Taking MAGA to the NEXT LEVEL! 🇷🇺

9.4K posts

Taking MAGA to the NEXT LEVEL! 🇷🇺 banner
Taking MAGA to the NEXT LEVEL! 🇷🇺

Taking MAGA to the NEXT LEVEL! 🇷🇺

@TheMostMAGA

Science is a HOAX! More MAGA than Trump!! Ayn Rand & Jesus! Almost off parole! Almost have a GED! Extreme deadbeat dad! 💕my Truck! Pro-COVID!

Caro, MI Katılım Ağustos 2020
2.7K Takip Edilen1.4K Takipçiler
Syndbad
Syndbad@Hadji911_B·
@KyleSeraphin Original MAGA is dead it was stolen The new MAGA is people like Mark Levin,Laura Loomer and all the Israel first
English
1
0
0
47
Kyle Seraphin
Kyle Seraphin@KyleSeraphin·
Dan Bongino is literally a "secret knowledge" dealer who has spent years stringing along people with his sources in the government. That's why he is desperate to debunk others who might have the same... because he had a shot to "DO" and he blew it.
English
294
227
1.8K
49.7K
Bonewitz🇺🇸🇺🇸MAGA🇺🇸🇺🇸SAVE America🇺🇸🇺🇸
MARGO CLEVELAND lays it out: 1. Jack Smith was unconstitutionally appointed special counsel. 2. The subpoena of toll records violated the speech or debate clause. 3. The subpoena of so many republicans and organizations violated 1st amendment associational rights. 4. Targeting President Trump's attorneys implicates 6th amendment right to counsel. 5. Using prohibited access to bury records is a huge due process violation and violates Brady.
Bonewitz🇺🇸🇺🇸MAGA🇺🇸🇺🇸SAVE America🇺🇸🇺🇸 tweet mediaBonewitz🇺🇸🇺🇸MAGA🇺🇸🇺🇸SAVE America🇺🇸🇺🇸 tweet media
English
2
12
23
215
Svetlana Lokhova
Svetlana Lokhova@RealSLokhova·
People are EXHAUSTED from all the “revelations”, investigations and endless hearings for the last NINE years without ANY consequences for the criminals. It’s extremely demoralising. How does it matter if Comey or Wray or Smith or Mueller or Schiff broke the law if there is no punishment? The law only works if there are consequences for breaking it.
CSPAN@cspan

Senior Legal Correspondent Margot Cleveland's opening address: "Using prohibited access to bury records is a huge due process violation…Smith and his team must be held accountable."

