Stocker-Man

2.7K posts

Stocker-Man banner
Stocker-Man

Stocker-Man

@TheStockerMan

23 | $HIMS $ZETA $OSCR $NBIS $LMND $SOFI $DUOL | STOCKER20 - 20% off first sub👇| NFA 🕷️

Montréal, Québec Katılım Temmuz 2024
159 Takip Edilen2.9K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Stocker-Man
Stocker-Man@TheStockerMan·
People ask what I actually own. Here’s the bulk of my long-term portfolio: $HIMS Avg $25.73 $SOFI Avg $12.79 $LMND Avg $52.75 $ZETA Avg $18.17 $NBIS Avg $129.48 $OSCR Avg $14.38 $DUOL Avg $114.21 I’m not touching these positions until 2030+ unless the long-term thesis changes. If the thesis gets stronger, I’ll continue averaging up… exactly like I’ve been doing.
English
2
2
31
4.9K
Stocker-Man
Stocker-Man@TheStockerMan·
@HedgebergCom I’ve actually been building a cash position over the past few weeks for this exact reason. My long-term conviction in all my stocks hasn’t changed, but if the market enters a true bear phase, I’d rather have cash to buy than be forced to sit through it with no flexibility.
English
1
0
1
26
Stocker-Man
Stocker-Man@TheStockerMan·
The current sentiment around $ASTS reminds me a lot of what happened with $HIMS earlier this year. When $HIMS lost its $NVO partnership and multiple lawsuits started making headlines, sentiment completely collapsed. The conversation shifted away from revenue growth, profitability and execution. Instead, every discussion became about the worst-case scenario. I bought $HIMS when the sentiment was at an all time low and it rallied +150% in 3 months. Today, I think $ASTS is going through something similar. The entire conversation has shifted to the recent $1B convertible note offering. $ASTS had built one of the strongest cash positions, ending Q1 with roughly $3B in cash and cash equivalents. That’s exactly why the convertible offering caught me by surprise. My first reaction “Why raise another $1B when you already have billions on the balance sheet?” My guess is management wants to remove capital as a constraint before the most important phase of the company’s history. If you’re about to manufacture dozens of Block 2 satellites, secure launch capacity, expand production, and accelerate commercialization, having excess liquidity can be a strategic advantage. Raising capital while your balance sheet is still strong is very different from raising capital because you have no other choice. Could I be wrong? Absolutely. That’s why the next earnings call will be so important. I want management to explain exactly why they chose to issue the convertible now and what return they expect from deploying that capital. Just like with $HIMS, I think the market is hyper-focused on today’s headline. I’m trying to determine whether that headline actually changes the long-term thesis.
Stocker-Man@TheStockerMan

I am continuing to accumulate $ASTS and $CRWV with their recent pullback. I want to begin with $CRWV. The more I study $CRWV, the more I think the entire investment case comes down to one thing and that is execution. Demand isn’t the problem. $CRWV now has roughly $99B in remaining performance obligations (backlog), giving it one of the largest contracted AI infrastructure revenue pipelines in the industry. Revenue is expected to grow from roughly $2B in 2025 to well over $10B annually within the next few years if management executes on existing customer demand. But here’s why the stock remains controversial. The balance sheet is aggressive. Tens of billions of dollars in debt and financing obligations. Billions more in planned AI infrastructure CapEx. Significant interest expense while the company is still scaling. The market isn’t questioning whether AI demand exists. It’s questioning whether $CRWV can build enough GPU capacity, deliver projects on time, and convert that $99B backlog into recognized revenue while improving profitability. These are the numbers I’ll be watching next earnings: - Backlog growth and how much converts into revenue. - Quarterly CapEx and whether spending is becoming more efficient. - Operating cash flow and free cash flow trends. - Gross margin and EBITDA margin progression as utilization increases. - Debt levels, interest expense, and any refinancing updates. Available liquidity and cash on the balance sheet. If utilization continues improving, each new data center should generate significantly more cash flow over time while fixed costs are spread across a larger revenue base. That’s why I’m less focused on today’s balance sheet and more focused on whether management is executing against the numbers. If they are, today’s leverage could look far less intimidating.

