ヴイcチエ

#Gumayusi #Worlds2025 #T1 #lolesport

親愛度999　メグと温泉メモロビ

対魔忍ターニャ

ローアングルから見たねねちち🍑 #ねねアルバム

ゲンエキカオウ~歌姫~ 歌わせていただきました！ ご視聴ありがとうございました☺️✨️ ひとりでも多くの方に 想いが届きますように🫂 次回の放送もお楽しみに💫 #ゲンエキカオウ

ありがとうございます！！！ また4月から日本一周再開します🚗

Kaede 💗

NACIÓ EL BEBÉ DE LA ARTISTA DE LAS 100 NOVIAS Nozawa Yukiko, artista del manga de LAS 100 NOVIAS anunció que ha dado a luz a un bebé sano. 💕 Una vez recuperada, retomará su trabajo en el manga.

Dios mío

@periwinkle4343 @grok @yuritismpilled @edpwatch_

@grok @yuritismpilled @edpwatch_ @Grok given that lolicons are seemingly exclusively attracted to cartoon depictions of children, despite the fact that its not legally CSEM and there are no real children hurt, how likely is it that lolicons are pedos, and that seeking lolicon pornography is pedophilic behavior?

LOLI IS NOT CHILD PORN

shes so flat its freakin awesome #rkggk

@Naoto244 vrga de donde sacan lo isekai xd?

Sao arruinó el género isekai, no es una opinión es una realidad

@ELNASHI00 Ojala algun dia que me fuercen asi

@TheFaster11 Que rico si

Esto es el equivalente a que tú madre le meta la lengua hasta la garganta a tu novio.

@KaiKai2492 This is the same argument that has been categorized for censorship, saying that by consuming a medium or trying it in some cases in real life, such as "NTR, rape or incest roleplay" is to seem like being selective, just as some people find furries as "zoo".

I'm all for separating fiction and reality but I'mma be real you will never look good defending loli stuff man. It's not like other things like incest or rape where you can argue their narrative value even outside of dark fetishes, the only "use" for lolicon is to goon to prepubescent looking characters. Even with those fetishes there are safe, consensual outlets for them like roleplaying with an adult partner, which doesn't exist for something like this. I'm not saying liking it inherently makes you a pedophile but you have to realize how bad it looks, and the harder you defend it the worse you look. This isn't something a majority of people will ever come around on.

The pedophiles bundled together to brigade and community note my thread asserting it claims that it is NECESSARY to use CSAM to draw small anime girls, when it doesn't say that. Ever. This is a total strawman, which is expected of lolicon retards. If you say they're attracted to children and call them pedophiles (which they are, it's literally what a lolicon means in Japanese), they will claim you're calling them predators and demand evidence of them preying on a child. This kind of strawmanning and elevation of claims is the cornerstone of the lolicon persecution complex. If you make a thread talking about how artists use references and that if you're looking at lolicon art, you have no guarantee the artist did not use images of real children or even CSAM as reference to produce it, they will claim (as you can see in the community note) that "CSAM is NECESSARY to draw small anime girls". The only thing that is asserted is that all lolicon art is based on what real children look like, which is undeniably true. Loli characters don't look like old grandmothers or adult women. Despite being stylized, they heavily emphasize childlike features. This isn't the same as claiming all lolicon art uses photographs of real children as reference or traces photographs of real children. The whole point is that if you're willing to draw a line at Shadman draw explicit images of real children, you should reasonably be skeptical about what material the other lolicon art you look at is based on. As is stated at the end, it could even be CSAM passed through an AI filter. "But it literally never happens!" I already mention the example of Shadman in the OP, but that seemed to fly over people's heads, but there are other examples: x.com/realNikandros/… I've already pointed to an example of Dorontabi, the artist responsible for the "uoooh 😭💢 correction" memes that he publicly talked about hoarding Japanese child gravure photos. x.com/P33P00peepee/s… Other commenters brought up other examples like the author of Vampeerz clearly using a photo of a real child on their work. What is the number of examples I need to pull up before you accept that there is a non-zero risk that the artist behind the lolicon images you enjoy might be using real children as reference? It doesn't matter what the artist says, because they have every incentive to lie. Just like lolicons have every incentive to lie and boldly strawman me, because they know exactly what they are and refuse to accept it.

@couder_jose @realdeidad A su ves diciendo que por no tener fanservices es sano, pasivo-agresivo diciendo que los romcoms que tienen esto son para gente enferma.

@realdeidad Pero el solo está pidiendo más animes como el que le gusto

Que gente más aburrida zzzzz hagan más animes harem lento con fanservice para que la lloren

@bignothingman @cover_corp No es rentable, solo pierden mas dinero, cover no deja de ser una empresa, y tiene que velar el finaciamiento para bien. Algo que Niji siempre ignoro por tratar de apostar en cosas que no le convenia fincancieramente.

@cover_corp So does this mean the are basically abandoning them like Niji did to their en branch?

[Announcement] Notice on the Changes to be Made to HOLOSTARS' Management Structure cover-corp.com/en/news/detail…

おこねねち🍑 #ねねアルバム

@Zackktually @Akibaguar @Awk20000 yes

@Akibaguar @Awk20000 No, no they are not.

Schlep & Chibi Reviews clash over Chibi’s latest controversial video defending l*lis Some highlights “This video is a self report..I stand with free speech to call you a freak..it’s expired (victim card) lil bro” -S “No wonder your fiancee cheated on you..I would cheat on them too..let’s hop on Jidion’s stream..more than willing to talk” -S “When people have to attack your personal life instead of countering your points..you know they lost..I assume you only have bad intentions and don’t care about children or victims..I ain’t debating with someone that resorts to slander instantly..no interest in talking with someone that has bad faith arguments” -C