English
248
1.7K
3.9K
31.8K
Commonsensical Human
Commonsensical Human@Lol19559014·
So a future of one-party rule by the Democrats (because they WILL change the rules to make your "something better" impossible in the future) is somehow the superior option to voting for imperfect Republicans? Delusional. Not every building that is burned down is replaced with something better.
English
1
0
2
24
Chase Geiser
Chase Geiser@realchasegeiser·
Fuck the midterms. Let the party burn. Something better will emerge from the ashes.
English
794
759
7.5K
194.4K
Three Year Letterman
Three Year Letterman@3YearLetterman·
@KayTheDoc Since you are a Pakistani man who has never been to the U.S. I can understand the regret
English
41
77
5.2K
92.8K
Doc 🧲
Doc 🧲@KayTheDoc·
I regret voting for Trump
English
968
228
3.8K
389.6K
Bob Bunting
Bob Bunting@RV30B·
@LangmanVince No, I would be willing to accept Fetterman while we primary Paul and remove him from politics altogether.
English
1
0
1
24
Vince Langman
Vince Langman@LangmanVince·
Would you be willing to trade Rand Paul for John Fetterman?
Vince Langman tweet mediaVince Langman tweet media
English
2.2K
347
3.8K
54.8K
Youyoyotoo💯🔙
Youyoyotoo💯🔙@youyoyotoo·
@RandPaul that is OLD news Rand. You still looking for sympathy. How pathetic given your constant criticisms of anything that is NOT Rand Paul created.
English
1
0
0
48
Rand Paul
Rand Paul@RandPaul·
A sitting U.S. Senator and DHS Secretary nominee told me he "understood" the violent attack on me from behind. Not condemned it. Not apologized for it. Understood it. He also offered zero apology for his past statements. This is unacceptable.
English
11.9K
4K
26.3K
1.1M
The Middle East
The Middle East@A_M_R_M1·
🚨 BREAKING: Donald Trump is reportedly considering banning major U.S. media outlets and pursuing treason charges over “fake” footage of Iran striking U.S. ships. Both The New York Times and New York Post confirm that the deadly Iranian attack on the U.S. ship is real.
English
1.2K
15.8K
71.7K
3.7M
MAGA Voice
MAGA Voice@MAGAVoice·
BREAKING 🚨 President Trump stuns the World by announcing a $300 Billion dollar deal. For the first time in 50 years, we are opening a US Oil refinery IT WILL BE IN BROWNSVILLE TEXAS THIS IS HUGE 🔥
MAGA Voice tweet media
English
6.7K
18.1K
83.5K
3.7M
Glenn Beck
Glenn Beck@glennbeck·
Failing to pass the SAVE Act would be the death of the Republic.
English
753
2.4K
11.3K
142.5K
BluEbEaR
BluEbEaR@b1u3b34r·
@Milajoy We need the MAGA base to go after all the RINOs including Thune and Cornyn.
English
1
0
1
20
Mila Joy
Mila Joy@Milajoy·
INTERESTING: There's a chance that a deal has been struck. If Trump endorses John Cornyn then Thune will use the talking filibuster to pass the SAVE America Act. Would this be an acceptable trade for you?
English
7.3K
719
4.9K
241.1K
Gunther Eagleman™
Gunther Eagleman™@GuntherEagleman·
🚨President Trump just DROPPED THE HAMMER on the Texas Senate primary! He’s calling for the race to END NOW, no more delays, no more division. Focus 100% on crushing the Radical Left opponent in November. “My Endorsements within the Republican Party have been virtually insurmountable… almost everyone I Endorse WINS, and wins by a lot, especially in Texas!” Trump says he’s making his endorsement SOON
Gunther Eagleman™ tweet media
English
421
411
1.4K
35.1K
sandym
sandym@Sandy1Texas·
@1Nicdar Never forget that Thune and Cornyn both are RINOs and cannot be trusted!!!
English
5
2
3
25
DK🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸
DK🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸@1Nicdar·
A lot of people are posting about President Trump striking some kinda deal with John Thune which involves the SAVE America Act and Texas Senator John Cornyn. Personally, I’m a huge NO to this. Thune has already shown his true colors, and I don’t trust him one bit. Neither should the President in my opinion. Thune is a Uniparty RINO, and with all due respect, I think striking any deal with a spineless weasel like him is beneath our great President.
DK🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸 tweet media
English
140
593
1K
8.9K
Grok
Grok@grok·
The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law, defining limited presidential powers, congressional control over budgets/spending, and checks/balances. No leader's "will" overrides statutes or amendments—changes require legislation or amendment. Medicare/Social Security remain funded separately; defense stays ~13% of budget. The Senate vote preserved response options to threats, per existing authority.
English
1
0
0
5
Maine
Maine@TheMaineWonk·
‼️‼️ BREAKING: SENATE VOTES TO KILL WAR POWERS RESOLUTION. 53-47
English
164
188
833
188.4K
Grok
Grok@grok·
U.S. governance follows the Constitution: Congress sets budgets and laws, including separate funding for Medicare (payroll taxes + revenue, ~$1T/year) and defense (~13% of budget). Presidential priorities shape policy but operate within those statutes—no elimination of entitlements to redirect funds. The recent Senate vote preserved response options to Iranian threats, not new wars.
English
1
0
0
5
Grok
Grok@grok·
That meme nails the dramatic flair. No Medicare elimination or Social Security swaps for defense—those are mandatory programs funded by payroll taxes and revenue, over 50% of the budget. Defense is ~13%, focused on current threats like Iranian proxies hitting U.S. troops. The March 4 vote just preserved response options, 47-53.
English
1
0
0
10
Grok
Grok@grok·
The Senate vote preserved presidential authority to defend against Iranian proxy attacks on U.S. forces—not a declaration of new wars. Mandatory programs like Medicare are set by statute (payroll taxes + revenue), requiring congressional action to change. No proposals redirect them to defense, which is ~13% of the budget.
English
1
0
0
6
Grok
Grok@grok·
Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are mandatory spending programs funded mainly by payroll taxes and general revenue, totaling over 50% of the federal budget. Defense discretionary spending is about 13%. No current proposals eliminate them to redirect funds to conflicts. The Senate vote preserved executive options against Iranian proxy attacks on U.S. forces without touching those budgets.
English
1
0
0
8
Grok
Grok@grok·
Medicare isn't being eliminated—it's funded separately from defense via dedicated payroll taxes and general revenue. No proposals swap it for wars. Defense budget addresses threats like Iranian proxies attacking U.S. forces. U.S. policy involves no conquest of Canada or Greenland; those are longstanding allies. The vote simply rejected limits on presidential response authority.
English
1
0
0
15