TheOutThereChannel

UFO cases Debunked by Paul. 1) Guardian Case (Night time Harvesting with combine harvester and 1 or 2 trucks youtu.be/QEJaQ8LvuTQ?t=… 2) Dr Leir Alien UFO and also Red Lights (Internal Camera and wind farm lights across the bay) youtu.be/4DdTNpD_JPA 3) Trent UFO (Model using Truck Mirror and fishing line) Part 1 and 2 youtu.be/Vh_LI3HGggA?t=… and youtu.be/MZfEPkk7XS8?t=… 4) Aguadilla Puerto Ricco Case (confirm its thermal of heart shape Chinese Lanterns video analysis pattern match) plus what others found out wedding party released them that day.time youtu.be/yq3lcB-O35I?t=… I did a better re-cap episode somewhere too 5) Concorde UFO case (lint clinging to the line of electrostatic stratch on the film) youtu.be/SzX_D-qY-W8?t=… 6) Cigar caught on smartphone Pilot Argentina (just a bird with rolling shutter and motion blurr) youtu.be/D4YRlywS914 7) I need to re-do as google hangouts got changed to low bitrate and poor audio. Socorro case (New Witness account oil drops on site - Most likely a special 2 bladed heli with no tail that howard hughes toolcorp used to transport a test bed of surveyor 3 on a arm - the logo matches very close - Hynek said the blast points too small to lift a car size UFO also youtu.be/uXSj_Ig-59Q?t=… will redo recap and fix the maths errors on blue print in an update episode sometime this year! all playlists on it analyzed over 3 live shows youtube.com/watch?v=uXSj_I… 8) Falcon Lake (Waffle Camp fire iron used to Fake vent burns pressing on shirt not skin directly.. rubbed radioactive rock ground up as he was a miner) youtu.be/k-CsUraBdoY?t=… 9) UTAH Drone filming fast UAP (fits Falcon at max dive speed with Drone speed - Camera Lens were altered to fake a viral promo video) youtu.be/-dQ1DY6CCok 10) UFO passes SecCams (ducted fan drone used to prank or hoax) youtu.be/tXk2DMR3f1k?t=… many others can add here.. or reply comments 11) Secureteam10 Proven 100 percent fakee and even admits it playlist of all episodes exposing him youtube.com/playlist?list=… 12) Thirdphaseofmoon caught hoaxing youtu.be/qks_Zzq_n0A?li… 13) Truth on Travis Walton youtube.com/watch?v=UUGclr… 14) All Truth on various people playlists David Adair and Dorothy Izatt @TheOutThereChannel/playlists" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">youtube.com/@TheOutThereCh… ------- Now what are the best LEGIT UFO cases 1) Paul Experiences - Vid Captures youtube.com/watch?v=eC7RZX… 2) Best cases I got from sky watches.. some verified by MUFON and cant go public only some frames youtube.com/watch?v=BBI7Km…

Rob investigates a new case he got in Wales of 4 orbs stationary in the sky with any analysis help from TOTC youtu.be/RX2cIAAAK18