English
4
2
13
3.4K
Stocker-Man
Stocker-Man@TheStockerMan·
@EndicottInvests No way no way. One of his worst. Interstellar, Dark Knight, Inception, The Prestige and Oppenheimer all better.
English
0
0
0
64
Nate Endicott
Nate Endicott@EndicottInvests·
The Odyssey was incredible Top 3 Christoper Nolan film. Must see.
English
63
10
211
14.1K
Con
Con@__Con_·
After selling the top on $NBIS, I'm officially buying in again. My next post will go over why I'm making this change.
Con@__Con_

People are going to hate me for this: But now is not the time to buy $NBIS. I do think it's worth selling here. Let me explain why: 1) $NBIS operates in the AI data center / GPU cloud hosting layer ofc. Basically, selling compute capacity. This segment is becoming increasingly crowded and competitive: - Hyperscalers ($GOOGL, $AMZN, $MSFT, $META, etc.) are aggressively building their own internal capacity at massive scale. - Multiple specialized neoclouds and traditional providers are chasing the same constrained resources (power, land, GPUs, and interconnection). - As capacity comes online across the industry, utilization rates and pricing power can compress for pure hosting plays. 2) $NBIS has outlined multi-GW data center buildout plans. This creates elevated binary risks: - Power procurement and grid interconnection delays (a major industry bottleneck). - Construction and permitting timelines. - Actual customer utilization ramp after facilities come online. - High ongoing capex intensity to stay competitive. 3) $NBIS has geopolitical risk (origin overhang): - As a carve out from Yandex, $NBIS carries residual geopolitical perception risk (Russian origins, sanctions history), which can affect trust and long-term contracts with Western hyperscalers: Even as it focuses on US/Europe assets. 4) $NBIS valuation seems pretty high here: - In Q1 2026 earnings were decent. Revenue $399M (strong beat, massive YoY growth) and narrower EPS loss than expected. But it's still unprofitable. - They have crazy 2026 guidance ($3B–$3.4B+ revenue/ARR range discussed) which seems pretty aggressive and requires close to flawless execution on new capacity imo. - Insane Trailing Multiples: TTM P/S: 80x, EV/Revenue (TTM): 77x, Trailing P/E: 102–108x (on $2.60–2.92 EPS). Even high-growth AI names rarely sustain 50x+ trailing sales for long without massive profitability or clear path to it. - Still Losing Money on a Normalized/Operating Basis: Operating income TTM: –$619M (op margin deeply negative), EBITDA TTM: –$38.6M, normalized net income is negative; the big positive GAAP net income ($817M TTM / $621M in Q1) is also heavily boosted by unusual/one-time items (likely spin-off gains, investments, or fair value adjustments from the Yandex restructuring). - Forward P/S on Guided Revenue Is Still Premium (22x). At $71B mkt cap and $3.2B midpoint FY2026 guidance -> 22x forward sales. This is pretty crazy. 5) $NBIS technical analysis wise looks massively overbought): - We seem to be hitting the top of the 5 wave (out of the 1-2-3-4-5) on the HTF. On the LTF, we also seem to be hitting the wave 5, adding confluence to this resistance area. - We ran through the 1.618 level and 2.618 level showing a high sign of aggressive buying. Now we're at the 3.618 level, which means very aggressive buying has just occured. This is why, overall, I'm bearish $NBIS. "What are some other names worth buying then, and what should be my game plan?" I gotchu. $OPTX, $ASYS, and $SHMD are 3 great stocks. It's worth buying these right now imo. It's just not worth the risk holding $NBIS here, compared to them. Now, I don't fully dislike $NBIS (for a couple reasons), so here's how I'm going to play this out though: I'm going to sell my shares here (that I bought at 90). If $NBIS goes to 310, then uses the 3.618 level as support, then I will look to get in again, because that means we're going fully parabolic. It would mean losing a 5% move to the upside, on the potential of a large 20% move downward. That's why I'm doing this. Hope this makes sense on what I'm doing, and why. Of course, there are counter takes to these arguments (I'm not denying that). But, it's all about if those counterarguments make more sense. Right now, it seems we are very overbought, with a very high valuation. If we continue to run, and this "bubble" continues to grow, I'd happily join that (after losing out on a 5% run lol). If you enjoyed, pls lmk your guys' thoughts. And if you have any other sort of reasoning you guys want to come to me with, feel free to comment it below (I try to read everyone's comments, and respond ofc). Just my 2c and what I'm doing here.

