame·
Nonsense. We've two carriers and the vast sensor suites that come with a carrier battle group, as well as heavy satellite overhead coverage (which also moves with carrier battle groups). Why? Because some dipshits in the City of London decided to go all in on a dirty nuke in Israel, blaming it on the Iranians, in order to force us all into WWIII.
Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡@shanaka86

The USS Gerald R. Ford is not parked near Iran. It is parked off Israel. And nobody is asking the only question that matters: why. The $13.3 billion crown jewel of the US Navy, the largest warship ever constructed, just positioned itself off Haifa. Not in the Arabian Sea where the Lincoln sits 850 kilometers from Iranian shores loaded for offensive operations. Not in the Gulf where strike range is optimal. Off Israel. Defending Israel. This is not redundancy. This is architecture. Two carriers. Two missions. Two entirely different strategic functions. The Lincoln is the sword, positioned to launch strike packages into Iranian airspace within hours of an order. The Ford is the shield, its Aegis missile defense systems creating an umbrella over Israeli population centers against the retaliation that follows the first Tomahawk. America just split its carrier doctrine into offense and defense simultaneously. That has not happened since the Pacific theater in 1945. But the positioning reveals something deeper than tactics. When Iran retaliates, and every wargame says Iran retaliates, its missiles and drones fly toward Israel. They will fly through the same airspace where a US carrier strike group is now stationed. Every Iranian missile aimed at Tel Aviv or Haifa must traverse the Ford’s defensive envelope. Shooting at Israel means shooting at, around, and through an American carrier group. Iran cannot retaliate against Israel without engaging American naval assets. The Ford’s position makes that physically impossible. The carrier is not defending Israel as a favor. It is positioned so that any Iranian response to American strikes automatically becomes an attack on American forces, triggering the full unrestrained weight of US military response without a single additional political decision required. This is escalation insurance written in steel and seawater. If the campaign goes longer than planned, if munitions run thin in 7 to 10 days, if allies hesitate, the Ford’s position ensures that Iranian retaliation does the political work Washington cannot do alone: it transforms a limited American strike into an act of self-defense that no ally can refuse to support. You do not park a $13.3 billion carrier where the enemy’s return fire will hit it unless you want the enemy’s return fire to hit it. The Ford is not there to prevent escalation. The Ford is there to guarantee that if escalation comes, it comes on terms that make American restraint politically impossible and allied participation politically unavoidable.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ open.substack.com/pub/shanakaans…

English
28
70
298
36.7K
Test John
Test John@TestJohn713·
@TFL1728 Assets are getting activated across the world it's a troublesome scenario to be in this region. Violence and chaos are their methods and not everyone can fight back. Hope Trump wins the mid terms. Only by winning it can we solidify the gains.
English
0
0
1
345
Tom Luongo
Tom Luongo@TFL1728·
The basic idea of this post is correct, the conclusions about who is affected by it however is dead wrong. The cartels are an integral part of the British organized crime money layer. As a cash settled business, drug and human trafficking, create an entire layer of silver-backed high-powered money circulating outside of the normal economy, to be invested etc. the cartel in Jalisco, CjNG, is very involved in making sure the silver produced there flows to “the right people.” I would venture a guess, that silver is part of the supply pledged on not just the COMEX but mainly the LBMA to ensure proper control over the price of silver itself. This attack on them therefore should be viewed as an attack to liberate silver flows rather than to staunch them. And if London’s allies no longer control that silver that should lead to real price discovery. Moreover, notice how the latest silver rally started BEFORE the conflict with CJNG. The relationship was realized after the market began moving. The market anticipated this move….. who do you think was pressuring who here? My bet is on Big Gay Patton Scott Bessent
Lukas Ekwueme@ekwufinance

Mexico, the biggest silver producer on earth, is plunging into chaos. Here is why this matters: - Silver was declared a critical mineral for the first time in history - No silver = no AI, no missile production - 50% of US silver imports come from Mexico The US modeled a scenario where Mexico stopped silver exports to the US, which would trigger a GDP decline, raising national security concerns. A few days ago, 10 workers of Vizsla Silver were abducted, 3 were found dead. As a result, mining companies are having trouble attracting employees and are incurring higher security costs. This was before the cartel war.... Now the situation has gotten worse. - Silver transport is disrupted - Costs are rising across the board - It's getting harder to attract employees This could resemble the doomsday scenario the US modeled. All of this is happening in a market which has been in deficit for 5 consecutive years, with COMEX inventories getting drained at an accelerating pace. The world is in desperate need of silver and the biggest supplier is at war.

English
36
109
425
44.3K
Test John
Test John@TestJohn713·
@TFL1728 I really wonder how Trump is going to survive this year with all these snakes. The turnout for midterms are generally lower. The Dems will have their base charged up. Hope for some knockout punches soon from the administration.
English
0
0
0
61
Tom Luongo
Tom Luongo@TFL1728·
It’s far worse than this. I auto-block all people who are their tweets with “Tom, I love you but …” Come up with better slop maggots.
0HOUR1@0hour1

Looks like @krassenstein is running a fake conservative group account network on X He was busted posting on the wrong account. Ive been telling people most of the Massie shit is liberals posing as conservatives. Take heed Pysops are real.

English
14
12
141
9.4K