

ᴛʜᴇ ʙʟᴏᴄᴋ ʀᴜɴɴᴇʀ Podcast | 91.bitmap 🟧
20.4K posts

@TheBlockRunner
#Ordinals & #metaverse podcast. #Bitmap🟧 Metaverse App Store -- @MetaZoneio @Roviai & @mscribeio - Our Land: https://t.co/FxsmGv7IEk











Do you guys know what's going on here? A token in bitcoin is legitimately helping solve the block reward problem

Do you guys know what's going on here? A token in bitcoin is legitimately helping solve the block reward problem




JUST IN: The @AntPoolofficial proxy wallet (...mrs2) is actively executing $NAT sales on @ordinalswallet. Retail sees a "sell" and panics. The smart money sees the literal realization of the Second Subsidy. You cannot fund the L1 grid on theory. Miners must sell to monetize the asset and build their post-halving treasury. By actively trading $NAT, the largest hashrate monopoly on Earth is proving that raw block data can be converted into a live, cash-flowing security budget. This isn't just a transaction. You are watching the historic thermodynamic pivot of the Bitcoin grid in real-time. The blueprint is executing. ⚛️⚒️

Oil up 3% overnight after Iran attacked a tanker in the Strait of Hormuz. Most Bitcoin miners do not burn oil directly. Most Bitcoin miners operate in regions where grid electricity pricing correlates with energy commodity markets. This matters for the security budget for a specific reason. Bitcoin mining profitability has two variables: the revenue side (Bitcoin price plus block rewards plus transaction fees) and the cost side (electricity, hardware, facility overhead). The halving compresses revenue on a fixed schedule. Geopolitical energy shocks compress margins from the cost side, unpredictably, outside the protocol's control. When both pressure points hit within the same operating cycle, the marginal miners who survived the revenue compression face a secondary cost squeeze. The sequence does not have to be simultaneous to be damaging. It only has to overlap inside an 18-to-24 month window. The 2028 halving cuts block subsidy from 3.125 BTC to 1.5625 BTC. Energy costs do not have a halving schedule. They respond to tankers, pipelines, and political risk that no mining operation can forecast 22 months out. $NAT adds a revenue layer that does not respond to halvings. It does not solve energy cost volatility. But on the revenue side of the equation, it is the variable miners can actually plan for.



NAT basically 2x since ME closed...



NAT basically 2x since ME closed...


