Al_Lo_Ch

@AmmousMD Or maybe, cardiologists know a lot more than you about the topic, not that your knowledge is particularly good, but still

Your typical cardiologist ignores the elephant in the room causing heart disease in young people. The proposed solution? Start statins earlier....

@DrStephenHussey Stick to your useless massages

My thoughts on the latest cholesterol lowering study! I've said it so many times. We shouldn't have to take something that increases our risk of disease in order to prevent another disease. That is just plain illogical and illustrates how modern medical science and research lack a sound philosophy of health. When it comes to health and preventing disease, we will never individually find our truth if we stay bogged down in the weeds of medical research. Modern society has convinced us that the answers can only come from modern "science", but the answers are are found within us when we realize how to align our bodies with the signals of nature that we are so deprived of in our modern way of life. If you want to know the actual causes of heart disease and how to prevent it, click the link below to learn more about my 12 week heart health mentorship program! stephenbhussey.com/register

@AmmousMD @malcolmken 1. It does 1. It does 3. It does, not solely 4. They do 5. It´s not 6. Not at all 7. That ´s just pure bullshit

Summary of the actual truth about cholesterol by .@malcolmken: 1️⃣ Dietary fat does not affect blood cholesterol. 2️⃣ Even if it did, it wouldn’t matter much. 3️⃣ High cholesterol doesn’t cause heart disease. 4️⃣ Statins don’t protect by lowering cholesterol (if they help), it’s through other mechanisms. 5️⃣ The benefit of statins is tiny and massively exaggerated. 6️⃣ Side effects are more common and serious than admitted. 7️⃣ Many “experts” promoting them are funded by the companies making them.

@AmmousMD There´s plenty of smokers without lung cancer and there´s non smokers without lung cancer, anyone care to explain?

Plenty of people with "high" cholesterol live without heart disease. Plenty with "normal" cholesterol still get it. Anyone care to explain this paradox???

@MrJohnJnr Again with this fucking opinion piece? Damn

CANCER HAS BEEN CURED Ivermectin & Fenbendazole cure cancer. Pass it on. BREAKING NEWS: First-in-the-World Ivermectin, Mebendazole and Fenbendazole Protocol in Cancer has been peer-reviewed and published on Sep.19, 2024! The future of Cancer Treatment starts NOW. My thanks to lead authors Ilyes Baghli and Pierrick Martinez for their incredible inspired work, FLCCC’s Dr.Paul Marik for his extensive work on repurposed drugs and every co-author who worked hard to bring this paper to life. I hope that this peer-reviewed paper lays the groundwork for a brand new future for Cancer Treatment. Many of you know that I have been helping thousands of Cancer patients with high dose Ivermectin, Mebendazole, and Fenbendazole FOLLOW ME, THE NEXT DROP WILL BE SHOCKING

@forestm555 Again with the fake outrage I see

Brock Lesnar should be suspended indefinitely. Nick Khan should resign. Paul Levesque should face a no confidence vote before being removed. Stephanie McMahon shouldn’t be on TV or the HOF. This is what WWE would look like with the most minuscule of morals.

@CepnikMaciej I guess you haven´t met a lot of mexicans then and you don´t seem to know that there are in fact vegan and vegetarian mexicans

This study from Forbes México seems like it’s fake… I’ve never met a single Mexican that eats vegetarian tacos, let alone 8% of them.

@zaidkdahhaj You have to be pretty retarded to think that and I mean, unbelievable retarded

Vaccination, and it’s not even close

@matthewbaszucki Apo B? The LDL lipoprotein? It´s a safe assmption that if LDL is high, Apo B is high too, fasting insulin is not gonna change the management, so, It´s not needed for the most part, Tryglicerides and HDL are routinely measured and guess what, theres pills for every one of them

We measure LDL cholesterol not because it's the best marker of cardiovascular risk, but because we have a pill that lowers it. The markers that actually matter (ApoB, fasting insulin, triglyceride to HDL ratio) we don't routinely test. Because there's no pill to sell.

@arhamgrowthcap @_OliverVenture @matthewbaszucki Lmao

@_OliverVenture @matthewbaszucki Cholesterol and atherosclerosis are not causally linked. No evidence has been produced of the matter. Correlation is not causation

@reallyoptimized Classic Dunning-Kruger effect on your part

After a discussion about my moms labs and imaging tonight, one thing became clear. It's actually kind of ridiculous that I'm far more qualified to be providing primary care advice than my moms own doctor - at least for basic health optimization. The amount of things he completely failed to even catch, consider, and the terrible advice regarding LDL/CVD risk - it's just astonishing. It shouldn't be this way. It makes me upset. I don't WANT to be the "doctor" - but the current state of establishment primary care is atrocious.