English
23
11
247
36K
Void
Void@VOIDTHINKSx·
@TheStockerMan Agree with everything. $CRWV never truly ran like the other neoclouds/AI plays. The debt is backed and tied to use-or-pay contracts i.e. debt taken on = contracted backlog/revenue. $NBIS (as seen today) will have to start taking on debt to scale like $CRWV.
English
1
0
2
380
Stocker-Man
Stocker-Man@TheStockerMan·
Everyone is talking about $NBIS after its recent pullback. But I think people are overlooking what is happening with $CRWV. The stock has also been hit hard. When I look at valuation, $CRWV actually looks considerably cheaper than many people realize. Let’s break it down: $CRWV generated $2.08B of revenue in Q1, growing 112% YoY. It also exited the quarter with approximately $99.4B of contracted revenue backlog… one of the largest revenue backlogs in AI infrastructure. Despite that… The market is valuing the company at roughly 2-3x 2026 expected revenue. Compare that with many of the higher-multiple AI infrastructure names, including $NBIS, which still trades at a materially richer forward revenue multiple because investors assign it a premium for its cleaner balance sheet and lower financing risk. Why is $CRWV cheaper? Because the market is discounting three major risks: - Massive debt. - Massive CapEx. - Execution. Those risks are real. $CRWV is building AI infrastructure at a pace few companies in history have attempted. But here’s what I keep coming back to… The company isn’t building capacity hoping demand eventually appears… the demand is already contracted. The real question is whether management can deploy enough GPUs, bring data centers online fast enough, and convert that nearly $100B backlog into recognized revenue while protecting margins. If management executes… Revenue continues compounding, operating leverage improves and financing becomes less of a concern. And suddenly the market may no longer value $CRWV as the highest-risk neocloud. That’s where multiple expansion comes from. For me, $NBIS remains my highest-conviction long-term AI infrastructure holding, and I’ve been adding on this pullback. But $CRWV is one of my largest swing positions because I think the current valuation is already pricing in a substantial amount of pessimism.
English
8
4
38
4.2K
Con
Con@__Con_·
I don't say the bottoms in often. But this is the time. I think the AI plays have bottomed. $NBIS had a great retest at $166. $ASYS retested my $16 level. $MU had the downturn and retest of $820. $SNDK $1290 just got hit. $SIVE hit $34 and I think the bottom is coming. $AAOI is still consolidating around this $100 mark well. $QCOM had a great retest at $166. Now is the time to be buying these stocks. Over 95% of the drawdown has already occurred imo. Maybe even the full drawdown. There's a lot of FUD in the market right now, but don't be selling the bottom. Now is when we buy. You heard it here.
Con@__Con_

A lot of AI stocks are down today. But not all of them are good buying opportunities. So here's my top 5 large AI stocks to buy, and the best prices to buy them at: 1) $MU - I think we get a dip to $820, and once it gets there, that's going to be a great buying opportunity. 2) $SNDK - $1290 seems like a great buying opportunity, we got that as the end of the last wave, and 3) $SIVE - $34 would be an amazing opportunity to get a bid in. This one I think is the closest to bottoming out. The accumulation seems like it's starting earliest (as it has gone down the most). 4) $AAOI - I'd love to get in at $83 dollars... but I don't know if it's the most realistic. So, I'm DCAing in here at $108, and will load up heavy if we get there. 5) $QCOM - $166 seems like the perfect bottom for this one. I love this company, and believe it'll be one of the best investments in the future (along with $INTC). Like I said, some stocks will go lower than others. And some are better buys here than others. But these 5, in general, will be a great buying opportunity over the long term. All you have to do it hold.

