ᴛʜᴇ ʙʟᴏᴄᴋ ʀᴜɴɴᴇʀ Podcast 🟧

22.3K posts

ᴛʜᴇ ʙʟᴏᴄᴋ ʀᴜɴɴᴇʀ Podcast 🟧 banner
ᴛʜᴇ ʙʟᴏᴄᴋ ʀᴜɴɴᴇʀ Podcast 🟧

ᴛʜᴇ ʙʟᴏᴄᴋ ʀᴜɴɴᴇʀ Podcast 🟧

@TheBlockRunner

We sit down each week discuss what is actually happening. Bitcoin, AI, creator markets. Will & Iman since 2019. @natgmi builders @natdotfun is live.

Houston, TX Katılım Nisan 2019
1.5K Takip Edilen19.7K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
ᴛʜᴇ ʙʟᴏᴄᴋ ʀᴜɴɴᴇʀ Podcast 🟧
The non-arbitrary era begins today… We’re throwing in our biggest contribution to Bitcoin we could come up with Digital Matter Theory represents an opportunity for all who seek to identify new purpose and value that can be derived from the discoverable patterns within a block We recorded a detailed breakdown of DMT as a concept and explain the operations to formally register the existence of patterns and deploy, mint, and transfer NATs (Non-Arbitrary Tokens) in ▶️  watch here or on YouTube 👇 youtu.be/Dx_qf1196FQ All of this juice is also in the docs we just published 👇 digital-matter-theory.gitbook.io In there you will find the JSON syntax to mint the very first NAT deployments $NAT $BMT Let the DMT pill consume you 💊 Summary: In this episode, we delve into the intricate universe of Digital Matter Theory (DMT) and its potential applications in the blockchain space. We discuss how DMT enables the creation of non-arbitrary tokens by recognizing patterns in data. Safeguarding the provenance of these elements allows the launch of unique projects tied to them, leading to a diverse ecosystem of tokens. We delve into hybrid tokens, a result of minting NFTs harboring fungible aspects. By parsing through Bitcoin data, meaningful patterns can be codified and used for creating projects. We touch upon the inception of bitmap and the role of communities like Yuga Labs or Rare Sat Society in relating patterns within Bitcoin data to create ecosystem value. We also discuss the concept of 'bit informatics', where the search through Bitcoin's blockchain for patterns holds immense potential for creating new tokens or games. In the process, we unravel the creation and utilization of Nats or Non Arbitrary Tokens. Throughout, we draw parallels between DMT and the early days of NFT, stressing the need for a unified method for creators. We underscore the value potential of non-arbitrary data in the metaverse and the chance to create ecosystems through the recognition of patterns. As with every episode, we invite listener feedback, and encourage questions via YouTube and Twitter. For those wanting to dive deeper into this captivating subject, follow and subscribe for future videos. 🚀Sign up to receive our Ordinal Takeover Newsletter for weekly updates! theblockrunner.com Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed by The Block Runner are for informational purposes only and do not constitute financial, investment, or other advice.
YouTube video
YouTube
English
139
248
820
307.2K
ᴛʜᴇ ʙʟᴏᴄᴋ ʀᴜɴɴᴇʀ Podcast 🟧
If you’re arguing for Bitcoin miners to make less money means You don’t understand Bitcoin. Here are the miners that are opting to make more money and thus increase the security of Bitcoin: @AntPoolofficial @SpiderPool_com @f2pool @ViaBTC @luxor 65% of global hash power gets it. The rest will have no other choice. The 2nd subsidy in ethereum:0x249130f5e2dd4cf278180c0df8273f3592ad1247 is inevitable.
Fred Krueger #BIP-110@dotkrueger

@TheBlockRunner i am essentially arguing that, yes.