UFO cases Debunked by Paul. 1) Guardian Case (Night time Harvesting with combine harvester and 1 or 2 trucks youtu.be/QEJaQ8LvuTQ?t=… 2) Dr Leir Alien UFO and also Red Lights (Internal Camera and wind farm lights across the bay) youtu.be/4DdTNpD_JPA 3) Trent UFO (Model using Truck Mirror and fishing line) Part 1 and 2 youtu.be/Vh_LI3HGggA?t=… and youtu.be/MZfEPkk7XS8?t=… 4) Aguadilla Puerto Ricco Case (confirm its thermal of heart shape Chinese Lanterns video analysis pattern match) plus what others found out wedding party released them that day.time youtu.be/yq3lcB-O35I?t=… I did a better re-cap episode somewhere too 5) Concorde UFO case (lint clinging to the line of electrostatic stratch on the film) youtu.be/SzX_D-qY-W8?t=… 6) Cigar caught on smartphone Pilot Argentina (just a bird with rolling shutter and motion blurr) youtu.be/D4YRlywS914 7) I need to re-do as google hangouts got changed to low bitrate and poor audio. Socorro case (New Witness account oil drops on site - Most likely a special 2 bladed heli with no tail that howard hughes toolcorp used to transport a test bed of surveyor 3 on a arm - the logo matches very close - Hynek said the blast points too small to lift a car size UFO also youtu.be/uXSj_Ig-59Q?t=… will redo recap and fix the maths errors on blue print in an update episode sometime this year! all playlists on it analyzed over 3 live shows youtube.com/watch?v=uXSj_I… 8) Falcon Lake (Waffle Camp fire iron used to Fake vent burns pressing on shirt not skin directly.. rubbed radioactive rock ground up as he was a miner) youtu.be/k-CsUraBdoY?t=… 9) UTAH Drone filming fast UAP (fits Falcon at max dive speed with Drone speed - Camera Lens were altered to fake a viral promo video) youtu.be/-dQ1DY6CCok 10) UFO passes SecCams (ducted fan drone used to prank or hoax) youtu.be/tXk2DMR3f1k?t=… many others can add here.. or reply comments 11) Secureteam10 Proven 100 percent fakee and even admits it playlist of all episodes exposing him youtube.com/playlist?list=… 12) Thirdphaseofmoon caught hoaxing youtu.be/qks_Zzq_n0A?li… 13) Truth on Travis Walton youtube.com/watch?v=UUGclr… 14) All Truth on various people playlists David Adair and Dorothy Izatt @TheOutThereChannel/playlists" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">youtube.com/@TheOutThereCh… ------- Now what are the best LEGIT UFO cases 1) Paul Experiences - Vid Captures youtube.com/watch?v=eC7RZX… 2) Best cases I got from sky watches.. some verified by MUFON and cant go public only some frames youtube.com/watch?v=BBI7Km…

🚨 HOLY CRAP! Dirty cop James Comey is FINALLY being subpoenaed in the TRUMP-RUSSIA HOAX By JUDGE CANNON in Florida! 130 OTHER subpoenas have also gone out. This whole conspiracy is about to be blown WIDE OPEN! 🔥

So what didn't we already know Lok anyone off street knows this

Clowns make big cash

“Why doesn’t anyone mention the Bledsoe’s when they refer to orbs?” Probably because you constantly post debunked videos of planes, drones, satellites, space launches, meteors (like below which occur by the hundreds daily), stars, planets and make statements like you’re a prophet. Meanwhile, community notes always shows just how WRONG you truly are, @RyanDBledsoe You’ve got main character syndrome.

@nicksortor True too

🚨 LMFAO HOLY CRAP! President Trump just dropped an INSANE one-liner in front of the Japanese PM in the Oval REPORTER: Why didn't you tell Japan before the Iran war? TRUMP: "Who knows better about surprise than Japan? Why did you not tell me about PEARL HARBOR!? Right?" 🤣🔥

@astrooalert Yet another AI slop engagement account in f**king Pakistan.

🚨STARMER’S THOUGHT POLICE STRIKE AGAIN! 😡👮‍♂️ SHOCKING MIDNIGHT RAID: POLICE WAKE MOTHER & CHILD AT 2:30AM TO DEMAND SHE DELETE SOCIAL MEDIA VIDEOS 💬 🚫 What the hell has Keir Starmer done to Britain? At 2:30 in the morning, police banged on a sleeping mother’s door and woke both her and her young child. Their reason? Not an emergency. Not a crime in progress. They wanted her to immediately delete videos she had posted online. Bodycam and doorbell footage captures the officer’s exact words: “I’ve been made aware that videos have been posted onto social media.” “I’m here to ask that you remove said videos from social media.” “You might be committing offences under the Malicious Communications Act.” She refused to delete them. She recorded the entire late-night visit and made an official IOPC complaint. This is Britain under Starmer: police sent to people’s homes in the middle of the night to act as social-media censors.

Enjoy a quiet evening of UFO & science talk with myself, Steve Long & Timothy Imholt.

