Sven Blust

6.6K posts

Sven Blust

Sven Blust

@TheGermanOne86

Katılım Temmuz 2023
28 Takip Edilen119 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Sven Blust
Sven Blust@TheGermanOne86·
... thats quality journalism in the $AVZ story! Thank you, Mr Kienge
KIKI KIENGE@KiengeKki

#Mines_RDC🇺🇸 #Lithium de #Manono : $AVZ constate, informe et n'accuse, tandis que certains médias attisent les tensions. Par Kiki #Kienge Alors que le groupe australien AVZ Minerals poursuit sa démarche de défense de ses droits sur le projet de lithium de Manono, une certaine narration médiatique semble vouloir déformer les faits et alimenter une opposition artificielle entre AVZ, l’État congolais et la société américaine KoBold Metals. Contrairement à ce qu’affirme MINES.CD dans un article publié le 21 juillet 2025, intitulé « Lithium de Manono : AVZ Minerals accuse Kinshasa et KoBold Metals de violer une décision d’arbitrage international », AVZ n’a pas accusé, mais constaté une violation de l’ordonnance procédurale n°3 (PO3) rendue par le Tribunal arbitral du CIRDI. La nuance est de taille. Dans un communiqué officiel, le groupe australien précise clairement qu’il a informé le tribunal de la signature d’un accord entre la République démocratique du Congo et KoBold Metals, dans lequel figure la mention du gisement de lithium de Manono, exploré , certifié et des études de faisabilité et environnementales finalisées par AVZ. Pourtant, AVZ n’a pas été impliquée dans la rédaction ni dans la conclusion de cet accord, ce qui soulève des questions légitimes quant au respect de la procédure en cours devant le CIRDI. "AVZ reste ouverte à un dialogue constructif avec les parties, afin de convenir d'une issue commerciale convenable pour les actionnaires d'AVZ, dans le respect de ses droits légaux et des relations commerciales existantes." Peut-on lire dans le communiqué du groupe. Plutôt que de chercher l’affrontement, AVZ manifeste une volonté d’apaisement et de dialogue, tout en faisant valoir ses droits. Mais cette position responsable semble être caricaturée par certains organes de presse. L’article de MINES.CD transforme en effet un constat juridique factuel en accusation directe, une interprétation qui dénature la démarche légale d’AVZ et suggère une tentative de monter Kinshasa et KoBold contre le groupe australien. Une telle lecture biaisée ne sert ni les intérêts des parties prenantes, ni ceux de la RDC, qui a tout à gagner d’un règlement respectueux des procédures et des droits de chaque acteur impliqué dans le projet Manono. Alors que les enjeux autour du lithium congolais deviennent de plus en plus stratégiques à l’échelle mondiale, la rigueur journalistique et l’objectivité doivent primer sur des titres sensationnalistes. Il en va de la crédibilité des médias spécialisés et de la sérénité du climat des affaires en RDC. @AvzMinerals @KoBold_Metals @kizpaka @MinMinesRDC @SuminwaJudith @Presidence_RDC @US_SrAdvisorAF @USAenFrancais #CONGO #AUSTRALIA #USA