English
1
15
34
1.1K
ᴛʜᴇ ʙʟᴏᴄᴋ ʀᴜɴɴᴇʀ Podcast 🟧 retweetledi
meong
meong@natatrillionair·
Bitcoin is dead without $NAT!!! 💀💀💀💀💀💀💀 do $NAT miss the MoonKing @iambroots youtu.be/hK9GnM11F18?si… via @YouTube
YouTube video
YouTube
English
0
8
32
973
ᴛʜᴇ ʙʟᴏᴄᴋ ʀᴜɴɴᴇʀ Podcast 🟧 retweetledi
The Hood Man
The Hood Man@Web3Insect·
The entire market is trapped in the "laser eyes" echo chamber, relying on pure faith while the math silently bleeds out. Bitcoin dies without NAT. RT - let the world know.
English
2
11
26
555
ᴛʜᴇ ʙʟᴏᴄᴋ ʀᴜɴɴᴇʀ Podcast 🟧
Every single one of these transactions within the block paid the market price to be in the block. Those fees went to miners as an incentive to continue securing the network. You're essentially arguing for miners to make less money. The equation that matters to real bitcoiners is the following: Miner revenue = network security = network value Currently miner revenue is declining which means the cost to attack the network is declining. Fees will never be enough to underpin the security of the network because fees can not scale as the value of the network increases. If fees go up less people use the network. You're advocating for the wrong thing. You should be advocating for more miner revenue because the security will always be the ceiling for the value of Bitcoin. If miner revenue ceases to increase, the market cap of Bitcoin will no longer rise. study @natgmi ethereum:0x249130f5e2dd4cf278180c0df8273f3592ad1247
Fred Krueger #BIP-110@dotkrueger

34% of the entire Bitcoin block space is being used for worthless "inscriptions". Houston, we have a problem. wtfhappenedinfeb2023.com

English
6
13
41
3.2K
ᴛʜᴇ ʙʟᴏᴄᴋ ʀᴜɴɴᴇʀ Podcast 🟧 retweetledi
NAT~星Y (蓝V互关)
NAT~星Y (蓝V互关)@AmitKum51152395·
虎二爷 虎嫂 工作室非常忙碌
日本語
11
4
28
378
ᴛʜᴇ ʙʟᴏᴄᴋ ʀᴜɴɴᴇʀ Podcast 🟧
ethereum:0x249130f5e2dd4cf278180c0df8273f3592ad1247 is a viable solution to the declining security budget for two main reasons 1. It directly incentivizes miners to continue mining bitcoin by delivering more cash to them for every block forever. 2. It’s the only proposed solution to the problem that makes people money. Psychology plays a major role here.
English
1
10
51
607
ᴛʜᴇ ʙʟᴏᴄᴋ ʀᴜɴɴᴇʀ Podcast 🟧 retweetledi
origin
origin@natssats·
Transaction fees alone won't sustain Bitcoin in the long run. That's because Bitcoin is primarily used as a store of value, not a medium of exchange. As a result, transaction velocity declines, fee revenue remains low, and eventually it's not enough to secure the network. The alternatives are either destroying the 21 million supply cap by introducing perpetual inflation or switching to Proof of Stake. Both would undermine Bitcoin's core value proposition. The only viable solution is a second subsidy like $NAT, which has already been adopted by 65% of Bitcoin's hash rate. It's the only solution that might work because speculators can make money from it. That upside potential attracts speculation, speculation increases market value, and a higher market value ultimately strengthens Bitcoin's security. Without $NAT, Bitcoin will eventually fail. @natgmi
Coin Bureau@coinbureau

🔥FORMER META ENGINEER: BITCOIN HAS TWO TICKING TIME BOMBS He says quantum computers could one day break Bitcoin wallet security, with no cohesive plan to migrate the network. The second: 95% of all Bitcoin is already minted and the fee economy that was supposed to replace block rewards never materialized. "A slow death spiral could trigger."

English
2
5
24
533
ᴛʜᴇ ʙʟᴏᴄᴋ ʀᴜɴɴᴇʀ Podcast 🟧 retweetledi
origin
origin@natssats·
Mr @saylor, You're absolutely right. Spam is what ultimately secures Bitcoin once the block subsidy disappears. No spam = fewer transactions → lower transaction fees → less revenue for miners → weaker security and greater centralization. We need to have an honest conversation about Bitcoin's long-term security budget. After quantum computing, it's the biggest existential challenge Bitcoin faces. Without @natgmi, Bitcoin will fail.
Michael Saylor@saylor

There are 110 things more dangerous to Bitcoin than spam. BIP 110 turns a spam dispute into a consensus change that would invalidate some currently valid, fee-paying transactions. That precedent is the danger. We should save our energy for threats that really matter. $BTC