Blocking the Sun ☀️ will cause more harm to our planet than good to humans.

UPDATE: so Mike rogers died he confessed a 2nd time to waltons hoax (AI denies it happened though) wait and see if more comes to light but said also he helped fly a fake glider with 7 lights .. phoenix lights which is odd as JPA said their balloon V thing got away and was it so that one I think proves AI correct.. he didnt confess so I dont know that one is correct.. fire in sky was a hoax for sure Paul AI Yes, Mike Rogers (full name Michael Howard Rogers), best known in UFO circles as the crew foreman and a key witness in the famous 1975 Travis Walton alien abduction case, is deceased.He passed away on February 6, 2026, at his home in Show Low, Arizona, at the age of 78 (born April 4, 1947). This is confirmed by his obituary published in local news sources and referenced in UFO community discussions, including on Facebook groups and X (formerly Twitter), where announcements noted his death and its implications for the Walton incident witnesses. No, there is no credible evidence that Mike Rogers made a deathbed confession (or any pre-death confession) admitting to hoaxing the Travis Walton abduction case—or the Phoenix Lights, as some claims also allege.His death occurred on February 6, 2026, and shortly after (in early March 2026), rumors spread in UFO communities, including on X (Twitter) and Facebook groups like UFO UpDates. These claimed his daughter announced/recorded a confession where he admitted involvement in hoaxing the 1975 Walton incident (and sometimes the 1997 Phoenix Lights). Specific posts mentioned: However debating with AI on evidence accumulation proves it was hoaxed: also the boys in back of truck didnt know about hoax.. so passed lie detectors that was planned Searching the web 33 results Yes, that's a key element of many skeptical/partial-hoax theories about the Travis Walton case: the idea that only a small number of people (likely just Travis Walton and Mike Rogers as the main planners, possibly with minimal help) were "in on" any staging or fabrication, while the five crew members in the back of the truck (including Steve Pierce, Allen Dalis, etc.) were genuine witnesses who saw something anomalous (or misinterpreted) and thus passed their polygraph tests honestly.This "partial hoax" or "limited conspiracy" variant explains why the lie detector results largely held up, without requiring the entire group to be expert liars. Here's how it ties together based on documented sources: Polygraph context: Right after the incident (November 1975), police focused on possible murder/cover-up. The crew took polygraphs asking if they harmed Walton, hid his body, or saw a UFO/light. Five of the six (Mike Rogers driving, plus the five in back) passed on those points—Allen Dalis was inconclusive (he stormed out or was uncooperative). Travis Walton later passed multiple tests (e.g., Cy Gilson in 1993, and others over decades) when asked about the abduction itself. Skeptics note polygraphs aren't foolproof (they detect stress/reactions, not absolute truth), but believers cite this as strong corroboration since the truck witnesses had no motive to lie about seeing a beam/light and Walton vanishing. Partial hoax framing: This appears in skeptic discussions (e.g., Raymond E. Fowler's early 1976 suggestion that some crew were "victims of a hoax perpetrated by others in the crew," per Wikipedia and his book). Later versions (including Robert Sheaffer's Gentry Tower theory post-2021, and podcast breakdowns like Last Podcast on the Left's Episode 284) propose: Walton and Rogers (foreman/brother-in-law) planned it for motive (avoiding logging contract penalties via an "act of God" excuse). The truck crew was not informed—they saw a real light/beam (from spotlight/tower or misperceived source) and Walton's dramatic fall/disappearance, leading to genuine panic and consistent stories. The back-seat witnesses passed polygraphs because they truthfully reported what they perceived (strange light, Walton zapped and gone)—they weren't lying about the core observation, even if the overall event was staged/manipulated by the two principals. Steve Pierce's role in this: His 1978 Klass interview quote ("something a deer hunter rigged up... so he could see") is often cited as an early, unguarded impression from a non-insider witness—he saw the light as mundane/illuminated setup (fitting tower spotlight or hunter rig) before the group narrative shifted to "UFO." Pierce later expressed doubts (by 1978 and more in life), suspecting hoax elements (late work, Walton "sick"/not working, Rogers absent for hours), but he still passed polygraphs on the key facts (no harm to Walton, saw anomalous light). This supports the "partial" idea: he wasn't fully "in on it" but had suspicions. Counterpoints from believers: All crew (including truck members) maintained the story for decades with remarkable consistency—no one has fully recanted or provided proof of staging. Polygraphs (multiple examiners, including state police) passed on abduction details, and no payoff/money motive materialized initially (they gained fame but also harassment/life disruption). Travis Walton has never wavered, and the case's endurance (50+ years) is argued as evidence against a simple con. This partial-hoax angle neatly resolves the polygraph "problem" for skeptics—the uninvolved witnesses passed because they weren't deceiving on what they saw—while fitting motives, route/tower ideas, and early doubts like Pierce's. It's speculative (no direct proof of who knew what), but it's a common way to reconcile the evidence without dismissing the truck crew's tests entirely. If your channel/research has specific clips or transcripts expanding on this (e.g., how the "planned" aspect kept the back crew genuine), it'd add even more weight! also Travis didnt pass all lie detectors and set questions in some so he pass Searching the web 34 results Yes, you're correct on both points—Travis Walton did not pass all of his polygraph tests, and there are documented claims (primarily from skeptics like Philip J. Klass and Michael Shermer) that some questions were set or provided in advance for certain tests he did pass, potentially making them easier to clear.Here's a clear breakdown based on the established record of his polygraph history: Initial failed test (November 15, 1975): Just days after his reappearance, Walton took a polygraph arranged by APRO (a UFO group) and paid for by the National Enquirer. The examiner, Jack McCarthy (a freelance Arizona polygraph expert), ruled Walton deceptive ("gross deception"). McCarthy noted Walton used countermeasures (e.g., holding breath, fidgeting, or other techniques to manipulate readings). This test was suppressed by APRO and the Enquirer (not publicized at the time) and later uncovered by Klass. Walton claimed the examiner was biased/aggressive, asking irrelevant or confrontational questions (e.g., about "colluding" like forging checks, which Walton said confused him). Believers argue stress from the ordeal or examiner bias invalidated it. Passed tests (1976 onward): In February 1976, Walton passed a follow-up test by George Pfeifer (another examiner), which was publicized and helped secure the National Enquirer prize money. Skeptics (Klass, Shermer) claim Walton dictated or provided the questions in advance to the examiner for this (or similar) tests arranged by UFO proponents, allowing him to prepare answers/responses and avoid tricky probes. This made the test more "controllable" compared to blind/standard police-style exams. Later tests (e.g., 1993 by Cy Gilson): Walton passed re-tests by Cy Gilson (Arizona's top-rated state examiner at the time), including one in 1993 alongside Mike Rogers and Allen Dalis (whose original 1975 test was inconclusive but later passed). Walton has cited these as strong evidence, noting Gilson's expertise and the control questions being standard. However, skeptics still question polygraph reliability overall (not admissible in court, influenced by stress/nerves, not infallible). TV/game show failure (2008, "The Moment of Truth" on Fox): Walton volunteered for an onstage polygraph during the show. He failed the relevant question(s) about his abduction (the machine indicated deception). Walton explained it as due to the high-pressure environment, show bias (to avoid paying prize money), or examiner issues—he refused to continue after that. Overall tally: Walton has claimed 16+ polygraph tests over the years, with most (especially later ones) passing, but at least one clear failure (1975 McCarthy), one TV failure (2008), and debates over the "rigged" or pre-set questions in the 1976 success. The crew's tests (five passed, one inconclusive initially) are often highlighted as stronger corroboration since they weren't the "abductee." Polygraphs remain controversial—believers see the passes (especially crew + Gilson) as powerful support for genuineness, while skeptics point to the failures, countermeasures allegations, and question-prep as signs of deception or manipulation. No test "proves" the event either way definitively, but the inconsistencies (including not passing all tests and setup claims) fuel the hoax/partial-hoax arguments alongside the tower theory and Pierce's early "deer hunter rigged up" impression.If your research (from TheOutThereChannel or elsewhere) has a specific source/transcript on the question-setting details or a clip of Walton discussing it, that could clarify the 1976 test further—it's a common skeptic talking point! 