English
23
10
210
51.1K
Stocker-Man
Stocker-Man@TheStockerMan·
Today I put a large portion of my remaining cash into $NBIS. The pullback from nearly $300 to around $170 hasn’t changed my long-term thesis. If anything, it made the risk/reward more attractive. The biggest reason I’m bullish is that $NBIS isn’t just selling GPU capacity. They’re building an integrated AI cloud platform. Over the last few months they’ve announced major agreements, including a multi-year $MSFT partnership and a $META agreement worth up to $27B, giving them long-term demand visibility while they continue expanding capacity. What really separates $NBIS for me is the balance sheet. Compared with many AI infrastructure peers, $NBIS is in a much stronger financial position. After its recent capital raises, the company reported more than $9B of cash available to fund expansion while maintaining what management described as a healthy balance sheet. Compare that with many competitors that have had to rely much more heavily on debt to finance growth. $NBIS still has to execute. Q1 revenue reached $399M, up 684% year over year. Management also raised full-year guidance to $3.0B–$3.4B in revenue while maintaining its target of $7B–$9B in exit ARR by the end of 2026. Even more impressive is the demand sitting behind those numbers. $NBIS finished 2025 with approximately $21.3B of remaining performance obligations (RPO), and management recently highlighted a record pipeline of roughly $27B generated in Q1 as customer demand continues accelerating. This is why this pullback didn’t scare me. It gave me the opportunity to increase one of my highest-conviction long-term positions.
English
12
6
120
9.9K
Stocker-Man
Stocker-Man@TheStockerMan·
Great question. I don’t think there’s an exact price, but I do think there’s a valuation where the risk/reward flips. If $NFLX settles around 8–10x forward revenue (assuming the current slower growth profile holds), I’d start paying much closer attention. At 13–15x, I still think the market was pricing in faster growth than management is now guiding for.
English
0
0
0
55
Carson
Carson@CarsonTalkMoney·
@TheStockerMan At what price do you think the slower growth would be reflected?
English
2
0
1
129
Stocker-Man
Stocker-Man@TheStockerMan·
I said this last week heading into earnings: $NFLX was becoming scary because the valuation was starting to re-rate. The business could remain strong, but once growth expectations soften, investors stop paying the same premium multiple. That is exactly what this quarter reinforced. Q2 revenue reached $12.56B, up roughly 13% YoY, but came in slightly below the $12.58B consensus. Net income still grew to approximately $3.4B, while EPS beat expectations by around a penny. Advertising remains a major bright spot, with $NFLX expecting roughly $3B of ad revenue in 2026, approximately double last year. Engagement also increased to around 97B viewing hours during the first half, up approximately 2%. So no, this is not a broken business. The problem is the direction of growth and what investors are willing to pay for it. Operating margin slipped to 33.4% from 34.1%, while revenue growth slowed from 16% in Q1 to 13% in Q2. $NFLX also narrowed full-year revenue guidance to $51.0B–$51.4B, while maintaining its 31.5% operating-margin target. When a stock carries a premium valuation, still growing is not always enough. It needs to consistently beat expectations, raise guidance and prove that the growth rate supporting the multiple is durable. This feels very similar to what happened with $DUOL: Great business. Strong long-term fundamentals. But a softer outlook forced the market to reconsider the valuation it was willing to assign. I was fortunate enough to start buying $DUOL around $110 during its valuation reset. I am now watching $NFLX through the same lens. Catching a falling knife during a valuation reset can work, but only when the price has fallen far enough to reflect the slower growth.
Stocker-Man@TheStockerMan