English
0
6
26
557
ᴛʜᴇ ʙʟᴏᴄᴋ ʀᴜɴɴᴇʀ Podcast 🟧 retweetledi
The Hood Man
The Hood Man@Web3Insect·
Day 399 #NatTo1bChallenge Bitcoin = Crude Oil. NAT = High-Octane Fuel. ​You don't pour raw crude into a multi-trillion-dollar engine. ​Bitcoin extracted the pure thermodynamic energy. NAT is the refined digital matter distilled directly from the block data - powering the ecosystem and sustaining the miners as the block subsidy decays. ​Crude stores the value. Fuel creates the velocity. ​Physics wins. NAT Bitcoin DMT
English
0
11
42
781
ᴛʜᴇ ʙʟᴏᴄᴋ ʀᴜɴɴᴇʀ Podcast 🟧 retweetledi
Shane ”THE SHILLER” 🧸👽👾🛸
Check this out!! DMT $NAT @iambroots joins for an interview. BULLISH 🔥🚀
ᴛʜᴇ ʙʟᴏᴄᴋ ʀᴜɴɴᴇʀ Podcast 🟧@TheBlockRunner

He caught ethereum:0x95ad61b0a150d79219dcf64e1e6cc01f0b64c4ce on day three and rode it to millions. Now @iambroots says @natgmi is the only new coin he's backed with that same conviction. We sat down to talk about his moon math, why he believes Bitcoin needs ethereum:0x249130f5e2dd4cf278180c0df8273f3592ad1247, and the only three coins he's held through the entire cycle. 👇 Bitcoin Is Dead Without ethereum:0x249130f5e2dd4cf278180c0df8273f3592ad1247 | A ethereum:0x95ad61b0a150d79219dcf64e1e6cc01f0b64c4ce Millionaire's Bold Bet | MoonKing #322 We sat down with MoonKing, a trader who has been in crypto since 2013, long enough to watch entire cycles be born, die, and get reborn under a new name. Most people know him as the meme coin guy, the one who rode Shiba Inu from a tiny Uniswap pool to life-changing money. What we wanted was the story underneath the gains, and how a self described degen ends up with real conviction in @natgmi. He takes us back to day three of ethereum:0x95ad61b0a150d79219dcf64e1e6cc01f0b64c4ce, when it was just a dogecoin:native killer tagline and a couple hundred people in a Telegram. He walks us through the crash that nearly rugged it, the morning he looked at his phone during a walk to the park and sprinted a mile and a half home, and the week so volatile he needed Benadryl to sleep. It is a story about fast wealth and how few people are actually built to hold it. From there, he gives us his framework. He calls it moon math, the simple act of asking what a coin has to do to reach a target people can actually picture, because a believable number is what lets a community hold through the boredom. He explains why he now teaches people to take profit and still keep a moon bag, a lesson he learned the hard way by leaving a fortune on the table. And he draws a sharp line between the class of 2017 that knew how to hold and the pump era that trained everyone to sell in seconds. Then we get into ethereum:0x249130f5e2dd4cf278180c0df8273f3592ad1247. He is not a technical person, but he is a marketer, and he tells us exactly what he thinks the token is missing. Not adoption, not the math, not the miners already signaling. It is controversy. He argues that the safest way to be ignored is to play the hero, and that the version of a story that actually spreads is the uncomfortable one. We talk through the billion-dollar threshold that would force the loudest Bitcoiners to finally weigh in, why Adam Back dismissing it without looking is the exact mistake that ends up mattering, and why a token that helps Bitcoin instead of competing with it is a narrative almost nobody knows how to sell yet. What stays with us is his read on attention itself. He has watched every cycle reward the thing people could not stop arguing about, from @ethereum against Bitcoin to every meme that got called a scam on its way up. That being right and quiet is not a strategy, and that conviction only compounds when other people are forced to react to it. @natgmi is one of only three coins he has held from a bear market into a bull market, and he has only ever bought more. That is not a price call, it is a bet on how long a real idea can be ignored before the market has no choice but to look. If he is right about how this plays out, the interesting part was never the coin. It was who gets to decide what Bitcoin is allowed to become next.

English
3
8
48
969
ᴛʜᴇ ʙʟᴏᴄᴋ ʀᴜɴɴᴇʀ Podcast 🟧 retweetledi
$DMT-NAT
$DMT-NAT@natgmi·
Bitcoin doesn’t care about laser eyes. It respects math, and the math is failing the miners. ​You can't secure a trillion-dollar network on a subsidy decaying to zero. Without a secondary thermodynamic reward, hashpower starves. ​Bitcoin dies without NAT.
English
3
34
98
2.1K