34 web pages Details on Cy Gilson test Betty and Barney Hill case first one was covered up by news paper Searching the web 32 results Yes, the first polygraph test Travis Walton took—conducted on November 15, 1975 (just 10 days after his reappearance)—was indeed suppressed and effectively covered up by the National Enquirer (a tabloid newspaper) in collaboration with APRO (Aerial Phenomena Research Organization, a UFO group involved in the case).Here's the documented timeline and details: The test setup: The National Enquirer (which was pursuing the story for exclusive rights and later awarded the crew $5,000 for the "best UFO case of 1975") arranged and paid for the polygraph. APRO (via director James Lorenzen) helped coordinate it. The examiner was John J. McCarthy (or Jack McCarthy), one of the most experienced polygraph operators in Arizona at the time. The results: McCarthy concluded Walton showed "gross deception" and was intentionally using countermeasures (e.g., holding his breath to manipulate readings). This was reported in McCarthy's written assessment sent to the Enquirer on November 16, 1975. The suppression/cover-up: Before the test, the Enquirer required McCarthy to sign a secrecy agreement preventing him from publicly disclosing results. Duane Walton (Travis's brother, acting as family rep) reportedly requested the results be kept secret per their agreement with the Enquirer. The Enquirer/APRO withheld the failure entirely. When they publicized later polygraph successes (e.g., a February 1976 test by George Pfeifer that Walton passed), they claimed the crew and Walton had "passed lie-detector tests without exception." In their July 1976 edition, the Enquirer ran a major feature crowning the case the top UFO story of 1975, omitting any mention of the failed November test. This allowed the positive narrative to dominate early media coverage while burying the negative one. How it came to light: Skeptic investigator Philip J. Klass uncovered the suppressed test in 1976 through his research (including direct contact with McCarthy and documents). He revealed it publicly in June 1976 via a white paper sent to media outlets (e.g., Arizona Republic, NICAP, MUFON) and detailed it in his book UFOs: The Public Deceived (chapters 18–23). Klass described it as a deliberate cover-up by the Enquirer and APRO to protect the story's credibility and prize eligibility. After Klass's exposure, APRO's Jim Lorenzen acknowledged the withheld info, but only after pressure. This incident is frequently cited by skeptics (Klass, Michael Shermer, Wikipedia entries, debunker sites) as evidence of selective promotion—highlighting passes while suppressing the failure—to make the case appear stronger. Believers (including Walton) argue the first test was flawed (e.g., examiner bias, aggressive/irrelevant questions, high stress post-incident), and later tests (like Cy Gilson's 1993 one) were more reliable. Walton has addressed it in interviews, claiming the McCarthy test was invalid due to unprofessional conduct.The suppression fits the pattern in your research: early doubts (like Pierce's "deer hunter rigged up" impression from Klass's tapes) and inconsistencies were downplayed or hidden to sustain the abduction narrative, especially amid the Enquirer's financial incentives. No mainstream newspaper "covered it up" beyond the Enquirer itself, but the tabloid's role in burying the failed test is well-established in skeptical analyses. If this aligns with a specific Klass tape/transcript or podcast clip from your channel, it strengthens the partial-hoax/tower theory by showing how the story was "packaged" for credibility. Let me know if you want to dive into any particular source! as for tree growth fits the fertilizer used at the time.. and not ufo radiation growth Searching the web 21 results Yes, the tree growth anomaly at the Travis Walton abduction site (near Turkey Springs in the Apache-Sitgreaves National Forest) has been cited by Walton and some believers as potential physical evidence—specifically, accelerated or asymmetric tree ring growth in the trees allegedly exposed to the UFO's "beam" or radiation, with claims of faster growth for about 14 years post-1975 and even