$NFLX The business is still incredibly strong. The problem isn’t the fundamentals, It’s the valuation. With softer guidance, I don’t think the market is willing to keep paying the same premium multiple it was before. This feels a lot like $DUOL. Great business but softer outlook. let due multiple compression. The challenge now isn’t figuring out whether $NFLX is a good company. It’s figuring out where the market finally decides the valuation is attractive again. I was fortunate enough to catch $DUOL around $100 after its valuation reset. Now I’m asking myself the same question with $NFLX. Where’s the bottom?

English
4
2
24
5.7K
Stocker-Man
Stocker-Man@TheStockerMan·
Mmm $ASTS The final terms of the $ASTS convertible offering are much better than I initially feared. $ASTS priced $1B of convertible notes due 2034 with only a 1.625% coupon. That means the company is securing another $1B of capital while adding roughly $16M of annual cash interest. The initial conversion price is approximately $79.57 per share, around 20% above yesterday’s closing price. But the most important detail is the capped call. $ASTS structured the transaction to reduce potential dilution up to approximately $149.20 per share. That does not eliminate dilution entirely and adding another $1B of debt before commercial revenue fully scales is still a real risk… But these are relatively shareholder-friendly financing terms for a company attempting to fund an extremely capital-intensive rollout. Short term, more debt and possible dilution’s concerning… the downside is obvious. Long term, accessing capital this cheaply could be a major positive if it helps $ASTS secure launch capacity, deploy satellites faster and begin generating meaningful commercial revenue. The financing terms are far better than initially feared imo…
English
1
3
36
2.6K
Axel
Axel@PotjePindakaas1·
@TheStockerMan I totally agree with you! I started researching $ASTS recently and the sentiment really does remind me of $HIMS a couple of months ago
English
1
0
1
158
Cole’s Trades
Cole’s Trades@ColesTrades·
I just bought 3 shares of $SOFI under $17 this morning Now is a great time to buy!
Cole’s Trades tweet media
English
3
0
41
2.4K
Stocker-Man
Stocker-Man@TheStockerMan·
@brent_e_trader The difference is growth. AT&T is a mature telecom generating modest growth. $NBIS is becoming a leader in one of the fastest-growing industries in the world.
English
0
0
1
130
Brent
Brent@brent_e_trader·
@TheStockerMan They are, but that doesn't necessarily translate to higher prices. AT&T is the leader in telecom. But stock is going nowhere.
English
1
0
1
79
Stocker-Man
Stocker-Man@TheStockerMan·
I have no idea when $NBIS will stop bleeding. But here’s how I look at it: $NBIS is guiding toward 7-9B of annualized revenue (ARR) by the end of 2026. Let’s assume they land around the middle at 8B. The market is currently valuing the company at roughly 43.61B. That means investors today are effectively paying around 5.45x forward revenue if $NBIS reaches that target. For one of the fastest-growing AI infrastructure companies in the world, I don’t think that’s expensive. Let’s compare it. Mature software companies growing 15-20% often trade around 5-8x sales. High-quality cloud software growing 30-40% can trade 10-15x sales. AI infrastructure businesses with years of hypergrowth ahead should arguably deserve a premium if they can prove margins and execution. So let’s run a few scenarios. 6x Sales $8B revenue = $48B valuation That’s about 10% upside from today’s valuation. In other words, if $NBIS simply hits management’s revenue target and the market only assigns an AVERAGE multiple, there isn’t much downside from valuation alone. Now look at a more optimistic case. 8x Sales $8B revenue = $64B valuation That’s roughly 47% upside from today. 10x Sales $8B revenue = $80B valuation That’s roughly 83% upside. Now imagine management exceeds expectations. Suppose they reach $10B in annual revenue over the following years while expanding EBITDA margins as utilization improves. Even an 8-10x sales multiple would imply an 80-100B company (+100% upside) And remember… This isn’t a company growing 20%. The biggest reason the stock has sold off isn’t because demand disappeared. It’s because investors are questioning whether $NBIS can finance and execute such an aggressive expansion. I’m focused far more on revenue growth and execution than I am on the day-to-day price action. Because if the numbers end up where management believes they can, today’s valuation could look very different a few years from now.
English
22
5
105
18.8K
Hedgeberg | Technical Precision. Fundamental Depth
$NBIS - has bounced right off the buy zone The buying zone around $170 attracted enough buyers today to trigger an intraday reversal. It is currently battling resistance at $182. If this level is broken, we’ll start Wave 3 with a target of $196/197. Wave 5 should then take us roughly to $205–$209 slightly higher than planned yesterday.
Hedgeberg | Technical Precision. Fundamental Depth tweet media
Hedgeberg | Technical Precision. Fundamental Depth@HedgebergCom