@HerbsandDirt You´re welcome, retard

@TheRadDr_ Thanks chubs. I hope you’re not advising patients about health. 😉

Friend gets labs done: His Total Cholesterol was 245 and it was flagged high. His Vit D, (which is wild because he’s in the So Cal sun every single day) was 32. What does his NP say? “Great job on the D! Are you taking supplements?” WHAT? I told him that’s not even close to an optimal Vit D marker. Am I crazy? Shouldn’t it be AT LEAST double that?

@okRudydepp @Steph_Vaquer Stop following wrestlers, fucking weirdo, get a fucking life

@DrStephenHussey Lmao, just do your massages and leave medicina to those who studied it

There's a brand new study that supposedly shows that pharmacologically lowering LDL more agressively (shooting for 55 or lower rather than 70 or lower) creates a 33% lower risk of cardiovascular events. (DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2600283) Aside from other issues with this study, which I will discuss in future posts, I just wanted to remind everyone that have low LDL lower than 70 has been associated with higher risk of many other ailments. I point this out to say that we shouldn't have to aggressively lower one biomarker to "prevent" one disease only to increase the risk of many other diseases. It just doesn't make sense and illustrates how lacking in a health philosophy our medical system and medical science is. An excerpt from my book, Understanding the Heart: "It’s also important to understand that the “normal ranges” of LDL cholesterol have changed over the years. In 1984, the NIH (National Institute of Health) held a conference with the goal of coming to a consensus on whether cholesterol was good or bad.[i] As a result of their incorrect conclusion that it was bad, an organization called the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) was created to educate doctors on how to define and treat their at-risk patients. Unfortunately, the NCEP’s definition of “normal” started being heavily influenced by drug companies who profit from doctors using LDL lowering drugs.[ii] As the recommendation for what a healthy LDL is became lower and lower at subsequent meetings of the NCEP, the bigger the market for LDL lowering medications.  At first, it was supposed to be no higher than 250. Then they lowered it to 200. Then 150, then 100, now they say it needs to be under 100. To me, this suggests we have lost a true understanding of what “normal” is. For what it’s worth, a 2020 study looked at the association of cholesterol levels and all-cause mortality and found that having LDL cholesterol between 117 mg/dL and 137 mg/dL (above the recommendation of lower than 100) associated with the lowest all-cause mortality and that lower than 84 mg/dL associated with the highest all-mortality.[iii]"

@MikeBales I think, I´ve read the exact same story like 4 times, come up with some new fake shit

Doctor: "Chemo might give you 12 months. Without it? 6 months." Dad: "I'll take the 6 months." He didn't want to die in a hospital bed. He wanted to die in a national park. He bought an RV, grabbed his wife and hit the road. He stopped fighting the cancer and started fighting the boredom. Six months passed. He was hiking. Twelve months passed. He was fishing. Eighteen months passed. The tumor had... The doctors called it a "medical anomaly." He called it "The Grand Canyon Cure." Maybe the best chemotherapy isn't a poison. Maybe it's just... life.

@60s_hippychick @ElieJarrougeMD That hippo would fuck up the lion like it´s nothing, lmao

@ElieJarrougeMD Vegan vs. Carnivore.... Get it?

New patient last week… 6 years vegan. No weight loss. No lab improvement. Always hungry. Then his vegan cardiologist died of a heart attack. That was it. He ditched the diet. Went animal-based. Now? Leaner Better labs More satiety More energy Dogma doesn’t fix disease.

@ElieJarrougeMD That didn´t happen, obviously

@perpetualpam @QPATRIOTMLO1 Because it doesn´t work

@QPATRIOTMLO1 😢😭 Why didn't it work for my breast cancer? I HATE WHAT CHEMO HAS DONE TO ME!!!

People are going to be SOOOOOO PISSED when they find out these evil greedy bastards have had MANY MANY MANY cures for cancer for MANY MANY MANY years, but they not only get the money for cancer due to medical costs, but also the BILLIONS they get in donations every year to FIND A CURE. Micki Lynn Larson-Olson AKA QPATRIOT 21 years United States Air Force Iraq War Veteran Navy Mom Pardoned January 6th inmate 376303

@GoSatvik Another retard with fake anecdotes that probably sells garbage

I’ve seen multiple real families with 3–4 children where the unvaccinated child appears the healthiest. In one case, 3 vaccinated daughters had either asthma, allergies, & eczema, while the 4th unvaccinated daughter had none. Worth asking, "are vaccines making children sicker"?