English
0
5
30
899
LitioInv
LitioInv@LitioInv·
@sparkes_dwayne The figure of 850,000–875,000 metric tons of lithium concentrate is based solely on media reports, whereas the 130,000 metric tons of lithium carbonate equivalent is disclosed in Zijin Mining’s annual report. Zijin will produce both lithium concentrate and lithium sulfate.
English
2
0
0
19
Dwayne Sparkes
Dwayne Sparkes@sparkes_dwayne·
Saw this article today on the Manono North Deposit and just couldn’t help myself but to make comment. I'll also give my opinion on the deposit as I've had a few people ask for it. Firstly, the deposit was stolen from AVZ shareholders. I hope AVZ holders get what they deserve for this deposit and it's absolutely pathetic by the Australian government to sit idle. Lots of hard earned Aussie dollars were put into exploring and developing the orebody and the government stays silent? This orebody needed to stay under the one company in order for it to achieve its maximum potential. Zijin gained control of what is now known as Manono North which predominantly consists of the The Carriere de l’Este Pegmatite, often referenced as the CDL Pegmatite. I do think it's the inferior part of the orebody. It's lower grade than the Roche Dure Pegmatite (not in Zijin's control and to the south) and from an early stage, it seems its metallurgy wont be as good. Personally I think splitting the deposit up was also a technical mistake. I think it was important from a metallurgy point of view to keep the both the north and south together. The article states that the Manono North mine will produce up to 130,000 tonnes of LCE per year. I’d argue it won’t be anywhere even close to this. 40.4/(0.82*6) = 8.2 tonnes of SC6 per tonne of LCE. 130,000 * 8.2 = 1.06 million tonnes of SC6. 6/(1.58*0.7) = 5.43 tonnes of 1.58% ore needed per tonne of SC6. I’ve used a very generous recovery rate of 70% and you’ll see why it's generous later. 1.06million tonnes * 5.43 = 5.75Mtpa This seems doable but the problem is, I don’t think Manono North is going to produce SC6 looking at historical met work and its grade. I think Manono will join the same club as LTR, PLS, MIN, in terms of recoveries. It’s not Greenbushes. I think it will produce somewhere around SC5.2. 40.4/(0.82*5.2) = 9.47 tonnes of SC5.2 needed per tonne of LCE. It becomes very different when you plug this in. So they are going to need far more than the 850kt of concentrate as stated within the article to produce those 130kt of LCE. At the time Zijin took control of the north section, the resource was entirely inferred. This is understandable given the lack of drillholes and met work that had been undertaken (AVZ were mainly focusing on the south and doing a great job). I could be mistaken, but I haven’t seen anything via satellite (generally signs of drillholes are easily identifiable) that suggest Zijin has done further work to progress the deposit from Inferred to indicated or measured. So there's a decent chance that the proper work hasn't gone into understanding CDL and it's getting rushed. One thing that is important to understand is that size of the deposit just one of the many criteria which should be used to rank a deposit. If the deposit is larger than 90-100Mt, I’d say it gets less and less important. Grade and metallurgy become king. So, Manono North is large, but lets talk about its grade and metallurgy. I dug into historical metallurgy testwork undertaken on the CDL pegmatite and it was average. I can’t find any flotation testwork done on CDL specifically, but the DMS testwork gave 55% recoveries for 5.6mm size and 66% for 3.35mm size. But here's the issue, the head grade used in these tests was 2.37% Li2O. The average grade of the deposit is 1.58% Li2O … What happens if you plug in the average grade of the deposit? So that rules out it being purely a DMS deposit and flotation will be required. Here’s some info from an old post on DMS and flotation from an older post of mine: x.com/sparkes_dwayne… So they’ll need to float it which means higher CAPEX and OPEX. There is some flotation test work done on the pegmatite to the south so I’ll use that as a bit of a guide (It’s a rough guide as metallurgy can change rapidly over 50 meters let alone kms). It came in at 81.5%. Lab work always comes in higher. Every single time. Also it's important to note that this test work was done on a higher grade pegmatite than CDL. One example which is comparable from a testwork and grade point of view is Kathleen Valley. Manono south's testwork for flotation comes in at almost identical to how Kathleen valley’s (whole of ore flotation not DMS + flotation) did. 81.5% vs 81%. Liontown’s recovery is now at ~63% for SC5.2, 18% less than what the test work gave and not for SC6 as their test work suggested. Just an example how lab tests don't equal what actually happens in practice. Summary: So in my opinion, Manono North will be somewhat similar to another Kathleen valley or Wodgina coming online. It's grade is somewhat above average @ 1.58% and I'd say its metallurgy is average. Yes it's large, but above 90-100Mt, this becomes less important. So overall a good deposit, but it's no Greenbushes and i don't believe it will spit out the tonnes as what many are suggesting. In order to get those tonnes you're going to need an extremely large capex and i don't think Zijin will invest that much given the nature as to how they got the deposit and also the jurisdiction (unstable). Those are my thoughts on the Manono North Deposit. Cheers for reading.
Dwayne Sparkes tweet mediaDwayne Sparkes tweet mediaDwayne Sparkes tweet mediaDwayne Sparkes tweet media
English
15
31
176
9.8K
Diano Olwenyi Peters
Diano Olwenyi Peters@DianoPeters·
Zijin Mining Group is launching one of the world's largest lithium mines in the Manono region of the DRC, aiming to boost Africa's role in the global battery supply chain. The project is expected to produce about 130,000 tonnes of lithium carbonate equivalent per year, potentially accounting for nearly 5% of global lithium output by 2028. Zijin Mining owns 55% of the project, while the DRC government maintains a significant stake to ensure local involvement.
Diano Olwenyi Peters tweet media
English
4
5
18
719
Swahili Nation Network
Swahili Nation Network@1swahilination·
Zijin Mining Group has officially greenlit one of the world’s most massive lithium projects in the Manono region, DRC. This move is set to position Africa as a dominant force in the global electric vehicle and battery supply chain.
English
3
0
0
20
BETO
BETO@betordc·
#RDC : le gouvernement et CMOC Group Limited veulent accélérer la production de cuivre et renforcer les investissements miniers beto.cd/economico/mine…
Français
3
1
7
597
Congo inter Info
Congo inter Info@CinterInfo·
#RDC 🇨🇩 | Mines : cap sur le cuivre À Beijing, le ministre Louis Kabamba échange avec le géant CMOC Group Limited pour booster la production nationale. Objectif affiché : hisser la RDC parmi les tout premiers producteurs mondiaux. congointer.info/2026/03/26/min…
Français
3
0
0
12
Zoom Eco
Zoom Eco@Zoom_eco·
#RDC: À Beijing, le Ministre des Mines Louis Kabamba Watum consolide un partenariat stratégique avec CMOC Group Limited, orienté vers l’accélération des investissements et l’augmentation de la production de cuivre, avec en ligne de mire le positionnement de la RDC comme 2ᵉ producteur mondial à court terme. La contribution du groupe pourrait dépasser 30 % de la production nationale, dans un cadre structuré autour du respect des normes environnementales et ESG, de la conformité légale, de l’amélioration des conditions de vie des communautés locales et du développement des infrastructures énergétiques. Les échanges intègrent également la question de la participation congolaise au capital des filiales, y compris celle des travailleurs, en cohérence avec les orientations nationales. Trois priorités structurent cette dynamique : hausse de la production, exigence environnementale et retombées économiques concrètes pour la population. | via @Zoom_eco
Zoom Eco tweet mediaZoom Eco tweet mediaZoom Eco tweet mediaZoom Eco tweet media
Français
3
0
4
250