$NBIS - support didn't hold It will very likely reach the $170 target. But even there, I wouldn't buy based on price alone; instead, I would wait for a bottom to form and watch for corresponding buy signals. If the bottom fails to form there and the downward trend continues at this pace, then the final target would be around $130. At that level, I firmly expect a successful bottom to form.

English
16
7
89
22.6K
Stocker-Man
Stocker-Man@TheStockerMan·
I think the market completely missed what $NBIS announced this week because everyone focused on the stock falling. Very few people focused on how $NBIS is solving one of the biggest bear cases. First… Industrial Development Funding and Oaktree announced a $1.7B project investment to finance power infrastructure supporting $NBIS AI cloud. Then… $NBIS announced $775M of secured debt financing backed by deployed GPU infrastructure and contracted cash flows from an investment-grade customer. The biggest question surrounding every neocloud has always been: “How do you keep deploying billions of dollars of GPUs without constantly diluting shareholders?” $NBIS is starting to answer that. Not with equity nor with convertibles… but with asset-backed financing secured against infrastructure that’s already deployed and generating contracted cash flows. Management also confirmed another important detail: $NBIS has delivered the latest planned capacity tranche to $MSFT and remains on schedule for the remaining deployments. Even better… The financing was significantly oversubscribed. To me, that’s a vote of confidence from lenders in both the collateral and the contracted revenue supporting these assets. None of this eliminates execution risk. $NBIS still needs to deploy capacity, convert backlog into recognized revenue and continue improving margins. But strategically, these announcements matter…
English
1
7
54
3.5K
Stocker-Man
Stocker-Man@TheStockerMan·
$ASTS is rebounding more than 6% today after yesterday’s brutal selloff. Piper Sandler has reportedly initiated coverage with an Overweight rating and a $100 price target. The bullish argument is straightforward: $ASTS has differentiated direct-to-smartphone technology. Major global carrier partnerships. And now a much larger capital base to fund satellite production and launches. But I would not pretend yesterday’s risks disappeared overnight. $ASTS still raised $1B through convertible debt and potential dilution remains real. And the company moved its target of approximately 45 satellites into early 2027, versus its previous goal of 45–60 by the end of 2026. That deployment delay matters more than an analyst price target. The nuance is that the financing is not entirely negative because $ASTS could receive roughly $1B in net capital to expand its network, secure additional launch capacity and reduce the risk of running short of cash before commercial coverage scales. The capped-call structure also helps limit dilution if the stock performs significantly better over time. My honest view: Yesterday’s selloff correctly reflected higher execution and dilution risk. Today’s rebound reflects the other side of the story. $ASTS now has more capital to actually build the network. The long-term opportunity remains enormous…
English
0
2
20
1.3K
TradingScience
TradingScience@ValueThesis1994·
@TheStockerMan $NBIS will either be bankrupt in 2030 or be $1000. And I’m willing to bet its the latter.
English
1
0
1
425