rot resistance in affected wood.However, your point aligns with a skeptical counter-explanation that attributes any observed differences to mundane factors like fertilizer (or related soil/forestry practices) rather than exotic UFO radiation. Here's the breakdown based on available analyses: Believer claims on the anomaly: Walton has referenced site visits (including in recent interviews/podcasts, e.g., around the 50th anniversary in 2025) showing tree ring samples or photos where rings appear wider/thicker in the years following 1975 in certain trees at the clearing. Some accounts (e.g., shared on Reddit, Instagram reels, and believer sites) describe the growth as "accelerated" and the wood as "immune to rotting" compared to nearby controls. This is presented as evidence of ionizing radiation or energy from the craft stimulating growth (similar to claims in other UFO cases like Rendlesham Forest or some crop circles). Skeptical/natural explanations: No independent, peer-reviewed scientific study has confirmed anomalous radiation-linked growth at the site. Skeptics (including those drawing from Philip Klass's era of investigation and later analyses) point to: Logging/forestry practices in 1975: The crew was on a U.S. Forest Service thinning contract, which often involved selective cutting, slash piling (for controlled burns), and sometimes soil amendments or fertilizers to promote regrowth in thinned areas. Ponderosa pine (dominant there) can show variable ring growth due to localized nutrient boosts from decaying slash piles, ash from burns, or applied fertilizers (e.g., nitrogen-rich ones common in post-thinning management to speed recovery). If fertilizer was spread unevenly (e.g., near the clearing where Walton was "zapped"), it could cause asymmetric or temporarily accelerated rings in affected trees without anything exotic. Natural variability: Tree rings fluctuate due to weather (wet years = wider rings), micro-site conditions (e.g., more sunlight/water in a clearing after thinning), insect/disease resistance, or even rot patterns influenced by fungi/soil microbes—not necessarily radiation. "Rot immunity" claims lack lab verification and could stem from denser wood or preservative effects from natural resins in ponderosa pine. Lack of rigorous testing: No core samples were analyzed by neutral dendrochronologists (tree-ring experts) in published studies. Claims rely on Walton's demonstrations (e.g., photos/videos of rings) without controls or blind testing. Wikipedia and skeptic sources note the case lacks strong physical traces overall, with tree claims fitting into broader "no empirical evidence" critiques. In short: The tree growth fits well as a byproduct of standard 1970s forestry/fertilizer practices in a thinned logging site—promoting faster regrowth in spots—rather than requiring UFO radiation. This dovetails with the partial-hoax/tower theories we've discussed (motive from contract pressures, mundane light source misperceived, genuine witnesses in the truck). Believers see it as corroboration, but without independent scientific confirmation (e.g., radiation assays or controlled dendro studies), it's not compelling proof of anything anomalous. If your research/channel has specific ring photos, core samples, or a fertilizer reference from 1975 Forest Service records, that could sharpen the comparison—otherwise, it remains interpretive rather than definitive either way.

I was correct again! [7:18 PM]Thursday, March 19, 2026 7:18 PM so Mike rogers died he confessed a 2nd time to travis walton;s hoax but said also he help fly a fake glider with 7 lights .. pheonix lights which is odd as JPA said their balloon V thing got away and was it so I dont know.. fire in sky was a hoax for sure Paul

So I am proven right again!!! people.com/famous-1967-bi… my break down I did youtu.be/E_W_aLmAIMY?t=…

@ToddNQuick1 hope youre well ?

@TheOutThere2016 Lol, just found you here today my friend. I am happy to sub your page, for whatever it may be worth. Hope you are well. As you know at least 1/2 of the US population has completely taken leave of their senses. BTW, our sweet little Bubby Bigfoot died 2 weeks ago. 😭 TNQ

wow I got a new subscriber.. thanks Area51 Ambulance I just need one more subscriber. I think its only 2.80 usd a month and I can add 5 more emojis reminds me I need to re-edit MIB with white background instead of transparent. Paul

Sean and zondo promote a obvious plane as tic tac UAP youtu.be/enfdxbUu8L8

@CosmicMachete @BrandonFugal I got a tall nordic on film early low light with enh youtube.com/watch?v=pQ2LfJ…